Thanks @Op
First thought came into my mind is this is not a valued feature for crex24 users who can't make fast trades and for coins listed there especially those having low volume in other exchanges or not listed at all but in crex24.
Btc2 team have to take the condition of crex24 deposits into consideration.

For btc2 deposits in crex24 exchange platform, how many times transactions should be confirmed to be shown in balance? Is it an issue related to platform or all the btc2 transacrions are in slow motion. I waited till 120 confirmation to see my balance.

Nothing new in the review. Perfectmoney is an active reputable service since a time.
May be you just want to redirect traffics the website, right? This has nothing related to perfectmoney, but to the endorsed website.
Users will discuss the review or its publisher?

You can use segwit wallet to send ur funds to the mixer, but it's still obvious if you can use segwit for output transaction. If it's not mentioned in the faq, then preferely to only use legacy addresses until getting the confirmation from the team.
I made a search about this but also didn't find answer so better to wait for manager's response, he is very active here.

You might have right about your concerns, they have the worst service(as you confirm), they don't have to raise fees. If you don't like the service, just leave it, cauz seems that many others like it the way it is. If they control fees without any parameters, then "fees" is not a subject for community discussion.
Can't understand the move too, the service will lose rate if to continue with low quality service. I don't expect their service will better after increasing the fees. 

My post was just my vision from a neutreul sight. Am not accusing your service or have any valid proofs against you, i felt that i should warn users who will read the topic.
If you can assume credibility of the team behind and other users confirm that it's smoothly running, this doesn't deny my concerns. Dealings or offers from new accounts is always taken with extreme cautions.

Peace!

I don't advice anybody to use those anonymous services started by brand new accounts. Before all, telegram is the worst place to start with, for both lunchers and users, especially with those confirmed bot use.
The service has no known reputation so it's not trustworthy until proving the opposite.

This is why most report threads have to be sticked in Meta or elswhere. Report threads works like childboard when sticked. You can consider this as a suggestion. Keep the good work

It should be moved to Reputation board.
BM have to be asked about his reactions towards those greeders. If the manager is indifferent and hunters are fake scammers, the whole project for that campaign is trustless and the full subject around, will get discussion in Scam Accusation board

I suggest to add mix services running their official channel in bitcointalk, as well for campagnies offering host and domains by btc.

This is an awsome thread that should be sticked instead of the bump activities everyday .

Thanks OP

Talkers and posters about what exactly?
Who pay whom and for what purposes?
I can't understand the goals of this topic.
Please provide more details about you forum and why you host it in the darkweb.

What kind of Fiat deposits ?
The implementation of of a Fiat Deposit feature may take long time unless you made some important partenerships.

As there is no yet complaints about you, i will be interrested following your updates.

Week 04
First post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4903449.msg49280691#msg49280691
Last post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5099751.msg49339416#msg49339416

I use Neteller since 2014 or earlier, as many of people i know using it in gambling platforms. They have a good support and i didn't hear about any complaints against it. Issues related to identification and verification always take too much time than expected but not than 2 to 3 days in weekends.
Lets see what will happen by tomorrow.

But this will only secure personal use of european contributors.
It's highly recommended to apply such procedures security but what would happen for data users out of the European Union?
I think many compagnies will relay on to ensure more credibility but this still lack further regulations for other contributors worldwide.

Knowledge should be free and accessible for everyone. Paid courses won't be different from free ones. All the contents mentioned to be in your courses are explained in details by benevols across the net.
I don't believe on those selling false dreams in paid courses. In addition, you are in the most reputable known source of information about cryptocurrencies environment.

I think you are selling the wrong product in the wrong place.

Anyway, you should move this topic to Digital Goods board.

When it comes about adding trade services using Fiat money, then no way but centralisation.
I didn't hear about a decentralized market using Fiat but i can't expect how binance is willing to deal with it in the appropriate way.

Let's discuss the problem which you want to solve.
If you want to help community in choosing the right non-scammy projects, this doesn't look helpful because any fake project can submit to conditions you mentioned and may get positive trust by being listed in your website despite it's fake.
If you want to help Projects from the contribution of scammers in bounty participation, i don't see how you can do this.

Interest discussion about Hodler started in the web-wallets board : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5098468.0

I just installed the 0.3.2 version for windows. I think i will try it later today, i think Hodler would be a very useful tool to store multiple crypto-funds in one wallet. I didn't hear about your ICO. Does the wallet run a coin within it?

How much supply is in circulation after being traded in a second exchange?
CoinMC set a lot of conditions for coins to be listed as the coin can be delisted if not much supply value in 24 h circulation. How you deal with this?
Does there more details about the partenerships? with whom? for what goals? conditions? dates?