Really happy to see price growing. This coin has a lot of potential I think people are starting to see
DiCE1904, can you redownload the OSX version and see if it works out for you now?
|
|
|
When you are given a choice of two pistols to shoot yourself with, the correct answer is "NO!". If you vote, you can't bitch, because you HAVE accepted the clearly illegitimate system as legitimate. As Emma Goldman said, if voting could make a difference, they would outlaw it. +1 - Totally agreed
|
|
|
USA, land of the free? Those were the days... USA, land of the free? More like land of the terrorists. Hahahaha! +1 to you both, you gave me a good laugh!
|
|
|
edited up a bit more to make it a bit better Still agreeing
|
|
|
Here we go with the World Police stuff...I suppose we can excuse England, Rome and the Mongols for doing the same thing. How the US doing is the worst possible thing ever in the world...Sure its bad, but your level of ostracizing is beyond comparison of prior history. So don't even attempt to compare it, you are just being foolish. Rome thought that they were spreading civilization and civilized behaviour to other countries by invading them, the American government tells everyone that they are spreading Freedom and Democracy to wherever they invade, you know nothing of history, England also thought they were doing the world a favour by colonising people ( I'm British just so you know ) you can go and ask the Irish how well that turned out for them, possible a hundred years now you still have conflict between the Irish and the English in Northern Ireland. +1 to you. Cloudn't agree more! Good written!
|
|
|
Here we go with the World Police stuff...I suppose we can excuse England, Rome and the Mongols for doing the same thing. How the US doing is the worst possible thing ever in the world...Sure its bad, but your level of ostracizing is beyond comparison of prior history. So don't even attempt to compare it, you are just being foolish.
Does mistakes by other countries in the past justifie the US's actions/mistakes today? Do they have the right to do it becasue of England, Rome and the Mongols, and actualy Germany and probably more have done some wrong things in the past? No. Example: If your neighbor kills another neighbor. Does this justifie for you killing another neighbor of yours?
|
|
|
Of course the country was founded by traitors, thats easy to agree with. As to say direct harm wasn't done, that leads a lot to be considered. Right now that may be true, but of the foreign governments that are upset, what if a war breaks out, and people die, all because he broke national security, how much of a hero is he to you then?
LOL. You're country is already with war with a number of countries without any of this. IMHO you have bombed so many innocent families in eastern countries that it's way of the limit. But I'm not a violent person, so I won't go so far and say you deserve it back since I believe in peace. And of course, the actions where done by your leaders, not the innocent families in the US. But it's f*** wrong what you're doing today and the past few years to other countries. You are not the world police. The world needed to know what Snowden said. You and your government are not the only victim here, stop acting like one. We will find a solution on this together without war, CHILL. So yes, he is still a hero. Because this was also a criminal act on the public, not only governments.
|
|
|
Interesting thing is, I never said the US Government wasn't at fault for what they are doing. Of course those running it should answer for it, the same way Snowden should answer for himself. It's bad form yeah. But then again, as I said before, Every other country with an Intelligence Agency is doing the same thing, prime example UK and the GCHQ. Its why there are only a couple countries being openly butthurt about it, because they know they are doing it too.
And as you said, he didn't do it to directly harm your contry, since he disclosured other countries doing it as well. It was a act of humanity. He's "crime" was needed to end the running of it. Perhaps this have been much worse in 5 years from now if he did not. And those criminals would have done this maybe forever in the future. It's a lot of wrong actions done in the history that has turned good. I'll give you an example, from your own country's history. Look at your own country, it was founded when rebels chased the englishmen of the land. So in a way, your government was founded by criminals from the englishmens perspective, you actualy stole it from them. I guess you agree on at that was a "right crime" since you're seem to be happy with your government and your land of the free. So, then Snowdens crime was also a "right crime". You might not see it now, since in this senario you're the englishman that got your land robbed by criminals so I'll guess it would take some time.
|
|
|
Yes, you're right, and I understand your frustration; all we can really do is state our case in a way we would understand before we started believing in anarchism. It wasn't that long ago that I thought anarchists were crazy people myself I think it wasn't until the beginning of this year that I'd been introduced to the viewpoint... What really draws me to it is how rational anarchists are, and eventually I couldn't call myself rational while fighting them with irrational logic. I believe it was a gun debate that finally broke me; I tried to make the case that banning guns was a good thing, but after I was explained why it wasn't, I had to roll with what made more sense. Anyhow, I believe the best approach is to leave anarchism out of the equation, but to instead push for rationalism; find a break in someone's logic and pull the thread, show them why you believe the things that you do, state your intentions, have patience. Anarchism evolves naturally from secular rationalism; the more rational a society is, the less dependence they have on the state. Since the state loses all its power if nobody believes in it, it's not a matter of political preference, but a matter of understanding why it's better to have a foundation of reason and ethics; everything flows naturally from these philosophies. Seems like we have had some of the same experiences and agree with you +1
|
|
|
History time! Its so cute how your only defense to my opposition is calling me stupid and an eater of fatty foods. I would be insulted more on a playground by 10 year olds than you lot...just grow a pair. Get a real job, and earn living, get an apartment move out of the basement or garage apartment, trailer park, whatever...just do something with your life and stop trying to "beat the man." All that is teenage anarchist hubbub of idiots not having the balls to be their own man and make something of their life. Your conspiracy theories are just ways you punks try and justify your inaction of being a real person and part of society. Grow the hell up.
I don't care where you live or what you do either way. Nor do I care what you think about my statements, maybe its occurred to you that I am the one having fun here, at your expense. Your buddy he is certainly not getting it, but suppose he is now...but meatsticks will be meatsticks.
---------------------------- You seem confused. Let me sort it out for you. Get a real job, and earn living, get an apartment move out of the basement or garage apartment, trailer park, whatever.
I don't care where you live or what you do either way.
Decide. Do you care or not? One place you're applying like caring, next you're not. I suggest contacting your local doctor if this continues, it can result in schizophrenia. Nor do I care what you think about my statements
Why do you reply then? Isn't the /ignore better? Apparently you care a lot since you have to defend them. Again. Do you care or do you not? Decide. maybe its occurred to you that I am the one having fun here, at your expense.
Tell me how. If you're having such fun, please share it with everyone else Your buddy he is certainly not getting it, but suppose he is now
Buddy? I don't know him. But he seems fairly more educated and well informed than you. --- Still all your statements are based on assumptions, which leans towards consp. theory which you seem to look so much down at.. As for this post...its so out of fricken control with assumptions and attacks its not even worth replying too, if you picked up all the shit in the world and put it in a single bag...this post of yours is more full of shit. Schizephrenia? really? what is wrong with you? If you were older than 14 you would realize the only thing I actually care about is getting meatsticks like you worked up because I know whats right, and your anarchist crybaby bullshit and supporting of criminals like Snowden is not right. He's a traitor, belongs in prison, end of story. The post is quite fair, look at your own posts. You're saying one thing in one post and the opposite in next post. It's nothing wrong with me. I'm just pointing out that you either have a problem, or you are so naive that you are convinced that you're right so you do anything to win this arguing. As for example go so far that you say against what you said the last post when you post a new post. Also, your word "meatsticks".. What the fuck is that kind of alias for your fellows (humans)?? It actually seems like you are 14, or a redneck. You act like one. The moniker meatstick, certainly fits you. You are now going as far and digging as deep as you can to attempt to insult me. The intelligence digs are the funniest ones, especially when you are the one trying to pin assumptions on me, but the irony of yours only makes it sweeter. Aside from that, its very off-topic. Snowden is a traitor and a criminal and he belongs in prison, stop trying to raise money for him, he is not worth it. Yes, it make perfectly sense. He is a criminal for telling the world that the U.S is doing criminal actions agains the rest of the world. Make perfect sense! [img]yawn...another stupid image The subject matter of the security leak does not negate the fact the leak was made at all, its a crime, he broke his security oath and the work done to obtain the clearance. He violated the security of the country, simple fact, and he will burn for it. If you knew anything about holding a position in government service you would understand the importance of the security clearance given to you, and why it is completely dishonourable to violate it as well as illegal. The U.S violated the security of a unknown number of countries before he did anything. Shall we burn the US and put all in jail for that? That's a crime agains the world, not a country, which is in fact a little part of the world. What about the security leaks of other countries that the US has extracted from this process? The subject matter of the security leak does not negate the fact the leak was made at all, its a crime, he broke his security oath and the work done to obtain the clearance. He violated the security of the country, simple fact, and he will burn for it. If you knew anything about holding a position in government service you would understand the importance of the security clearance given to you, and why it is completely dishonourable to violate it as well as illegal.
How do you think the rest of the worlds governments feel about their security leaks because of the US? Who's gonna pay for that? The US is a criminal overment! Deal with it!
|
|
|
I'm from U.S, and I will never visit. But I think it's great that Jesus helps people to get pass those stupid border controls there http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFxijuRjX1UDon't take this the bad way, I really mean it, it's great!
|
|
|
History time! Its so cute how your only defense to my opposition is calling me stupid and an eater of fatty foods. I would be insulted more on a playground by 10 year olds than you lot...just grow a pair. Get a real job, and earn living, get an apartment move out of the basement or garage apartment, trailer park, whatever...just do something with your life and stop trying to "beat the man." All that is teenage anarchist hubbub of idiots not having the balls to be their own man and make something of their life. Your conspiracy theories are just ways you punks try and justify your inaction of being a real person and part of society. Grow the hell up.
I don't care where you live or what you do either way. Nor do I care what you think about my statements, maybe its occurred to you that I am the one having fun here, at your expense. Your buddy he is certainly not getting it, but suppose he is now...but meatsticks will be meatsticks.
---------------------------- You seem confused. Let me sort it out for you. Get a real job, and earn living, get an apartment move out of the basement or garage apartment, trailer park, whatever.
I don't care where you live or what you do either way.
Decide. Do you care or not? One place you're applying like caring, next you're not. I suggest contacting your local doctor if this continues, it can result in schizophrenia. Nor do I care what you think about my statements
Why do you reply then? Isn't the /ignore better? Apparently you care a lot since you have to defend them. Again. Do you care or do you not? Decide. maybe its occurred to you that I am the one having fun here, at your expense.
Tell me how. If you're having such fun, please share it with everyone else Your buddy he is certainly not getting it, but suppose he is now
Buddy? I don't know him. But he seems fairly more educated and well informed than you. --- Still all your statements are based on assumptions, which leans towards consp. theory which you seem to look so much down at.. As for this post...its so out of fricken control with assumptions and attacks its not even worth replying too, if you picked up all the shit in the world and put it in a single bag...this post of yours is more full of shit. Schizephrenia? really? what is wrong with you? If you were older than 14 you would realize the only thing I actually care about is getting meatsticks like you worked up because I know whats right, and your anarchist crybaby bullshit and supporting of criminals like Snowden is not right. He's a traitor, belongs in prison, end of story. The post is quite fair, look at your own posts. You're saying one thing in one post and the opposite in next post. It's nothing wrong with me. I'm just pointing out that you either have a problem, or you are so naive that you are convinced that you're right so you do anything to win this arguing. As for example go so far that you say against what you said the last post when you post a new post. Also, your word "meatsticks".. What the fuck is that kind of alias for your fellows (humans)?? It actually seems like you are 14, or a redneck. You act like one. The moniker meatstick, certainly fits you. You are now going as far and digging as deep as you can to attempt to insult me. The intelligence digs are the funniest ones, especially when you are the one trying to pin assumptions on me, but the irony of yours only makes it sweeter. Aside from that, its very off-topic. Snowden is a traitor and a criminal and he belongs in prison, stop trying to raise money for him, he is not worth it. Yes, it make perfectly sense. He is a criminal for telling the world that the U.S is doing criminal actions agains the rest of the world. Make perfect sense!
|
|
|
I agree with you; precisely because humanity is not mature enough to handle anarchism, we rely on the state in order to survive together. Anarchism would never work if it suddenly occurred now, as it would always devolve back into the state system, e.g. Somalia.
You're completly right here, and I agree Mike Christ. But chowderman seems to have a BIG problem to understand the difference between anarchy and rebellion/protestion against some laws. I can't recall it's beeing mentioned anything about anarchism from the side wihch chowderman apparently is not on, but he still throws blames about anarchism and criminals and more. That's why I don't agree with him. He sweeps everyone under one comb. Because you don't agree with one or two rules, it does not magicaly make you an anarchist that will remove the government and let the ciminals rule. We still need police and stuff for fuck sake, people are still killing and raping people, and unfortunaly they will probably a long time in the future.
|
|
|
History time! Its so cute how your only defense to my opposition is calling me stupid and an eater of fatty foods. I would be insulted more on a playground by 10 year olds than you lot...just grow a pair. Get a real job, and earn living, get an apartment move out of the basement or garage apartment, trailer park, whatever...just do something with your life and stop trying to "beat the man." All that is teenage anarchist hubbub of idiots not having the balls to be their own man and make something of their life. Your conspiracy theories are just ways you punks try and justify your inaction of being a real person and part of society. Grow the hell up.
I don't care where you live or what you do either way. Nor do I care what you think about my statements, maybe its occurred to you that I am the one having fun here, at your expense. Your buddy he is certainly not getting it, but suppose he is now...but meatsticks will be meatsticks.
---------------------------- You seem confused. Let me sort it out for you. Get a real job, and earn living, get an apartment move out of the basement or garage apartment, trailer park, whatever.
I don't care where you live or what you do either way.
Decide. Do you care or not? One place you're applying like caring, next you're not. I suggest contacting your local doctor if this continues, it can result in schizophrenia. Nor do I care what you think about my statements
Why do you reply then? Isn't the /ignore better? Apparently you care a lot since you have to defend them. Again. Do you care or do you not? Decide. maybe its occurred to you that I am the one having fun here, at your expense.
Tell me how. If you're having such fun, please share it with everyone else Your buddy he is certainly not getting it, but suppose he is now
Buddy? I don't know him. But he seems fairly more educated and well informed than you. --- Still all your statements are based on assumptions, which leans towards consp. theory which you seem to look so much down at.. As for this post...its so out of fricken control with assumptions and attacks its not even worth replying too, if you picked up all the shit in the world and put it in a single bag...this post of yours is more full of shit. Schizephrenia? really? what is wrong with you? If you were older than 14 you would realize the only thing I actually care about is getting meatsticks like you worked up because I know whats right, and your anarchist crybaby bullshit and supporting of criminals like Snowden is not right. He's a traitor, belongs in prison, end of story. The post is quite fair, look at your own posts. You're saying one thing in one post and the opposite in next post. It's nothing wrong with me. I'm just pointing out that you either have a problem, or you are so naive that you are convinced that you're right so you do anything to win this arguing. As for example go so far that you say against what you said the last post when you post a new post. Also, your word "meatsticks".. What the fuck is that kind of alias for your fellows (humans)?? It actually seems like you are 14, or a redneck. You act like one.
|
|
|
This link is foxnews safe... http://rt.com/usa/facebook-police-social-lipp-743/A partnership between police departments and social media sites discussed at a convention in Philadelphia this week could allow law enforcement to keep anything deemed criminal off the Internet—and even stop people from organizing protests. A high-ranking official from the Chicago Police Department told attendees at a law enforcement conference on Monday that his agency has been working with a security chief at Facebook to block certain users from the site “if it is determined they have posted what is deemed criminal content,” reports Kenneth Lipp, an independent journalist who attended the lecture. Lipp reported throughout the week from the International Association of Chiefs of Police conference, and now says that a speaker during one of the presentations suggested that a relationship exists between law enforcement and social media that that could be considered a form of censorship. According to Lipp, the unnamed CPD officer said specifically that his agency was working with Facebook to block users’ by their individual account, IP address or device, such as a cell phone or computer. I support this, monitor and track those anarchist hipster morons, then arrest every one of them, put them in prison where they belong. Same stupid image he posted before Oh its right...just teenage anarchist meatsticks don't understand it..."meeerrrr we're sticking to the man! Merrrr yeah!" Ah, you with all the assumptions again. Go somewhere else with your conspiracy theories. I'm still wating your reply if you haven't forgot. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=272505.msg3592230#msg3592230
|
|
|
Death returns you to the same state before you were born, where you are all knowing and as powerful as you make yourself. You can do anything without an ego.
Death is completely predictable, psychedelics would give you a glimpse of the afterlife, yet there's a good chance that you're ego is too scared to try.
Agreed. +1
|
|
|
USA, land of the free?
|
|
|
Drop clearnet! Tor/I2P
|
|
|
This link is foxnews safe... http://rt.com/usa/facebook-police-social-lipp-743/A partnership between police departments and social media sites discussed at a convention in Philadelphia this week could allow law enforcement to keep anything deemed criminal off the Internet—and even stop people from organizing protests. A high-ranking official from the Chicago Police Department told attendees at a law enforcement conference on Monday that his agency has been working with a security chief at Facebook to block certain users from the site “if it is determined they have posted what is deemed criminal content,” reports Kenneth Lipp, an independent journalist who attended the lecture. Lipp reported throughout the week from the International Association of Chiefs of Police conference, and now says that a speaker during one of the presentations suggested that a relationship exists between law enforcement and social media that that could be considered a form of censorship. According to Lipp, the unnamed CPD officer said specifically that his agency was working with Facebook to block users’ by their individual account, IP address or device, such as a cell phone or computer. I support this, monitor and track those anarchist hipster morons, then arrest every one of them, put them in prison where they belong.
|
|
|
"Patrick McMullen, who had hoped to study computing at Cambridge University, was boasting about the high kicking in from taking half a gram of ecstasy and three LSD tabs when he suddenly keeled over."
When you take such high doses, IMHO you're begging to die. No, I'm not defending drugs. They can harm you. But so can sugar in high doses too. If you use recommended dosages like 120mg MDMA(ecstasy) which is the current volume on the dosage for patients that tries this out in a controlled situation with a doctor for research, it probably won't hurt you much. And no, I'm not recommending anyone to use it.
|
|
|
|