Good afternoon WO,s Nice day of april fools with KYC verification for all. It would be better an airdrop of merits, even if it were false. 
 This is true: Thanks for the support, Bitcoin Prehistory is working well.  |
|
|
|
<...>
Perfect, the more people know the story, the better. Of course, you can post it on your local board. |
|
|
|
|
^
A very complete poll, It is very well made and the result in the impeccable presentation.
Cypherpunk movement UP
Thx.
|
|
|
|
^ Me dio por ver como estábamos comparando con las otras secciones locales de Bitcointalk de una forma muy simple y si, los números nuestros están bajos, después DdmrDdmr, que se le da muy bien la extracción de datos, no se que pensar, si es humano o un bot testando Inteligencia Artificial,  abrió un hilo con todo tipo de detalles, allí podrás ver con números y gráficos lo que había antes y lo que hay ahora. Análisis - Número de posts en el foro Español > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5124474.0 |
|
|
|
 KYC |
|
|
|
Well, I would have saved a lot of work looking for the links of each appointment. If you compare the two listings in which you pass me missing links and luckily are not the same. I will review them and update them if they have better information. Thanks for your contribution. |
|
|
|
I have opened a new thread, Bitcoin Prehistory, the quotes and links are sorted by date, there is a lot of interesting literature to read up to our days, I hope you like it, 1973 until 2009. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5126554.0If you have an important appointment that is not on the list in the graphic, it will be a pleasure to include it. Critics or comments are accepted, of course. |
|
|
|
<...>
Ok, estará bien analizar todos los datos nuevos que vas extrayendo. |
|
|
|
 This graphic reflects where the technology we have now come from in our homes, computers, networks, Internet, smartphones, virtual currencies, exchanges, to get here, many people have contributed their knowledge to the technological evolution we have today. Some of them are very well known in Bitcointalk, thanks to all of them. I have ordered the appointments chronologically with a link to the corresponding information: - 1974 Robert E. Kahn / Vint Cerf TCP/IP = Internet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_protocol_suite- 1976 Whitfield Diffie / Martin Hellman / New Directions in Cryptography https://ee.stanford.edu/~hellman/publications/24.pdf- 1978 RSA Public Key Cryptosystem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_(cryptosystem)- 1980 Ralph Merkle Protocols Cryptosystems http://www.merkle.com/papers/Protocols.pdf- 1981 David Chaum Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Chaum- 1982 Murray Rothbard The Ethics of Liberty https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Rothbard- 1983 David Chaum Blind Signatures https://sceweb.sce.uhcl.edu/yang/teaching/csci5234WebSecurityFall2011/Chaum-blind-signatures.PDF- 1985 Elliptic Curve Cryptography https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic-curve_cryptography- 1988 Timothy C. May The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto https://www.activism.net/cypherpunk/crypto-anarchy.html- 1989 David Chauman DigiCash https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DigiCash- 1991 Phil Zimmermann https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Zimmermann- 1991 Haber / Stornetta How to Time-Stamp a Digital Document https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00196791- 1992 / 1993 Eric Hugues A Cyperherpunk's Manifesto https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg49471136#msg49471136- 1992 Cypherpunk Founded https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cypherpunk- 1994 CyberCash https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CyberCash- 1994 Timothy C. May https://nakamotoinstitute.org/static/docs/cyphernomicon.txt- 1996 E-Gold https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-gold- 1996 NSA How To Make A Mint http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/money/nsamint/nsamint.htm- 1997 Adam Back HashCash https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Back- 1997 Nick Szabo Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks https://ojphi.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/548/469- 1998 Nick Szabo Secure Property Titles with Owner Authority https://nakamotoinstitute.org/secure-property-titles/- 1998 Bit Gold https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Szabo- 1998 Wei Dai B-Money https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/B-money- 1999 Dot Com Bubble https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-com_bubble- 2001 Bram Cohen BitTorrent https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bram_Cohen- 2001 Distributed Hash Tables https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_hash_table- 2004 Hal Finney / Reusable Proofs of Work https://nakamotoinstitute.org/finney/rpow/index.html - 2008 Satoshi Nakamoto / A Peer to Peer Electronic Cash System https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf- 2009 Bitcoin Launched Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Genesis_blockSource image: https://twitter.com/bitcoinje/status/1091672330277961728 |
|
|
|
Immersion, up to 1 m depth Ingress of water in harmful quantity shall not be possible when the enclosure is immersed in water under defined conditions of pressure and time (up to 1 m of submersion). Test duration: 30 minutes. Tested with the lowest point of the enclosure 1000 mm below the surface of the water, or the highest point 150 mm below the surface, whichever is deeper. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_CodeIPX7 You can listen to music by taking the aperitif in the pool, on the boat or raining. Your music equipment is safe. |
|
|
|
Aaron Brown says Bitcoin boom pushed crypto forward 3 to 5 years The value of cryptocurrencies has fallen eightfold last year. What silver-lining might be here besides the fact that it pushed the speculators away?
“That’s a silly way to look at it. Crypto prices today are about where they were in September 2017. The run-up and crash pulled in about $20 billion in investor funding. Some of it was stolen or frittered away, but most went to support, and is still supporting, useful development. It did a lot to clarify legal and regulatory issues, and it pulled in a lot of financial institutions. It raised public awareness and stimulated a lot of developer ideas. The boom pushed crypto forward three to five years in my estimation.
The boom without the crash would have put too little selection pressure on ideas, like the Internet from about 1998 to 2000, with really stupid ideas wasting billions of investor dollars and enriching frauds and idiots, giving them platforms to teach nonsense. Crypto would have been flooded with opportunists seeking quick money rather than thoughtful and talented developers with ideological convictions. Regulators and politicians would have fought to get their shares (or what they considered their shares) of the bounty, to the detriment of crypto. None of this would have killed crypto, any more than it killed the Internet, but the price of 1998 – 2000 was twice as many years (2000 – 2006) of obstruction and trouble, and the extra funds raised in 1998 – 2000 were not spent nearly as productively as the funds raised from 1995 – 1998.”In my opinion, quite sensible the article, but without Bitcoin none of this would have happened. https://dailyhodl.com/2019/03/30/bloombergs-aaron-brown-says-bitcoin-boom-pushed-crypto-forward-3-to-5-years/ |
|
|
|
<...>
Habrá un buen numero que desde 0 vayan subiendo , eso espero, para ellos y para mi, todos los novatos estamos aquí sin airdrop, lo que se me hace raro es que obtuviera todos los méritos en la sección local, a menos que desde el primer día de registro empezara a publicar o por otra parte que la sección alemana tenga mas fuentes de merito y repartan mas cantidad de ellos a los que aportan contenido. Cada día tengo mas claro que el salto de Sr.Member a Hero Member es excesivo y de Hero Member a Legendario ni te cuento, creo que cortaron por el mismo rasero a spammers buscando rangos altos para el tema de firmas, y se están cargando gente buena que no les importa lo mas mínimo las campañas de firmas limitandolos en la subida del rango con los méritos. Hubiera sido mas fácil seguir trabajando en los tiempos de actividad para conseguir la necesaria para las firmas o si me apuras implementar actividad y merito solo para las campañas de firmas, pero solo la actividad para subir de rango con la exclusión de participar en las campañas, osea subir de rango solo con la actividad. Rangos = Nº Actividad x Campañas de Firmas = Nº Actividad x + Nº de Meritos x Así a los que nos interesa estar en Bitcointalk no tendríamos que estar pendientes del tema tan absurdo de los méritos, con un simple like de votación podrías puntuar el post de calidad que considerases oportuno y santas pascuas, todos contentos. (Y este tema aun tiene menos sentido cuando tienes una cuenta anterior al sistema de méritos y un buen día entras y ves todos estos cambios.) Tu que tienes contacto con las altas esferas transmite mi queja, seguro que te hacen caso y de paso pide un airdrop para todos.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
