|
02 & 07 - icopress
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
I raise this thread because I see no reason to create a new one. McAfee archive ... has it already been decrypted? |
|
|
|
Bitbollo, grazie... Immagino sia inutile dire che apprezzo i tuoi sforzi! A proposito, ho aggiunto un collegamento a questo thread come thread di discussione in italiano, quindi se dimentichi di aggiornare l'OP l'anno prossimo, te lo ricorderò (non sorprenderti se vedi qualcuno graffiare la tua Chrysler).  Spero che le mie parole senza senso in italiano siano ancora almeno un po' chiare.  Storie poco edificanti successe fuori di qui, che preferirei rimanessero fuori si qui.
Questa community è piccola, ma ha alcuni pregi innegabili.
È per questo che mi piace e mi do da fare per farla crescere il meglio possibile.
Mi hai incuriosito... Non voglio deviare dall'argomento della conversazione, ma ti sarei grato se indicassi dove puoi leggere di più a riguardo. |
|
|
|
I don't want to be the harbinger of bad news, but an urgent loan and a quick repayment followed by another loan request is a bad sign (with a larger amount).So be on the lookout if HedgeFx applies for a third time and requesting more than before.  |
|
|
|
Hopefully it'll be my first yellow cap! Looks like two people can still catch up by getting a correct score and they're both going for a United win, while I picked a 1-1 draw  Should be pretty exciting to see who comes out on top. Do I cheer for a United win or for my yellow cap? 🤔 This is a great example of why we all shouldn't publicly state our expectations ... because I was in exactly the same situation, (It seems that a huge number of points warms the soul, but due to the absence of a yellow cap, it becomes not so rosy).In any case, you are not alone in your disappointment as the second goal in the 97th minute knocked my accurate prediction for this match off balance.  |
|
|
|
If the private commercial sponsors (like Sportsbet, CryptioS, ChipMixer, BestChange) [...]
It's just a matter of misattribution, since CryptioS is a BCA partner and not a sponsor, since it supported our endeavors from the very beginning, without pursuing any commercial goals, (as far as I know, they have only one large client with whom they have been working for many years). Not to mention that this company does not specialize in the production of collectibles ... most of the equipment was purchased because of this event. Although this makes some sense, I'm not in favour of a hard rule for it. Merit sources are free to send Merit the way they want. I wouldn't Merit people just for making a certain vote though. In general, I agree with you, and most likely next year I will come up with a mechanism that will limit any influence on the vote, (I even had the idea of only accepting votes from those who created their own trust list, lol... but unfortunately that would be a conflict of interest). Using my own example, I can say that in my understanding there is nothing wrong with sending merit to a user who spent 5 minutes making a meaningful choice. The difference is that some users don't share my opinion and use the merit system as a way to say thank you. It's not official, but the fact that it shows up as News on top of this page makes me believe it is at least endorsed. Let me put it this way: promoting the use of a custom Trust list never made it to that level (although I believe it should).
I think it would be possible to consider this event as official only if Theymos hypothetically contributed something more tangible to the awards. Rewards: | Community Awards will be held under the auspices of the forum and the prizes are directly dependent on community voting. The Administration has kindly agreed to assign the winners Custom Title, to express gratitude to those who have made an exceptional contribution to the development of the crypto community.
The "Merit Prize fund" is a kind of addition to the "Custom Titles" and is intended to award the I, II and III place winners.
| | | |
█ Custom Title cannot be chosen at will, it can only be earned by public recognition.
█ Awarded to winners for an indefinite period of time, displaying the year of distinction.
█ These abilities are subject to moderation, and can be taken away for any reason.
█ It is not guaranteed that you will be able to wear the title forever, as software changes may make this feature impractical.
| | | _________________ | _________________ | |
[...] offered such a huge sums of money.
You are mistaken, I can say with confidence that for companies of this size this is not a significant amount. |
|
|
|
When will we see new statistics? Btw, guys, if anyone is interested, here is a link to all past updates. |
|
|
|
Guys... get your asses up, stock up on beer and join in soon!  |
|
|
|
[...] I don't see any point in continuing the discussion with you either in Russian or in another thread, since you are simply diverting the conversation ... with this attitude towards others, you should consider creating your own guild of subjective standards. Moreover, I already gave you a detailed answer in Russian, which included answers to key questions, and moreover, in the same post I mentioned the situation with sockpuppets. This kind of behavior reminds me of a M'Twain expression “Never argue with a fool, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience''. |
|
|
|
icopress is on my no-trust list for the same reason that these members are there: [Balthazar, KTChampions, tvplus006, witcher_sense, madnessteat, lovesmayfamilis, FontSeli, zasad@, Goran_] Something I did not notice that these users were in favor of banning signatures in the Russian version of the WO thread. [...] I used the tilde against you because you proposed to ban signatures in the "Analytics, Analysis, Forecasts" thread. I don't trust them
I consider them a group of people who illegally seized power in the Russian DT1
It's your right, but the irony is that: [1] I rarely communicate in the local section, [2] None of the users you mentioned are on my trust list. |
|
|
|
The above statement doesn't seem correct: Even without those 4 accounts voting for him, The0ldl_lser has enough inclusions to join the DT1-election.
Your evidence is in Ru, so I can't easily review it. But even if those 4 accounts aren't the reason The0ldl_lser reach DT1, if they're alts they shouldn't give any user more than one vote.
I know about the criteria, the problem is that until week 158 he was not eligible to participate in the elections [the moment when 5 alt accounts intervened]. I have nothing against this guy, I'm just for the fact that the 4 mentioned accounts would be blacklisted. By the way, Google translator should translate normally (I checked). |
|
|
|
LoyceV, I hope you don't mind if I refrain from creating a new thread Unlike the previous policy, I will not generally be trying to cultivate a good list; that will be left to the DT1 members themselves. However, I reserve the right to remove you and blacklist you from future selection if you engage in egregious and obvious abuse, or if multiple known alt accounts could be selected. Request to exclude 4 related accounts from the DT selection process. - Irrefutable evidence linking these accounts
Merited by witcher_sense (4), madnessteat (4), A-Bolt (1), imhoneer (1), tvplus006 (1), lovesmayfamilis (1), zasad@ (1)Thank you, I have long wanted to leave the forum, I do not need it and only took my time. [...] - Manipulation of the trust system [thanks to these voices, The0ldl_lser became DT1 for the first time this month]
Soon after the exposure, all the mentioned accounts began to distance themselves from each other (example 157/158 week). |
|
|
|
How to get the Boosted Odds:
- Register a new account on Duelbits (unless you have received an invitation email from Duelbits)
- Deposit at least $20
- Place a pre-match single bet on Rams to win the Super Bowl
- If you win, the additional winnings to reflect the 11.00 boost will be credited within 24 hours
The maximum stake for the boosted odds is $1. Any stake above this amount will be paid out at the normal odds. Am I the only one who thinks that this offer is more aimed at inattentive users? Or am I not fully understanding something? I just judge by myself and the first thing I noticed was the crazy odds ... but it wasn’t there, because after reading the conditions, 11 bonus dollars no longer seem so attractive to me. I would even say that it's more like a 50% bonus to a $20 required deposit (if the bet wins).  |
|
|
|
Steve, I'm pretty sure you know about this marketing opportunity but I'll say it anyway... FPL has millions of players and the twist is that every time you refresh the page you see the schedule for the next round and it would be really cool if here, instead of the logo of some unknown company, your logo appeared. |
|
|
|
So... there are about 400 points of difference between me and the first place, but I'm not upset because it was my first gaming experience. Preparing for the upcoming games, I still leave Bernardo captaining as he hasn't scored in a while and Manchester City have some pretty easy games ahead of them. (unfortunately I can't afford De Bruyne, because seeing that MU had a double game week, I preferred Ronaldo). I also got rid of the Arsenal goalkeeper by replacing him with Sánchez (for at least 4-5 weeks). So most of the players on my team are playing twice this week and next, the only thing I'm not sure is who to replace Maupé after the weekend (I think Dennis or Edouard as both will play twice). |
|
|
|
Which one of Satoshies, please specify [...]
If you think there are several Satoshi's on our timeline at the moment, please contact the Time Variance Authority and they will make adjustments as soon as possible. But if you're hinting at your patron, then I can assure you that last year he already received a consolation prize. As for the nominations in which Satoshi and Lauda won, I can assure you that this question also bothered me until I contacted [permanent@ban.com] them directly. They unanimously expressed their desire to trade their T-shirts for a T-shirt for CW and frankly, I was surprised that FedEx delivered the package to him before Christmas.  Did theymos asked to be removed?  I think if this happens, he will announce it himself .. but I, as a typical egoist, intend to refuse him! |
|
|
|
|
Villareal - Real Madrid
1. Match line - Away
2. Both to score - Yes
3. Number of yellow cards in the game - 4-5
Atalanta - Juventus
1. Match line - Away
2. Both to score - No
3. Number of yellow cards in the game - 4-5
21' minute
|
|
|
|
|
1. Huddersfield - 1:0
2. QPR - 1:2
3. Draw - 1:1
4. Bournemouth - 0:2
5. Fulham - 0:2
6. Derby - 0:1
7. Cardiff - 0:1
8. Nottingham - 1:0
9. Preston - 1:2
10. Coventry - 1:2
11. Swansea -2:0
Sportsbet username: icopress
|
|
|
|
|
15) Israel Adesanya
14) Derrick Lewis
13) Brunson, Derek
12) Kyler Phillips
11) Bobby Green
10) Jared Vanderaa
9) Casey O'Neill
8 ) Alex Perez
7) William Knight
6) Ronnie Lawrence
5) Renato Moicano
4) Carlos Ulberg
3) Dobson, Aj
2) Sergey Morozov
1) Jeremiah Wells
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
