What hashrate? Can do scrypt? |
|
|
|
|
did you try running cgminer as root?
Havent GPU mined for ages, but i recalled having issues using GPU in headless setup, needed to be logged into some form of xwindow system...
|
|
|
|
14. sudo nano .metiscoin/metiscoin.conf insert: listen=1
server=1
daemon=1
rpcuser=u
rpcpassword=p
rpcport=1098
gen=1
addnode=162.243.197.118 CTRL+X to save PLEASE DONT DO THAT!!!11 Use a long random string for password. Because if u use the default mentioned here, and the rpcport happens to be accessible from outside, then consider your wallet pwnd. |
|
|
|
difficulty has gone from 1 up to 4 in last 5 mins  yeah... and itll likely be 16 next time... it can only go up maximum of 4x prolly cause of all the instamine. |
|
|
|
The Small Time Miner XCoin Pool * http://xco.smalltimeminer.com* Pplns Payouts. Full Block Rewards Rewards Including Tx Fees, 1% Pool Fee. * Stratum Only: stratum+tcp://xco.smalltimeminer.com:3350 Pool should work, completely untested at this point, wasn't a miner available at the time and I won't even be able to test it myself for several hours, difficulty is still low so solo mining is probably the best option yet but its running if anyone wants to try it out. Getting 100% rejects. Thanks for checking it for me, I'll have to fix it later. Sorry folks. I think I have it fixed now folks if anyone wants to try again. Thanks Still reject. This is a CPU coin. Are you using the modified miner from an earlier page? minerd -a X11 -o stratum+tcp://xco.smalltimeminer.com:3350 -u username.worker -p password -t 4 is what I am trying to use , but it won't let me connect. [2014-01-20 00:10:44] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to xco.smalltimeminer.com port 3350: Connection refused [2014-01-20 00:10:44] ...retry after 30 seconds is the error I am getting. EDIT OK, it just connected and has given me a yay! Thanks BigAl , looks like you got it working  My apologies for the initial issues, I'm traveling today making it difficult to debug anything, now to find that first block! Good work. Sending my (puny) hashrate that way. |
|
|
|
The Small Time Miner XCoin Pool * http://xco.smalltimeminer.com* Pplns Payouts. Full Block Rewards Rewards Including Tx Fees, 1% Pool Fee. * Stratum Only: stratum+tcp://xco.smalltimeminer.com:3350 Pool should work, completely untested at this point, wasn't a miner available at the time and I won't even be able to test it myself for several hours, difficulty is still low so solo mining is probably the best option yet but its running if anyone wants to try it out. Getting 100% rejects. |
|
|
|
awesome. now time for a pool. |
|
|
|
- Block reward controlled by moores law ( 1111 / (diff+1 ^ 2))
This is not working, right? I'm getting 500 coins as reward see all function in source )))
int64 static GetBlockValue(int nBits, int64 nFees)
{
double dDiff =
(double)0x0000ffff / (double)(nBits & 0x00ffffff);
int64 nSubsidy = (1111 / (pow((dDiff+1),2)));
if (nSubsidy > 500) nSubsidy = 500;
if (nSubsidy < 1) nSubsidy = 1;
nSubsidy *= COIN;
return nSubsidy + nFees;
}
so diff needs to be > 0.49063744754 for the subsidy to be below 500 |
|
|
|
any nodes? cant sync
"addr" : "23.23.186.131:41490",
"addr" : "212.7.200.8:9999",
"addr" : "81.190.117.6:9999",
"addr" : "50.16.206.102:9999",
"addr" : "46.183.216.84:9999",
"addr" : "54.211.19.102:9999",
"addr" : "114.79.36.226:24501",
"addr" : "98.165.130.67:9999",
"addr" : "86.4.102.125:9999",
"addr" : "162.243.33.16:9999",
"addr" : "54.226.144.1:9999",
"addr" : "24.56.43.184:9999",
"addr" : "54.234.214.166:9999",
"addr" : "54.235.239.14:9999",
"addr" : "54.197.22.82:9999",
"addr" : "23.20.9.158:9999",
"addr" : "83.248.99.134:9999",
"addr" : "54.227.210.63:9999",
"addr" : "54.196.100.234:9999",
"addr" : "54.205.131.190:9999",
"addr" : "89.134.172.182:51187",
"addr" : "172.245.208.234:9999",
"addr" : "23.22.98.102:9999",
"addr" : "183.111.10.26:9999",
"addr" : "54.203.94.44:9999",
"addr" : "199.48.164.198:9999",
"addr" : "54.221.170.103:9999",
"addr" : "50.112.82.162:9999",
"addr" : "137.135.200.139:1120",
"addr" : "191.234.40.58:1144",
"addr" : "138.91.48.137:1080",
"addr" : "137.117.201.91:1160",
"addr" : "137.117.138.79:1064",
"addr" : "168.62.213.56:1040",
"addr" : "138.91.56.10:1136",
"addr" : "137.135.205.224:1128",
"addr" : "138.91.50.152:1128",
"addr" : "138.91.53.228:1120",
"addr" : "137.135.206.30:1112",
"addr" : "137.135.209.195:1096",
"addr" : "137.135.103.204:1168",
"addr" : "137.135.207.116:1040",
"addr" : "137.135.200.14:1160",
"addr" : "191.234.34.136:1032",
"addr" : "138.91.49.237:1040",
"addr" : "137.135.60.201:1128",
"addr" : "191.234.33.235:1152",
"addr" : "168.61.84.37:1176",
"addr" : "137.135.209.9:1064",
"addr" : "137.135.208.52:1080",
"addr" : "137.135.1.82:1048",
"addr" : "137.135.207.139:1120",
"addr" : "138.91.48.240:1032",
"addr" : "191.234.34.86:1160",
"addr" : "137.135.202.79:1136",
"addr" : "138.91.54.22:1176",
"addr" : "23.99.20.99:1024",
"addr" : "191.234.40.164:1176",
"addr" : "137.116.231.53:1032",
"addr" : "137.135.162.95:1048",
"addr" : "137.116.230.126:1040",
"addr" : "137.116.229.112:1136",
"addr" : "138.91.54.194:1168",
"addr" : "137.135.209.167:1152",
"addr" : "168.63.203.214:1168",
"addr" : "65.52.120.174:1040",
"addr" : "138.91.54.226:1080",
"addr" : "65.52.119.150:1136",
"addr" : "137.135.207.218:1072",
"addr" : "65.52.120.165:1152",
"addr" : "168.61.85.13:1136",
"addr" : "168.63.66.51:1064",
"addr" : "168.63.203.210:1160",
"addr" : "137.135.1.60:1120",
"addr" : "137.135.205.26:1136",
"addr" : "138.91.56.36:1040",
"addr" : "137.135.216.240:1152",
"addr" : "137.117.235.15:1152",
"addr" : "137.117.66.227:1152",
"addr" : "168.61.87.67:1104",
"addr" : "138.91.116.136:1176",
"addr" : "54.244.195.204:38347",
"addr" : "137.135.204.129:1024",
"addr" : "137.135.60.190:1224",
"addr" : "54.203.242.24:44843",
"addr" : "54.203.211.146:54155",
"addr" : "54.203.231.220:46590",
"addr" : "54.203.83.237:35095",
"addr" : "54.203.24.96:55809",
"addr" : "50.112.10.185:56865",
"addr" : "54.202.75.71:49327",
"addr" : "54.212.164.221:41794",
"addr" : "54.212.32.86:60033",
"addr" : "54.202.185.142:55931",
"addr" : "168.61.36.106:1072",
"addr" : "54.202.162.56:9999",
"addr" : "54.212.171.58:9999",
"addr" : "54.203.215.90:39215",
"addr" : "54.202.174.228:56464",
"addr" : "50.112.38.82:45450",
"addr" : "54.212.189.65:60441",
"addr" : "54.202.70.156:58850",
"addr" : "54.244.84.153:9999",
"addr" : "54.245.219.141:9999",
"addr" : "54.184.65.108:9999",
"addr" : "54.214.64.131:9999",
"addr" : "54.214.217.9:60147",
"addr" : "54.203.199.175:33997",
"addr" : "54.218.143.120:9999",
"addr" : "144.76.45.199:9999",
"addr" : "62.210.177.2:9999",
"addr" : "54.224.80.96:9999",
"addr" : "54.242.185.39:9999",
"addr" : "54.203.32.45:54395",
"addr" : "192.99.10.172:9999",
"addr" : "138.91.55.20:1128",
"addr" : "23.99.20.89:1144",
"addr" : "54.211.180.136:33275",
"addr" : "54.202.137.113:36773",
"addr" : "5.9.146.74:59818",
"addr" : "138.91.48.42:1040",
"addr" : "54.221.163.161:37444",
"addr" : "191.235.131.174:1024",
"addr" : "50.17.39.214:35818"
|
|
|
|
For me it would be not that big security problem to open one port forwarding to each ants. With a strong root pw should not be unsecure...
Let me remind you again that this is still very unsecure if you login from unsecure networks, especially public hotspots or unencrypted wifi. Your strong password is transmitted in cleartext and the hotspot operator or ISP (or even anyone in near vicinity in case of open wifi) can see the strong password. |
|
|
|
When is the next difficulty retarget?
id say in 3 blocks (~15 mins) |
|
|
|
for me it is the single reason for staying with cexio and that's the equipment being maintained by them, buying equipment is very expensive now and you don't see an ROI for a long time, by which time the difficulty is always increasing.
I dont understand on what basis do people buy GH/s on cex.io. 1 GH/s bought today at cex.io will make a total of ~0.01 BTC in its lifetime (assuming 30% difficulty jumps) and from mid may will actually start costing more in maintenance fee than it would mine. For the same reason that people buy antminers etc etc is about the same amount per GHS Are you telling me 0.012 is "about the same amount" as 0.046 ? In fact even the current antminer price is also way expensive in ROI terms... |
|
|
|
Why don't we just petition cex.io to split ghah.io into two separate pools? Would that not solve the problem?
There no problem, 55% of what is reported as Ghash.io is not their hardware, but individual miners pointing their hardware to ghash. So they only have about 17% hashing power Does not matter whose hardware provides the hash. The problem is that a single entity controls the hashrate. By mining at a pool, the pool operator controls the hashrate. The miners would mine whatever work the pool sends them to. |
|
|
|
I'm getting errors when trying to mine:
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
what(): CreateNewBlock() : ConnectBlock failed
Aborted
Same here. delete ~/.xcoin/blocks and ~/.xcoin/chainstate then ~/xcoin/src/xcoind -rescan It happened to me once too Tried it... no dice. Deleted everything except for .conf same thing |
|
|
|
2014-01-18 22:05:44 ThreadRPCServer method=setgenerate
2014-01-18 22:05:44 XcoinMiner started
2014-01-18 22:05:44 XcoinMiner started
2014-01-18 22:05:44 XcoinMiner started
2014-01-18 22:05:44 XcoinMiner started
2014-01-18 22:05:44 XcoinMiner started
2014-01-18 22:05:44 XcoinMiner started
2014-01-18 22:05:44 XcoinMiner started
2014-01-18 22:05:44 XcoinMiner started
2014-01-18 22:05:44 keypool reserve 2
2014-01-18 22:05:44 33
2014-01-18 22:05:44 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000
2014-01-18 22:05:44 nActualTimespan = 35 before bounds
2014-01-18 22:05:44 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
2014-01-18 22:05:44 nTargetTimespan = 3600 nActualTimespan = 900
2014-01-18 22:05:44 Before: 1e06752f 000006752f000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2014-01-18 22:05:44 After: 1e019d4b 0000019d4bc00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
2014-01-18 22:05:44 ERROR: ConnectBlock() : coinbase pays too much (actual=50000000000 vs limit=42300000000)
|
|
|
|
I'm getting errors when trying to mine:
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
what(): CreateNewBlock() : ConnectBlock failed
Aborted
Same here. |
|
|
|
What happens to the bitcoin transactions if there is no miners to process them?, will they just pile up ?
Yes |
|
|
|
Current software only supports Bitcoin and Litecoin mining.
huh? U mean the pool and/or difficulty is hardcoded in the software? |
|
|
|
for me it is the single reason for staying with cexio and that's the equipment being maintained by them, buying equipment is very expensive now and you don't see an ROI for a long time, by which time the difficulty is always increasing.
Are you saying that if you use equipment maintained by them, the difficulty rise wont affect you? I dont understand on what basis do people buy GH/s on cex.io. 1 GH/s bought today at cex.io will make a total of ~0.01 BTC in its lifetime (assuming 30% difficulty jumps) and from mid may will actually start costing more in maintenance fee than it would mine. I have a feeling that they artificially inflate prices to make people think that their GH/s is actually worth something. One day when people get better at math, it'll come crashing down. Hope you aren't still holding your GH/s on that day. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
