Looks good so far :-) Just a couple of can't connect errors, but it should be because of the bitcoin client preoccupied with synchronizing.
Yeah, unfortunately while bitcoin is downloading blocks, the RPC is ridiculously slow, and I can't really do anything about that. |
|
|
|
Any news on this?
Yeah, thanks to twmz I guess I'll just go all public domain with this code. I'm planning on CC since that allows most things, but I have a new issue... I'm unsure what the licensing issues I'll have if I throw it under CC considering: - Bootstrap is Apache v2
- and JSONRPC-PHP is GPL v2
Can anyone good with licenses explain to me whether I'm allowed to release my code under Creative Commons, and whatever steps I have to do to ensure I'm not breaking their licenses? First, please don't release software under Creative Commons. Creative Commons wasn't designed for software (it's designed for content: photos, books, music, etc). See http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions#Can_I_apply_a_Creative_Commons_license_to_software.3FSecond, IANAL, but if you use a GPL's library like JSONRPC-PHP and if you choose to distribute your application to others then your code must also be GPL (or public domain, since that means you are relinquishing your copyright altogether). If this isn't something you want to be forced to do, then don't use the JSONRPC-PHP library (JSON RPC is not that complex... you could probably just whip up a couple wrapper functions yourself if you had the desire). Apache v2, on the other hand, is a pretty restriction-less license. In fact, it may be one of the licenses you might want to concider instead of using Creative Commons as it basically says "do whatever you want, just don't blame me, and don't remove my copyright notices, etc"). I'm going to be releasing the first version on my github in the next few hours under public domain  |
|
|
|
|
So... Anyone want to help with my question above ^ so that I can finally release it?
|
|
|
|
Some quick questions: - Does the bitcoind need to run on the same server as the php files?
- Does the wallet need to be in the same place?
Appart from that, cool project even if you use it on your local machine with XAMPP (or linux) 1. No, it uses host/port, it uses the JSONRPC, so it would allow connecting to say yourdomain.com on 8333 if it's forwarded, and identify using its bitcoind username and password. 2. Same as above, it uses the JSONRPC, so the bitcoind server you connect to is responsible for the wallet. After seeing this, I must say I would really like to have a look at this.
Since parts of the code could even be used as a codebase for other implementations, the less restrictive the license is (within your limits), the most people and projects will be able to reuse it for their own implementations. So Unlicense would fit into that criteria IMHO.
Watching this!
I'm planning on CC since that allows most things, but I have a new issue... I'm unsure what the licensing issues I'll have if I throw it under CC considering: - Bootstrap is Apache v2
- and JSONRPC-PHP is GPL v2
Can anyone good with licenses explain to me whether I'm allowed to release my code under Creative Commons, and whatever steps I have to do to ensure I'm not breaking their licenses? |
|
|
|
Me too  LQ1LK2VWsVYcP5GFFngNn9NcUk7TJzD3ax I'll bite. Send some my way?
Lf2QLDgdBofYXqTRYiAtx8ZihW9E5CKN4C
This is testnet. You can't use normal litecoin addresses. Testnet addresses begin with m |
|
|
|
When was this testnet created?
The genesis block for it, well, it was finally created just the other day. (the other testnet probably evaporated from a lack of users) |
|
|
|
Well, I have 73K Testnet LTC. So, if you need some, just post your address here and I'll send you 500 TLTC.  |
|
|
|
|
I'm serious, every time I play freeplay, I get perfect straight lines 99% of the time.
I throw on 0.01 and I die on first try...
Lost an entire 0.5 by dying on the first try every single time with 0.1's...
|
|
|
|
|
Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at minefield.bitcoinlab.org.
It's down again.
|
|
|
|
good job, do you have any experience with ruby on rails, im about to deploy a beta version of and app today and i would like to have you on the team.
No not really, though I could probably pick up ruby quite easily if I needed to... I'm mostly just PHP. |
|
|
|
uhh, how secure is it?
Not very. Throw on apache Auth-Basic though, and it should be good enough, plus if you hide it in /derpy/derpy/derpy/nobody/will/ever/guess/ on your web server, it's unlikely someone would stumble upon it If you had fail2ban, auth-basic would be good enough since they get an IP ban after 3 attempts anyway. |
|
|
|
I've been working on the +Coin webUI for a while, my main purpose was originally for a namecoin management system, though I lacked time and effort for it, eventually I needed a webUI for bitcoind due to bitcoin-qt's instability while using p2pool (0.5.2), so I continued my work on it. (Psst. If you submit a pull request and accept it, you'll get some BTC if your github is linked to tip4commit)  So far, it currently has the following features working: - Listing transactions
- Sending coins
- Compatibility with any *coind that uses the bitcoinRPC (inc. Litecoin, Namecoin, Feathercoin)
- In standard PHP, so it's easy to deploy onto a normal webserver (Great for managing coind's on your VPS/Dedi)
- Colour coded send/recieves, and colour coded confirmations
- A really nice bootstrap interface
- The ability to list how much BTC/whatever is in an account, and then to list the addresses contained in the account.
- Able to display confirmed/unconfirmed balance (All transactions are "confirmed" at 6 in +Coin, including generated ones. I haven't bothered to separate it yet.)
ScreenshotOLD VERSION: http://i55.tinypic.com/24mc1go.pngCURRENT VERSION:  Version 0.01 Alpha - Released under UNLICENSE (public domain) and is available on my Github: https://github.com/Someguy123/-Coin |
|
|
|
I had a similar problem: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60534.0The issue with mine is that they suspended my account, and they're completely ignoring my emails. I've had no mention of bitcoin, and I'm hoping nobody opened a dispute with me and said about bitcoin. I've been suspended for nearly 3 months now, they still refuse to let me know why, and are convincing me that "This limitation can not be appealed" Great thing about that is that I lost my steam account, and just to be nice I paid anyone who I bought BTC off, back in BTC, while paypal now has around $100 of my money locked away... |
|
|
|
My prediction is a massive sell on BTCe now that Solidcoin is finally dieing.
 And on that day... nobody gave a single fuck about SC  |
|
|
|
yes so it can be because of me switching networks with my laptop, thanks. How many computers do you utilize for your 60kh/s?  A normal athlon II x4 is capable of nearly 30kh/s on its own, if not more when OC'd... So he's either got a huge network of low end computers, or just a few high powered CPU's... e.g. my Phenom II x6 gets 5kh/s per thread/core, and I utilize 4 of the cores for mining which ends in around 22kh/s |
|
|
|
The article was saying MS is working with Intel on Windows 9 with the goal of making it the first 128bit OS... and Windows 10 being the first 256bit OS... I'll see if I can dig up that article again.
I've built servers with up to 256 GB RAM. For the sake of estimates, let's say 1 TB RAM is about tops right now. That's 2^40. If we extrapolate with Moore's law, we'll max out 64-bits (2^64) in about 36 years. (Realistically it's going to be a lot longer than that) There's no way MS is going to support Win9 40 years from now. There's no 128-bit hardware in the works, so there's no point in designing 128-bit software for the foreseeable future. 256-bit computing will likely never happen. Just remember Bill Gates famous quote... "640K ought to be enough for anybody"... and today we're going around with a minimum of at least 1GB in most newer computers, and data centers with nearly petabytes of RAM in total. Technology advances fast when it needs to... so 128-bit could come up any time soon. Although 64-bit still isn't fully adopted in every computer. So it'll be a long time before 128-bit ever gets wide scale adoption. |
|
|
|
|
Seems like it, he's the one who always stands up for solidcoin on the forums. So it makes sense.
|
|
|
|
phpBB seems to be pretty popular and seems to have a very good community support too.
phpBB it is then. Unfortunately I can't find any xenforo converters, but the database backup will be posted on the forum (only posts and threads) incase anyone can convert them for liteco.in. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
