Can your guys publish a comparison of features with other crypto projects that are perceived to be your direct competitors?
interesting question,there are any similar projects? and if so, what are the strengths that will eventually make this project stand out from the others?... Well, there were previously projects dealing with data transferring but I do not know how are they now... |
|
|
|
thanks for the video, even if short, points out its usefulness for the whole world and why it is worth investing... Really, thank you for sharing with us, the activity on youtube troxe channel credibility in the previous stages, very good to see videos appear again here, albeit with short duration I think Dr. Dennis is not working full time on EHF so it is nice that he occasionally appears in those videos. The appearence of a doctor who recognized ehealth indeed is a great thing for the project. It means a lot for us to keep supporting it. yes, the support of a doctor means a lot for the users who believe in the project, who knows if he works full time for ehf it would be interesting to know... I have seen once a sport project advertised by a football player - that was really logical and cool. Here, some similar thing will definitely do good to the project. |
|
|
|
Since the community manager is not really active here, maybe Laneaxis team can think of doing a Q&A session, every place is ok, slack, reddit, I don't care as long as they would host one
You are right, when the community manager is active - in theme more detail explained all information that can't be found in whitepaper. Right? Because whitepapers aren't always very clear and this one seems outdated to me (because again, it's stated that ethereum mining is CPU friendly when we know that right now there ethash asic out there) So much already has been said about the importance of the community managers and keeping community up to date with important information. Especially since quite some projects decide to go for the private sales only, you gotta keep your materials updated. Do they have a community manager or someone else who is active here? I hope it's not the thread creator... his last post was the ANN  Their team could at least conduct online sessions on the YouTube channel with questions and answers at least once a week. I think one of the devs is active in the thread, but weekly updates would be good of course. Maybe some short article from time to time. Weekly updates are usually shared in the medium account as well as in the twitter account, but it would be nice to actually get them together here on the topic, not everyone routinely accesses all their networks For some reason, the lion part of the projects' devs persist in ignoring threads here, forgetting that it's their main audience... |
|
|
|
Wow! Congrats to the team and community on this wonderful project! Already reached 100 pages of healthy discussions with regards to the SCIENTIFICCOIN. Keep it up!  Yeah, it shows that the community has grown and this achievement shows that ScientificCoin is interesting project - all questions have answers, due to community manager. The community has grown and the only thing that prevents the breakthrough of such a project is the market. Many at the end of last year were ready to work, but now everything has changed and the market has become more demanding. If the project will provide quick profits as promised by patents, then im think the growth will be exactly stable and fast. Yes, we are investing time and resources on the community aspects! If anyone wants to help, please vote us https://twitter.com/TokensMarketpl1/status/1042384899825709057Done! at the moment 81% voted for ScientificCoin - I hope that your project will win, and become hot ICO at this week. In fact is winning quite easily. It looks like they are not going to have to many problems to win it. The link seems inaccessible to me now, but if it is related to voting as the best project, I believe it will have more force than its competitors, I will vote as soon as possible 83% for scientificcoin - good result comrades. But it's only the beginning, only 18 votes yet... |
|
|
|
Why did you guys decided to have a private sale only? Isn't it more work? You have to discuss conditions with everyone who would like to invest separately and negotiate and stuff.
They are not expecting too many small buyers to participate their sale and going after big investors. Private sale as I know is the phase where investors could buy tokens in huge amount with good bonuses. While for public there will be the main sale where everyone can take part on it. There won't be any ICO as far as I know. Tokens are only being sold via private sale only. Ouch, I didn't notice it before. This for sure will be very different with the most projects I've ever seen. Idk whether this innovation will result in the better outcome or not but lets wish for the best. Differently, from other projects, our founders čut $500k in the initial project phase; now we are looking for the support of medium/large investors to speed up the growth. That's why we don't need an ICO. This is showing the ambition and belief of the team in the project. $500K is a huge amount and no-one put this kind of money to their project if they have any doubt of failure. That's true! It's quite a refreshing change that instead of greedy devs you have a committed team that believe in their project and its success. Wow, 500k usd for initial phase funded by the team, i didn't hear something like this for a long time. This dedication will bring you success definitely. It'S good that they have invested their own money. This makes them less dependent on the sale and they will make sure the project becomes a success. Also in my opinion this shows to community that they are not after some quick hit and run, they are here for the success of their project. It's like they believe or at least show others their belief in their own project. Anyways, I am not sure how it will turn own later on - good or bad... |
|
|
|
how are you guys planning to convince trucking company to use platform? do they going to be rewarded to use service?
That's a good question. The success of this projects highly depends on the adoption and here they will need to work a lot. I don't know if giving rewards to companies for using the service would be cost efficient for the platform, but some partners or loyalty programs in this area wouldn't hurt. I think this project will attract trucking companies because it eliminates the need for third party or middle men during the transaction, thereby saving them a significant amount of money. A lot of crypto projects targeted that removing the middleman and third parties in transactions and raise a lot of investment. So laneaxis has a huge potential in that area. Of course, the intermediaries must now be replaced. this is not the end of a perfect system that needs to be improved. The mechanization of many processes and improvements through such projects will soon take place. we are on the right track. I think this kind of tracking could quickly become standard much like your standard parcel tracking. So freight companies will want to adopt it because customers want it. Customers love decreased freight costs of course, because this can be a major cost in their balance, imo this project by removing middlemans can provide that solution to them. What middlemen will be removed though? Anyone who is just adding some cost to the final product and doing nothing or almost nothing I guess. |
|
|
|
|
It's like you are already get used to something and this goes well as far as it's ok for you; but then suddenly you experience much better thing and think - the hell, why not, it's much better than the one I used to...
|
|
|
|
Why did you guys decided to have a private sale only? Isn't it more work? You have to discuss conditions with everyone who would like to invest separately and negotiate and stuff.
They are not expecting too many small buyers to participate their sale and going after big investors. I think like this, following and doing marketing for the small investors and the other procedures(lots of kyc or etc.) can be painful so targeting big investors can be a smart decision, dont forget the recent market conditions, small investors are very conservative right now. But in many projects, exactly the small buyers consist a lion part of the investors and give the biggest part of money... |
|
|
|
Don't be sorry about communication. They have a very long roadmap and very busy jobs. They always update us time to time. Probably will do again at some point. So some patience would be better I agree with you. If you need daily updates jzst look for a different project. This one is super long term and Nicolas has never stopped updating the community. It's just a few weeks in between the news. I think it's Nikolay. Looks to me that they are working a lot on the background, so as soon as there are results we should be good. Also hope they gonna release the mvp as promised, that would be the biggest news. agreed, people are so impatient these days. investing in this one is for the long run not mooning anytime soon. Sure people will be impatient in ico projects but they should know when they want to join in ehealth because this project won't give return in a short time. Ehealth is for people who willing to wait longer. this is a long-term project, maybe at the moment there are no relevant news, when there will be i'm sure that the team will inform us promptly... Are we still making excuses for such a long roadmap? I think that here it is like an eternal reason. Do NOT blame the situation, look for the devs - they are doing absolutely nothing to satisfy our curiosity. Some people still invest in crypto because of the prospect of fast gains, so the words "long-term project" are really like a scare  But you are totally right. Despite the project having a long-term roadmap, devs should still make an effort in order to satisfy community's curiosity. Yes, and this is not the only project with a long roadmap. Having such a plan, they should undertake certain obligations. |
|
|
|
|
I would also prefer a WP alternative in simple English. This is not THAT complicated, but it's full of unnecessary technical details for me.
|
|
|
|
Why did you guys decided to have a private sale only? Isn't it more work? You have to discuss conditions with everyone who would like to invest separately and negotiate and stuff.
They are not expecting too many small buyers to participate their sale and going after big investors. Private sale as I know is the phase where investors could buy tokens in huge amount with good bonuses. While for public there will be the main sale where everyone can take part on it. There won't be any ICO as far as I know. Tokens are only being sold via private sale only. For me, the project without full ICO campaign is somewhat like underdog or something. It's a demo version of a full one, I just hope that this step will help the devs. |
|
|
|
You have quite a big number of competitors in the supply chain's sector by the way, Vechain, Waltonchain, Ambrosus to name a few, how are you confident to make a better platform? I'd really like an answer to this question
I'm interested in that as well, beside some of them, now i don't recall which started already to go live with their tracking system. Unless you are planning to use it with existing pool of customers, may not be very easy to move forward. Well, it is a very competitive sector but also it is a huge sector. There is a place for more than one solution. I believe they can succeed if they perform well. You are right. Competition is always good for the end users as it keeps all the players in their toes to do better. Right, stiff competition is a stimulus to better services and products, that is why monopoly is mostly forbidden in almost all spheres of life. |
|
|
|
For the use of the email or transfer of files for business use, will be charged some fee for such purposes of use?
I highly doubt that they will be able to stand the competition if they would have any fee for such sh*t. Everyone I know charge for this type of service but, the question is how much with respect to the competition. Oh, really? Could you provide some examples of these services, because all I know there are lots of 'em doing it for freeeeeeee. |
|
|
|
Don't be sorry about communication. They have a very long roadmap and very busy jobs. They always update us time to time. Probably will do again at some point. So some patience would be better I agree with you. If you need daily updates jzst look for a different project. This one is super long term and Nicolas has never stopped updating the community. It's just a few weeks in between the news. I think it's Nikolay. Looks to me that they are working a lot on the background, so as soon as there are results we should be good. Also hope they gonna release the mvp as promised, that would be the biggest news. agreed, people are so impatient these days. investing in this one is for the long run not mooning anytime soon. Sure people will be impatient in ico projects but they should know when they want to join in ehealth because this project won't give return in a short time. Ehealth is for people who willing to wait longer. this is a long-term project, maybe at the moment there are no relevant news, when there will be i'm sure that the team will inform us promptly... Are we still making excuses for such a long roadmap? I think that here it is like an eternal reason. Do NOT blame the situation, look for the devs - they are doing absolutely nothing to satisfy our curiosity. |
|
|
|
Timing is worse for ICO lately due to market condition. LANEAXIS seems good project and hope raise enough to finish complete platform.
As this has raised the soft cap already, there's no worries on that part. In fact it's better for investors if it isn't oversold, so it don't have to keep insane marketcap but there's more room to grow. Hard cap is anyway quite high and will be difficult to reach in this time. Softcap is reached and they will surely collect some more money in main sale so they'll have enough to develop their platform. It's just better for us investors in a short term if we thing about speculative value. Real value comes always in time and for that it's better that the ico funds are enough for everyone's salaries etc, so the firm can run even without profit for a while. Well that's also true, i am more or less of a ico flipper as i don't have enough patience to wait for a year as the value of the most icos don't survive long time. But i've got a good feeling about this. I don't think there are many projects ready to run for nothing for a while. Mostly, they are trying to thighten their belts for the sake of something, not for the sake of some mystery bright future. |
|
|
|
Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?
Health Monitor was a test to validate the main idea behind scientific coin: funding science with cryptocurrencies. Also, both projects share some investors and team member (included me  ) Interesting. You were unlucky because had you launched scientificcoin last year you could have raised millions in an ICO. Wekk, I think it will succeed anyway.  You are looking toooooooo far. This is not the case when the project is doomed to be successful - it may go anywhere just because of dust in the wind... |
|
|
|
For the use of the email or transfer of files for business use, will be charged some fee for such purposes of use?
I highly doubt that they will be able to stand the competition if they would have any fee for such sh*t. |
|
|
|
According to the roadmap the MVP will be ready in October so we can expect big news in a few weeks. they made a funny mistake though and called it minimum valuable (instead of viable) product. If this is the case it means they must be working on it in this very moment, but still saw no news about it. Wish we are going to have a pleasant surprise. Taking into account how often they publish news is possible that they are working now on it and we don't know anything about it. I guess we don't have to expect regular news from the team on a weekly basis as we should consider that it has a longer than average roadmap. Imho. They don't need to give update in weekly basis. Once in a month will be enough therefore we will keep knowing that the team is still struggling with the project. I would say that regularity is an important thing here. If you post like 10 news in a week and then keep silence for two months - it's not a nice thing to do to your community. Anything goes here, at least be it regular. |
|
|
|
Blockchain Solution For Transportaion - not the best option to make mistakes in the initial topic, right? May harm reputation here a lot.
Yeah you are absolutely right, obsessed people (like me) can dislike these type of mistakes a lot. Anybody can make a typo in quick writing but it shouldn't be on the header of the topic. Me totally too, I am as obsessed as hell. Actually, I am a professional editor, and to be successful in that field, I should be having a grammatical pedantry syndrome, which is right the case with me... |
|
|
|
Why there is no information about the algorithm they are using. I found none in the white paper also.
We will publish soon an article on this subject Can't wait to see it. I hope it is dpos or similar thing which can bring more tokens to holders. new blockchain ? I support any project not ethereum erc20 As far as I know they are using BOINC algorithm which I don't think any other project has used til now in crypto space I checked the website of it and didn't understand a bit. And couldn't find any project using this algo either to check. Could somebody maybe elaborate a bit about this algorithm? I'm not familiar with it, would like to learn some. We promise to disclose much more information about algo in the coming weeks. I look forward to it. I have heard about BOINC. It is a piece of software that lets you help calculate science problems and support the scientists. Is it Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing? If so, I am right now getting to know it better by googling it)) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
