Bitcoin Forum
June 19, 2024, 09:47:44 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 [103] 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 ... 257 »
2041  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: ⚡️[BOUNTY/REFERRAL] VANTUM - FIAT-RELAY SMARTCONTRACTS + MASTERNODES (666 ETH)🔥 on: August 04, 2018, 01:36:37 PM
I ask you to change my old purse address: 0xff67A6be9A06C9fE368a0b46168Eac16Df69fEC6
                       to the new purse address: 0x2A77e40b47C8990605509f377Cd2450c47a6BED8

Username: rinatvr2
Bitcointalk profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2178251
Native Language: Russia
ETH add:0x2A77e40b47C8990605509f377Cd2450c47a6BED8
Telegram: @RinatVRB
Contact: rinatvrb@gmail.com                                                 
Twitter:  https://twitter.com/rinatvr                             
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rinatvr
Thank!


You are rejected from the campaign because you have negative trust.
2042  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? on: August 03, 2018, 11:24:38 AM

Prevention of disease spread is accomplished by vaccination. There are two kinds of polio vaccine—oral polio vaccine (OPV), which uses weakened poliovirus, and inactivated polio vaccine (IPV), which is injected.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poliomyelitis_eradication

http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/polio/en/  (Fact 4, 5 etc)

''Do your research'' they yell..

Back at the end of the 1950s, polio was virtually cured, not by vaccine, but by redefining the symptoms. This means that the disease was not cured at all.

Today's redefined polio might be controlled by by medicine to some extent, but it is not the polio of the 1950s and before. More than likely it is a created polio, designed by the medical to match their medicine controls.

Cool

''not by vaccine, but by redefining the symptoms'' And you know this how? Where is the proof?
2043  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Evolution is a hoax on: August 03, 2018, 11:15:11 AM

Study entropy. The simplest way to describe entropy is the breaking down of complexity into simplicity. Entropy doesn't allow evolution over the long term to occur. In fact, entropy suggests devolution.

The reason we don't have any factual example of evolution is not because of its nature. Rather, it's because there isn't any evolution. All the talk of evolution is simply talk. When you add the rest of science to the science of evolution, you can easily see that evolution is impossible.

You are being played. Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

''Entropy doesn't allow evolution over the long term to occur.'' Badecker has alzheimer's or an IQ below 70, maybe both.

The theory of evolution does not contradict any known laws of physics. I have showed you this like 40 times before, of course your brain doesn't work normally. http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/astronomy-links/136-physics/general-physics/thermodynamics/816-does-evolution-contradict-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics-intermediate

Entropy doesn't contradict the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The fact that energy and matter remain without being lost, doesn't have anything to do with the form in which they exist. Entropy is simply the breaking down of the complexity of the form. It's all still there. It simply is less complex. There is nothing in nature that shows the opposite.

In addition, cause and effect, which is upheld by Newton's 3rd Law, shows that everything is programmed. Programmed mutations that cause evolution are not the evolution of evolution theory. ETE mutations have to be random and un-programmed.

Now, I can understand your inability to explain what you say... because there isn't any explanation for what you say. And, it's the major reason for not having found even one factual piece of evolution theory evolution, although countless billions or trillions of pieces should be available to make life what it is in the world today. So, why keep on maintaining the evolution fable?

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

''Entropy doesn't contradict the Second Law of Thermodynamics.'' HuhHuhHuh?

The second law of thermodynamics states that the total entropy of an isolated system can never decrease over time. The Earth is not a thermally isolated system because it receives constant energy from the Sun. This is the energy fixed by plants using photosynthesis, which is then acquired by herbivores that eat the plants and carnivores that eat the herbivores. It is certainly true that without this constant addition of energy to the Earth’s system, life would be impossible, but fortunately for us, the radiation we receive is like the constant motivation for the youngster to keep his or her room tidy. The second law of thermodynamics simply cannot be used the way the anti-evolutionists try to use it.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12052-009-0195-3

You are wrong.

''cause and effect, which is upheld by Newton's 3rd Law, shows that everything is programmed.'' No it doesn't.
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/newtlaws/Lesson-4/Newton-s-Third-Law
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/forces-newtons-laws/newtons-laws-of-motion/a/what-is-newtons-third-law
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%27s_laws_of_motion#Newton's_3rd_Law

Where does it say that everything is programmed?

Wrong again, as usual, I already showed you this dozens of times.
2044  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Evolution is a hoax on: August 03, 2018, 10:43:18 AM

Scientifically speaking I already gave you scientific examples of evolution confirmed by scientists. https://www.wired.com/2008/12/evolutionexampl/

All of this accepted by virtually all scientists... Just saying...

That's a nice science fiction article, there. But it doesn't have even one proof that evolution exists in it.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Think you are looking for examples of proof that is simple not available.  That’s does not mean you can’t deduct from proof that are there. Example can we agree on that humans average high have increased in say the last 100-200 years? If you take that premises as acceptable, even true, how are you going to prove that, 100 million years from now?

The chances that you are going to dig up 10 specimens of each gender, for every single year, for every region of the planet, many 1000 specimens in all, to make a good case, that is very hard to argue against, is statistical zero. Chances are you only have a few specimens of mixed gender, and mix completeness, cover those couple of 100 years. From that you deduct or rather make a theory.

In case of evolution, we far from have all the answers and far from all the proof to 100% support all branches of those theories. Working on it, but to say there is no proof, is your unsupported theory.

Think of it this way. In evolution we have 1 specimen from 3000 b.c, 2 from 400 b.c, a couple from 200 a.d and one from 1920. From that we have an evolution theory. Complete, narrr far from it. Work in progress. We are learning every day.


Study entropy. The simplest way to describe entropy is the breaking down of complexity into simplicity. Entropy doesn't allow evolution over the long term to occur. In fact, entropy suggests devolution.

The reason we don't have any factual example of evolution is not because of its nature. Rather, it's because there isn't any evolution. All the talk of evolution is simply talk. When you add the rest of science to the science of evolution, you can easily see that evolution is impossible.

You are being played. Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

''Entropy doesn't allow evolution over the long term to occur.'' Badecker has alzheimer's or an IQ below 70, maybe both.

The theory of evolution does not contradict any known laws of physics. I have showed you this like 40 times before, of course your brain doesn't work normally. http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/astronomy-links/136-physics/general-physics/thermodynamics/816-does-evolution-contradict-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics-intermediate
2045  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? on: August 03, 2018, 10:38:30 AM

I wasn't sure because you believe in stupid shit too, I thought you were religious. How is the evidence thingy going on? You got any?

A lot, and of much higher quality than your 'the politicians and corporate media says vaccines are perfectly safe.'

In fact vaccines are classified as "unavoidably unsafe" officially, and billions of taxpayer dollars have been paid out to victims.  That fact is well hidden from the public and we see this forum infected by mouth-breathers like you who cannot and will not research anything.

The reason why tax-payers foot the bill when there is no alternative but to pay off a victim (99.9% of the time the government weasels out of paying) is that the politicians give the multi-national pharma corporations financial immunity for damage.  This being the case, there is no need real need for safety studies and no real harm in falsifying data (like Merck did for Mumps in the MMR in order to keep their monopoly.)  Mumps is now popping up in highly vaccinated populations because it doesn't work for shit.  But Merck don't care...they have lobbyists.

By having something like 'unavoidably unsafe' in the fine print which nobody reads (in part because doing so make you a 'conspiricy theorist') there is another layer of legal protection against people who get fucked up from their shots.

http://www.hutchnews.com/a1f84eca-2bf8-5839-b94b-d0a0d1c6e7f6.html



How many people still die of polio? Do you know how smallpox was eradicated? Keep yelling DO YOUR RESEARCH HURR DURR THE GOVERNMENTS ARE CONTROLLING US, stfu man you are just another delusional troll, go back into your cave with your stupid conspiracies.

Polio was eradicated in the early sixties by changing its symptoms for diagnosis on the books. This was done because all the vaccines had failed, or had caused polio.

Smallpox was never eradicated. It simply has a cycle where it dies off in the community when people use proper hygiene and common sense in living with it. The medical simply took advantage by introducing vaccines at the end of the cycle.

Now and again you hear about new outbreaks, but with proper hygiene and nutrition, and care for the sick, the outbreaks die down. In addition, the medical sees to it that the outbreaks are hushed up, supposedly to keep the populace from panic. But it is really so that the medical can save face from their failed vaccines.

Cool

Prevention of disease spread is accomplished by vaccination. There are two kinds of polio vaccine—oral polio vaccine (OPV), which uses weakened poliovirus, and inactivated polio vaccine (IPV), which is injected.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poliomyelitis_eradication

http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/polio/en/  (Fact 4, 5 etc)

''Do your research'' they yell..
2046  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? on: August 03, 2018, 08:18:32 AM

I wasn't sure because you believe in stupid shit too, I thought you were religious. How is the evidence thingy going on? You got any?

A lot, and of much higher quality than your 'the politicians and corporate media says vaccines are perfectly safe.'

In fact vaccines are classified as "unavoidably unsafe" officially, and billions of taxpayer dollars have been paid out to victims.  That fact is well hidden from the public and we see this forum infected by mouth-breathers like you who cannot and will not research anything.

The reason why tax-payers foot the bill when there is no alternative but to pay off a victim (99.9% of the time the government weasels out of paying) is that the politicians give the multi-national pharma corporations financial immunity for damage.  This being the case, there is no need real need for safety studies and no real harm in falsifying data (like Merck did for Mumps in the MMR in order to keep their monopoly.)  Mumps is now popping up in highly vaccinated populations because it doesn't work for shit.  But Merck don't care...they have lobbyists.

By having something like 'unavoidably unsafe' in the fine print which nobody reads (in part because doing so make you a 'conspiricy theorist') there is another layer of legal protection against people who get fucked up from their shots.

http://www.hutchnews.com/a1f84eca-2bf8-5839-b94b-d0a0d1c6e7f6.html



How many people still die of polio? Do you know how smallpox was eradicated? Keep yelling DO YOUR RESEARCH HURR DURR THE GOVERNMENTS ARE CONTROLLING US, stfu man you are just another delusional troll, go back into your cave with your stupid conspiracies.
2047  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? on: August 02, 2018, 05:52:22 PM

My God wouldn't allow governments to do it anyways, don't you agree badecker? God is powerful, he wouldn't allow this evil to happen, right? RIGHT?

Actually, your god, the devil, is the one who caused all the evil. It is also the one who is deceiving people into thinking that money is more important than human life, so that they go out and kill other people using vaccines. And you are evil, right along with it, by promoting it's agenda.

Why is it that you attempt to bring your religion into everything? And then you disguise it by suggesting that it is good, when you know it is evil?

Lucifer is the 'light bearer'.  He brings 'illumination' to his people and lets them see things in a 'better' way than we who don't know his teachings.  God is the bad one who tries to keep people ignorant.  Ignorant Christians (like you) and Atheists (like me) get 'good' and 'evil' mixed up because we reject or don't know the teachings of the light bearer.

That is a basic thesis of how some of these creeps think.

Surely a god wouldn't allow this to happen, I mean how could he? Nah, no way.


I'm an Atheist.  It's all hocus-pocus to me.

That doesn't mean that I cannot differentiate between a decent person (many/most people who know and follow Christ's fundamental teachings) and a scumbag (many/most 'Lucifarians'), or that I cannot have a preference for one over the other.


I wasn't sure because you believe in stupid shit too, I thought you were religious. How is the evidence thingy going on? You got any?
2048  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? on: August 02, 2018, 05:19:29 PM

My God wouldn't allow governments to do it anyways, don't you agree badecker? God is powerful, he wouldn't allow this evil to happen, right? RIGHT?

Actually, your god, the devil, is the one who caused all the evil. It is also the one who is deceiving people into thinking that money is more important than human life, so that they go out and kill other people using vaccines. And you are evil, right along with it, by promoting it's agenda.

Why is it that you attempt to bring your religion into everything? And then you disguise it by suggesting that it is good, when you know it is evil?


Lucifer is the 'light bearer'.  He brings 'illumination' to his people and lets them see things in a 'better' way than we who don't know his teachings.  God is the bad one who tries to keep people ignorant.  Ignorant Christians (like you) and Atheists (like me) get 'good' and 'evil' mixed up because we reject or don't know the teachings of the light bearer.

That is a basic thesis of how some of these creeps think.



Surely a god wouldn't allow this to happen, I mean how could he? Nah, no way.
2049  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Evolution is a hoax on: August 02, 2018, 03:40:04 PM

Scientifically speaking I already gave you scientific examples of evolution confirmed by scientists. https://www.wired.com/2008/12/evolutionexampl/

All of this accepted by virtually all scientists... Just saying...

That's a nice science fiction article, there. But it doesn't have even one proof that evolution exists in it.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Well I mean, your argument is basically saying to anything that's proof of evolution, that is not. Not much of an argument really.

So far, every proof of evolution you have shown, is simply proof of adaptation and/or like-begets-like. It is proof of how people try to delude themselves and each other with lies, as well.

The neat thing is, when scientists get right down to showing proof for evolution, they admit that there isn't any, and that even the IDEA of evolution doesn't have much of any real support for itself - https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/07/fred-reed/signature-in-the-cell-and-intelligent-design/.

Cool

Religion is truly a mental illness. Look what it did to you, unable to accept anything other than a book written 6k years ago. Even your fellow delusional friends accept evolution.
2050  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? on: August 02, 2018, 03:38:45 PM

My God wouldn't allow governments to do it anyways, don't you agree badecker? God is powerful, he wouldn't allow this evil to happen, right? RIGHT?

Actually, your god, the devil, is the one who caused all the evil. It is also the one who is deceiving people into thinking that money is more important than human life, so that they go out and kill other people using vaccines. And you are evil, right along with it, by promoting it's agenda.

Why is it that you attempt to bring your religion into everything? And then you disguise it by suggesting that it is good, when you know it is evil?

Cool

Why would god allow this? Can't be, god wouldn't allow this, no way. Right?
2051  Other / Off-topic / Re: Flat Earth on: August 02, 2018, 01:44:20 PM
I can't decide if the fat phuck buffoon with the turkey leg and funny hat
is batshit crazy, suffering from acute OCB or running the longest trolling joke thread on bitcointalk.

Probably both.....

To be fair, it truly is their belief, just like Jehovah's Witnesses believe what they believe. I respect their belief, with sometimes their arguments are strong - others being wacky in my eyes.
I guess that a big question. People have all different kinds of religious beliefs. That's generally accepted in out society. Religious beliefs don't usually contradict science so much though. That's where this differs. Flat earthers believe and spread something that is contrary to science. They don't even have any other "doctrine". Maybe it would be less controversial even if they had a leader, who said God told him the earth is flat. Then at least they wouldn't be pretending that there's so much evidence. It would be more of a faith thing instead of blatantly misleading.


Flat Earth doesn't contradict science or religion, you're just a chump who belives the lies, that or a shill. Everybody who researches flat Earth becomes a flat earther.




Everybody who watches youtube videos of flat Earth and has an IQ lower than 70 or wants attention becomes a flat earther.
2052  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Evolution is a hoax on: August 02, 2018, 01:42:59 PM

Scientifically speaking I already gave you scientific examples of evolution confirmed by scientists. https://www.wired.com/2008/12/evolutionexampl/

All of this accepted by virtually all scientists... Just saying...

That's a nice science fiction article, there. But it doesn't have even one proof that evolution exists in it.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Well I mean, your argument is basically saying to anything that's proof of evolution, that is not. Not much of an argument really.
2053  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? on: August 02, 2018, 01:41:28 PM

But you still haven't provided evidence for your claims. That's what flat earthers say too, just look at the other side of the argument, there is no other side, we know the earth isn't flat. Maybe somewhere some specific vaccines can be harmful, could be but you are suggesting that governments and people around the world purposely make harmful vaccines, come on now..

As the guy who started this thread said, the entire thread is filled with pointers to valuable material.  In fact, if you look around just a little bit you'll find lots (in spite of the recent trend on the parts of the biggest corp/gov players like Google to memory-hole lots of stuff.)

If you have to have a government certified admission that the government is trying to push dangerous products to promote an agenda, you probably won't find it.  At least not as directly as you demand.  That's kind of how the world works.



''If you have to have a government certified admission that the government is trying to push dangerous products to promote an agenda'' Here is the thing, you are saying it as if only the governments have access to vaccines. Everyone has access to vaccines, from doctors to scientists to a normal person. Anyone can test them personally, how would a government do it? How would they make vaccines that are intentionally harmful without getting caught immediately? Specially when they give access to them to anyone, how would they pull it off? It seems impossible.


And as long as they can keep you and most of the other people thinking this way, they will be able to get away with it a lot longer.

Cool

My God wouldn't allow governments to do it anyways, don't you agree badecker? God is powerful, he wouldn't allow this evil to happen, right? RIGHT?
2054  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? on: August 01, 2018, 08:06:44 AM

''If you have to have a government certified admission that the government is trying to push dangerous products to promote an agenda'' Here is the thing, you are saying it as if only the governments have access to vaccines. Everyone has access to vaccines, from doctors to scientists to a normal person. Anyone can test them personally, how would a government do it? How would they make vaccines that are intentionally harmful without getting caught immediately? Specially when they give access to them to anyone, how would they pull it off? It seems impossible.


All of the standard tricks of propaganda honed by the adverting industry over the last century is one of the mechanism used.

In terms of 'science', the primary method of controlling information is by funding almost every entity who can get a hold of the equipment and techniques.  And torpedoing anyone's career who does not go along with the program.

Any study which pointed to problems with any vaccine will be immediately and forcefully rejected by a broad swath of society.  So we have a situation where there is no evidence that there are any problems with vaccine regimes because any studies which seem to indicate a potential problem are by default invalid and anyone who is involved in such a study is automatically a fraud.

In rare (though not totally unheard-of) instances someone or some group does some research which does get out.  It's actually fairly easy to do 'cutting edge' research on the health impacts of certain very commonly used medical technology because in spite of the propaganda, very few actual safety studies have been performed.  Much of the technology is considered 'safe' simply because it has been used for a long time and little actual bench science has ever been attempted.  Looks to me as though a lot of people have a hunch about what they would find and they don't want to go there for that reason.

http://www.curealternative.net/vaccini/alluminio_tomljenovic_shaw-cmc-published2.pdf

I'll help you with a response:  You can go to a site like 'realclearscience' or 'evidencebasedmedicine' and find some hit pieces on Dr's Tomljenovic and Shaw.  Then you can rest easy that all is good in the vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate world again.



As I said, you are exactly like a flat earther, making outrageous claims that the government will silence anyone immediately and bla bla. There is no point in arguing with people like you. If you truly think the government has the power to control every single study and everyone involving vaccines then you might as well not believe in anything. How do you know vegetables are healthy? They might be lying, maybe they have poison inside.
2055  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? on: July 31, 2018, 04:03:45 PM

But you still haven't provided evidence for your claims. That's what flat earthers say too, just look at the other side of the argument, there is no other side, we know the earth isn't flat. Maybe somewhere some specific vaccines can be harmful, could be but you are suggesting that governments and people around the world purposely make harmful vaccines, come on now..

As the guy who started this thread said, the entire thread is filled with pointers to valuable material.  In fact, if you look around just a little bit you'll find lots (in spite of the recent trend on the parts of the biggest corp/gov players like Google to memory-hole lots of stuff.)

If you have to have a government certified admission that the government is trying to push dangerous products to promote an agenda, you probably won't find it.  At least not as directly as you demand.  That's kind of how the world works.



''If you have to have a government certified admission that the government is trying to push dangerous products to promote an agenda'' Here is the thing, you are saying it as if only the governments have access to vaccines. Everyone has access to vaccines, from doctors to scientists to a normal person. Anyone can test them personally, how would a government do it? How would they make vaccines that are intentionally harmful without getting caught immediately? Specially when they give access to them to anyone, how would they pull it off? It seems impossible.

2056  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: [ENDED] ⚡⚡ P2PEP - Energy Trading Platform (BOUNTY HAS ENDED) ⚡⚡ on: July 31, 2018, 02:50:19 PM
The P2PEP bounty has now ended! To stay updated with our latest bounties, please join: https://www.t.me/BountyCloud
2057  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? on: July 31, 2018, 02:45:24 PM
...

That's just words, I asked for evidence not some conspiracy that you think it's happening. It's proven beyond doubt that they are not harmful, just like we know earth is not flat. If a scientist insists the earth is flat I wouldn't mind him getting fired.

All I want is for people to hear the other side of an argument.  In today's world even while we still have a relatively free Internet, many people never hear any dissent about certain programs that are critical to corp/gov.  These people don't necessarily deserve what's coming their way.  A small fraction of people will perk up their ears and start looking into the mountain of scientific evidence and/or they will ask themselves why the super obvious propaganda?  I've done my part and that's good enough for me.



But you still haven't provided evidence for your claims. That's what flat earthers say too, just look at the other side of the argument, there is no other side, we know the earth isn't flat. Maybe somewhere some specific vaccines can be harmful, could be but you are suggesting that governments and people around the world purposely make harmful vaccines, come on now..
2058  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated: Guess who is Sicker? on: July 31, 2018, 08:04:04 AM

Do you have any shred of evidence that vaccines are harmful or do you just like to use fancy words and talk out of your ass?

Yes I do.  Among them, the presentations of hundreds of doctors, scientists, etc.

Only in rare occasions can a doctor or scientist maintain their career if they question the 'official' stance on vaccination as dictated by corp/gov.  Academia is highly reliant on support from governments, corporations, and so-called 'non-profit' entities (which are places where the wealthy can spend their money on their pet projects without paying taxes.)  Thus, it is inevitably a terminal career move to study the 'science' unless one is prepared to come up with the 'right answer' by any means necessary.

Even so, the damage is so threatening and the ethical considerations so awful to a minority of people that some small fraction will speak out.  Even this small fraction makes a huge number of people.



That's just words, I asked for evidence not some conspiracy that you think it's happening. It's proven beyond doubt that they are not harmful, just like we know earth is not flat. If a scientist insists the earth is flat I wouldn't mind him getting fired.
2059  Other / Off-topic / Re: Flat Earth on: July 31, 2018, 07:55:49 AM


INFRARED TECHNOLOGY CONFIRMS FLAT EARTH -- https://youtu.be/EtVpy4T1_Zo

Youtube videos > science.
2060  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Evolution is a hoax on: July 31, 2018, 07:54:38 AM

Any website about anything might have the words random in it, we use it all the time. Poker is random, a lot of luck is involved, wouldn't you say? Science hasn't proved that everything is guided or has a cause.

That's a truly nice observation, there, but it doesn't have even a single proof that evolution exists in it.

There are millions or billions or trillions of readily observable instances of adaptation and like-begets-like. The odds for evolution happening even once are so small, that evolution is an impossibility, scientifically speaking.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Scientifically speaking I already gave you scientific examples of evolution confirmed by scientists. https://www.wired.com/2008/12/evolutionexampl/

All of this accepted by virtually all scientists... Just saying...
Pages: « 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 [103] 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 ... 257 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!