no, I'm talking about what there are any other methods of deception? regardless of the Xwin and their technology.
I'm not sure if you've got the right topic to discuss that kind of methodology I think it is right because it is necessary to know can this method can be used by Xwin
|
|
|
Do you mean another options for influence or not?
yes. roughly speaking, how else bookmakers can keep money and deceive users? AI does all the necessary calculations, I don't think there's a solid way to deceive users. no, I'm talking about what there are any other methods of deception? regardless of the Xwin and their technology.
|
|
|
What are you talking about? How can bookmakers influence the decision after the match? What a decision?
Of course they can't, but they can update coefficients in the real time . what about another options? It seems pretty obvious to me Do you mean another options for influence or not? yes. roughly speaking, how else bookmakers can keep money and deceive users?
|
|
|
I dont think it is a good idea to sell all your Bitcoin for ripple. Dont put all your eggs in one basket, it is good to diversify in both Bitcoin and Ripple. In term of ratio, I will keep more bitcoin than ripple in my portfolio.
I do not think that selling bitcoin to any other altcoin is good idea in general. absurd lol
|
|
|
I see that something new is happening with the ripple. what do you say about it?
|
|
|
depending on which course, it's all very difficult. sometimes I get out through the exchange rate, like the dollar or the ruble. that is, I make a very long circle.
|
|
|
I think the main problems have already been overcome by bitcoin and now it will grow. so, by the end of the year it will larger than before again in several times
|
|
|
What are you talking about? How can bookmakers influence the decision after the match? What a decision?
Of course they can't, but they can update coefficients in the real time . what about another options? It seems pretty obvious to me
|
|
|
I am the first time in such a situation, so I'll ask you. if I have less than 100 followers on my twitter, should I first follow them and then start bounty? or can I start bounty and already in the process of following have my 100?
|
|
|
Do you think that BBC will be interested in it?
Ofc, charity attracts attention and also brings a good income. if it was not like this, then no one was doing it, no matter how good a person he|she might be. Actually, it depends. If you do charity for the sake of charity and you're not being particularly audible about it, it's not too relevant. it is the details. I'm talking about charity in general. everyone perfectly knows that charity is popular now as a way to improve the image and makes people talk about. Celebrities like do it, and ofc even more like TV.
|
|
|
And under the protection of the one who will give them benefits (BBC)
What do you mean by giving benefits? Is it like supporting people or what? First of all, I mean advertising. BBC is a huge company with TV, radio etc. Also, they attract many artists, who bring the main income. Do you think that BBC will be interested in it? Ofc, charity attracts attention and also brings a good income. if it was not like this, then no one was doing it, no matter how good a person he|she might be.
|
|
|
And under the protection of the one who will give them benefits (BBC)
What do you mean by giving benefits? Is it like supporting people or what? First of all, I mean advertising. BBC is a huge company with TV, radio etc. Also, they attract many artists, who bring the main income.
|
|
|
Exactly my point. They opened up in a place where it's easy to maintain and operate an organization and where their suppliers are.
And under the protection of the one who will give them benefits (BBC) Just follow the path of least resistance and you'll get yourself a nice cozy place in the sunlight. I think I've already heard this quote from someone! By the way, is there any opportunity for novices to join Xwin's bounty campaign? I think everyone has twitter or facebook, so you can join there
|
|
|
Yet still, they depend on BBC. If, say, they had to work on behalf of CNN or Fox they'd be US organization.
Yes, but at the same time, they do not collect money for charity in Britain! British organizers are in Britain. And they collect money not for children in Britain, but for children in Africa just because it is more profitable in this period of time. Also any charitable organization brings a income to the organizers. Exactly my point. They opened up in a place where it's easy to maintain and operate an organization and where their suppliers are. And under the protection of the one who will give them benefits (BBC)
|
|
|
But they're under BBC. It would make no sense if they opened up somewhere else. BBC provides them with equipment and people. What I was talking about is any random "I want to do a favor to the universe" charity organization.
Yes, they are under BBC, but they do not do charity for Britain. This is an example when it is better to open at home, but for another country. That's how work many charitable foundations. Yet still, they depend on BBC. If, say, they had to work on behalf of CNN or Fox they'd be US organization. Yes, but at the same time, they do not collect money for charity in Britain! British organizers are in Britain. And they collect money not for children in Britain, but for children in Africa just because it is more profitable in this period of time. Also any charitable organization brings a income to the organizers.
|
|
|
Thats a shame about half block reward I was about to mine this, but you have to reduce calculators now by 50% and its no longer profitable Indeed. You are a day and a step late. But MN rewards are good. Should we just take your word or do you have arguments?
|
|
|
That's actually a valid point, though if you have a charity organization taxation might take a toll on the money donated. Pun intended.
Let's look at some charitable organizations. For example, Comic Relief, they are organized in Britain but help the countries of Africa. They chose Britain, because it is their home country and also because they will collect more money here than if they will create in Africa. Although, England has problems with which the charitable foundation could help too. But... But they're under BBC. It would make no sense if they opened up somewhere else. BBC provides them with equipment and people. What I was talking about is any random "I want to do a favor to the universe" charity organization. Yes, they are under BBC, but they do not do charity for Britain. This is an example when it is better to open at home, but for another country. That's how work many charitable foundations.
|
|
|
What do you mean "non-profit"? Could you please provide an example?
I mean if you started a business but it will be like church or etc, then maybe better start it in other countries? where it will be a profitable business. That's actually a valid point, though if you have a charity organization taxation might take a toll on the money donated. Pun intended. Let's look at some charitable organizations. For example, Comic Relief, they are organized in Britain but help the countries of Africa. They chose Britain, because it is their home country and also because they will collect more money here than if they will create in Africa. Although, England has problems with which the charitable foundation could help too. But...
|
|
|
|