Did you get it to compile?  I don't even have a clue how to do that. If yes how.

 
I downloaded a zip file and it doesn't appear to be compiled either.  IF this was stuff I did normally like these guys I'm sure there is more than enough information provided, but I know nothing!

I'm lost.

I'm running XP.  I've installed all the prereqs but I have zero clue what application I use to install goxgui.  I'm a windork so I don't know much about all this kind of stuff.

If anyone can point me to the app I use to run the script listed in the OP I'd be very appreciative.


Thanks.

LMAO

Only a complete idiot like those who work at Gox would not know their platform is a goxing joke.  Gox knew they needed a major upgrade.

You state you "feel safest" with Gox?  What other exchange just lost ~$200usd per BTC?  You seem to have a real funny definition of safe.

All the new people who bought into BTC are pissed and nothing travels faster than bad news.  Your choice for a "safe" exchange just crushed BTC and Gox stole thousands of people's money with their blatant failures.

Gox is a 51% attack.

Some of the buyers were likely people who sold pre Gox, and they saw a lot of value in buying lower priced BTC.

Other people were likely people who injected more fiat into the system to buy the lower priced BTC.

MtGox and don't forget BTC's glaring technical issues, especially to newb's who are not computer savvy.

MtGox has to go, and it is already dead.  I think the only people who don't know this are the idiots who work at Gox.

BTC will always lend itself to being exchanged in a central location due to the huge effing hassle with transferring btc to another location.  WTF that it takes sometimes over 24 goxing hours to get a single goxing confirmation is goxing ridiculous.  New adopters of btc will not understand why in this day and age of almost instantaneous money transfers between accounts that btc takes a day.

Since it takes anywhere from 30min, best case for 3 confirms, and 1 hour, best case for 6, that's why I say btc has to be traded on one exchange, to hard for the hated speculators to arbitrage, also too hard to convert btc to fiat and get out of the system.  It's nearly impossible to move between exchanges unless you have a great automated system and have large accounts on all exchanges, which by the time you do that you're really just trading on each exchange and not physically altering the amount of btc traded on any one exchange.

Other issues

The cool down period that resumed prices at the level off Gox trading had reached was goxing stupid.  Not rolling back trades to before Gox lost everyone's money was goxing stupid.  Don't even act like Gox couldn't do that cause they freeze accounts and steal people's money all the time with their goxed up policies.  People need to grow up and get over the "money laundering" moniker/issue.  Goxing high priced art is money laundering and that's right in your face.

Also with all the idiotic KYC stuff at Gox, any half intelligent person would merely pay x number of people to get verified at Gox and traded through those accounts.  It's not goxing rocket science to get around all these childish laws. 

For Goxs sakes a major fiat bank[HSBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20673466] was recently fined ~1.9billion for money laundering.  The the kids who promote the money laundering mantra in the media and regular people who parrot the media narrative need to let that horse die and decompose in regards to BTC and any exchange being used for money laundering.

2013 is now the year of the Gox.

Don't forget Gox claims to have increased trade throughput by 50x.  That's ~2250min if figured on the old platform's trade throughput.

This is why BTC needs a stable exchange.  IDC that people think BTC has value because people can purchase goods/services with BTC since the valuation of BTC rises so much who would want to spend BTC buying a fixed price or depreciating asset?

Due to Gox BTC's salad days may, I stress may, be nearing an end.  I say this because of all the recent hype and now Gox has Goxed BTC and any and all goodwill new people had towards BTC.  BTC because of Gox is now no different than a boilerroom looking for new suckers to buy into BTC and get crapped all over and then sell BTC at 1/2 -1/4 the price they bought it for.  I know this is not what "smart" or "astute" investors/traders would do, but that's the point. All the recent new money just got fleeced and Goxed over.

To me for BTC to remain viable over a longer period of time the majority of the community must decide on a equitable trading system.  As we see yet again today Gox is not that system since a few bots can destabilize their trading engine on what was really a pretty low volume day.  This problem is more serious than people seem to admit since Gox stated they allegedly upped their trades/sec by 50x.  I guess that means Gox's engine can now handle 50 calls a second, up fro 1 call a second.

IDC is it's this thread or the threads linked on the first page, but for BTC to accomplish anything other than massive embarrassment a few powerful people must do something or a large group of regular folks must learn to work as a group, decide on a plan and not everyone act like they're the chief while the group is trying to implement the plan.

This one has those features.

https://www.kraken.com/
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=159974.0;topicseen

I agree with most the article but seems more to me this was not the correction people are looking/hoping for.  This was a system failure and reboot, GoxBTC Screen of Death.

Plus after more thought, I'm not so sure I believe a damn word of Gox's PR's. Think how easy it is to flood Gox with orders, cause unacceptable lag and cause a cascading failure as all the other bots freak out.  Conspiracy me is thinking this was another ddos on Gox through the trade engine.

I have been supporting other exchanges, but the problem is for me and most/many is the ease of getting the evil fiat into and out of Gox.

Also, in the pursuit of gaining wider public acceptance most new people feel more comfortable with going to where the crowd is, the ol safety in numbers.  You can learn about this in Asch's Conformity psychology experiment on Youtube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyDDyT1lDhA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asch_conformity_experiments

My point being that mast people are not crypto, exchange/trading nor computer experts and see the world in a different way.  If there is only one major exchange and the largest number of people possible are voting owners then how is that so bad?

Also this is a great idea.

Seems to me that so far exploiting the arbitrage possibilities between exchanges is a real issue in that not all exchanges are equal in regards to the ability to withdraw fiat.

This FX based idea has a lot of merit.

I agree a pure P2P system is the nirvana, but how do you transfer the other item for trade?  Meaning where does fiat enter the system, and how?  To my best understanding a pure P2P exchange would still require a clearing house for the transfer of fiat or some other commodity that is not a digi-coin, such as LTC or another digi-coin.

Also to my best understanding of the macro view of any human group is that there does need to be some kind of central authority.  It exists in the very fabric of BTC in the BTC devs are a central authority.  Imagine if BTC splintered like Linux?  I'm no Linus expert, but to my understanding is that even if all flavors run the latest Linux kernel that does not mean each runs the same way.

So BTC and the world does need a large driving central force behind providing liquidity to BTC.  I'm trying to solicit ideas for how to make this centralized force as open source and purely democratic as possible.

Very good idea.  I'm not trying to argue, merely play some devil's advocate.

How would this stop any one closely held exchange possibly taking over BTC and holding the entire community hostage to their ineptness and greed in the form of any deals they make with entities known and unknown to provide services? 

Gox is the prime example in that they sold to ConLab [CoinLab] when ConLab has ZERO experience in running an exchange, they stumbled upon the idea/opportunity and got the VC funding to make it happen.

So basically the fate of BTC has just been sold to the very posers that be, that the BTC community seems to think they're fighting.  It makes zero sense to me, other than the veil of pure avarice and greed has covered the eyes of a great many early adopters of BTC since they're now getting fiat bank.

Don't get me wrong I understand BTC is purely a means by which to gain fiat while bemoaning fiat as a bastard child.  If the BTC community was above fiat then there would be zero fiat exchanges.

Let's discuss and brain storm on how to replace Gox.

My idea is that a crowd sourced exchange is created.  The exchange is non-profit esque in that fees would be for pure overhead of reasonable and not necessarily customary expenses and compensation.  This exchange would not remove profit motive at all, it would shift profit motive from the owners of the exchange to the BTC community.

This exchange exists only to serve BTC and provide liquidity.  It will be open source and there will be no dark trades. Bots will be allowed, but not allowed to flood orders and set artificial  prices by buying some BTC then filling in the bids with a ton of small orders to reach the new ask, and vice-versa.

There is more than enough bonafide real world talent on this forum to pull this off.  It may take a year to get it going and up to speed, but I think the long term payoff for everyone in the BTC community makes this worth while.

Imagine an exchange that does not exist to make the exchange's owners rich, and an exchange that is answerable directly to the many shareholders?  You can't can you?  Try again and you can imagine a post Gox BTC world.

There would be a minimum of 1-2 BTC per individual to fund the development and receive a vote.  Every shareholder receives 1 vote regardless how much is paid for a voting position.

I know it's all whack.  I mean that if someone decides to put in 200BTC worth that they still get 1 vote.  I say this is Democratic in the sense that the person who can put in 200 BTC is more in a position to benefit from this exchange and in turn must be beholden to the alleged intended ideals of BTC as I understand them from reading on this forum. (Believe me this is difficult for me to write and mean since IRL I'm all about moral hazard and very pro you get equal consideration for compensation. But this is allegedly not what BTC is founded on. Problem with that is that era is gone for now and wide acceptance of BTC by the world requires a modicum of stability.  Beggars can be choosers depending on who they vote for.)

The exchange would have a board of directors who are voted in by the shareholders.  The board elects all other positions.  Board members have rights to remove any position according to Robert's Rules to order.  Terms are two years, and have a two term limit. Shareholders have recall rights as long as a supermajority over at least 60%, level TBD, gives a member a vote of no confidence.

I know this is not a complete plan, merely a brainstorm of mine to try and get a ball rolling and hopefully get more minds involved with removing the Gox from the ass that they are turning BTC into.  Gox and all other private, dark exchanges must go if BTC is to truly realize what it's alleged to be and that is a decentralized commodity.


Please if you have another idea on how to accomplish a paradigm shift from Gox and the privately held dark exchanges, such as Gox then post them, or expound on what I've written or tear it to shreds. If you decide to tear it to shreds then back up your claims with a better idea/solution.


edited, added sentences 3,4 in paragraph 8.

I'll post in your thread, and ask a mod to delete mine.

Sorry, but I have to say at least now I don't feel so bad now that I have company.

I get this error when I'm trying to find out why BTC i'm sending to Gox shows 3 confirms in my client but is not in my Gox account and the txid, and address I sent to bot give this error "Got error 157 'Unknown error code' from NDBCLUSTER."

I'm pretty confused when it comes to how this can happen and what happened to my BTC?

Yes I know I'm wrong and hypocritical in sending BTC to Gox, but so far this is the only place I know of that I can get money out of the system without jumping through more hoops than I already have.


Added

I just checked other transactions of mine on Blockchain.info and I get the same "Got error 157 'Unknown error code' from NDBCLUSTER."

I didn't read all the posts since last time I was here.  If this has been suggested then apologies, but good thinking kudos to whomever may have suggested this.

First, who actually believes the trade engine overload was not a planned attack?

I'd say think again.  Anyone who does not work for MtGox knows their engine sux.  Anyone knows that the Achilles heel for Gox, except people who work for Gox, is the trading engine.

What's the difference between setting up 100 trading accounts, or whatever number and flooding the trading engine with buy/sell orders for small amounts of BTC, say a few thousand a second, or how ever many, maybe 10 a second, it takes for Gox to lag.

I say conspiracy theory says this is a much more viable option than their given reason.

What part of BTC staying over $75usd didn't you get?  Then $100, $150, $175 and $200.

Either you have zero clue as to what is going on, or you thought BTC was overpriced and would crash causing a slowdown in traffic.

Your site has a huge fiduciary responsibility to the entire BTC network.  So much so that you either need to sell and become BTC sourced, or get taken out by a better company with open source architecture that is scalable and still crowd sourced with BTC.  Too much power in the hands of too few people who admittedly have no clue. 

Your admittance came in the form of an admittance by MagicalTux about your system:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=172991.msg1802127#msg1802127

I'm not offended at all. I misread your post.  I was making sarcastic fun of the posters claiming you were saying that Juniper was listed on NYSE and that was the reason for your picture, when clearly your post was about Juniper being the network that runs NYSE's trading.

I think Gox is a joke and that Gox is a 80% attack on a coin that has finally garnered enough fiat worth to make pulling a true 51% attack pretty simple and possibly very lucrative.  ASICs and ddos the major pools and BTC is a goner.  Gox is doing their job of ruining BTC for all the new people who just got suckered into what is/was supposed to be some new kind of commodity where people run through dew covered meadows wearing garmets made of thin white silk while Cherry Trees blossomed and rose petals rain from the sky and there are no crooks or sharks or bot run exchanges stealing people's actual money.

Eh Bytecoin.

I like my idea for a new coin much better.  Of course I would it's my idea.

The new coin is called KingCoin^TM, Copyright 2013, (R).  Proof of work is complete a level of Donkey Kong that has a many floors as there are in the Empire State Building.  plus 15% of the coins value is indexed against all other digi-coins that have over $100mil market cap.

The Donkey Kong will have captchas to make sure people are playing and not bots.

Also this is KingCoin RC2 since RC1 had guess a number between 0 and 99 as proof of work.  So we have a major step forward with this release.

The Donkey Kong game has a built in AI that varies difficulty based on the player's ability, and the payouts have a funky cool algo to make sure that more experienced players cannot game the system and take over the network.

This coin will be as truly Democratic as a coin can be and be digital.  There will be none of this I have 50k to drop on ASICs or GPUs for LTC and can mine more cons than most people so I get to make more coin.  Anyone with access to the net can play King Coin, and the game saves in progress any time.

If you're including me in the gang of morons you need to reread what I wrote.