With fees, I see no problem with the market sorting it out. Except - when someone wants to minimize the fees of his own transactions, some transactions will suddenly take forever to confirm. So a possibility to raise the fee on a nonconfirmed transaction would be great. Has anyone suggested that, or is it unpossible technically?
Yes it is called replace by fee I'm not sure. With replace by fee, you can change other things in the transactions (like outputs), no? This makes double-spending much easier. I'm not sure wether "increase fee" can even be done, since it also requires changes to the outputs (and maybe inputs). I see replace-by-fee as a very bad idea currently. |
|
|
|
You can find it on the auroracoin.is website. These are the old wallets and yes 1.3.0.0 is the latest version. We are however just a few days away from publishing new wallets.
New wallets? So the price will start rising again  . I like it. you're jumping to conclusions. we might be due at this point for a more substantial correction (which is good, but I could be wrong) |
|
|
|
Excellent. Any serious Bitcoin business will have this view because retaining the 1MB will not only cripple the network but also cripple dependent business models. Except if the business model includes profiting from off-chain transactions. It's good to see coinbase support bigger blocks. I wouldn't have bet on it. What about circle? |
|
|
|
I love my TREZOR BTC wallet.
I love mine, too. It's become part of my life. Thank you satoshilabs! |
|
|
|
dump time  1 Million USD worth of shorts got closed on finex:  I like seeing these closed at low prices |
|
|
|
From the 2014 Annual Report published last month: Authorized Participants who make deposits of bitcoins with the Trust in exchange for Creation
Baskets receive no fees, commissions or other form of compensation or inducement of any kind
from either the Sponsor or the Trust. No Authorized Participant has any obligation or
responsibility to the Sponsor or the Trust to affect any sale or resale of Shares. Authorized
Participants may realize significant profits buying, selling, creating and redeeming Shares as a
result of changes in the value of Shares or bitcoins. In particular, an Authorized Participant may
profit from the “spread” (or difference) between the prices at which it purchases and sells Shares
and bitcoins (or obtains Shares or bitcoins through the creation and redemption of Baskets). For
example, when creating Shares, an Authorized Participant may deposit bitcoins with the Trust that
it has acquired at a price that is lower than the current Bitcoin Market Price and thus receive Shares
with a value greater than the Authorized Participant’s cost of acquiring the deposited bitcoins.
Similarly, an Authorized Participant may sell Shares to a customer from its inventory at a price
higher than the Authorized Participant’s cost in acquiring such Shares. As another example, when
redeeming Shares, an Authorized Participant may receive bitcoins and then hold them for later
resale at a profit if the price of bitcoins increases. The frequent and significant fluctuations in the
price of bitcoins increases the extent to which an Authorized Participant may profit from its
transactions in Shares and bitcoins. As of the date of this Annual Report, the only Authorized
Participant is SecondMarket, Inc., an affiliate of the Sponsor.
SponsorGrayscale Investments LLC CustodianSecondMarket Holdings The Only Current Authorized Participant SecondMarket, Inc The main question for me: Is it is possible for SecondMarket, Inc to receive creation baskets of shares and place them for sale on the OTC market without the 12 month lockup? If yes, SecondMarket could quickly arbitrage the OTC share price closer to the NAV of the trust while providing liquidity that the OTC share needs at this point. If no, the ask supply of the OTC share will be completely dependent on 12 month aged shares from individual investors. Meaning very low volume and little impact on the bitcoin market in general, at least for the reasonably near future. Care to comment Barry? I won't hold my breath. I second this question. EDIT: in fact I forwarded it on a medium Barry might listen on:  |
|
|
|
about $ 1 million USD longs closed (roughly equal to 4,300 BTC): A good thing tm |
|
|
|
|
ca. $ 1 million USD longs wurden geclosed auf bitfinex (entspricht ca. 4300 BTC).
Nur falls sich jemand fragt warum wir eingebrochen sind.
Und natürlich: meine Linie wurde durchbrochen (s.o.) ;-)
|
|
|
|
Bei mir steht dort gerade ne 175 statt der 42 O.o
hehe. ja, aber volume war bestimmt nur 1 share oder so. |
|
|
|
L33t  fett! jetzt $42 ist zwar alles mit großem Vorbehalt zu geniessen wg. sehr schlechten arbitrage-möglichkeiten (wenn ich's richtig verstanden habe), aber EGAAAAL. Mooon ;-) EDIT: das orderbook sieht aus wie von 'ner miesen altcoin beim vergeblichen 3ten pump-versuch. |
|
|
|
How much of the premine got distributed to Icelanders and how much did the dev steal?
we don't know satisfied? |
|
|
|
Thanks for the stats. I don't think you can add these number up, though. A lot of people are probably in more than one of these sets. |
|
|
|
 Mir gefällt diese Linie. Hat viele Berührungspunkte und fast immer wenn sie durchbrochen wurde, war ein erheblicher Move im Gange oder die Folge. |
|
|
|
Sieht definitiv sehr gut aus. Ich denke im Januar lag die Grenze der Holder irgendwo bei 220$, die wir jetzt schon öfters getestet haben. Diese Grenze könnte den Kurs jetzt langsam eingeholt haben und womöglich für einen langfristigen und etwas stabileren Anstieg sorgen - ist aber nur eine Vermutung. Bezogen auf die aktuelle Situation halte ich 270/280$ im Juni für realistisch. Das kann sich ja aber - wie wir alle wissen - schnell wieder ändern...
Was meinst du mit "Grenze der Holder"? Er meinte wohl "Grenze der Hodler". Dann sollte es verständlich sein. ach soooo! Klar, ich Depp. |
|
|
|
Sieht definitiv sehr gut aus. Ich denke im Januar lag die Grenze der Holder irgendwo bei 220$, die wir jetzt schon öfters getestet haben. Diese Grenze könnte den Kurs jetzt langsam eingeholt haben und womöglich für einen langfristigen und etwas stabileren Anstieg sorgen - ist aber nur eine Vermutung. Bezogen auf die aktuelle Situation halte ich 270/280$ im Juni für realistisch. Das kann sich ja aber - wie wir alle wissen - schnell wieder ändern...
Was meinst du mit "Grenze der Holder"? |
|
|
|
someone put up a 35kAUR ask wall today... someone else might have figured such an amount was hard to get without too much slippage and took the offer:  aurora-whales. |
|
|
|
|
bitspill, thanks for great transparency.
|
|
|
|
 etwas rausgezoomt (huobi), sieht man aber dass wir in einem schönen Uptrend-Kanal sind. Das letzte high (Nacht zum 1. Mai) ist übertroffen. Mal sehn wo wir landen. Ob wir die 1500 (~ $240) CNY schaffen? 1520 (~ $245) wäre ca. bei meinen oberen Begrenzungslinien des Kanals. Mit irgendwas wischen den beiden genannten Levels wäre ich zufrieden. So, und jetzt raus an die Sonne auf den Balkon, schön frühstücken  |
|
|
|
 hm, nachdem der kurzfristige downtrend gestern nach oben durchbrochen wurde hatte sich ein kurzfristiger Uptrend-Kanal etabliert. Dieser ist jetzt nach oben durchbrochen. Könnte lustig werden. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
