Can anyone put my anxiety at ease here. I dl the new cpuminer and this is what came up after the 4th hash  I trust spybot and it never failed me to date. I know some things can be accidentally added to DB's However this has never come up with these miners. This one is the first miner program that has done this. check the MD5 from the github dowload and compare it with urs, if its the same then its a false positive, otherwise u maybe got a problem  |
|
|
|
K1773R debian wheezy version please  test the one already there, GLIBC is backward compatible |
|
|
|
K1773R has been awarded a generation share for his debian devcoin binary: http://darkgamex.ch/devcoin/MD5: 52e64363838315633c64d883c79ecfc3 which he'll receive in round 17. If anyone wants a binary for another Linux distribution, please message him or post a request. ive uploaded the x64 now too |
|
|
|
Does bitcoin have an actual "installer" thingie for Windows yet that could be adapted for other coins? Or is Windows still basically a horrible mess for all the types of coins?
-MarkM-
which part of winblows is not a horrible mess? |
|
|
|
Still not working with the newer 12.10 drivers. Is this a problem with the program? If oclvanitygen produces invalid results, i'm assuming oclvanityminer will be the same?
probably just usual ATI crap driver, hopefully it will get fixed or there will be a workaround. But I've heard of other using 5xxx cards, and it works fine. This just seems to be an issue with the 7xxx cards. Like I said, the -S option works fine, but at 1/3 of the speed. and thats what ive said, the OpenCL driver is broken for 7*** cards. Why does it work for BTC, scrypt, and everything else? either its a bug in the CL from the miner or its a bug in ati drivers with specific parameters (as for you) which is more likely. |
|
|
|
You do realize that p2pool isn't the only pool to distribute blocks directly to miners?
No I didn't realize. But I've only mined in 2 pools ever, and I haven't studied how each pool works if p2pool finds every block
A virtual impossibility. I realize that, but even if it is a block every hour or every other block, the overhead is still there. And you yourself brought up that other pools do direct payment, so if you combine all pools that do this, and combined they find every other block, my thought process is still valid. again, look at how many transactions are with satoshidice, compared to p2pool, p2pool is like 0.1% or even less... |
|
|
|
I just found this, and I must say, it's awesome! Getting ~30Mkey/s on my 7970 @ 1150/1485.
on 7970: (seems it is finding matches, but disregarding due to mismatch? CPU hash: 6707a76e848f5e9368c2d9d9ec6d60880df44891
GPU hash: 020b0bda39a9bbb2eeddd194a8be20934835dff6
Found delta: 94027 Start delta: 1
When you get the CPU hash/GPU hash mismatch, it means the OpenCL device is producing incorrect results. I have not had a chance to test it on an AMD 7XXX series GCN card yet, but others have reported that it works. Try running it with -V on that card for a little while and see what you get. Since it's producing incorrect results, the performance numbers may or may not mean anything. Looks like I spoke too soon, cuz I'm actually getting this this error on my 7970, with 12.8 drivers. I tried a few different flag options, but nothing really worked. Well I only get 9Mkey/s instead of 30, but the -S option produces valid results. Still not working with the newer 12.10 drivers. Is this a problem with the program? If oclvanitygen produces invalid results, i'm assuming oclvanityminer will be the same? probably just usual ATI crap driver, hopefully it will get fixed or there will be a workaround. But I've heard of other using 5xxx cards, and it works fine. This just seems to be an issue with the 7xxx cards. Like I said, the -S option works fine, but at 1/3 of the speed. and thats what ive said, the OpenCL driver is broken for 7*** cards. |
|
|
|
I just found this, and I must say, it's awesome! Getting ~30Mkey/s on my 7970 @ 1150/1485.
on 7970: (seems it is finding matches, but disregarding due to mismatch? CPU hash: 6707a76e848f5e9368c2d9d9ec6d60880df44891
GPU hash: 020b0bda39a9bbb2eeddd194a8be20934835dff6
Found delta: 94027 Start delta: 1
When you get the CPU hash/GPU hash mismatch, it means the OpenCL device is producing incorrect results. I have not had a chance to test it on an AMD 7XXX series GCN card yet, but others have reported that it works. Try running it with -V on that card for a little while and see what you get. Since it's producing incorrect results, the performance numbers may or may not mean anything. Looks like I spoke too soon, cuz I'm actually getting this this error on my 7970, with 12.8 drivers. I tried a few different flag options, but nothing really worked. Well I only get 9Mkey/s instead of 30, but the -S option produces valid results. Still not working with the newer 12.10 drivers. Is this a problem with the program? If oclvanitygen produces invalid results, i'm assuming oclvanityminer will be the same? probably just usual ATI crap driver, hopefully it will get fixed or there will be a workaround. |
|
|
|
forrestv, it is possible to catch erors in more elegant way? Fragment of log: 2012-10-26 18:27:46.661441 Pool: 376GH/s Stale rate: 9.8% Expected time to block: 9.7 hours
2012-10-26 18:27:47.489866 > Error while calling merged getauxblock:
2012-10-26 18:27:47.490452 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2012-10-26 18:27:47.490728 > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 545, in _runCallbacks
2012-10-26 18:27:47.491193 > current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
2012-10-26 18:27:47.491493 > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1095, in gotResult
2012-10-26 18:27:47.491694 > _inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
2012-10-26 18:27:47.492124 > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1037, in _inlineCallbacks
2012-10-26 18:27:47.492684 > result = result.throwExceptionIntoGenerator(g)
2012-10-26 18:27:47.493071 > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/python/failure.py", line 382, in throwExceptionIntoGenerator
2012-10-26 18:27:47.493683 > return g.throw(self.type, self.value, self.tb)
2012-10-26 18:27:47.494030 > --- <exception caught here> ---
2012-10-26 18:27:47.494498 > File "/home/rav3n/p2pool/p2pool/util/deferral.py", line 41, in f
2012-10-26 18:27:47.494755 > result = yield func(*args, **kwargs)
2012-10-26 18:27:47.495327 > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1037, in _inlineCallbacks
2012-10-26 18:27:47.495597 > result = result.throwExceptionIntoGenerator(g)
2012-10-26 18:27:47.496006 > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/python/failure.py", line 382, in throwExceptionIntoGenerator
2012-10-26 18:27:47.496226 > return g.throw(self.type, self.value, self.tb)
2012-10-26 18:27:47.496612 > File "/home/rav3n/p2pool/p2pool/util/jsonrpc.py", line 71, in callRemote
2012-10-26 18:27:47.496817 > raise Error_for_code(resp['error']['code'])(resp['error']['message'], resp['error'].get('data', None))
2012-10-26 18:27:47.497191 > p2pool.util.jsonrpc.NarrowError: -10 I0Coin is downloading blocks...
2012-10-26 18:27:47.566807 > Error while calling merged getauxblock:
2012-10-26 18:27:47.566949 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2012-10-26 18:27:47.566984 > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 545, in _runCallbacks
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567016 > current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567063 > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1095, in gotResult
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567092 > _inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567194 > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1037, in _inlineCallbacks
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567263 > result = result.throwExceptionIntoGenerator(g)
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567292 > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/python/failure.py", line 382, in throwExceptionIntoGenerator
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567320 > return g.throw(self.type, self.value, self.tb)
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567346 > --- <exception caught here> ---
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567371 > File "/home/rav3n/p2pool/p2pool/util/deferral.py", line 41, in f
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567397 > result = yield func(*args, **kwargs)
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567422 > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1037, in _inlineCallbacks
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567447 > result = result.throwExceptionIntoGenerator(g)
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567592 > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/python/failure.py", line 382, in throwExceptionIntoGenerator
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567679 > return g.throw(self.type, self.value, self.tb)
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567707 > File "/home/rav3n/p2pool/p2pool/util/jsonrpc.py", line 71, in callRemote
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567779 > raise Error_for_code(resp['error']['code'])(resp['error']['message'], resp['error'].get('data', None))
2012-10-26 18:27:47.567809 > p2pool.util.jsonrpc.NarrowError: -10 I0Coin is downloading blocks...
2012-10-26 18:27:49.675252 P2Pool: 18454 shares in chain (18458 verified/18458 total) Peers: 11 (1 incoming)
In fact it can be one-liner: 2012-10-26 18:27:47.567809 > p2pool.util.jsonrpc.NarrowError: -10 I0Coin is downloading blocks...
Also it is printed 2 times one by one, getauxblock function is called second time immediately after failed try? just wait until i0coin is done donwloading blocks! current blocks: 489547. also did u specify it twice with --merged ? this happend once to me and it always said: New merged mining work... |
|
|
|
nice stuff.......
sadly it looks like its discontinued since the OP is inaktive  damnit i want one of these! |
|
|
|
|
a simple question as i cant find any information about it:
what is the min/max for url shortening income per 1k visitor?
greetings
|
|
|
|
I'd love to use P2Pool with my upcoming ASIC miners.
Of course I'm not psyched about configuring it because I suck at software implementation and really just don't like dealing with software.
Anyway, if it's reasonable enough to set up ASIC miners and use P2Pool without penalty, I'll do it.
no problem at all, set ur difficulty to a higher fixed difficulty and thats all https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2PoolDon't forget provision of work, not just difficulty targets, and in fact p2pool still expects diff 1 shares, it just tests them all and ignores most of them. So none of the scaleable solutions have really been implemented yet as far as I can see. my p2pool is providing work fast enough well, will see how it goes when my ASIC ships  EDIT: i gonna take a look at the p2pool source to find a good way to implement it aslong i have time for it. |
|
|
|
BTC pool is up and running.
take a backup of your server so you can restore it if anything goes wrong again. or just stop using it, i dont wanna know his "seucirty" design  |
|
|
|
JoelKatz says true, it was harmfull ONLY for hoppers, Honest folks who dont try do cheat are very satisfied with polmine.pl.
How can it be harmful only for hoppers when you take money out of all user accounts? You made the switch to PPS retroactive and took back money that had already been paid under the old system. Most people who run a bitcoin service would not dream of doing something like this. just one thing: greedy scam nothing to discuss here, he can say 1000 times everything was announced/correct/etc, its still was/is a greedy scam! |
|
|
|
I'd love to use P2Pool with my upcoming ASIC miners.
Of course I'm not psyched about configuring it because I suck at software implementation and really just don't like dealing with software.
Anyway, if it's reasonable enough to set up ASIC miners and use P2Pool without penalty, I'll do it.
no problem at all, set ur difficulty to a higher fixed difficulty and thats all https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool |
|
|
|
tried this again, about 7ghash on it, was getting some absurd orphan rate. out of ~60 shares, had 1 DOA and ~10 orphans. something is either wrong with the newest version or someone that has a high hash rate has a crap link to the hetzner datacenter
did you disable the queue in ur miner? |
|
|
|
Certainly this is a real danger with a proxy pool...
but only if the proxy pool is using PPS, otherwise it would harm much. i wonder if anyone already created some patches for miners to do this... Indeed, but they could easily redirect shares to a PPS should they feel malicious. or a proxy pool just simply switches to another PPS pool to kill it and pay the surpases. this could be really nasty |
|
|
|
Certainly this is a real danger with a proxy pool...
but only if the proxy pool is using PPS, otherwise it wouldnt harm much. i wonder if anyone already created some patches for miners to do this... |
|
|
|
Hmm that is weird, presumably there must be a working version of it someplace then, I wonder where they hide it.
-MarkM-
donst ur tar on SF work? (didnt check it out yet) No it does not, they did some binary-only upgrade or something though I think that didn't work for me either. -MarkM- dammit, just wanted to MM another alt-chain |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
