|
Any clue for easy regression to 10.6 in Debian/Ubuntu!?
|
|
|
|
|
Does the 1-week autopayment stand!?
|
|
|
|
Saluton! En Prago okazos konferencon pri interesa projekto nomita Bitmono. Bitmono estas discentra valuto. La mono ne posedas regantan aŭtoritaton kaj funkcias kiel baza reto. Kio signifas bazan reton? Ĝi signifas samtavola ŝutado, kie ĉiu persono egalas en la reto. Neniu persono povas ordoni al vi, ke li kreu regulojn pri kiel vi uzi vian monon. Ekzemple, retopaĝo ekzistas per Tor por aĉetado de narkotaĵo kiel Mariĥuano. Mi parolos tie pri bitmono, kaj feliĉiĝos kunvenigi aliajn esperantistojn. Mia nomo estas Amir Taaki. La ligo: conference.bitgroups.orgEsperanto, Linukso, Bitmono, Vikipedio, ... kaj tiel plu. Tiuj projektoj nature similas unu la alian. Vi pravas ke esperanto iel similas al tiuj grandaj liberigaj projektoj (inkluzive de Bitcoin). Ĉu vi havas ian kontakton kun la ĉeĥa esperanto-movado? Eble ili povas interesiĝi kaj partopreni (ekz. mi konas aktivan ĉeĥan esperantiston vikipediistan). Sed mi timas ke la oficialeco de la angla kiel konferenca lingvo fortimigus ilin. |
|
|
|
We cannot handle 2+ TH/sec like we used to, because it isn't worth keeping up the hardware at this time. That's why I'm looking at cancelling signups (private pool) or a major payout structure change: Get the botnets off and keep our regular users with a stable pool.
I have an idea that could help: instead of accepting bare shares, pools may accept shares over a given small difficulty; say 4, 8, 16... of course accepted shares should count up as 4, 8, 16... "normal" shares. This countermeasure should get down the legal flood and make easier to identify the DDoS flow. I don't know how much miner software should be amended to avoid alarming high rates of states if such solution is implemented. |
|
|
|
How strong of a power supply is needed?
That depends on the age of the machine (a pentium 4 is also very demanding) but for a single 58xx card usually a 400-500 watt psu has a sufficently sized 12v rail, one like this is on the lower end of the spectrum it would handle a single 58xx or a pair of 57xx without too much trouble http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817182202Be careful with PSU: I've recently bought a 650W one for one 5850 and it gave most of the power to the 5V, 3.3V lines and only a small fraction to 12V. So it was useless for my mining purposes. |
|
|
|
Me alegro hombre, varias personas trabajan para que funcione sin problemas el bH. Es verdad, como utilizamos las señales de LP para las minas que retrasan sus estadisticas a veces la consola no coincide con la realidad, pero con un poco practica puedes empezar ajustar la penalidad LP de las demas minas y hacer que bH averigue mejor cuando una mina encuentra el bloque.
Pues no tengo ni idea de cómo hacerlo :-/ Miraré lo del "workbench". De todas formas, yo pensé que bH tenía otra táctica para burlar a los "pool" que ocultan sus datos. Via blockexplorer o mejor pi.uk.com/bitcoin bH podría saber, en cuanto se resuelve un bloque, si el "pool" ganador está entre los minados por el usuario y apuntar allí el minero. El error que ves en consola esta provocado por el bot de que ayuda averiguar de quien son los bloques y lo hace por votacion en un canal IRC. Si abres el bh.cfg bajo la section [plugins] vas a ver uno que pone "lpbot", ponle "False" para desactivarle y dejara de molestarte. Eso no te afecta porque bH ya casi no utiliza este sistema.
Ok. Gracias. |
|
|
|
disable p2pLP.
Where is it enabled? I've revised cfg files but I didn't see such an option. If you mean p2pool, it is disabled. |
|
|
|
|
Tiene buena pinta y lo estoy probando. Pero tengo algunos problemas.
En la pantalla de estadísticas (localhost:8337/stats) veo que el programa calcula los "shares" totales en función de la velocidad del equipo (pool), pero NO como debiera, es decir, investigando el número real de "shares" y comprobando si el equipo ha resuelto el bloque.
Otras veces, los bloques se resuelven con demasiada rapidez, por lo que no está viendo bien si el equipo ha resuelto o no los bloques que dice. Luego, pasado el tiempo prudencial (los equipos retrasan sus estadísticas) se comprueba que no había tal consecución de bloques.
Y por último, el programa me lanza una y otra vez los siguientes mensajes:
Connecting...
Couldn't connect to socket: [Errno 111] ECONNREFUSED
Connect returned
|
|
|
|
|
I'm testing it.
I don't know if I'm doing things right. bf.cfg is the default one. It guides my miner to the pools correctly (I can see the effect of mining in the pool page).
But:
1) The reported shares for pools are a bit crazy. For example, bitcoins.lc seems to solve blocks too quickly. In this moment I shutdown bh and restart it; then, bitcoins.lc is in a "normal" round.
2) I've got in console the following annoying message: "Couldn't connect to socket: [Errno 111] ECONNREFUSED"
I have a Debian box.
TIA
|
|
|
|
My comparison (ON TOPIC AT THAT) was between Deepbit and BTC Guild ONLY..... 10% vs 7% for PPS payouts.
Are you sure? Don't you remember your own words? For those who PPS mine, BTC Guild's PPS Pool is by far the best So, even if English is not my mother language, I understand the best to be different from better thanSorry, you've got owned. |
|
|
|
No, compared to 0% fee of arsbitcoin and eligius, 7% is infinitely big.
About waiting: I'm not hurry.
About stability: BTCguild has a black past managing DDoS.
Must I really say P P S once again ? makes no difference at all with SMPPS, except for payment delay. I don't want to pay a 7% tax (or 10% in deepbit) for some hours waiting for my BTCs. |
|
|
|
For those who PPS mine, BTC Guild's PPS Pool is by far the best in terms of performance, stability and payout options. I don't understand why more people don't use it.
- Instant payouts (no waiting for a block to end, no confirmations...just a running total of your earnings available at any time).
- Insanely LOW Stales etc.....like INSANELY LOW (4/4000 shares ON A BAD DAY, for me anyways...closer to 4/40000 most times).
- Established Pool with history.
- Standard 7% PPS Fee.
This is an insane big fee. Compared to the 10% PPS Fee @ Deepbit ? ....... What PURE-PPS Pools offer a lower fee with stability and under 1% Stale count ? ..not to mention, paying out for bad blocks.....IMMEDIATELY, no wait. No, compared to 0% fee of arsbitcoin and eligius, 7% is infinitely big. About waiting: I'm not hurry. About stability: BTCguild has a black past managing DDoS. |
|
|
|
For those who PPS mine, BTC Guild's PPS Pool is by far the best in terms of performance, stability and payout options. I don't understand why more people don't use it.
- Instant payouts (no waiting for a block to end, no confirmations...just a running total of your earnings available at any time).
- Insanely LOW Stales etc.....like INSANELY LOW (4/4000 shares ON A BAD DAY, for me anyways...closer to 4/40000 most times).
- Established Pool with history.
- Standard 7% PPS Fee.
This is an insane big fee. |
|
|
|
|
I'm really shocked about how many people still mine on deepbit: big fees, no 8-decimal pays, no particular clear interface, no repayment after leaving, risk of deepbit getting more than 50% hash power... with the result it is the most powerful pool.
On the other hand, somebody could think they are using the income in good DDoS-reluctant counter measures, so those disadvantages are a worthy price for security. But the early catastrophe proves this is not true.
That is why I launch the poll, because I'm really curious about the matter of advantages mining in deepbit, even as a backup pool. Feel free to answer here, if your option is not in the poll.
|
|
|
|
Perhaps, but many users don't care about nor want NMC... what then?  Like me. I prefer money, instead of restaurant tickets. |
|
|
|
|
I'm really shocked about how many people still mine on deepbit: big fees, no 8-decimal pays, not particular clear interface, and... not DDoS-reluctant...
So, the worst pool has the biggest power. Incredible!
|
|
|
|
There have been some unconfirmed reports that 7800s have been delayed until next year.
I've heard they said that series 6xxx is so well selling, that launching early 7xxx is not worthy. I can't imagine why 6xxx is so wealthy for them... :-D |
|
|
|
Hi, is there any poll issues? Because im getting this message on both my rigs: work queue empty, miner is idle
Try mining on server2.arsbitcoin.com if you are not aleady doing so. Does this advice still stand? Will it appear on the frontpage of the pool? |
|
|
|
Friend, don't worry, be happy. It's just a crypto-currency that you are mining, it is not the coming apocalypse or anything dramatic.
I apologize if it sounds so dramatic. English is not my mother language. I hope the leaves of dramatism allow seeing the wood of my complain. |
|
|
|
So, essentially, you have no sense of humor...
I do. Believe it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
