Address 1CMLxDM4oathZX7EpzVZuU5fAtDfCyc16Z was archived in your profile on July 22,2017. Sign a message from there, and I'll tag the account as being hacked. Example: This is RealCracked5 from Bitcointalk confirming on December 20, 2018 that my account cracked5 was hacked./code] |
|
|
|
3. Are you the same person as hillariousetc? 3) No. Never heard of him. Trolololo  Well some one told me you were the same person but I thought it was unlikely due to both posting on the same meta board and due to the amount of posts on each account. Just wondering anyway. Work on your spelling. After that, check those feedbacks left on the account. |
|
|
|
I have the "bitcoin-wallet-backup-" file but i forgot the password, how can i restore it?
FYI: Determine wallets based on filenames (note: these are the default filenames, you could have renamed yours)
|
|
|
|
special "" Chihuahua
doberman bullet proof glass.
your blow up doll Don't you see it's virtually impossible by now for anyone to form an opinion on this matter? You have dozens if not hundreds of long posts on the same subject, and yet you keep dragging in completely irrelevant things. After reading many posts, I still don't know exactly what the "" is about, and I still don't know what marlboroza's initial tag said. |
|
|
|
Loyce everybody want you to be the king of BAKKT no poll or nothing needed for that  I didn't realize that when I picked this slightly bullish number, but I love how everybody wants me to win this thing |
|
|
|
Ladies and gentlemen, from now on we offer a stunning 25 BTC for the Superprize — nearly a massive USD 95,000 in current rates! Just half an hour later, it's over USD 100,000 now  Here you can play FOR FREE and earn some bitcoins on your True Flip account!
Guess the number and win 0.01 BTC!
All you need is to post 5 numbers from 1 to 100 in comments below. If one of them matches the winning number - the prize is yours! I can't believe I've missed this lottery for over a month! But, there's this: Giveaways/promos/etc do not belong in this forum!: To be specific, I'm referring to "Post in this thread for free x". That belongs in Games and Rounds. Though it isn't limited to that, in general you shouldn't be giving people incentives to post in your thread, it's disruptive to actual discussion.
You're risking your thread being closed, or even a (temporary) ban. Posting here for the giveaway has the same risk. May I suggest to move it to your thread in Games and Rounds? And can I make my entry there already? I'd like to join, but I don't want to break forum rules. |
|
|
|
Here you can play FOR FREE and earn some bitcoins on your True Flip account!
Guess the number and win 0.01 BTC!
All you need is to post 5 numbers from 1 to 100 in comments below. If one of them matches the winning number - the prize is yours! 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 |
|
|
|
Any updates regarding this?
There's this suggestion: With the introduction of reporting badges on the horizon we should consider introducing badges for other things. Most importantly I think looking at the possibly of rewarding a badge for setting a custom trust list. The trust system is wholeheartedly broken and theymos has even said himself its not working as intended. We are not sure of the positive effects that badges bring at the moment. But this is why reporting statistics should be released before the implementation of the badges and then after an initial period (3 months) we should look to see if this has increased the number of reports being made. I think it's a very good idea! A shiny badge under a name will be something others notice, and if clicking it brings you to your trust settings, more users can be encouraged to make their own list. (I haven't made my own list yet, because I want to be able to see trust the way most users see it) |
|
|
|
I would have been in time to fit the 10 days account age, but I'm not allowed to join according to chapter 12.2 of the Terms. I've never seen The Netherlands excluded anywhere, guess my government's gambling monopoly is increasing in power  |
|
|
|
|
Is there any chance you can restore deleted files to find back your original wallet from before the upgrade? If so: stop using your computer right now, and run recovery software by plugging your disk in another system.
If that's not possible: can you (as a test) create a new wallet with the previous version of Atomic Wallet again? Then, write down your new seed phrase (don't deposit!) and write down the Bitcoin address it gives you for deposits to your wallet.
Then, upgrade to the new version again, restore from seed, and compare the Bitcoin address you get. If this is different again, at least you can reproduce it.
|
|
|
|
Is buying merits allowed here? It is allowed, but just like buying accounts, it's heavily frowned upon and you risk red trust from DT. Buying Merit is like buying a medal, you may actually get what you want, but without any accomplishment. Judging by your post history, you can earn Merit on your own. You got 2 from theymos already, that's worth something! |
|
|
|
I may have figured out what the problem is I'm just speculating here: could it be caused by the way you handle posts from " recent"? I've been scraping that too, and on frequent downloads with slow posts it often gives the same post again. If you keep track of the latest postID, you should be able to easily prevent processing the same post twice. |
|
|
|
What would you expect to happen? I'm not sure. It would be nice if the system would reach a certain equilibrium at some point, instead of needing a war or a plague to reset and start over. |
|
|
|
Badges? We don't need no stinking badges... Talk for yourself: I've reported over 2,500 posts with 99% accuracy. I want one: 5000! Now where's my badge? Seriously though, of course it's not a priority |
|
|
|
If we give a table with 100 million addys with their privatekeys, AI could be able to get an equation to direct get the private keys from addys. This won't work, there is no "equation" that returns a one-way hash. Mycryptopedia explains it better than I can: Hash functions are powerful because they are ‘one-way’. What this is means is, it is possible for anyone to use a hash function to produce an output when given an input; however, it is impossible to use the output of the hash function to reconstruct its given input. |
|
|
|
Can’t wait to see everyone’s guesses get recked including mine  My pick can be "recked" with any amount, and I'd still win I'm already looking forward to call myself King of BAKKT when the bull moons. |
|
|
|
Weird http://loyce.club/Merit/history/163641.html shows who sent the Merit: 1 from Steamtyme 3 from Zocadas 2 from Lanatsa I can dig up the last post (merited by Steemtyme). You posted this before any edits: eternalgloom
163641
48367327
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#4">Other</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=24.0">Meta</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5078423.msg48367327#msg48367327">Re: Be patient about getting merits. </a></b>
<br />You're not going to get any merits from posting these sorts of replies. <br /><br />I mean, you're replying to threads with 1 sentence replies, that do not add anything useful. <br /><br />Examples: <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Now, do you think those replies deserve any sort of recognition for being good replies? I don't think so. I lost 2 merited posts in that thread too |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
