Sounds like you got momentum. Any chance you'll hire me for a little bit of work on your game? I am a coffeescript/canvas ninja!
That is actually a possibility. Right now I have someone working on parts of the game like the payment handling, but I think there is still a lot of work to do on the game, if you think you can expand on the game by making new things to do, I'd be more than happy to bring you on board! PM'd.
|
|
|
I think this game is an awesome idea. I can't seem to download it though. I think you should try make it a web game to get more people to play, but I'm impressed that you got a working game!
|
|
|
For sale I have several Asus Radeon GPUs for sale. They are all in box with everything, were used for bitcoin mining in a cool environment and they were run at stock frequencies. They are in like-new condition and under warranty. PM or post here if you are interested. Current Memory Express prices: Radeon 6870 - $199.99 Radeon 6850 - $189.99 I am asking $160 for a Radeon 6870 1GB and $140 for a Radeon 6850 1GB, payable in BTC or cash, Paypal in certain cases. Prices do not include shipping, 2+ card discounts available. I am only selling because I am running out of room and we are upgrading to 5970s.
|
|
|
List updated: Newbie Lottery added. Jackpot Dice back online, added description. Added report about bitcointoss.com. Added pyramid schemes section. Added Bitcoin Pyramid. Added BTC Matrix. Hi mc_lovin can matrix referral programs be a part of gambling? It is like a game, can you look at my site and see if it fits on your list? Thankyou. http://btcmatrix.comI think it fits. It seems like a gamble! thanks for the backlink...
Your welcome!
|
|
|
whois information: [Querying whois.verisign-grs.com] [Redirected to whois.godaddy.com] [Querying whois.godaddy.com] [whois.godaddy.com] The data contained in GoDaddy.com, LLC's WhoIs database, while believed by the company to be reliable, is provided "as is" with no guarantee or warranties regarding its accuracy. This information is provided for the sole purpose of assisting you in obtaining information about domain name registration records. Any use of this data for any other purpose is expressly forbidden without the prior written permission of GoDaddy.com, LLC. By submitting an inquiry, you agree to these terms of usage and limitations of warranty. In particular, you agree not to use this data to allow, enable, or otherwise make possible, dissemination or collection of this data, in part or in its entirety, for any purpose, such as the transmission of unsolicited advertising and and solicitations of any kind, including spam. You further agree not to use this data to enable high volume, automated or robotic electronic processes designed to collect or compile this data for any purpose, including mining this data for your own personal or commercial purposes. Please note: the registrant of the domain name is specified in the "registrant" field. In most cases, GoDaddy.com, LLC is not the registrant of domain names listed in this database. Registrant: Domains By Proxy, LLC Registered through: Go Daddy Domain Name: BITCOINTOSS.COM Domain servers in listed order: NS1.NATIONALNET.COM NS2.NATIONALNET.COM For complete domain details go to: http://who.godaddy.com/whoischeck.aspx?Domain=BITCOINTOSS.COMDoesn't tell us much.
|
|
|
man, where have you been the last 8 months ? lol apparently living under a rock! I know, they are like 2009-2010 but I just heard about them now..
|
|
|
I don't really think it's worth it. 15 MH/s is like 0.01 BTC per day, so after 3 months you would get a bitcoin, only profitable unless you don't pay for electricity and I'm pretty sure the PS3 would burn out before then. A year ago this would have been very profitable, but 15 MH/s doesn't cut the mustard like it used to.
However, if you were able to make the GPU usage vary depending on GPU temperature, that would make sure the PS3 doesn't burn out. In that event, it would be worth using but you won't actually see a profit unless you can get free electricity.
I'd love to see the project work but I'm just a bit skeptical.
|
|
|
I know that if it goes lower, I have money ready to invest. So maybe I'm generalizing. Anyone in the same case?
Ditto. When the price is $2, buy $2000 worth for 1000 BTC, wait till price is $10, sell for $10,000. The price sways up and down often enough to be reliably unstable and there is so much money to be made in this system.
|
|
|
I can just see headlines now: Bitcoinica website source of major identity theft ring.
|
|
|
It makes perfect sense. If you see a bet that is close to the deadline, you have a much better idea of the outcome than one that is a year off. For example, there was a bet for the price of an ounce of gold at the end of 2011, and I think it was like $2000 or something, but the price was hundreds of dollars away from the goal and it was only a couple weeks away. I was positive my bet was correct, placed my bet, and I won 0.13 on 3.00 bet. If I had placed my bet 6 months ago or earlier, it would have been a lot more of a gamble, with a much better reward. I absolutely love the system.
|
|
|
I'm really excited about making interest on my bitcoin, but I don't think I understand the system.
I put 4.991 BTC on my Bitcoinica account as a tester to see if I get any 'daily' interest. This week I have not seen a single satoshi. How do I get this interest? Do I need a buy/sell position? Because I don't want to sell any Bitcoin, I figured they would just add it to my BTC balance.
|
|
|
Today's new GUI miner release has somewhat solved my problem.
I see that when I install 11.6, there are 3 devices, [cl:0:0], [cl:0:1], and [cl:0:2].
After installing SDK 2.1, there are now many more devices. [cl:0:0] - Intel CPU [cl:0:1] - Cypress [cl:0:2] - Cypress [cl:0:3] - Cypress [cl:1:0] - Cypress [cl:1:1] - Cypress [cl:1:2] - Cypress [cl:1:3] - Intel CPU
Which brings me to the conclusion that SDK installs an entire additional OpenCL platform for all devices. Makes perfect sense. Using the 0 platform devices, I get pretty decent hashrates (1.11 GH/s) and using the 1 platform devices I get pretty shoddy hashrates.
My CPU usage is once again 100% on one thread, but I can live with that unless someone can shed some light on how to avoid this, but at least i'm hashing!
|
|
|
I absolutely love Phoenix 2. I installed it on a dozen systems, and everything went smooth, hashing all around. But then I figured I could squeeze a few extra hashes out of my main system here, i was getting 1.12GH/s with a 5970 & a 5870, Windows 7 x64. All my other systems are just running the latest ATI drivers, but everyone is raving about 11.6 and SDK 2.1, so I figured I would give it a shot and roll back my drivers. I installed 11.6 and SDK 2.1, and now I'm having issues. I would uninstall ALL ATI software, install 11.6 then 2.1, uninstall, try 2.1 then 11.6, over and over, trying to figure out the order in which to install them. I know the order shouldn't matter, but installing SDK 2.1 seemed to have an affect. Installing the drivers as I thought they should be installed would work until I tried mining with Phoenix. MSI Afterburner would report the proper Catalyst version, and it would mine when I started it except I would get bluescreens, total lockups, or it wouldn't detect OpenCL. Also, it would appear that when I install 11.6, everything is good, but installing 2.1 gives me an additional unwanted GPU in Phoenix. Screenshot 1Right now in my cfg file, if I leave all my configuration commented (just the card configuration) it should default and start mining. It shows 4 GPUs. This only appears after I install SDK 2.1. Hopefully I have the right version, the app filename is ati-stream-sdk-v2.1-vista-win7-64.exe. . This current installation I have uninstalled ALL ATI software, installed 12.1 drivers and SDK 2.1. If I just install 12.1, it only hashes at 1.00GHz (120MH/s less than before) but when I install 2.1 it gives me much faster speeds but not faster than before I started messing with things. Once I install 2.1, my CPU USAGE IS ZERO on all cores. This is why I haven't changed the current installation. In this first screenshot, it detects [cl:0:0], [cl:1:1], [cl:1:2], and [cl:1:3], however when it starts mining, I see [cl:0:1] and [cl:0:2] submitting shares (these, plus [cl:0:3], are what it should be displaying, or at least it did before), additionally we see [Cypress 0,1,2] submitting shares, so there's some madness going on! Screenshot 2So if it detected [cl:0:0], so let's tell it to ignore it. [cl:0:0] disabled = true was added to the above screenshot. You can see it no longer detects it, but we still have shares coming from both the [cl:0:1]/[cl:0:2]/[Cypress 0,1,2]. Screenshot 3So I figured if it is detecting [cl:1:1], [cl:1:2], and [cl:1:3], let's disable them. I commented the [cl:0:0] disabled line because if it isn't commented it doesn't use the 5870 at all. Screenshot 4So let's uncomment the card configurations. CPU usage goes up. It actually feels like it's mining now. Hashrate is around 1.04 GH/s. If I leave the [cl:1:1], 2, 3 disabled = true lines off then it detects them and then I see the [Cypress 0,1,2] submitting shares as well. Screenshot 5This is an interesting situation. Hashrates go up to 1.16GH/s and CPU usage is ZERO. The system has very low stale shares except I let it run all night and it crashed some point in the night. Also, temps are higher here than ever. I think i'll stop with the screenshot posting madness, I'm just trying to figure out why sometimes my CPU usage can be zero and hashrates be high, when sometimes I install 11.6 and my CPU usage is 100% on all cores. Bearing in mind, all my other computers are mining happily and this is the only machine I am having problems with. If I uninstall all ATI software on it and put on 12.1, my hashrates do not go above 1.00 GH/s. Sum Ting Wong! Are these bugs in Phoenix? Something I am doing wrong when installing drivers? Is there a magical order to the installation? When installing your ATI drivers, do you uncheck the SDK version from the custom installation and then install SDK 2.1 after? Or before? I tried unchecking the SDK version in installation and Phoenix said it didn't see any OpenCL devices. If I put 11.6 on here I get bluescreens and driver crashes constantly so I might need some advice. My goal here would be to have 0% CPU usage and go back to a 'normal' situation where devices are detected properly.
|
|
|
|