Still appreciate the suggestion, but would love to solve it without creating a self moderated thread though ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Set local rules, in which you specify that from this moment onwards, certain users are no longer allowed to post in the thread. If they continue, report the posts and point out to the Mods that they break local rules. Or: Hire an independent user to manage a self-moderated thread. It does look suspicious that they all registered recently. These users have posted in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1952324.0: 1. 171x Nimiq ( 3 Merit earned) ( BPIP) 2. 121x rngkll ( BPIP) 3. 109x nimiqshitcoin ( BPIP) 4. 102x F2b ( 161 Merit earned) ( BPIP) 5. 88x CryptoNeed ( 3 Merit earned) ( BPIP) ......... ......... See the full list here. Use this list to find and report offenders.
|
|
|
lulz... can I please get a special title "Such ADHD". From what I read, theymos sometimes grants requests for a custom title. You beat me by earning Merit on one more board than I did ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Quoted ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
I've just tested it: my Electrum 3.0.6 * gives this popup after sending a transaction: ![Image loading...](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi68.tinypic.com%2F4t0xa1.gif&t=663&c=RxuyZLDr1GP36A) It didn't disappear on it's own, and didn't stop the transaction. *I still have this old version with low balance in a VM, and didn't bother to upgrade yet because of the low balance.
|
|
|
He was buying merits and you reported him... Right? So that got him demerited? If that's the case, I'm curious what made Admin take away 1928 Merit from a user who had only 2. And if it's a punishment for spamming, why not just ban the user?
|
|
|
Update!February 13, 2019. Results ↑↓ after 6 months, with 4 months to go:
| | | | | Altcoin | | | Exchange | | | Start | | | Month 1 | | | Month 2 | | | Month 3 | | | Month 4 | | | Month 5 | | | Month 6 | | | Month 7 | | | Month 8 | | | Month 9 | | | End | | | | | 1. | | | 0.98450454 GBYTE | | | Bittrex | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.00959094BTC↓ | | | 0.00623531BTC↓ | | | 0.00661597BTC↑ | | | 0.00892677BTC↑ | | | 0.00812216BTC↓ | | | 0.00846674BTC↑ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 2. | | | 58.50783037 PIVX | | | Bittrex | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.00798866BTC↓ | | | 0.01022249BTC↑ | | | 0.01205261BTC↑ | | | 0.00936125BTC↓ | | | 0.01238903BTC↑ | | | 0.01172321BTC↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 3. | | | 11465.51724138 SC | | | Bittrex | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.00974569BTC↓ | | | 0.01158017BTC↑ | | | 0.01020431BTC↓ | | | 0.00791121BTC↓ | | | 0.00779655BTC↓ | | | 0.00710862BTC↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 4. | | | 212.23404255 XRP | | | Bittrex | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.00912394BTC↓ | | | 0.01415177BTC↑ | | | 0.01698085BTC↑ | | | 0.01887822BTC↑ | | | 0.01933664BTC↑ | | | 0.01785525BTC↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 5. | | | 56.46348000 NANO | | | Binance | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.02072774BTC↑ | | | 0.01659462BTC↓ | | | 0.01571379BTC↓ | | | 0.01362464BTC↓ | | | 0.01369804BTC↑ | | | 0.01359641BTC↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 6. | | | 3.63636000 NEO | | | Binance | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.01031999BTC↑ | | | 0.00915635BTC↓ | | | 0.00878908BTC↓ | | | 0.00631272BTC↓ | | | 0.00770181BTC↑ | | | 0.00828363BTC↑ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 7. | | | 79.73019000 WAN | | | Binance | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.01146520BTC↑ | | | 0.01214291BTC↑ | | | 0.01112236BTC↓ | | | 0.00759829BTC↓ | | | 0.00684085BTC↓ | | | 0.00634652BTC↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 8. | | | 83.63362106 NMC* | | | Poloniex | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.00897472BTC↓ | | | 0.00740324BTC↓ | | | 0.00722845BTC↓ | | | 0.01241875BTC↑ | | | 0.01614630BTC↑ | | | 0.01431138BTC↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 9. | | | 2446.07843137 DGB | | | Poloniex | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.00914833BTC↓ | | | 0.00905049BTC↑ | | | 0.00738715BTC↓ | | | 0.00594397BTC↓ | | | 0.00662887BTC↑ | | | 0.00594397BTC↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 10. | | | 0.67222271 XMR | | | Poloniex | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.01175381BTC↑ | | | 0.01103004BTC↓ | | | 0.01099084BTC↓ | | | 0.00837256BTC↓ | | | 0.00830755BTC↓ | | | 0.00906976BTC↑ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | | | | Total in Bitcoin | | | | | | 0.10BTC | | | 0.10883902BTC↑ | | | 0.10756739BTC↓ | | | 0.10708541BTC↓ | | | 0.09934838BTC↓ | | | 0.10696780BTC↑ | | | 0.10270549BTC↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | | | | Total in dollar | | | | | | $648.30 | | | $707.25↑ | | | $675,47↓ | | | $686,26↑ | | | $342,70↓ | | | $392,24↑ | | | $369.35↓ | | | $*7*↑↓ | | | $*8*↑↓ | | | $*9*↑↓ | | | $*10*↑↓ | | | | | | | | BTC dominance | | | | | | 51.1% | | | 56.2%↑ | | | 54.0%↓ | | | 52.6%↓ | | | 54.9%↑ | | | 52.4%↓ | | | 52.6%↑ | | | *7*%↑↓ | | | *8*%↑↓ | | | *9*%↑↓ | | | *10*%↑↓ | | |
* NMC has a very large price difference on different exchanges, that makes the average price on CMC much different than the price on Poloniex. Archived just in case it's needed later.
In the table above: "Start" is August 13. "Month 1" means the first month ended, AKA September 13. "End" means June 13, 2019.
|
|
|
That will make the current off-topic spammers move to other boards. I barely read off-topic, so I prefer to keep them there ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
2) I'll feel bad when BPIP launches a better service ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Please do so ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I've made tens of thousands of links to BPIP for a reason ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) 5) There is no way I will ever catch you for merit. ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Lol ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Can you alphabetize the names? Some lists are fairly long. I could, but I won't. I'm using theymos' ordering: oldest accounts first. especially with some of the latest and greatest of trust list jockeying that seems to be going on. This got me thinking of another improvement: I now highlights weekly changes: NEWRemovedNEW: Highlight weekly changesI now highlight weekly Trust list changes. Sample: (I have nothing against Foxpup, it's just a convenient sample to show changes) This created a complication: if someone isn't included in any trust list anymore, but was in the previous week, I now have to add a page again for that account. Example: maximus222. The BBCode, meant to copy onto the forum, won't highlight new or removed entries. Known problem: the BBCode currently shows the removed entries. This is for another time to fix.I was thinking for a little fun, filtering of lists could be interesting, too. Perhaps, limit the names on the list to three or four characters and begin backwards in the alphabet, too? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) those kinds of changes would help to put Vod higher on all lists, specifically. What's the fun in that? I've designed my ranking specifically to put myself on top ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
The bot sees the bbcode, and it allows only one character after your alias. When someone refers to for instance "LoyceV's data", it doesn't notify me either.
|
|
|
( the most merited regular wall observers ) ![Image loading...](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi66.tinypic.com%2F21e564p.gif&t=663&c=gWMEiDH5U-sFxA)
|
|
|
You will have to talk to timelord about bumping the two year old thread. He was the one who bumped it. I can confirm this. May I suggest locking this thread? We get it: you don't like Vod, Vod doesn't like you. It's been years, it's okay for people on the internet not to like everyone.
That was eight hours before Timelord2067's post. True, but editing doesn't bump it. I believe Timelord's post was deleted as well, which may have prompted him to post again. That makes sense and explains the bump right after the edit.
|
|
|
I don't want to bitch about it but this report marked as bad was actually correct. Mods are human, they make mistakes too. And there's this statement: "Do not worry about your accuracy too much". (I hate seeing my bad-count go up too, but I know it's all between my ears ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) )
|
|
|
No questions I have one: are you okay? But I am not going to remove you from my trust list. ~ We can't ask someone to add on trust list. Am I right ? So we should not ask also for remove from trust list ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) I'm on the same boat with this. OP is one of the few users on my trust list because I trust his judgement, ratings, and thorough analyses. I've been playing with the thought of dropping myself off DT1 by making a trust list <10 too. I figured it could make a statement, especially since I'm the most included DT1 after theymos. There's too much drama with DT1, and this might be a good way to show I don't like it. I haven't done it yet, but I'm still thinking about it. I was fine being DT2, and haven't added anyone unique to my trust list anyway.
You used to be DT1. I'm surprised you dropped out instantly, does that mean you can drop from DT1 the moment you don't have 10 users on your trust list anymore? This is not a question to OP, just a general observation.This explains it: Blacklisted on request ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Iasenko quoted a post from theymos. It fits this topic: ~ bitcointalk.org is not a normal for-profit company. Even if banning iamnotback somehow stopped all future ad revenue, he would still be banned, since his rule-breaking is disrupting the forum's mission of hosting free discussion of Bitcoin and related topics. (As explained above, "free discussion" is not "unmoderated discussion".) Similarly, I would welcome effective competition from decentralized forums, and I would be thrilled to be able to shut down bitcointalk.org in favor of a better-in-all-ways decentralized alternative. But although decentralized forums have existed for a long time (eg. Freenet's FMS is almost exactly what iamnotback keeps describing, and has existed since before Bitcoin), they have unfortunately not been widely used since the era of the semi-decentralized Usenet system, mainly due to vastly inferior usability.
|
|
|
|