^ Aparte de las distintas opciones de registro que puedan tener, creo que la noticia de The PIT va en dos direcciones, 1° la relevancia de quien esta detras de todo esto y 2° el enfasis que transmiten en aplicar velocidad de negociacion ya sea en entorno normal de funcionamiento y en momentos de alta volatilidad, para evitar que en un momento dado te quedes sin ejecutar las ordenes de compra o de venta. edit: Blockchain.com ingresa a nueva bolsa criptográfica “The Pit”The Pit ejecutará órdenes en menos de 50 microsegundos, frente a los 200 a 500 milisegundos en la mayoría de los intercambios de cifrado, dijo Smith. El director ejecutivo declinó identificar algún banco que trabaje con Blockchain.com y se limitó a comentar que solo los prestamistas permitirán a los clientes depositar dólares estadounidenses, euros y libras británicas en el intercambio. https://es.finance.yahoo.com/noticias/blockchain-com-ingresa-bolsa-criptogr%C3%A1fica-172641682.html
|
|
|
Facebook advierte a sus inversores que su stablecoin, Libra, puede que nunca se lanceEl compromiso con el ente regulador es "crítico para el éxito de Libra"
Facebook dijo a sus inversores en su último informe trimestral que, aunque la empresa espera lanzar Libra el año que viene, algunos factores podrían impedir su lanzamiento. En la sección de factores de riesgo del documento, la compañía admite que reconoce la importancia del retroceso mostrado por los entes reguladores hacia Libra. https://es.cointelegraph.com/news/facebook-warns-investors-that-libra-stablecoin-may-never-launchEsto no se si es un globo sonda en sentido contrario o realmente ven que hay muchas dudas (preocupación, privacidad, perdida de datos...) por parte de bancos centrales y gobiernos para seguir adelante con el proyecto.
|
|
|
Saludos colega VB1001, te dejo el enlace del hilo: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170503.0;topicseenLa primera respuesta ha sido la propuesta de SEO para la sección en Portugues, sería agradable que cada sección aportara su propuesta y que estas sean aplicadas, creo que le daría un bump bastante grande al foro en temas de posicionamiento web. Ok, también he respondido en meta apoyando tu solicitud, thx, por la propuesta.
|
|
|
If this change is approved in all local sections, the impact on visits to Bitcointalk will have a considerable increase and also in new registrations, of course.
|
|
|
I have a small trip to Amsterdam next week though where I will meet the goose & cryptoqueeen.
This sounds great. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Voy a llevar la propuesta a meta para ver que opinan los grandes y esperemos que la tomen en cuenta y la apliquen, ya que el impacto sería muy bueno para esta comunidad.
Ya te lo comente mas arriba, proponerlo en meta es lo mejor, para ver si nos arreglan todo el tema SEO de una vez, publica aquí el enlace cuando tengas el hilo activo.
|
|
|
Blockchain.com, casa de cambio de criptomonedas denominada The PITTiene como objetivo ejecutar operaciones en microsegundos para inversionistas minoristas e institucionales.
Después de una extensa investigación y desarrollo en el lapso de un año, Blockchain.com dijo que su motor paridad Mercury ofrece velocidades cuánticas más rápidas que cualquier otra casa de cambios de criptomonedas. https://www.criptonoticias.com/negocios/servicios-financieros/monedero-blockchain-casa-cambio-criptomonedas-operaciones-alta-velocidad/Los componentes del grupo son bastante familiares, Google, Revolut, Bolsa de Nueva York, Ameritrade, Goldman Sachs, UBS, Interactive Brokers, quien nos diría hace tan solo unos años que la gran banca estaría involucrada en proyectos de esta envergadura con las monedas virtuales (como las llaman ellos), despegar a lo grande no se si vamos a despegar, pero algo debe haber cuando todos los sectores se están implicando en diferentes frentes, tanto económicos como en desarrollo.
|
|
|
This thread is so quiet at the moment. **Sighs** Oh, I do miss the excitement of a mid to peak bull run. I’m always here, reading but I don’t really have much to post about in this thread atm Apart from that there is not much movement in the price, it is also vacation time, many are on the beach with their girls taken caipirinhas.
|
|
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5126554.0He had to read long before reaching Bitcoin. 1994 - CyberCashOn January 1, 2000, many users of CyberCash's ICVerify application fell victim to the Y2K Bug, causing double recording of credit card payments through their system.[5] Although CyberCash had already released a Y2K-compliant update to the software, many users had not installed it.
The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 11, 2001. VeriSign acquired the Cybercash assets (except for ICVerify) and name a couple of months later. On November 21, 2005 PayPal (already an eBay company) acquired VeriSign's payment services, including Cybercash. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CyberCash
|
|
|
A Comparative Analysis of Bitcoin ForksSummary Although BSV and BCH have some of the desirable features of a medium of exchange asset, like low transaction fees, this has not yet led to a large increase in activity as compared to BTC. Both BCH and BSV still only have a small fraction of the usage of BTC when measured by metrics like adjusted transfer value and active addresses.
Furthermore, BSV and BCH are increasingly being used as ways to store data on chain (often without an associated economic transaction), and not as a medium of exchange. BSV, in particular, is predominantly being used as a way to record data on-chain, with over 94% of transactions containing OP_RETURN, a majority of which come from a single weather application. BSV may ultimately be used as a data storage blockchain, likely due to their removal of the size restriction on OP_RETURN transactions.
Additionally, although both BCH and BSV have larger maximum block sizes than BTC, they have not yet utilized that extra space. For the most part, BCH and BSV’s daily average block size has remained well below BTC’s 1MB average.
Both BSV and BCH have had blocks that have exceeded BTC’s maximum blocks. BSV blocks, in particular, are increasingly being filled by OP_RETURN transactions. BSV and BCH’s increased block size may become a factor if either gain adoption as a data storage blockchain. But it does not appear to currently be a factor in terms of being used as a medium of exchange.
Additionally, BTC currently has a big lead over BCH and BSV in the four metrics we used to measure security. BTC has over 95% of the hash rate market share (amongst BTC, BCH, and BSV) as of July, 2019.
BTC also dominates in terms of daily mining revenue. BTC has over 30 and 60 times more daily mining revenue than BCH and BSV, respectively. This will become even more of an issue as block rewards continue to halve, as BCH and BSV’s total transaction fees are negligible compared to BTC’s.
We also found that if BTC miners were to theoretically attack BCH they could rewrite ten days of the blockchain in 7 hours. If they were instead to attack BSV, they could rewrite it in 3 hours.
As of now, BCH and BSV are not gaining real usage over BTC as a medium of exchange, and are not utilizing their larger block sizes. BTC also remains a much more secure blockchain than both BCH and BSV. It remains to be seen whether BCH and BSV can take more of BTC’s market share moving forward. https://coinmetrics.substack.com/p/a-comparative-analysis-of-bitcoinExtensive article, but interesting. Good morning WO,s
|
|
|
Gobierno iraní autoriza la minería de criptomonedas como actividad industrialEl gobierno iraní ha autorizado la minería de criptomonedas como una actividad industrial.
Un informe de la agencia de noticias Mehr, propiedad de IIDO, reveló el 29 de julio que la decisión se tomó este fin de semana, durante una sesión dominical del gabinete presidida por el presidente de Irán, Hassan Rouhani. https://es.cointelegraph.com/news/iranian-govt-authorizes-cryptocurrency-mining-as-industrial-activityPues parece que va en serio el tema. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
D-day in Bitfinex trial - Will Bitcoin price react?ALL EYES ON MONDAY’S TRIAL OUTCOME
As previously reported by Bitcoinist, the Supreme Court of the State of New York will resume hearing on the case between the NYAG and bitcoin exchange platform Bitfinex on Monday (July 29, 2019).
A negative outcome for iFinex — the parent company of Bitfinex, could potentially open the exchange and Tether up to more lawsuits. The NYAG is accusing Bitfinex of covering up $850 million in client losses.
https://bitcoinist.com/d-day-in-bitfinex-trial-will-bitcoin-price-react/ My view is that they are gonna lose big. Others? What do you all think? Judge Punts on Decision in NYAG Case Against Bitfinex and TetherOn Monday, New York Supreme Court Judge Joel M. Cohen said he needed more time to make a final decision on whether to dismiss the NYAG’s case entirely, or rule the other way and reject Bitfinex and Tether’s motion to dismiss. As such, a preliminary injunction he filed in May will be extended, probably for 90 days. “The idea is to keep things where they are until the decision of this motion, so the decision is to extend the stay and … extend the injunction.” The ruling means Bitfinex and Tether can continue operating their businesses as normal, but Tether still cannot lend any more funds to Bitfinex. https://www.coindesk.com/judge-punts-decision-nyag-bitfinex-tetherHonestly, I have no idea how it can end.
|
|
|
EU Exchange Bitstamp Partners with UK Firm to Offer Pound Sterling OnrampMajor European crypto exchange Bitstamp has partnered with digital asset brokerage BCB Group to enable direct transfers in British pounds sterling (GBP).
A press release shared with Cointelegraph on July 29 revealed that following the new partnership, by the end of this year United Kingdom-based investors will be able to make GBP withdrawals and deposits directly to and from their Bitstamp accounts. https://cointelegraph.com/news/eu-exchange-bitstamp-partners-with-uk-firm-to-offer-pound-sterling-onramp
|
|
|
2019 - Data: Wall Observer BTC/USD Replies +/- Replies Views BTC Value end Month
2019 Jan / Wall Observer BTC/USD - 452.916 > 6,406 21.006.158 3,459 2019 Feb / Wall Observer BTC/USD - 459.605 > 6.689 21.042.628 3,901 2019 Mar / Wall Observer BTC/USD - 465.823 > 6.218 21.079.099 4,103 2019 Apr / Wall Observer BTC/USD - 473.225 > 7.402 21.133.357 5,270 2019 May / Wall Observer BTC/USD - 480.783 > 7.558 21.193.583 8,501 2019 Jun / Wall Observer BTC/USD - 488.192 > 7.409 21.256.108 11,262 2019 Jul / Wall Observer BTC/USD - 493.567 > 5.375 21.307.690 10,052
|
|
|
<…>
Es el efecto vacaciones, sumado al efecto de ser meritado frecuentemente … me explico: Ok, no te preocupes, lamento darte trabajo solo llegar de vacaciones. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Thx.
|
|
|
D-day in Bitfinex trial - Will Bitcoin price react?ALL EYES ON MONDAY’S TRIAL OUTCOME
As previously reported by Bitcoinist, the Supreme Court of the State of New York will resume hearing on the case between the NYAG and bitcoin exchange platform Bitfinex on Monday (July 29, 2019).
A negative outcome for iFinex — the parent company of Bitfinex, could potentially open the exchange and Tether up to more lawsuits. The NYAG is accusing Bitfinex of covering up $850 million in client losses.
https://bitcoinist.com/d-day-in-bitfinex-trial-will-bitcoin-price-react/
|
|
|
SOPR
ummmm, neat idea...but I'm just not seeing anything useful in the graph... am I missing something? https://studio.glassnode.com/metrics?a=BTC&m=valuation.SoprIntroducing SOPR: spent outputs to predict bitcoin lows and topsIntroducing the Spent Output Profit Ratio (SOPR) The SOPR a very simple indicator. It’s calculated from spent outputs. It’s the realized value (USD) divided by the value at creation (USD) of the output. Or simply: price sold / price paid. When SOPR > 1, it means that the owners of the spent outputs are in profit at the time of the transaction; otherwise, they are at a loss By plotting the SOPR of all spent outputs combined, aggregated by the day in which they were spent (using blockchain date), the graph can be produced https://medium.com/unconfiscatable/introducing-sopr-spent-outputs-to-predict-bitcoin-lows-and-tops-ceb4536b3b9
Hi, jojo69 It looks better here. When SOPR > 1, it means that the owners of the spent outputs got profit from the operation. Otherwise, losses. The bull market seems to reject SOPR below 1, and the bear market to reject SOPR above 1. https://twitter.com/renato_shira/status/1121517734574133249
|
|
|
Se ha procedido a actualizar el OP con los datos a fecha 26/07/2019.
En total tenemos 2 Hero Members, 4 Sr. Members, 6 Full Members, 30 Members, y 105 Jr. Members que han precisado sMéritos para escalar de rango.
Hola DdmrDdmr, queria comentar si es posible que la tabla recoja un error en el sistema o soy yo que no lo recuerdo, pero en mi caso la cuenta es sep-2017 y cuando volvi al foro en dic-2018 yo casi estoy convencido que tenia 0 Méritos, puede ser que al recoger los datos se interprete (por la fecha de registro) que corresponden 10 Méritos pero nunca se hayan contabilizado en mi cuenta? Puedes comprobarlo por favor?, si no los tengo y me corresponden los voy a reclamar al Jefe. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) user_id Nombre Actividad Méritos M.Recibidos M.Inicial Rango RangoInicial M.Español % Español 1138727 VB1001 294 737 727 10 Sr. Member Member 193 26,19%
Edit: Según BPIP el primer merito lo recibí el 12 de diciembre de 2018: 12/1/2018 10:54:00 AM somac. VB1001 1 Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion Y en total suman 742 que son los que tengo en este momento, si tuviera 10 de airdrop serian 752, no?
|
|
|
|