~Exceptional posters earn merit at a much faster rate than their activity
~
Even a mathematical formula could be applied, I think. I would love to hear your thoughts about this. I can think of several distinct ways to do this: 1. More Merit than Activity (this seems logical, but you may miss out on high quality users who barely ever post, while you include users who post a lot and receive Merit for some of their posts) 2. More Merit than Posts (this is a much better quality indicator!) 3. Percentage of Posts that received Merit (now it becomes interesting!) I'll give some examples of each category (full data and explanation here): 1. LoyceV (  ). Since the introduction of Merit, I've received much more Merit than Activity, but only 0.38 Merit per new post and only 10% of my posts received merit. 2. gmaxwell earned 7.1 Merit per post since the introduction of Merit! 3. theymos received Merit on 32.8% of his posts since Merit was introduced. Update: after checking an update for gmaxwell, he fits category 3 even better with 59% of his posts merited. Depending on which criteria you choose, you can get a completely different list of users to follow. I would suggest a combination (kinda like Vod's BPIP Recognition), but categories 2 and 3 require extensive scraping from the forum to get the numbers for each user. |
|
|
|
The previous messages posted here where by the seller of the account, i am the buyer that was scammed. Did you just buy the account that was used to complain about an account trade, and now continue the same accusation from the same account posing as a different person? This is definitely a new level In any way, the same as yesterday still applies: where's the evidence? Chat logs aren't worth anything, as it doesn't even prove the seller owns the account he's trying to sell. In that case it could just as well have been theymos' account intead of Mikemark's account. |
|
|
|
I am little bit surprised that how a DT member could involved with account sale ? OP was only recently added to DT. |
|
|
|
I will contact suchmoon and ask him why he flagged me. Suchmoon didn't flag you, he's just the messenger: Your account showed up on modlog, and he listed it. |
|
|
|
What I meant by this, was adding to your list, the users that were merited within these topics and because this might be difficult to format into a list I suggested transforming the data into a table. If there are too many users merited within a particular thread, then I was thinking the users that have garnered the most merit from that particular thread be listed alongside it. That'll be a lot more data. I can do it per thread if there's a specific interest: It's a quick fix which used my existing scraped usernames (I accidentally used the list from June 18), and not all of them worked as expected, but you'll get the idea. With some more work I could add the amounts of Merit, and make a similar list for Merit senders in a thread. If interested, let me know. I could do this for all threads, and it shouldn't be too much work, but I'll end up with another 34 thousand output files The Wall Observer for instance: these users received Merit: 1. theymos 2. Elwar 3. Syke 4. Anon136 5. marcus_of_augustus 6. Holliday 7. pera 8. Remember remember the 5th of November 9. something went wrong getting the username 10. ghandi 11. Sitarow 12. macsga 13. becoin 14. FractalUniverse 15. adamstgBit 16. conspirosphere.tk 17. jbreher 18. Lincoln6Echo 19. tvbcof 20. Alexander_Z 21. vapourminer 22. cAPSLOCK 23. infofront 24. enter`name`here 25. arklan 26. Wekkel 27. smracer 28. jojo69 29. Dabs 30. Xian01 31. Gyrsur 32. samson 33. DoktorKopf 34. flynn 35. kingcolex 36. elg 37. something went wrong getting the username 38. afbitcoins 39. fluidjax 40. trepper 41. ErisDiscordia 42. yefi 43. bitserve 44. 600watt 45. Wolf Rainer 46. Peter R 47. DaRude 48. sa_94 49. fred1111 50. Biro Bob 51. ImI 52. ssmc2 53. markj113 54. tonyq 55. oda.krell 56. toknormal 57. Searing 58. BldSwtTrs 59. veleten 60. kromer 61. Lauda 62. kurious 63. BitChick 64. hd060053 65. Majormax 66. Dunkelheit667 67. something went wrong getting the username 68. PoolMinor 69. itod 70. mymenace 71. jonoiv 72. fragout 73. User705 74. xhomerx10 75. EatonABooger 76. STT 77. strawbs 78. JimboToronto 79. explorer 80. samsonn25 81. xyzzy099 82. rolling 83. Timelord2067 84. Tzupy 85. Asrael999 86. nanobtc 87. figmentofmyass 88. BinaryReign 89. lightfoot 90. Totscha 91. windjc 92. Wilhelm 93. exstasie 94. erre 95. gentlemand 96. Nosk 97. Ibian 98. Arriemoller 99. UnDerDoG81 100. sgk 101. marky89 102. Torque 103. CookieFactory 104. stompix 105. u9y42 106. Zicore47 107. Heater 108. Paashaas 109. Imbatman 110. AlexGR 111. p\F6nde 112. mindrust 113. bikerleszno 114. HairyMaclairy 115. mfort312 116. buyandhold 117. pawel7777 118. something went wrong getting the username 119. MNDan 120. luckygenough56 121. Bitcoinaire 122. doc12 123. Hueristic 124. Msile 125. orpington 126. DonQuijote 127. Stevenirving 128. slowlyslowly 129. somac. 130. Cassius 131. koryu 132. zazzbg 133. podyx 134. adaseb 135. Karartma1 136. Biodom 137. fortune143 138. RayX12 139. hodl_2015 140. Gab0 141. cgt99 142. suchmoon 143. Toxic2040 144. qwizzie 145. Globb0 146. soullyG 147. JayJuanGee 148. criptix 149. willope 150. romneymoney 151. nathalie20 152. nikauforest 153. birr 154. andreibi 155. bitebits 156. grn 157. javierbaco 158. oblox 159. WhatsBitcoin 160. Colonel Panic 161. BitcoinNewbie15 162. Tyr808 163. HI-TEC99 164. Vin 165. something went wrong getting the username 166. Febo 167. European Central Bank 168. AZwarel 169. EtherCoin 170. vanobe 171. DPoS2 172. BlindMayorBitcorn 173. rjclarke2000 174. Thekool1s 175. btcbeliever 176. scambust 177. YourMother 178. theymos_away 179. Neo_Coin 180. e-coinomist 181. illinest 182. White sugar 183. sirazimuth 184. LFC_Bitcoin 185. dmwardjr 186. thejaytiesto 187. Coinnosaurus 188. petahashminer 189. BTCMILLIONAIRE 190. Denker 191. Fatman3001 192. Aby Normal 193. alevlaslo 194. julian071 195. drays 196. Warren Buffert 197. BlackSpidy 198. bones261 199. \F0\BA\DE\E6 200. Astargath 201. LoyceV 202. actmyname 203. something went wrong getting the username 204. Last of the V8s 205. olseh 206. Maicol792 207. BitcoinNewsMagazine 208. supertee 209. RoomBot 210. xxxxxzzzzz 211. Jacques_Bittard 212. InvoKing 213. rafanadal 214. Robin,Hood 215. something went wrong getting the username 216. starmman 217. DeathAngel 218. BobLawblaw 219. eddie13 220. hv_ 221. bitChipper 222. the artful bodger 223. gembitz 224. B1tUnl0ck3r 225. Raja_MBZ 226. fabiorem 227. Romanknickl 228. player99 229. KyleSpades 230. iwantapony 231. something went wrong getting the username 232. Traxo 233. Ted E. Bare 234. Aqualung89 235. savetherainforest 236. posi 237. kaicrypzen 238. smartcomet 239. Harlot 240. promomei 241. bluebits 242. BlackMambaPH 243. ccminer.net 244. kronos123 245. Millionero 246. ivomm 247. Theb 248. ChinkyEyes 249. ophyrim 250. Lontonbit 251. yonton 252. Farmer Bill 253. something went wrong getting the username 254. scum 255. Phil_S 256. mike4001 257. centralbanksequalsbombs 258. pfrtlpfmpf 259. RewFrew 260. Derpinheimer2 261. AlcoHoDL 262. pacman7331 263. Ludwig Von 264. supremnoob 265. something went wrong getting the username 266. Samarkand 267. Icygreen 268. aundroid 269. Yaplatu 270. SidETH 271. d_eddie 272. josephpogi 273. pablomp 274. elrippos friend 275. micgoossens 276. aleksej996 277. kenzawak 278. bifle 279. Spaceman_Spiff_Original 280. bitcoinPsycho 281. styralf 282. MoonIsBlue 283. goldkingcoiner 284. realr0ach 285. milkshock100 286. Maricel2017 287. vroom 288. zerberr 289. ragnar0k 290. thisisntbic 291. RealMachasm 292. Fazlurkhan.kz 293. BitcoinBunny 294. Lopumbo 295. krzynek_one 296. cannycassiopeia 297. hisslyness 298. jonemil24 299. hamza987 300. babanana 301. anhzaibro 302. serg_13 303. something went wrong getting the username 304. _javier_ 305. topleskacah 306. serveria.com 307. Makkara 308. AR_fan 309. Rosewater Foundation 310. ACVinegar 311. TERA2 312. Bapt07 313. cofefeGandalf 314. RobSteward 315. Flamaicon 316. True Myth 317. greensheep 318. dxbcoin 319. Agapios 320. coinlocket$ 321. 4rt3m 322. cmacwuz 323. Ivor Biggun 324. r01k 325. something went wrong getting the username 326. LastJedi 327. ThePunisher49X 328. motoprose 329. Enjel 330. MagicSmoker 331. rezurect007 332. OWZ1337 333. something went wrong getting the username 334. Typex 335. RivAngE 336. spirali 337. TheOtherCryptoball 338. ToTheMoon_XOM9IK 339. Deeyoh 340. bitmover 341. BTCHadzija 342. withlove99 343. shahzadafzal 344. Vlada69 345. something went wrong getting the username 346. Speculatoross 347. wh1rlw1nd 348. phabit2 349. Rsiyz 350. bakasabo 351. TopTort777 352. DavidLutz 353. Arching_wild 354. kalehon 355. k453345 356. Lowryy 357. bitcoin_is_here_to_stay_2 358. PaivanTreidi 359. Kylapoiss 360. FartBuddy 361. moneyForjam 362. reactorjuno 363. something went wrong getting the username 364. icoping 365. mudbone 366. something went wrong getting the username 367. something went wrong getting the username 368. something went wrong getting the username 369. Dancobit 370. Realerre 371. Wan King 372. Mister_Success 373. something went wrong getting the username 374. something went wrong getting the username 375. something went wrong getting the username 376. something went wrong getting the username 377. something went wrong getting the username 378. something went wrong getting the username 379. something went wrong getting the username 380. something went wrong getting the username 381. something went wrong getting the username 382. something went wrong getting the username 383. something went wrong getting the username 384. something went wrong getting the username 385. something went wrong getting the username 386. something went wrong getting the username 387. something went wrong getting the username |
|
|
|
@loyce if you want help I’ll go through and copy and paste the titles from the threads that still haven’t parsed As far as I know, I have all titles  |
|
|
|
May I ask you for legacy BTC address 1 riskingRemLwiUtYyLacRBaqNeZr1TaN Update: Hi, LoyceV we've just sent you 0,0013 btc. You could try standard or free trial mode. Feel free to publish your feedback it in this thread. Received. I should have some time for a review tomorrow. |
|
|
|
Suspected users that are abusing merit 3.0[/url]
USERS THAT ARE ABUSING MERIT SYSTEM [/url]
I was just scrolling through the list and stumbled upon these, which seem like they're supposed to be links, but are not. I'm wondering if I am the ignoramus in the room, or if these are incorrectly formatted/placed? Little clarification would go a long way for me on this one. It's the ignoramus (new word on my list!)  I explained this in the post above yours. Anyway, I've fixed it by adding a space to [ list]. I've also marked deleted posts, and I finally found the time to create the external link in HTML. This fixes the Russian titles and icons. Would it be too much work to throw it into a table, include the OP and the "merited users" or "top merited users" for each?
I'm not sure what exactly you're looking for. |
|
|
|
Another proof that you are an AI . That makes 3  Just curious how did you manage all this in one second??  ( source) Mouse click, Ctrl-Tab, mouse click, Ctrl-Tab, mouse click, Ctrl-Tab, mouse click. |
|
|
|
and why? It looks like they're sending it to addresses with at least a couple hundred Bitcoin. Advertising, I guess. |
|
|
|
The question that come to my mind is how much smerit a source could give in a row/repetitively without receiving (silly) remarks? My record is 4 in a second: October 13, 2018, 10:18:22 AM: 1 to Indamuck for Re: Universal Basic Income Is Silicon Valley’s Latest Scam
October 13, 2018, 10:18:22 AM: 1 to audaciousbeing for Re: Universal Basic Income Is Silicon Valley’s Latest Scam
October 13, 2018, 10:18:22 AM: 1 to figmentofmyass for Re: Universal Basic Income Is Silicon Valley’s Latest Scam
October 13, 2018, 10:18:22 AM: 1 to KonstantinosM for Re: Universal Basic Income Is Silicon Valley’s Latest Scam Serious answer: I don't think there's a limit. As long as the posts are worth it, who cares about silly remarks? |
|
|
|
A few months ago, I discovered Drownhim.com:Official thread: Drownhim! Brand new multiplayer game.
I like Drownhim because it's different than other gambling sites: it's a social multiplayer game. You can win by cooperating and fighting at the right moment.
Manual or Unibot
Drownhim offers manual playing, and several Bots. The most versatile bot is called Unibot:
Know what you advertise
Test Drownhim.com before joining. You'll need to have an account before you can apply to this campaign. Feel free to deposit, but there's a faucet too.
How to join?
1. Like and Follow Drownhim.com on Facebook.
2. Share at least 1 video and 1 post/image made by Drownhim on Facebook.
3. Enter your username and links in this Google Form.
Spreadsheet link
Rewards
This campaign pays in DROWNS. Currently, DROWNS only exist on Drownhim.com. Depending on the success, an on-chain Token may be created later on.
DROWNS can be converted into Bitcoin by playing them at Drownhim.com, see details here. The fee to withdraw Bitcoin from Drownhim.com is only 0.00005BTC (50 Bits or 0.05mBTC).
500+ Facebook friends: 40 DROWNS
100+ real (at my discretion!) Facebook friends: 70 DROWNS. To qualify for this, your Facebook friends should not be "bounty hunters", but real people you know IRL. To qualify for 70 DROWNS, I want to see friends with baby pictures and vacation videos, but no ICOs!
Note: your Facebook privacy settings should allow me to see your friends.
DROWNS will be rewarded for qualifying entries at least once per week, but we try to be much faster. If this campaign is a success, we'll have more campaigns later, for instance on Twitter and a signature campaign on Bitcointalk.
Rules
1. This campaign is self-moderated to stop (signature) spam. I will remove all non-qualifying posts. If you quote the entire OP, your entry will be deleted.
2. If you post your entry in this thread, your post will be deleted. Use this Google Form. Feel free to ask questions here, I want real users, not spam bots 
3. Only one account per person.
4. If you cheat, spam or plagiarize, I will get you banned. Just be fair.
5. If you don't follow the correct format to join this campaign, you'll be rejected. Think of this as a reading test
6. Anyone who has been blacklisted for any of the campaigns I've managed in the past will be rejected here.
7. Users with Red Trust on DT2 are not allowed to join. Those entries will be deleted.
Disclaimer
If we get less than 100 participants within 2 weeks, there will be no special DROWNS rounds. In that case, DROWNS will be exchanged at the rate of 1 DROWN = 1 Bit (100 Satoshi, 0.001mBTC or 0.000001BTC).We reserve the right to change or end this campaign at any moment, and to exclude people from the giveaway if we feel we need to do so. I (LoyceV) am not affiliated with Drownhim.com, but I've been in contact with MrDrowner, and run this campaign on their behalf. I am not in charge of any payments. There is no escrow.
|
|
|
|
I had brought that account from one buyer and sell that with another buyer.The person who had brought from me had scammed me , without payment. So you have no evidence, and there is no reason to tag MikeMark. |
|
|
|
I am pretty sure they are obliged by law if they are registered in the US or EU or other similar areas. Good luck with that! Let me quote theymos: I intend to ignore all stupidity coming out of the EUSSR. |
|
|
|
On every thread we have links for "download" wallets. (most likely malware IMHO)
A newbie asking to install 5 differents wallets with no explanations and links about the project is a big red flag to me. Agreed. But I don't leave red trust based on red flags, I leave it on smoking guns Edit also, untrusted feedback I saw that, but from a user with no posts.
I've downloaded this file and sent it to https://www.virustotal.com for testing. It shows this:  Virus explanation: Once infected, it will change your computer setting by changing the registry entries and startup items. When you start your computer, it will run itself automatically at the background. By taking up a lot of system resources, your computer performance will be very slow. It will add its malicious file on your computer. You will find there are a lot of unwanted shortcuts and icons on the desktop. HardZix answers this: All claims will be resolved soon, thanks That's not enough, so I'll tag him. Further quotes for my Reference link: |
|
|
|
User HardZix has opened 5 ANN threads in total. I can't check/confirm the virus warning, but I can see he instantly removed the warning from his self-moderated topic. I'm willing to tag him, but would like to see conclusive evidence first. Is there a site where I can upload a Windows file for virus scanning? Update: He has deleted many posts: busminer
121232
47185420
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#6">Alternate cryptocurrencies</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=159.0">Announcements (Altcoins)</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5055752.msg47185420#msg47185420">Re: [Pre-ANN][VKT]VEKTOR[POW/POS] NO ICO or Premine</a></b>
<span style="color: red;"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"><span style="font-size: 10pt !important; line-height: 1.3em;">VIRUS IN WALLET, DONT DOWNLOAD IT !</span></span></span><br /><a class="ul" href="https://threats.kaspersky.com/ru/threat/Backdoor.Win32.Androm/">https://threats.kaspersky.com/ru/threat/Backdoor.Win32.Androm/</a>
asiapool.trade
2223023
47185422
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#6">Alternate cryptocurrencies</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=159.0">Announcements (Altcoins)</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5055752.msg47185422#msg47185422">Re: [Pre-ANN][VKT]VEKTOR[POW/POS] NO ICO or Premine</a></b>
<img src="https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif" alt="Smiley" border="0" />
busminer
121232
47185477
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#6">Alternate cryptocurrencies</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=159.0">Announcements (Altcoins)</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5055752.msg47185477#msg47185477">Re: [Pre-ANN][VKT]VEKTOR[POW/POS] NO ICO or Premine</a></b>
<span style="font-family: Verdana;"><span style="color: red;"><span style="font-size: 10pt !important; line-height: 1.3em;"><span style="font-size: 10pt !important; line-height: 1.3em;">VIRUS IN WALLET, DONT DOWNLAD IT !<br /></span></span></span></span>
busminer
121232
47185481
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#6">Alternate cryptocurrencies</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=159.0">Announcements (Altcoins)</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5055752.msg47185481#msg47185481">Re: [Pre-ANN][VKT]VEKTOR[POW/POS] NO ICO or Premine</a></b>
<a class="ul" href="https://threats.kaspersky.com/ru/threat/Backdoor.Win32.Androm/">https://threats.kaspersky.com/ru/threat/Backdoor.Win32.Androm/</a>
olkah
881806
47185529
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#6">Alternate cryptocurrencies</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=159.0">Announcements (Altcoins)</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5055752.msg47185529#msg47185529">Re: [Pre-ANN][VKT]VEKTOR[POW/POS] NO ICO or Premine</a></b>
<a class="ul" href="https://www.virustotal.com/ru/file/9d809f1d55c16ec9b8f410a358c351577ecb85b768b8237ce975f8468fe0652a/analysis/1540295929/">https://www.virustotal.com/ru/file/9d809f1d55c16ec9b8f410a358c351577ecb85b768b8237ce975f8468fe0652a/analysis/1540295929/</a>
busminer
121232
47185569
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#3">Economy</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0">Scam Accusations</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5055759.msg47185569#msg47185569">Virus in wallet, new coin ann</a></b>
virus in wallet here in ann <a class="ul" href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5055752.new#new">https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5055752.new#new</a><br /><a class="ul" href="https://threats.kaspersky.com/ru/threat/Backdoor.Win32.Androm/">https://threats.kaspersky.com/ru/threat/Backdoor.Win32.Androm/</a>
olkah
881806
47185612
<a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php#6">Alternate cryptocurrencies</a> / <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=159.0">Announcements (Altcoins)</a> / <b><a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5055752.msg47185612#msg47185612">Re: [Pre-ANN][VKT]VEKTOR[POW/POS] NO ICO or Premine</a></b>
<b><span style="font-size: 30pt !important; line-height: 1.3em;"><span style="color: black;">VIRUS 100%<br /><a class="ul" href="http://prntscr.com/l9f51e">http://prntscr.com/l9f51e</a></span></span></b> Update: I've posted this in his thread. |
|
|
|
I wil lreport my own post and see if I get the moderators` attention. Mods can't delete your account either. They can delete your posts or ban you. The irony is: if you wouldn't have created this topic, nobody would have ever seen your name! |
|
|
|
Good Day All.
I had sold my MikeMark account for my mom medical expenses to one person.
That person get the account details and reset the password and mail .Now he is not paying me .
He scammed me .And saying me , you can't do anything now.
So please give that MikeMark account redtrust.
It is helpful for me.
Then that guy come to know ,their will be the punishment .If he scam others.
Quoted for reference. Your posting style doesn't look like MikeMark's posting at all. I also have a hard time believing MikeMark lives in a country where selling a Full Member account can pay for medical bills. If you can sign a message from 1PmHZ3eSuDK5BZA3pUqrCMmjeJk7uqZ4Ax, I'll tag the account. |
|
|
|
First, let's get clear which (opening) posts you use as examples (suchmoon already did this but I'll embed the images anyway): 1. [LEARN] BBCode Lessons & Tutorials [+tutorial videos!]: 15842 views. 2. Report plagiarism (copy/pasting) here. Calling for Mod action: please permban: 22399 views. 3. LoyceV's Merit data analysis (full data since Jan. 24, 2018; not just 120 days): 3875 views. I didn't know the last screenshot was from my topic until I found it through the Merit history. I'll comment on both threads created by me: 2. The OP itself clearly isn't worth that much Merit, but there's more to it: Merit means it's worth reading, and considering the topic has 972 posts, almost all of them on-topic (otherwise I'd report them to have them removed), and lead to hundreds if not thousands of forum abusers getting banned, it's definitely worth reading. 3. Do you have any idea how many hours I've invested in creating that thread? Have you seen the weekly updates for more than 6 months, and the enormous amount of data I've processed into human readable format? I didn't keep track, but in total I've spent many dozens of hours on it. That being said, time spent on it's own isn't enough to receive Merit. It has to be useful too. While you're pointing at me, did you know that only 0.26% of my posts made before and 10.45% of my posts made after the introduction of Merit received Merit? I've seen plenty of Newbies (with worthy posts) who have a higher percentage. Now, back to gellany32: Your argument would be a lot stronger if you could show 3 posts made my Newbies of equal quality that didn't receive any Merit. User Loycev has commendable post and there is no arguing with that. The only thing i empasized the post is that if you are a high ranks bias meriting would be possible and if you were lower rank you will be less likely to receive one.
I'll make you a deal: Find 3 high-quality posts made by Newbies without any Merit, and show them in this thread. If I agree, I'll merit all three of them, and your post too.You're not a spammer, so by that figure, you shouldn't be restricted by Merit. However, your posts look like you only made them to earn merit. Take this example: you're not adding any new information, you're just rephrasing text and numbers from other users. Instead of pointing at high ranking users and complaining about Merit, try to add something helpful to the forum. Now, can we be more friendly? I am started to worry now the possible replies. Me not sending you Merit doesn't mean I'm unfriendly. Merit was created to stop spam, and nobody is going to miss spammers. You can check this thread, Bitcoin Technical Support. There's a lot of newbies getting merited by higher rank member, why? its because they don't care about merits and they really deserves to be merited anyways. So there's no bias whatsoever. If higher ranks really see newbies showing quality post worth of at least 1 merit then they will give it hands down. I love meriting new users that show they aren't spammers! That's what this forum needs, and if they stick around, they'll be self-made high ranking users a few years from now. |
|
|
|
It would be interesting to see a ranking of users who received no more than 2 merits from other users and no more than 10 merits for a given post. That is, users who are constantly receiving merits for common posts. Which are neither extraordinary nor outlier, but still produce content interesting enough to receive some merits. That would be an interesting list indeed, but I'm not going to make it. Feel free to use Full Merit history to make this list. It should be pretty straight forward to do, if needed I can add usernames to the list of userIDs.
I've slightly updated my script, it now counts how many individual posts received Merit:
User LoyceV ( full history) - Received a total of 1135 Merit up to last Friday.
- Received 88 Merit (7.75%) for 9 (0.26%) of 3404 posts created before the introduction of Merit (0.0258 Merit per old post).
- Received 1045 Merit (92.07%) for 282 (10.45%) of 2696 posts created after the introduction of Merit (0.3876 Merit per new post).
- Received 2 Merit (0.17%) for posts that are now deleted.
I've updated satoshi's en theymos' stats in the OP. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
