test the one already there, GLIBC is backward compatible Wink I tried that allready, guess i wouldnt demand for it if your upper version would work on rpi, is there a way on debian to crosscompile?? En Gruess A friend of mine got a RPi, gonna ask him if i can use it and build the miner on raspbian. RPi is ARM6 not x86/x64 therefore it wont work on it  En gruess i0coin, is there still a need for devcoind build for ARM6? |
|
|
|
did anyone find an adress yet? ^^
Not yet... better ask again in 10000 years  sure, gimme the technology to survive 10k years  |
|
|
|
And we have a nice luck streak again  got 5,07 bitcoin in 12 hours of mining  (~4,5ghs, estimated by p2pool 0,62-0,80/24hr) I assume I'm misreading this because of currency differences. In 12 hours we had 4 blocks. I'm at ~2 gh, which gets me about 0.3 BTC/block. That's 1.2BTC for 4 blocks. Scale that up to 4.5gh and I get 2.7BTC. How did you get 5.07btc? M Hi, made screenshot:  even another transaction ~5hours later wich made another 0,60 bitcoin for the block. And you can see each block gets me less, dont know why that is but I think its the PPLNS system... yes its the PPLNS systems, sometimes u get more, sometimes less. |
|
|
|
Just use IE to download proper web browser....
I'm not using IE as my main web browser. Thanks for the useless comment though! M EDIT: Seriously, I'm thinking the content tag can't be added w/o messing up JSON parsers that don't use IE. That might mean a whole new URL is needed. Maybe I can figure it out. Sorry, I mean no offense ... IE just sux and when s1 is telling that "something is not working on IE" it is mostly IE feature, not a IE bug  No offense taken. IE is awful, just awful, in so many ways. But it sure makes web scraping easy from .net. In this case I think I'll try the direct socket approach. M why argue with someone who recommends IE? |
|
|
|
+1 I think this was a terrible idea. What happens if we send bitcoin to terracoin addy? Lost coins?
Assuming the fork simply left addresses alone, Bitcoin would go to the Bitcoin clone of the terra address. In practice, yes, lost coins. wrong, get the priavekey of your terracoin addy and add it to bitcoin, you got ur coins back! |
|
|
|
TRC imho looks like I0coin and Ixcoin.
but TRC isnt MM able. It could be...if the developers found that getting 51% attacked isn't worth being allowed. Example: Namecoin or the coin of the kid, cant remember the name. |
|
|
|
TRC imho looks like I0coin and Ixcoin.
but TRC isnt MM able. |
|
|
|
thanks, this gonna help me alot |
|
|
|
Hahaha. Well he didn't get banned before he criticized Theymos on the forums, did he?
And yet a very strong majority of the people who have ever been banned on BitcoinTalk.org have not once criticized a staff member. If I'm understanding you right, that means that we should never ban someone once they criticize one of the staff? Because statistically, only a handful of people have been banned after criticising a staff member out of hundreds of people who have been banned, so you can't say that it's a problem in that sense. Nor are we banning an overly high number of people from the pool of people that criticise us, so that's not an issue, either. So again, you're saying that we just can't ban people period after they criticise the staff because it might be a conflict of interest. So then who does ban them if they do something bad? It can't be another staff member, because you still claim that is a conflict: in both of the recent ban cases (Rarity and Goat), another mod has approved of the ban. So, I guess we give the decision to the people? Well, damn, that doesn't work either, since they both had orange ignore buttons. So please, tell me, what the hell are we supposed to do in such a situation? Well, first off I should say that think the moderation policy is pretty good on the forums, generally, and I appreciate the fact that you are listening to me and engaging with me publicly. I don't think that if someone criticizes a moderator they should be immune from banning. I think, simply, that if you are going to ban someone you should do it for an objective reason and do it promptly. If Rarity was banned for trolling, then he should have been banned months before he had a chance to criticize Theymos. If Goat was banned for being a general fool, then he should probably have been banned even longer ago. Their behavior was tolerated for a very long time. It was only punished after they criticized Theymos and his personal business activities. If this is a total coincidence then it is a very strange one. I think most people would agree that this looks suspiciously like corrupt censorship, even if some of them think that Theymos has the right to corruptly censor anyone he chooses. I would suggest that if you are going to ban someone for trolling or idiocy, don't do it after they have been allowed to get away with it for months. Otherwise you might coincidentally end up banning them for long standing behavior immediately after they have criticized the chief administrator of this forum. And that looks bad. maybe he did bann him cause he tougd "now its tomuch". after all the problem got solved so where is the problem? the real problem would start if the moderators/admins would start banning without a resason! altough i didnt see this happen yet (if im wrong, proov pls ) |
|
|
|
good, have fun fixing it |
|
|
|
i dont think so |
|
|
|
Hey, I have most of my Karma invested with this bank. With the compounding interst I will soon have enough karma to never have to do a single good deed in my entire live.
I will basically retire on good deeds, all thanks to Treacheroso and the Karmic Bank.
im sry but are you totally retarded? if this is for real then im sry, ur life is a waste... |
|
|
|
what happend here?  has your hoster screwd u over lol? This doesn't look good /: well, a site that translates native to russian should never be trusted, first rule :S |
|
|
|
what happend here? has your hoster screwd u over lol? |
|
|
|
Why put an ignore function in the forum if all you're going to do is ban/delete people you have a problem with? Use the ignore function and everyones happy, who cares if someone posts something stupid? It happens all the time, I've said stupid things before that I kick myself for when I read back on it but I think when we just ban people we disagree with or who have legitimate criticism all we do is just wreck communities. I've seen it happen again and again wherever I go often the thing that kills communities isn't what people complain about, it's when admins try to fashion their own little utopian societies through force.
I'm shamelessly going to plug my website here, but you guys are more than welcome join up on my forum, you can post right away after you join and there's even a chat room I've set up that I've posted the link to, it'll practically be anarchy and I'll be sure to make sure the ignore/block functions work everywhere so you don't have to put up with any nuisance. My only plan regarding it is to ban virus posters and bot spammers.
if there would be no control bitcointalk would be to 75% of spammers, scammers and trolls. Im sry some ppl think if they have "freedom" they can du every shit they want. |
|
|
|
EDIT: nvm |
|
|
|
And anyone (everyone?) with an ASIC, having invested hundreds of dollars, will be a "serious miner" in my eyes...
Some people, such as myself, can't really afford the high bandwidth usage of running a node. That's the main reason I switched pools. high bandwidth? WTF? |
|
|
|
|
did anyone find an adress yet? ^^
|
|
|
|
its not mainly about privacy, its mainly about being in control what goes where. im root and therefore i should be able to decide which input goes to which output. @CIYAM Pty. Ltd. if its so easy, why arnt u creating a little wrapper (best in C so u can directly patch bitcoind with it ) for it? Altough i have to say i didnt check this function out yet, maybe its really that easy. |
|
|
|
yey just 2 blocks in 1 minute wtf? shut the hell up p2pminers are unionized, if they hear you talking about luck they'll take the week off. lol why should they We do not use the L word here and do not talk about it in any round about ways. Usually when someone does mention it, things go badly. Yeah the problem there is that there are some people who actually believe that the text placed on this forum can negatively affect the pseudo-random distribution of bits coming out of a fixed non-random mathematical equation Kano, stop spreading FUD. I have luck charms for sale and you're ruining my market. how much per "luck charm" |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
