|
We return to 4 digits, what is the problem? crisis, recession, political tensions, it doesn't matter
BTC is here to stay, if for you 4 digits is cheap, buy.
|
|
|
|
Congratulations Mic! I miss those days when I used to have more merit than you. It was something like 600 vs. only 300, now it's 899 vs. 2448.  Three things I'm absolutely sure of: 1. My death. 2. Bitcoin reaching $100k in the next five years. 3. I'll NOT beat Mic in terms of merit ever again. You will also arrive, you are one step away from being legendary. Here is nothing free in this world.
Bull..... It's called an airdrop. Almost everyone here has received free coins and tokens. Dump 'em for BTCFREE BTC! I know, but I'm not interested, they ask for a lot of data, custionaries, participation in social networks. DAFUQ is "custionaries" ? There is quite a big difference between saying you're not interested in something free, and saying nothing is free. It seems you don't want to understand my answer. NOTHING, it's free, and if you believe otherwise, you have a lot to learn.  Satoshi Nakamoto
If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
|
|
|
|
Congratulations Mic! I miss those days when I used to have more merit than you. It was something like 600 vs. only 300, now it's 899 vs. 2448. Three things I'm absolutely sure of: 1. My death. 2. Bitcoin reaching $100k in the next five years. 3. I'll NOT beat Mic in terms of merit ever again. You will also arrive, you are one step away from being legendary. Here is nothing free in this world.
Bull..... It's called an airdrop. Almost everyone here has received free coins and tokens. Dump 'em for BTCFREE BTC! I know, but I'm not interested, they ask for a lot of data, custionaries, participation in social networks. |
|
|
|
Probably the author (and VB001) wanted to troll us.
Exactly, I am a troll disguised as WO.
Congrats, Mic, special celebration tonight... edit:> Legendary celebration. |
|
|
|
 "Shit runs downhill", 2019 bull season edition.
I don't get it. Why do all lines converge at 1.00 on the "performance" axis? As was pointed out in a twitter comment beneath this tweet, "Shouldn’t this be normalized where all alts start at the same point to the left?" Though its clear the majority of the coins are above the axis, meaning they have fallen relative to BTC, it gives a weird impression. I can't answer you, most of the responses from the followers don't seem to understand the graph, the message is clear, ALTS down / Bitcoin up, but apart from this, the graphic is fine for an abstract art gallery. |
|
|
|
"Shit runs downhill", 2019 bull season edition.
This is the performance of the the top 200 coins measured in satoshi value (performance against BTC).
Note alts got particularly rekted after BTC broke out on 1st Apr. https://twitter.com/woonomic/status/1161320822344179720CMC: BTC Dominance: 67.5% |
|
|
|
UK Advertising Watchdog Upholds Complaints Against BitMEX Bitcoin PromotionThe U.K. Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has upheld complaints over a bitcoin ad placed by crypto derivatives exchange BitMEX (HDR Global Trading).
The advertising regulator published its decision on Wednesday, saying that it supported the four complaints against the ad that had claimed it “failed to illustrate the risk of the investment,” “exaggerated the return on the investment” and “challenged whether it was misleading.”
The ad, placed on Jan. 3, 2019, purportedly to celebrate the tenth anniversary of mining of the first block of bitcoin on the same date in 2009, showed a graph spread across two pages, according to the ASA.
The ASA further described the promotion, saying:
It included a footer on the front page of a national newspaper that read “Thanks Satoshi, we owe you one. Happy 10th Birthday, Bitcoin”, the graph and text next to it and a full page article written by the CEO and co-founder of HDR Global Trading Arthur Hayes titled “Two sides of the coin: the bifurcated near-future of money.” https://www.coindesk.com/uk-advertising-watchdog-upholds-complaints-against-bitmex-bitcoin-promotionF..k, the UK is changing for the worse, typical English humor is disappearing to make way for stupidity.
|
|
|
|
Barclays Is No Longer Banking CoinbaseThe most prestigious banking relationship in crypto has ended.
Barclays, the London-based global bank, is no longer working with cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase, industry sources told CoinDesk. And while Coinbase found a replacement in U.K. upstart ClearBank, according to people familiar with the situation, the change has indirectly inconvenienced the exchange’s users.
That’s because, aside from the cachet of working with a household-name bank, Barclays connected San Francisco-based Coinbase to the U.K. Faster Payments Scheme (FPS), enabling users to instantly withdraw and deposit British pounds at the exchange. The end of the relationship disrupted Coinbase’s access to FPS – which in turn slowed deposits and withdrawals in GBP for U.K. customers, which now take days to process. https://www.coindesk.com/barclays-is-no-longer-banking-coinbase
|
|
|
|
Good googly. That article is needlessly convoluted... Whilst some of these models out-compete the original model in terms of Akaike Information Criteria, all of them fail to reject the hypothesis that stock-to-flow is an important non-spurious predictor for the value of Bitcoin. Double negatives, arcane language... Overall I think what he is saying is BTC attempts a random walk but ends up basically sticking to the S/F model? Exactly, in my opinion, an inappropriate title, to finish the article that says the same PlanB. |
|
|
|
La pagina de bitnodes no es la mas fiable para determinar el numero de Nodos activos de Bitcoin, esta pagina solo monitorean los nodos de escucha, vamos que tu quieres tu nodo sea visible, la pagina de referencia donde tienen un gráfico online con todos los nodos de Bitcoin es la del dev. de Bitcoin Core Luke Dashjr, los nodos que escuchan y los que no, hacen exactamente lo mismo, con una diferencia, los nodos que escuchan permiten que otros nodos se conecten con ellos, ahora mismo están activos 59.111 Nodos.  https://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/software.html
|
|
|
|
|
Here is nothing free in this world.
|
|
|
|
El exchange de criptomonedas Binance advierte un ataque de 'dusting' contra Litecoin"Este ataque se refiere a un tipo relativamente nuevo de actividad maliciosa en la que los hackers y los estafadores intentan vulnerar la privacidad de los usuarios de Bitcoin y criptomonedas enviando pequeñas cantidades de monedas a sus billeteras personales". https://es.cointelegraph.com/news/crypto-exchange-binance-points-out-a-dusting-attack-against-litecoinEl ataque "dusting" (limpiar el polvo) consiste en enviar pequeñas cantidades +/- 0,00000500 a muchas direcciones de billeteras personales, que hacen o que consiguen con esto, los receptores al encontrar esta cantidad en su billetera, mueven o envían las monedas, es cuando los atacantes, rastrean las transacciones intentando averiguar información del usuario o del intercambio a donde se envían. Hay varias opiniones sobre como solucionar esto, recomiendan no mover estas monedas, pero también seria posible, creo, enviarlas a un par de direcciones nuevas y de ahí a un mezclador para poner mas trabas a los atacantes, Chipmixer, por ejemplo y seria bastante difícil saber a donde han ido las monedas. Este enlace de Binance (en ingles) describe este tema, ocurrido con Litecoin también hay un vídeo para ver gráficamente el proceso donde se muy claro: https://www.binance.vision/security/what-is-a-dusting-attack
|
|
|
|
Quería compararlo con el Bolivar, dada la naturaleza inflacionaria de la divisa que dista mucho del comportamiento del USD.
Según la pagina, tiene los datos actualizados al día, para igualar 0,01 USD hacen falta 252370 de Bolivar Venezolano Fuerte (VEF), es este el dato que estas buscando? https://es.coinmill.com/USD_VEF.html?USD=001 |
|
|
|
La SEC pospone la decisión sobre las propuestas de cambio de reglas sobre los tres ETF de BitcoinLa Comisión de Bolsa y Valores (SEC) de los Estados Unidos ha retrasado su decisión sobre tres propuestas de fondos cotizados en bolsa (ETF) de Bitcoin (BTC).
Según documentos publicados el 12 de agosto, la SEC ha pospuesto una decisión formal sobre los cambios propuestos en las reglas por NYSE Arca y Cboe BZX Exchange para tres ETF de Bitcoin: por parte de los gestores de activos VanEck SolidX, Bitwise Asset Management, y Wilshire Phoenix. https://es.cointelegraph.com/news/sec-postpones-decision-on-three-bitcoin-etf-rule-change-proposalsLos ETF, se les están atragantando, no hay manera de que esto se apruebe, esta bien que cuando se presento el primero hubiera muchas reticencias por las partes implicadas, pero a estas alturas ya huele un poco..., cada vez que adaptan o presentan una propuesta nueva, la tumban o la posponen. Con toda la información que tienen, solo estrechando un poco el circulo para hacer cumplir las normas y que el cliente no pueda salir perjudicado por causas de estafa, esto ya estaría en el mercado hace días, o hay otros interesados en presentar ETF,s y no los tienen listos o simplemente alguien dice, NO, encallando de nuevo el proceso.
|
|
|
|
Si, la imagen es muy didáctica, se entiende muy bien, si subes al autobús verde BCH el viaje se acaba en la próxima estación local, si subes al autobús naranja Bitcoin das la vuelta al mundo.  Es como un restaurante a la hora punta para comer, si tienes 2 y uno de ellos siempre esta vació y el otro siempre tiene clientes, esta claro a cual de ellos hay que ir. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
