Yes. I'm making fun of the fact that you don't. Or in language you can understand: wah, wah, wah wah, wah wah, wah. Moron.

Argument from authority! Plus, kind of racist. Argument from racist authority!

Actually, I think you just need to take off Trump's wig.

To stay on topic, though, if you put a Hitler mustache on Roger Waters, he looks like Hitler. Eh, he kind of looks like Hitler anyway. (Watch The Wall. People misinterpreted the fascist imagery.)

I agree. My argument was better. You're just a moron. Any sequence of words spoken in your direction will be heard the way the Peanuts kids heard adults. Wah wah wah. "Argument from authority" is simply a phrase you've learned to say at times, without even knowing what it means.

Roger Waters has been responsible for the creation of a lot of impressive music. But he's at least as "pig-ignorant" as Trump about the world. His world-view has been warped his entire life by the fact that his Communist father was killed while fighting the Nazis -- something for which he naturally blames the Jews.

This thread has so much potential.


teaming up to defeat the evils of Jewish Capitalist Slavery.

But several hours with no follow-up? Don't let me down guys.

In spite of your illiteracy, you do have a point. Again, I said "if" -- it wasn't intended as any kind of threat or even wish that he gets captured and beheaded on video. Nevertheless, it perhaps can be read that way. For this reason, I "retroact" the statement.

I don't hate Muslims. In my experience most Muslims are like most Christians -- they don't know jack shit about their religion. The problem with Muslims is only if they start learning about their religion and taking it seriously. I suspect most Muslims who get to the point that they start learning about their religion either (1) stop learning about it because of the consequences or (2) stop believing in Islam but pretend to in order to stay alive. It's the third category -- those that learn about it and believe more fervently -- that form groups like ISIS.

It's a conditional statement. If you don't want me to exterminate the human race, just keep Israel from being destroyed. It's to let you know you all have skin in the game. Every step you take towards help millions of Jews be killed -- again! -- is a step towards your own extermination.

But to set your mind at ease, I won't exterminate the human race through violence. I can use nanorobots to sterilize everyone.

Well I do know what CAIR is (and even how to spell it). Maybe you should look up the definition of "ignorant."

I don't think either of us are fearful. I'm someone who states uncomfortable truths that most people like to ignore in today's society. I'm not afraid to do so. You do what most ill-informed lefties do: make funny jokes about harmless Christians -- "hillbillies" in your words. You imagine you're speaking truth to power, when really you're just repeating lies to morons.

Your posts make it clear that you are literally are more offended by Scott Walker supporters than by people who engage in crucifixion. Are you proud of yourself? You're probably dumb enough to be.

If you ever get captured and beheaded on video, I am going to download that and watch it on repeat while eating popcorn and laughing. Maybe you'll rethink your worldview in the few seconds between the separation of your head from your body and your final loss of consciousness.

Yes, well, no one's going to visit the White House with a device that looks like this. Because everyone who's pretending people were stupid scared Islamophobes for thinking this looks like a bomb -- is a liar. They know it looks like a bomb. They're just liars. And they know it.

You're a fucking moron.

One example of "superiority" of Muslims is stated in Qu'ran 3:110:


And what about unbelievers? Qu'ran 8:12-14:


Now, I recognize that you'd be against this kind of rhetoric if it were used by "whites" against "non-whites" or "Jews" against "non-Jews". I also recognize you don't have a problem with it when it's used by "Muslims" against "non-Muslims." I also know why you make this distinction.

OK. I accept that you're opposed to violence when it's committed by Jews. Based on your other comments I also accept that you're opposed to violence when it's committed by people you decide are "white" (or maybe "white enough"). But Muslims? Non-whites? Well, then you're willing to make up stories about how it's actually the fault of Jews and/or "whites." I'm really glad I don't have to deal with you in real life and only in this sewer of a forum.

That would be quite bizarre. There are references to the superiority of Muslims over non-Muslims, and of Muslim Men over Muslim Women. Obviously you know this and don't care. But superiority of the "white races"? Why are you fixated on skin color? By the way, there are Muslims of all colors, and Islamophiles of all colors. This is one reason I said Islam is a terrorist meme, not a terrorist gene.

There are also lots of Muslims who discriminate on the basis of skin color. Here's an interesting passage from Ayaan Hirsi Ali's book Infidel describing her time as a child living in Saudi Arabia. (She's from Somalia.) The passage is talking about how her mother would walk them to and from school.


I highly recommend her writings. It's sad that she has to live in constant fear and sad how she's eventually going to be murdered.

If you think you are siding against racists by siding with Islamophiles, you are not. You are siding with some of the worst most hateful racists in the world. You are siding with people who make the KKK look like cub scouts.

I added a link to snopes to my signature that verifies that Palestians celebrated 9/11, something which is obviously completely obvious anyway.

I, like many others, saw the video of Palestinians celebrating on the same day. It was after the towers had come down. And it was clear they knew what they were celebrating. It is also historically obvious that Palestinians support terrorism, due to an extremely long list of incidents. It was a few years later that I started hearing people rewrite history to say things like "that was video of a wedding" when it obviously wasn't.

Do you know why you're denying that Palestinians celebrated 9/11? I do.

By saying "no such pattern has been found in any other country" you're referring to things beyond the U.S. (and Britain and the West generally). I don't think the Ummah (in any time period) was a "country," but it there have obviously been many geopolitical units that did far more to "civilize" (Islamize) the "savages" (natives) -- and in more brutal ways than the West. But you don't care about that. Do you know why? I do.

Just wanted to point out that this response doesn't include "yes, they were real Muslims." I doubt anyone will say that, even though everyone knows they obviously were. And that ISIS (and all the other Islamic terrorist groups) are following in Mohammed's example. Lying about it is also following Mohammed's example.

Regarding "terrorist genes" -- I don't know if there are or aren't -- but Islam is obviously a terrorist meme. It is an extremely effective one. Ultimately Islam may prove to be the most effective idea at reproducing itself and destroying ideas counter to it.

You should read more about the expansion of the Islamic world in its early history.