What a wrong title you have, talking about government in the title and now discussing bitcoin investment and movement bla bla bla, I believe you have seen how the thread received no replies because no one want to waste time on threads such as this, be aware that bitcoin is just an alternative to the fiat banking system and not a replacement or an anti government assets, bitcoin is not an outlaw actor, but a complement to the existing system.
Bitcoin is becoming more and more popular and many governments are gradually becoming more bitcoin friendly. Things are slowly getting better but it's confusing that there are still people like OP trying to spread negativity between the government and bitcoin. It seems like he and those spreading this negativity do not want a world where bitcoin is legal and recognized. Stories about governments trying to stop bitcoin are slowly disappearing and we should do something to make it happen faster instead of trying to create bigger misunderstandings. Satoshi created bitcoin as an alternative, he never said that bitcoin is a replacement for banks, the current fiat currency system, but there are many people who are deliberately distorting the truth and spreading it . |
|
|
|
No mate, literally no one could predict the Bitcoin's price and we see all such speculation only when the market is upward and we don't see them often during market dip. Bitcoin may even cross $84k or even $100k or even drop below $60 k once again hence we cannot predict much about Bitcoin unless there is a strong factor threatening it's usage which usually results in temporary dump.
If we are all optimistic here, I guess $84k is lesser than what we expect to see in the market. It could be $100k or above, that’s what we want to witness happening in the market. However, bitcoin price is highly volatile that makes it so unpredictable to anticipate a price. Reality is we can witness higher or lower than $84k, and we have no control of that. But if positive news and updates will consistently hit the market, then it’s highly possible for bitcoin price to achieve $100k at the year end or even higher than that. Bitcoin is very volatile and price prediction is difficult because we often make short-term predictions but if we zoom out and think long term, I think predicting bitcoin price is not too difficult. If we stop making short-term predictions and set long-term goals, I think the target of 84k$ is not too difficult for bitcoin to achieve and even 100k$ or more. Even if we have more bad news spread and bitcoin may correct lower, but in the long run, bitcoin will soon recover and rise again. Based on history, bull season is approaching, we should not let bitcoin's short-term volatility cause us to waver and sell bitcoin too early. Hold and hold is the only thing we should do now. |
|
|
|
~
Most likely. I reckon a lot of people are expecting it as well tbh, and some are even expecting more than that even. Chances of it happening this year is pretty low though unless the market has only that positive vibes, which is unlikely. I mean look at the recent market, we stayed at 60k ish for a few months when people were expecting it to bulldoze through just like how it did when it went up from 40k to 70k last time. Same thing here, same cycle of going up, stabilizing, maybe going down every now and then and should slowly go up again. I do reckon if we hit 90k we might see a big bulldoze through 100k just because of hype though lol. There are more than 7 months left until the end of the year and bitcoin always brings us surprises, such as bitcoin reaching a new ATH before the halving, which no one could have thought of. So we don't need to be too pessimistic, optimism is the only thing we should keep at this time. Personally, I think it is not an impossible task for bitcoin to reach $100k this year because the gap from $70k to $100k is not too big. But we don't need to rush, if bitcoin cannot reach 100k$ this year then it will happen next year too. To me, bitcoin hitting $100K is inevitable and we just need to wait patiently. |
|
|
|
~Snip
I feel like we haven't seen a crash hard yet because we are in the bull run period, not saying that we are in the bull run exactly, but it is definitely the same period. Which is why I think it feels like we are going to end up with something that will take a while. I do hope that we are going to see a greater return, it may not be all that easy to handle, but it does feel like we are going to see a greater result one way or another. So that means that we may not see a crash all the way until late 2025, where the bull run would probably end, or even early 2026 could be a date. That is because in 2026 it is expected to be another bear year, just like 2018 was and just like 2022 was, every four years it's a cycle we have. History can still be expected to repeat itself, but we never know when. Even this time, bitcoin's new ATH occurred before the halving and this has never happened before in history. A holder who already owns 10 btc today will very likely become a millionaire in the coming bullish period, but diversification could make it quicker for them, or it could slow it down. I strongly believe that bitcoin will not lose too much in price in 2024 to 2025, but price volatility is very possible. Prices rising and falling for one reason or another are normal, but economic, political and other situations can have an impact on the market. We cannot expect that history will always repeat itself exactly in every detail because things will always change over time and the impact at each stage will be different. This year, bitcoin has a new ATH because we have a bitcoin ETF and this has never happened before, and for this reason, many people suspect that history has been changed. To be honest, I also doubt whether history will repeat itself, but if we look at the rapidly growing demand for bitcoin. Even if history doesn't repeat itself, bitcoin's price increase is inevitable. I agree with you, since the bitcoin ETFs were approved I don't think we will see another bear season like before, bitcoin is still falling, there will still be corrections, but bitcoin is dumped 70% - 90% will not happen again. |
|
|
|
but I think the upcoming bull season will not able to reach 20x multiplier, x10 is still realistic as Bitcoin price getting expensive, it require more money to pump it.
Yup, If you look at the exact bottom of the cycle, $15.4k, $154k is the 10x. My Target price for Bitcoin's next ATH is $172k. I mean I am not asking much from Bitcoin, or am I?  That's not that much and that's only going to be around 2.5x from the current price of $69k. And with what the speculations and analyses that I have read, 10x is actually more than from what they're seeing since it is past with the last cycles that we're in. So, IMHO $172k is possible but I hope that I still able to hold a lot from that time because many of us are likely to sell from the price ranges of $100k-$120k and $150k is going to be a survival mode for the ones who are still in diamond hands by that time. Thanks for the chart IT, with what the cycles that we've seen, the red line is likely going to surpass that green line. x10 profit is not much, how much do you think is much? You cannot find any traditional asset or business that can deliver x10 returns in 4 years. And those who buy bitcoin from now and if bitcoin can reach $170k, they will gain 2.5 times profit in just 1.5 years. And I can tell you that no traditional asset can do the same thing that bitcoin has done. That's also why many traditional investors call bitcoin a get-rich-quick investment. I also see many people on the forum setting a target of 100k$ but I don't believe they will sell when bitcoin reaches 100k$, in a bull market there will always be greed. Planning and setting goals is one thing, whether we follow the plan or not is another. |
|
|
|
This topic has come up quite a few times over the years on this board. A lot of the discussion around it has mostly been others opinions. I found this neat little graph online (instagram) from the New York Times that compares the two. Now keep in mind one's location will certainly have an effect on which one might make more sense, even in what part of you own country you're in.
There is nothing bad in buying a house or renting it, doing both, your plan and purpose for doing such matters. At times, you may not have the money to get the kind of house you want to buy, in this case, surely, you will not sleep outside or do any magic, you will have to be patient for a while until you are financially stronger enough to buy a house. In some cases, it could be a situation of relocation where you can't immediately settle for the buying of the house, and of course, you will have to rent. Again, there are some people who have bought or built houses at some disadvantaged location, they do not have a choice, and they might still opt to rent a house for the time being. If they calculate the proximity-caused issues like the convenience of getting to work, resources to be wasted due to and fro daily, and safety, they would surely resort to renting a house in most cases. So, the two are no big deal, as safety, purpose, plan and convenience are key here. It would really be something that will be depending into someones needs and preference because there are really people who are really that loving on having their own home and there are ones who do love to rent due to various reasons like the location of their job and something that do talks about practicality.It would really be just that depending on how well you would really be that making yourself that goes with your preference. When it comes to savings then it would really be something that renting would be saving you up rather than on having that your own house. It would really be that situational and just like been said it would really be affected with several factors on which we know that this could really affect your decision making. For me on which having your own house will definitely give out that kind of peace of mind and having that confidence since you are living on your own house which you wont really be needing to pay up some rent but still you would really be needing to pay up those monthly amortization on which this is where people would be that skeptical on making up decisions because they dont really like for these things to be happening because they dont have the money or having not have the plans on paying up big for a long term amort on which i do really that seeing this stuff on where people do come into a point or consider about speaking with practicality but of course it would really be still that depending on someones preference. I agree that whether to buy or rent will depend on each person because there are many things to consider . But I will disagree that renting a house is more economical than buying a house. When buying a house you will need to spend a large amount of money and not everyone has the economic ability to do that. Meanwhile , renting a house is largely due to some people not having much money or due to the nature of their work. But if you rent for a short term, there's no problem, but if you have to rent for the rest of your life, it's a problem . Some people say that the amount of money they rent for 30 or 40 years is enough to own their own house , but because they can't have that much money, they can't buy a house . Meanwhile, if you buy a house, you can live in it and after you die you can inherit that house to your children . In the long run , buying a house always has greater benefits than renting . I believe that owning real estate or a house is always the dream of everyone, especially those with families , which is why the demand for real estate or its value has never stopped increasing. On the moment that you would be buying your own house then it would be a one time big time payment specially if its cash purchased but that would only stop on there and next of that then you would be that free of monthly payment or wont really be having that responsibility on paying up something but we do know that not all people would be having that finances that they could afford their own house. If you do then you are lucky or consider yourself on a good position because building one doesn't come cheap and only a few could be having that capability on doing so. We are all hoping and wanting on having our own home but there are really indeed instances that due to lack of funds or cant be able to afford then we would be ending up on renting out. Just like on what Fatunad said above that it will really be situational basing up on what are the condition that you are into. If you do find that you could save up money on renting or really that near on your workplace then it would be common sense that you will be renting instead on making some commute specially if your home is really that too far. It would be impossible that you cant be able to assess yourself on what are the things that you should gonna do and stick out on where you could be able to save more. I do not deny that whether to rent or buy a house will depend on each person such as the nature of the job and many other factors. But like I said , I don't think long-term renting is more economical than owning a house. Personally, I lived in a rented house for more than 10 years while working away from home and I found that with that 10 years' rent , I was able to own a small house in my hometown. But because the economic conditions at that time were quite difficult, I could not buy a house and had to rent a house . If at that time I have enough money to buy a house and return to my hometown after quitting my job , I will even make a large profit from that house by renting or selling that house . That's why I disagree when people say renting a house is more economical than owning a house. |
|
|
|
 Chelsea are looking for dynamic manager, several candidates are being discussed internally with owners and directors involved.
Thomas Frank among names mentioned internally; also Kieran McKenna but still all open.
Seb Hoeneß, highly rated but fully focused on Stuttgart. Source: https://www.101greatgoals.com/news/next-chelsea-manager-kieran-mckenna-thomas-frank-thomas-tuchel/At least it is good to see that Chelsea are actually looking for a coach and not keeping the current coach any longer. Yes towards the end they were able to perform really well. Maybe better than they have performed the whole season. But that does not mean in the next season they are not going to suffer. So the decision that they have taken is very good in my opinion. And it looks like they are actually looking for a coach who will be able to handle pressure and also handle such a big squad like Chelsea as well. That is something we have seen many coaches fail to do in recent times. I have also heard that Chelsea is not going back to the previous coaches that they have brought in recently. I am talking about Jose Marino, Conte, and Tuchel. |
|
|
|
This topic has come up quite a few times over the years on this board. A lot of the discussion around it has mostly been others opinions. I found this neat little graph online (instagram) from the New York Times that compares the two. Now keep in mind one's location will certainly have an effect on which one might make more sense, even in what part of you own country you're in.
There is nothing bad in buying a house or renting it, doing both, your plan and purpose for doing such matters. At times, you may not have the money to get the kind of house you want to buy, in this case, surely, you will not sleep outside or do any magic, you will have to be patient for a while until you are financially stronger enough to buy a house. In some cases, it could be a situation of relocation where you can't immediately settle for the buying of the house, and of course, you will have to rent. Again, there are some people who have bought or built houses at some disadvantaged location, they do not have a choice, and they might still opt to rent a house for the time being. If they calculate the proximity-caused issues like the convenience of getting to work, resources to be wasted due to and fro daily, and safety, they would surely resort to renting a house in most cases. So, the two are no big deal, as safety, purpose, plan and convenience are key here. It would really be something that will be depending into someones needs and preference because there are really people who are really that loving on having their own home and there are ones who do love to rent due to various reasons like the location of their job and something that do talks about practicality.It would really be just that depending on how well you would really be that making yourself that goes with your preference. When it comes to savings then it would really be something that renting would be saving you up rather than on having that your own house. It would really be that situational and just like been said it would really be affected with several factors on which we know that this could really affect your decision making. For me on which having your own house will definitely give out that kind of peace of mind and having that confidence since you are living on your own house which you wont really be needing to pay up some rent but still you would really be needing to pay up those monthly amortization on which this is where people would be that skeptical on making up decisions because they dont really like for these things to be happening because they dont have the money or having not have the plans on paying up big for a long term amort on which i do really that seeing this stuff on where people do come into a point or consider about speaking with practicality but of course it would really be still that depending on someones preference. I do not deny that whether to rent or buy a house will depend on each person such as the nature of the job and many other factors. But like I said , I don't think long-term renting is more economical than owning a house. Personally, I lived in a rented house for more than 10 years while working away from home and I found that with that 10 years' rent , I was able to own a small house in my hometown. But because the economic conditions at that time were quite difficult, I could not buy a house and had to rent a house . If at that time I have enough money to buy a house and return to my hometown after quitting my job , I will even make a large profit from that house by renting or selling that house . That's why I disagree when people say renting a house is more economical than owning a house. |
|
|
|
I like this concept you have offered. It is also the duty of the rich to help the poor and needy. We recently saw on this forum that a thread was opened to help Ukrainians and everyone donated what they could.
You mentioned that you will donate $100 when the price of Bitcoin reaches $100k. At the price you mentioned i.e. if bitcoin price is not $100k dollars then will you stop donating. Maybe our donation does not depend on any event it should be our duty to help people whenever we can.
I think there is no specific time limit to help. If you want to donate, you can donate in any situation. Because even if the price of bitcoin hits $100k dollars, we will donate, even if the price of bitcoin does not hit $100k dollars, we will donate it should be our pledge.
If you want to donate, or charity , you can do it whenever you have money and are willing to help people , and you don't need to announce it or post it on any social network to brag with everyone . And when it comes to donating and charity , we should do it ourselves before giving advice to others . I also explained that our donation should not depend on any event as we will rush to donate whenever we have the opportunity and whenever we have money at our disposal. If you can, come forward to help the poor. Also donation should be kept confidential, you should not brag about donation to me or anyone. Donate according to your wish and ability. The OP said that when the price of bitcoin reaches 100k dollars you will donate a hundred dollars. If somehow the bitcoin price doesn't reach 100k dollars will we stop our donation which is what I tried to explain. But the procedure OP asked us to follow for grant is also correct. We don't know when bitcoin price will reach 100k dollars because crypto is very volatile so no one can predict accurately. If the price of Bitcoin reaches $100k it will be the highest price in the history of Bitcoin which will be worth celebrating. I understand what you're saying but what I'm trying to say is that donating to charity and celebrating when bitcoin hits $100k are completely different. There are many ways for us to celebrate when bitcoin reaches the 6-digit milestone but OP's idea is so good and with that idea it will definitely attract more participants and make the celebration more meaningful. Also, it is true that we cannot predict the movement of bitcoin but as a bitcoin investor, I am confident that bitcoin will be able to touch $100k. I am quite confident in that and the only problem is time, sooner or later bitcoin will reach 6 digits. |
|
|
|
In the end, Sunrisers Hyderabad got to a total of 159, which I would consider as quite decent. Pat Cummins added 30 valuable runs towards the end, and it may make a difference today. After being smashed all over the park, Mitchell Starc returnd back to form with a terrific spell of 4-0-34-3. Varun Chakravarthy also did well and picked crucial wickets. As of now, I would say that Kolkata Knight Riders remains as the favorites to win this match, unless the SRH bowlers can do something extra-ordinary.
Sunrisers Hyderabad lost the match very convincingly. They have lost the match against KKR and KKR has been able to beat them with eight wickets and 38 balls in hand. The way this whole tournament has been played, I thought obviously this target is not going to be enough. But I thought maybe there is a chance that the track is actually not that good and maybe there is something for the bowlers in it. But I was wrong. This was very much once I did and I am very much disappointed to see this match. I am personally very disappointed to see the whole IPL tournament to be honest. It is really not fun for me to see even good balls go flying out of the ground. It is like the player cannot do anything about it. Doesn’t matter what field they set or what ball they bowl. For me, there was not enough competitive integrity in this IPL tournament. |
|
|
|
 Source: Yahoo SportsI do not know about the managerial career of him. I know that he was a very good defender back in the day. I also know that he is currently the coach of Burnley. And Burnley just got relegated. So I do not think it is going to be a very wise idea to actually get him as the coach of Bayern Munich. They should look for someone who has already been able to prove himself. And I do not think he is that guy. You know, he has not coached big clubs so far. The first somewhat big club or decent club that he has actually taken up the coaching job for Burnley and they got relegated this season. So I do not think Munich should consider him as an actual candidate. I think Munich will be better off with the coach that they have right now instead of getting Kompany. |
|
|
|
Betis has delivered a disgraceful result for its fans after it was losing against sociedad with decent scores. Being able to sit in the conference league spot does not even help Betis get three points from its opponent and sociedad has taken it back from betis. The club must allow sociedad to take three points from Betis. It assists Sociedad in maintaining its position in the conference league this season as the club has very small chance to qualify for the conference league.
Congratulations to Sociedad on destroying Betis with a pretty good score and it's really help for sociedad to qualify for the conference league. The only possible scenario is that Betis will win the upcoming game with a large margin. Meanwhile, Sociedad must have dropped three points in the upcoming game but it sounds impossible to happen considering sociedad is also having more GD / GF compared to the best.
I'm not sure if betis will be able to do that given the poor performance of real betis.
A very disappointing match for those who support Real Betis. But we can see that Real Betis shot towards goal several times. This is an effort that has been carried out by Real Betis but the results obtained do not match the efforts made by Real Betis. Luck was still not on his side. I think this is the end of Real Betis' match because in the next match I am sure they will have difficulty winning because the opponents they face in the next match are three teams that have great strength and it is impossible for Real Betis to win this match.  If Real Betis had any chance of finishing in the sixth position, I believe it is officially gone now. The difference of four points cannot be closed when only one match is left. Congratulations to Real Sociedad for being able to win this match and of course after losing this match it has also been official that Real Betis is not going to take part in any European competition as well. If we talk about the next match, I do not think Real Betis is going to be able to win at all. Because the next match is against Real Madrid. Even though Villareal has been able to get one point from the match against Real Madrid after being behind significantly, I do not think Real Bettis will be able to do the same thing. |
|
|
|
I perfectly understand that Real Madrid is the most successful club in Europe and as the most successful European club, they have that winning mentality which I think is necessary of their biggest weapons as a club but after the result of their game today against Villarreal and how Villarreal were able to come from three goals down draw the game, I became worried of what Real Madrid in the final against a Borussia Dortmund team that's more formidable than Villarreal.
Borussia Dortmund did not win any other trophy and the only way they can finish the season a trophy is by winning the UEFA Champions League final against Real Madrid so I expect them to be at their best when facing Madrid. Real Madrid despite their result today against Villarreal is stilly favorite team to win that final but they must definitely be at their best to achieve that against Borussia Dortmund
Just because Dortmund haven't won a single trophy doesn't mean they have a better chance win it in the Champions League final than Real Madrid. Moreover, Real Madrid have so much more experience in this tournament that they can play more confidently, although these are just my assumptions. There is no need now to evaluate Real's defense based on the match with Villarreal, because there you need to evaluate the match comprehensively, starting with their squard and ending with motivation. In the final everything will be different, and most likely it will be Dortmund who will play most of the match in defense, unless they concede an early goal and have to win back.  Joselu: “These matches allow us to prepare for what's coming in two weeks”
"We have been very consistent throughout the season", said the forward, who netted Madrid's second goal. Joselu said in point. I am going to say that Real Madrid is going to be the winner of this Champions League final just because of the history that Real Madrid has in the Champions League competition. They are definitely one of the best teams to play in the Champions League. And we all remember the numerous times that has been able to make a comeback from unbelievable situations and win Champions League matches. That's why I think Real Madrid should be able to win the Champions League title this season. But of course, whenever there is a final being played, we have to assume that both of the teams have a 50-50 chance to win. And of course, both of the teams also have the capability of winning the final. That's why they are in the final in the first place. But Real Madrid is undoubtedly going to be the favorite. Source: https://www.realmadrid.com/en-US/news/football/first-team/latest-news/declas-19-05-2024 |
|
|
|
Most investors are hoping that bitcoin price will hit 200k and above in the bull run when bitcoin price hits its peak. Why I am saying this is that 73k was the highest price we saw this circle and it is just the price to start the bull run.
I don't see too many people being optimistic about the $200k target that bitcoin can reach this bull season , what I see is people only making rather modest predictions of $100k. I am also very optimistic and believe that this will be a super bullish cycle because we have many big catalysts in this year's bullish season such as the US election , interest rates , and inflation all have positive improvements , ETFs...but I think the goal of 200k$ is not an easy goal to achieve . Personally, I still believe that bitcoin hitting the 150k-180k level is much more feasible . |
|
|
|
I like this concept you have offered. It is also the duty of the rich to help the poor and needy. We recently saw on this forum that a thread was opened to help Ukrainians and everyone donated what they could.
You mentioned that you will donate $100 when the price of Bitcoin reaches $100k. At the price you mentioned i.e. if bitcoin price is not $100k dollars then will you stop donating. Maybe our donation does not depend on any event it should be our duty to help people whenever we can.
I think there is no specific time limit to help. If you want to donate, you can donate in any situation. Because even if the price of bitcoin hits $100k dollars, we will donate, even if the price of bitcoin does not hit $100k dollars, we will donate it should be our pledge.
If you want to donate, or charity , you can do it whenever you have money and are willing to help people , and you don't need to announce it or post it on any social network to brag with everyone . And when it comes to donating and charity , we should do it ourselves before giving advice to others . As for what the OP is saying , he means that we should celebrate when bitcoin hits $100k , and celebrate by donating $100 when bitcoin hits $100k. It's an important milestone that every bitcoin investor is aiming for . This is an impressive way to celebrate and I support this idea, I will be willing to donate if someone reputable enough comes forward to organize this event . |
|
|
|
-snip-
Who has observed that the speculations and predictions of Bitcoin price has gone silence since the market went DIP after the halving?
Bitcoin price speculation and predictions do not always have to be visible. On platforms like x.com, speculation and price predictions still exist if you pay attention. After the halving, we admit that the price of Bitcoin experienced a correction from a price above $73k back to a price below $69k or even below. Even now the price is still difficult to get above $69k. Although this is only normal and some people think that the difficulty in breaking through prices above $70k is only temporary in preparation for an increase higher. If I observe current conditions, the market is not bad. You are right, price predictions and speculations may not always be visible but I know they are still present in the market. It’s just that current price is now in a good position although it has not exceed above $70k but we all know it’s heading there. However, still price correction might eventually back again right after bitcoin reaches another significant price so we should still prepare for it and accumulate more bitcoin if possible. Bitcoin price predictions and speculations will always be a part of an unpredictable market. The moment it stops, which I guess won’t be possible, then I think this volatile market will not be interesting anymore. People are still making predictions about the market but we cannot deny that before the halving there were many positive predictions about bitcoin increasing in price and creating a new ATH after the halving. But after the halving was completed, bitcoin continued to adjust and showed no clear signs of price increase , which made most investors discouraged and did not want to make too many predictions about the market. I'm also a regular user of X , and I've also noticed that bitcoin's predictions have become much quieter than they were months before the halving . Even on this forum, people still make predictions about the price of bitcoin , but it is clearly becoming much quieter than before. |
|
|
|
Manchester City won their last match as well as Arsenal won their last match of the season but Manchester City's win was not good for Arsenal at all because of this win Manchester City won the title again this season. Arsenal lost the title every season to Manchester City at the end of the season. But I must praise Arsenal's performance this season because the performance they have shown this season and the way they have competed until the last match is undoubtedly commendable. This season Arsenal tried their best and they created many chances but for some reason they could not secure the title. Hope they will try again next season and they will be successful next season.
Congratulations to Manchester City for another season of title wins.
From the beginning of the season several teams have competed strongly in the race for the English league championship, but slowly continue to narrow down leaving Arsenal, Liverpool and Manchester City, Manchester City which in the middle of the season is still in rank 3 is still able to compete and be consistent in the race for the championship title, until in the end when the game only left a few more games in the race for the championship title, Arsenal And Liverpool experienced a crash that forced the two teams Having to lose points and even more tragically Liverpool had to get out of the winning path this season, Manchester City who benefited from the crash of both teams managed to overtake Arsenal and Liverpool, so they were ranked first in the Premier League at that time and made Arsenal have to hang their fate in the hands of other teams. Arsenal journey this season has ended in failure like last season, but admit it or not, for now Arsenal performance has improved drastically compared to a few seasons ago where they were only referred to as a team that only targeted the top 4, with Arteta coaching methods and also the addition of several experienced players in their squad, now Arsenal has become a championship challenger team as it has been in the last two seasons, so I think we will see Arsenal will continue to develop and will even remain title contenders. Manchester City created English football history by overcoming West Ham 3-1 to win their fourth straight Premier League title and break Arsenal's hearts as Jurgen Klopp made an emotional Liverpool exit.
Phil Foden scored two early goals at an expectant Etihad Stadium on Sunday to put his side on the brink of the title before Mohammed Kudus pulled one back with a spectacular overhead kick. Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/sports/2024/5/19/man-city-clinch-historic-fourth-premier-league-title-despite-arsenal-winbreak Arsenal's hearts?? Well, all I want to say is that we at least did not see any stupid results brought in by Arsenal at the end of the season. If I recall correctly, in the last season Arsenal had almost 10 point advantage over Manchester City. somehow Arsenal still ended up losing the English Premier League title. At least something like that did not happen in this season. And I think we can say that Arsenal has actually shown improvements. More improvements are needed of course. I think Arsenal is heading towards the right direction though. I also want to talk about another thing, what do you guys think about people calling the English Premier League the actual farmers' league? Manchester City has been able to win the English Premier League title six times in the last seven seasons. And I do not think this domination is going to change anytime soon. |
|
|
|
 Union Berlin actually got a very important win. Now they are going to stay in the Bundesliga with a good goal difference. And honestly, I would not have liked to see them get relegated from the Bundesliga after they had shown so many promises. I hope they will be able to make a comeback and will be able to improve their performance very soon. Now that they have made sure that they are going to stay in the Bundesliga, I hope they will be able to sort out the problems that they have. Actually, I am not saying that they should improve so much that they should be able to challenge for the Bundesliga title. Even though that would be very nice. But I think they should just be able to aim for the top four positions at least. They managed to hold on to the league with their victory against Freiburg in the last match. While Union Berlin was a feared team in the league a few years ago, it has now turned into the impression of a mediocre team that left the relegation zone in the last game. They were lucky this year, but what will happen next year? Will they be this lucky next year? They have to spend the transfer period well in order not to leave next year to chance. Yes, it is absolutely true. They were lucky in this season. Otherwise, it could easily have been a relegation for them. when they were actually performing well consistently sometime ago, I think that was actually skill. Well, to be honest, it was not on skill, it was probably 50% skill and 50% luck. when the luck ran out, they were not able to perform consistently. I still remember them performing really well towards the start of a certain season. I cannot remember which season. But after almost like 15 matches, they started to fall down through the table. I did not think they were going to fight so hard to stay out of the relegation zone so soon. But anyway I agree that they will have to spend some good amount of money to actually stay out of the relegation zone and at least stay towards the upper half of the table. |
|
|
|
Union Berlin defeated Freiburg at home to stay in the league.They did not start the match well against Freiburg.The first half ended in a goalless draw, but it is worth noting that Union Berlin missed a penalty.In the second half, the match started to get more active in the last 30 minutes. In the 68th minute, Union went 1-0 up with Hollerbach, but in the 85th minute, Union Berlin scored a goal and went into the last 7-8 minutes with a draw.Union Berlin managed to win the match with Haberer's goal in extra time and managed to get a life-saving 3 points.Bochum's defeat to its rival also played a big role in staying in the league. Although they wanted to win the match against Werder Bremen, there was a Bochum that could not do it.The total number of shots of the 2 teams in the match was 53 and there were only 5 goals in the match.In the match where we saw plenty of positions, the goals usually came in the last 15 minutes.
Union Berlin actually got a very important win. Now they are going to stay in the Bundesliga with a good goal difference. And honestly, I would not have liked to see them get relegated from the Bundesliga after they had shown so many promises. I hope they will be able to make a comeback and will be able to improve their performance very soon. Now that they have made sure that they are going to stay in the Bundesliga, I hope they will be able to sort out the problems that they have. Actually, I am not saying that they should improve so much that they should be able to challenge for the Bundesliga title. Even though that would be very nice. But I think they should just be able to aim for the top four positions at least. |
|
|
|
Pakistan women vs England women. 3rd T20I
Another match and another loss. Pakistan women team have lost another T20 series and this time its a whitewash. England gave target of 176 only because of Danni Wyatt brilliant knock of 87 runs on just 48 balls. In reply just see the strike rate of Pakistani batters, both openers played with strike rate of run a ball. Pakistani team played full 20 overs and lost just 4 wickets, seems like Pakistani batters were interested in improving personal stats only not in winning the match.
 I was sure that Pakistan would lose this series. Because Pakistan women's team is far behind compared to England women's team. In the second match, England Women's team set a target of just 145 runs. However, the Pakistan Women's team lost the match by a huge margin of 65 runs. Pakistan women's team mustered only 79 runs. After seeing the result of this match I was sure that Pakistan women team will lose in the last match as well. As usual we don't see good performance from Pakistan women team even in last match. England Women set a huge target of 177 runs. Pakistan women's team did not have the ability to win by batting against such a big target. However, Pakistan Women's team batted well enough and scored 142 runs for the loss of 4 wickets. Pakistani women team players need to work harder. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
