I've merited it, but didn't add it. I think a guideline on one website is too narrow to add as a general guide. |
|
|
|
Somehow the alignment is broken in part 2: |
|
|
|
I had some time to spare, mind if I help? You'll go nuts manually maintaining a growing list. I've used BPIP.org for Rank and Trust data, but the Merit data comes from last Friday's Merit data dump. I'll highlight banned accounts. There are some slight inaccuracies with the trust font color, "???" and bold font. I didn't spend more time making it completely accurate. TIp: Additional Options > Don't use smileys. |
|
|
|
... told me that they could not do anything because the hard drive is physically damaged.
If the hard drive is physically damaged (most likely damage to the read heads or platters... then the chances of using software to recover the data is pretty much nil. It would require specialist hardware to be able to recover bits and pieces and the costs involved would likely be very high... their initial quote of $400 does not seem outrageous. My advice: keep the list of coins, keep the drive, and store it safely. If the coins are ever worth enough in the future, you can try (expensive) data recovery. |
|
|
|
Deity, Ancient or Myth maybe.  I'm not a myth, maybe AI, but if there's going to be a new rank, I would like it to be just "Legend". My (x2) counter isn't really true, I don't have enough Activity. |
|
|
|
Although submit own thread is not wise but we should not discourage them. On the other hand thread is self moderate, once OP consider spam post then he is free to delete that. I recently deleted one very bad link. I've been very calm with the delete button in this topic, so far the entries are quite decent. I check all entries, but don't merit them all. Sometimes because I've seen the post already and didn't merit it then, and sometimes because it goes over my head and I didn't have the time to read enough pages from those topics. |
|
|
|
Let me quote from the Official Statement: After the dust settles we all need to remember the names of those who chose self-assertion over general public safety and acted irresponsibly. Was it really necessary to mention warith's full name 8 times? Coinomi calls him a "blackmailer", "irresponsible", and claims funds are "possibly still controlled by him". The entire Official Statement reads like damage control to me. |
|
|
|
To my knowledge, all banned accounts have their signatures taken away. Maybe this is an extra step to take for the Mod who bans him. If that's the case, it looks like a Mod forgot it. |
|
|
|
This user/spambots has not yet posted but I'm sure that intentions are the same. You can't report them before they post. |
|
|
|
I wish our DT members will put their attention on this matter soon to stop this kind of activities on forum No need: just report the posts, and he'll probably be nuked. |
|
|
|
I do not see that even one DT member marked manager account with red tag for as title say encouraging spam. DT shouldn't tag accounts accounts for things that should be handled by Mods. That's not only spam but also plagiarism, merit abuse and ban evasion, and from what I've seen, most DT members don't tag this anymore. |
|
|
|
A spammer testing his bot? And maybe testing the response time, all 30 involved accounts have been nuked. |
|
|
|
I think this one belongs in Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source  I couldn't find plagiarism, so I've sent him 6 Merit. It looks to me like a real user who isn't a spammer. That's what this forum needs for the future, and those users shouldn't be restricted by Merit. |
|
|
|
<...> I forgot to mention that these ranks are based on the merit amount regardless of the current activity, so I just added the notice below the chart.<...>
I looked into that option too, but strangely enough, we still seem to differ for some reason: I can reproduce your data: From Total number of users who received 1 or more Merit: 543. 99 Merit received by vh (#690806) from 12 unique users in 21 transactions
~
7080. 10 Merit received by (GrOOm) (#1613421) from 2 unique users in 2 transactions There are 7080-543+1=6538 users who earned anywhere from 10 to 99 Merit. I take into consideration the initial amount of merits, that is, the rank on the day the merit system is introduced also matters. If a user was a Member (or higher) on January 24, 2018, he/she couldn't rank up to his/her initial position. That makes sense I'm not going to try to reproduce it. |
|
|
|
Activity: 2000
Merit: 2000 That's going to take me another 1.5 years, you'll probably beat me to it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
