He is famous for manage spam free signature campaign. A bounty campaign can't survive on this forum without spam, as long as only spam threads get most exposure.
|
|
|
Perhaps a solution would be to invalidate the code after xxx number of consecutive attempts to login to an account not associated with the code. Shouldn't that be implemented for incorrect passwords too? If you fail more than 10 times, you should get a captcha again. That also stops any brute-force attack in case your unique link is leaked: If someone else gains access to your unique captcha-bypass link, then they could try to brute-force your password. In that case, you should reset it:
|
|
|
Fees are always an estimate based on past transactions. Fees can go up, which is what happened when mempool filled up with the recent Bitcoin price drop.
You can use CPFP or RBF, but unless it's time sensitive, I would just wait. Your transaction will confirm when fees drop again.
|
|
|
Judging by Bitstamp's order book, I need to market sell about 2200 BTC on there to be the winner ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I'm just under 2200 BTC short.
|
|
|
5134 LoyceV 5151 d_eddie 5248 iram1011 5264 LFC_Bitcoin 5420 mfort312 5454 supermine if i'm right then this is the closest to itMy prediction is suddenly nearby ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) I'm okay winning this, as long as I lose the BAKKT-game to vit05 ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Most likely he is working on it. One merit for 500 good report isn't big deal for forum. I don't think new people will encourage to make report only for single merit. Now imagine this: -bots create 10,000 accounts -bots start spamming "great project" with 10,000 accounts -1000 bots start reporting the other 9000 accounts -1000 bots turn Jr. Member and continue spamming with signature -Mods run away screaming
|
|
|
I don't see any evidence for the "trust exchanging" as mentioned in the title. Was that deleted?
|
|
|
Would you suggest trying to send it back to coinbase as a BCH transfer at this point? I've never used Coinbase, so I can't answer this with certainty. I assume you can deposit it and convert it to Bitcoin, but before doing so, you'd better double check it. How did you get the Bitcoin Cash in the first place? Did you buy it after depositing fiat, thinking you were buying Bitcoin? If that's the case, I would definitely recommend to trade it for what you planned initially. You're not in luck though, BCH just dropped a lot against Bitcoin. I'm not sure what options I have in terms of making any purchases with that recovered wallet funds, or if I have any chance of converting it to BTC through any other method. I've never used Bitcoin Cash for any purchases, it's less widely accepted than Bitcoin.
|
|
|
Interesting. Trying it now, looks like fun game ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) If only more people joined ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) It could be so much fun creating bots to fight 10 people all the time, adjusting my bot when other bots change too, making it a continuous battle for improvement.
|
|
|
How do I recover it I was still editing my post ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
You're one of many who fell victim to Bitcoin.com's propaganda to pretend Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin. You've sent Bitcoin Cash to Electrum, a Bitcoin wallet. The good news is that you can recover it, but the bad news is that what you have isn't Bitcoin. Bitcoin Cash is a Forkcoin that took it's own path. The easiest way to recover it is to install Electron Cash, import your private key or seed phrase, and send your Bitcoin Cash to wherever you want. IMPORTANT:1. Make sure you don't deposit Bitcoin Cash to a Bitcoin address owned by an exchange. Doing so will most likely make you lose your funds. 2. I don't trust Electron Cash, and never install it on a real system. I would recommend either a separate PC or a VM. 3. If you have any Bitcoin in your Electrum wallet, move it to safety before exposing your seed phrase to other software. And create a new wallet with a new seed after compromising your current seed. This is just off the top of my head, make sure you know what you're doing before doing it, so you don't mess up.
|
|
|
I could have put a few things in place before starting the Survey but I was too gullible and didn't think someone would try and abuse it considering the low payout It's only low if you don't apply 1000 times ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) I've ran several giveaways in the past, and it doesn't really matter how low the reward is. It's always enough to be abused ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Spammers are reading too, a batch of Brand New accounts just joined ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
Kind of hating BCH right now.
I only now notice hate includes the word hat.
|
|
|
Isn't it easier to set a 1 Merit requirement to join? That takes care of most fake accounts. Giving red trust to their army of bots doesn't matter, they're all throw away accounts. And the bots cause a lot of spam elsewhere on the forum.
|
|
|
[SURVEY]|Take a quick Survey about Gambling & Bitcoin/Crypto|Get $3 in BTC is filled with Newbies posting plagiarism. I've only checked 2, both are guilty. If someone is bored, have a look there! Please ban/nuke Newbies sophie_sagit2, Antwan Koch and elisamorenatorres All banned! for plagiarism: Copy: Currently, The coin market is still not stable. The price go up/down continuously. It is so hard to know the trend exactly. So, selling coin or not maybe confuse. This market is not safe for us to trade. I think we should hold it now. Wait and sell it once available.
Original: Currently, The coin market is still not stable. The price go up/down continuously. It is so hard to know the trend exactly. So, selling coin or not maybe confuse. This market is not safe for us to trade. I think we should hold it now. Wait and sell it once available.
Copy 1: The price of Ethereum broke through the highest price in history last year and reached nearly $2,000, which was surprising to me. Afterwards, the price of Ethereum suddenly fell sharply. I purchased some Ethereums during this period and waited for the price to rise.
Copy 2: The price of Ethereum broke through the highest price in history last year and reached nearly $2,000, which was surprising to me. Afterwards, the price of Ethereum suddenly fell sharply. I purchased some Ethereums during this period and waited for the price to rise.
Original: The price of Ethereum broke through the highest price in history last year and reached nearly $2,000, which was surprising to me. Afterwards, the price of Ethereum suddenly fell sharply. I purchased some Ethereums during this period and waited for the price to rise.
The users who made the "Original" posts also posted in the $3 survey thread, and that was the last post they made. I'm pretty sure they all belong to the same spammer, but with many hundreds of accounts, it's way too much work to report one by one.
|
|
|
@Hhampuz: I checked 2 of the recent Newbies who joined, and both have posted plagiarism. It's quite obvious your survey started with many high ranking users, then continued with tons of Newbies that are no doubt owned by one or just a few users. Isn't this making your survey results totally unreliable? I wouldn't be surprised if the posts are made by bots. ( plagiarism reported here)
|
|
|
I almost forgot my monthly update ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) I'm glad I'm still on time. November 13, 2018. Results ↑↓ after 3 months, with 7 months to go:
| | | | | Altcoin | | | Exchange | | | Start | | | Month 1 | | | Month 2 | | | Month 3 | | | Month 4 | | | Month 5 | | | Month 6 | | | Month 7 | | | Month 8 | | | Month 9 | | | End | | | | | 1. | | | 0.98450454 GBYTE | | | Bittrex | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.00959094BTC↓ | | | 0.00623531BTC↓ | | | 0.00661597BTC↑ | | | *4*BTC↑↓ | | | *5*BTC↑↓ | | | *6*BTC↑↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 2. | | | 58.50783037 PIVX | | | Bittrex | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.00798866BTC↓ | | | 0.01022249BTC↑ | | | 0.01205261BTC↑ | | | *4*BTC↑↓ | | | *5*BTC↑↓ | | | *6*BTC↑↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 3. | | | 11465.51724138 SC | | | Bittrex | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.00974569BTC↓ | | | 0.01158017BTC↑ | | | 0.01020431BTC↓ | | | *4*BTC↑↓ | | | *5*BTC↑↓ | | | *6*BTC↑↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 4. | | | 212.23404255 XRP | | | Bittrex | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.00912394BTC↓ | | | 0.01415177BTC↑ | | | 0.01698085BTC↑ | | | *4*BTC↑↓ | | | *5*BTC↑↓ | | | *6*BTC↑↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 5. | | | 56.46348000 NANO | | | Binance | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.02072774BTC↑ | | | 0.01659462BTC↓ | | | 0.01571379BTC↓ | | | *4*BTC↑↓ | | | *5*BTC↑↓ | | | *6*BTC↑↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 6. | | | 3.63636000 NEO | | | Binance | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.01031999BTC↑ | | | 0.00915635BTC↓ | | | 0.00878908BTC↓ | | | *4*BTC↑↓ | | | *5*BTC↑↓ | | | *6*BTC↑↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 7. | | | 79.73019000 WAN | | | Binance | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.01146520BTC↑ | | | 0.01214291BTC↑ | | | 0.01112236BTC↓ | | | *4*BTC↑↓ | | | *5*BTC↑↓ | | | *6*BTC↑↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 8. | | | 83.63362106 NMC* | | | Poloniex | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.00897472BTC↓ | | | 0.00740324BTC↓ | | | 0.00722845BTC↓ | | | *4*BTC↑↓ | | | *5*BTC↑↓ | | | *6*BTC↑↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 9. | | | 2446.07843137 DGB | | | Poloniex | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.00914833BTC↓ | | | 0.00905049BTC↑ | | | 0.00738715BTC↓ | | | *4*BTC↑↓ | | | *5*BTC↑↓ | | | *6*BTC↑↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | 10. | | | 0.67222271 XMR | | | Poloniex | | | 0.01BTC | | | 0.01175381BTC↑ | | | 0.01103004BTC↓ | | | 0.01099084BTC↓ | | | *4*BTC↑↓ | | | *5*BTC↑↓ | | | *6*BTC↑↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | | | | Total in Bitcoin | | | | | | 0.10BTC | | | 0.10883902BTC↑ | | | 0.10756739BTC↓ | | | 0,10708541BTC↓ | | | *4*BTC↑↓ | | | *5*BTC↑↓ | | | *6*BTC↑↓ | | | *7*BTC↑↓ | | | *8*BTC↑↓ | | | *9*BTC↑↓ | | | *10*BTC↑↓ | | | | | | | | Total in dollar | | | | | | $648.30 | | | $707.25↑ | | | $675,47↓ | | | $686,26↑ | | | $*4*↑↓ | | | $*5*↑↓ | | | $*6*↑↓ | | | $*7*↑↓ | | | $*8*↑↓ | | | $*9*↑↓ | | | $*10*↑↓ | | | | | | | | BTC dominance | | | | | | 51.1% | | | 56.2%↑ | | | 54.0%↓ | | | 52.6%↓ | | | *4*%↑↓ | | | *5*%↑↓ | | | *6*%↑↓ | | | *7*%↑↓ | | | *8*%↑↓ | | | *9*%↑↓ | | | *10*%↑↓ | | |
* NMC has a very large price difference on different exchanges, that makes the average price on CMC much different than the price on Poloniex. Archived just in case it's needed later.
In the table above: "Start" is August 13. "Month 1" means the first month ended, AKA September 13. "End" means June 13, 2019.
|
|
|
Trezor uses 24 words by default. If you know only 3, there's no chance of recovery. Electrum uses 12 words, and that too can't be brute-forced. Each additional word adds 2048 possibilities, 2048^21 is impossible.
If there's no way to recover your seed words, your only chance is to find back your Trezor.
|
|
|
If you take my own address for example : 1KingZeeW97uLvngcUA3R6QJx18Fn78ddb
You're basically telling me that I need this many keys 2.207.984.167.552, -at least- to run through every possible combination of 7-letter words, and maybe land into the pattern I want. I'll (slightly) go against bob123's answer here: that number doesn't give you all possible combinations (it also gives you duplicate (wrong) combinations). Without doing the math, I guess it's the number of combinations you need to try for 50% chance of getting the right one. Imagine a base6 system instead of base58, with numbers 1,2,3,4,5,6 (a dice). Say you want to roll a 1. No matter how often you roll, there's never a guarantee you'll get a 1. But you know the chance of your next roll is always 16.667%, and the more times you try, the more likely it becomes to roll a 1 eventually.
|
|
|
Deleted.
What's that about? I expected this to be an edited post, but my near-instant scraper shows the same too: Parodium 1162397 47872074 <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#4">Other</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=59.0">Archival</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5023723.msg47872074#msg47872074">Re: Are you looking for me?</a></b>
Deleted. Don't 'make me curious, I hate that ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|