total commission: 3.87648475 collected from: 26 users ( 39 total invested users )
[5316.76000766,5286.79818173,3340.39676033,1040.65510331,411.99642125,307.79678454,125.0770081,75.11271152,69.19397901,40.06261028,32.60681579,25.06160405,20.43929189,17.16047668,15.04830953,11.94303295,10.61283599,9.99786621,1.19309233,1.10783902] Stake Overview Total Stakes: 324 Total CLAM: 324.00450000 Orphan Count: 46 |
|
|
|
Is there any way to check for the state of the funding? How and where can i send a donation and be sure it really goes to the development of clam?
There is no "CLAM fund" or anything like that. Xploited works for me, I've offered to pay him 1/2 of his general hourly rate in order to work on CLAMS. (This is just FreeBitcoins.com donation to him) Right now Xploited is stuck on a problem that he isn't able to figure out... he's reached out to Dooglus for help. Dooglus said he will help him, but right now everyone that is in Canada is trying to enjoy their summers and fundless/no-commitment/hobby cryptocurrencies get knocked down from the priority list. I would guess we have a new wallet by this year that isn't so difficult. (It should be noted that we all run the CLAM wallet just fine) Anyone can contribute to this open source project... I can get you more information if you want to see if you can take a crack at it! Just let me know <3 |
|
|
|
Is it true that the price is supported by a flow of noobs? And as soon as this well dries, there will not be a project?
Yes, this is true. You should sell all of your CLAMS to avoid a complete loss. |
|
|
|
*Be careful with non-OP snapshots* |
|
|
|
Users have been able to easily transact Litecoin via Telegram Messenger, is that true? And is it safe to use?
Say that one more time differently. I do not understand your question. |
|
|
|
My losses now exceed $3,300,000 from this "Rick Rolling". (Coinbase hid the rick roll video in their launch page as a haha for their fake news) B) The coinbase.com/lunar site was just a fun way to tease people on the internet and to create some buzz.
I'm still exploring options. Not forgotten, but WAY harder than I would have expected. |
|
|
|
total commission: 2.72419838 collected from: 24 users ( 35 total invested users )
5276.95661894,4492.0028959,3315.38921616,1032.86407362,706.89008633,305.49249489,124.14063167,74.55038777,68.67439201,35.20767265,30.01514168,28.9834028,20.32205022,20.28607357,11.85362264,10.53338406,6.7544257,1.18416037 Stake Overview Total Stakes: 253 Total CLAM: 253.00350000 Orphan Count: 39 |
|
|
|
That's not correct. You can call "gettxoutsetinfo" on the core daemon to get the real amount (excluding coins on the map), which last I checked was around 23M (as expected). Whoa wait... I thought you died?!Nm I was confused as normal. |
|
|
|
|
There were some REALLY strong buys today thus far. Big % flashes in the green.
*phew*
|
|
|
|
Not that I care all that much because the people arguing here don't actually seem to be involved with the project, ie I'd care more if it was investors who were complaining about mismanaged funds and not random people with vendettas against each other. But just curious, would the ~10 BTC from the BTCCash to BTC exchange that people say have gone missing happen to be from a fork exchange service fee? As in a service that searches for forks, converts them all to BTC, and then handles the transaction?
What was the txid for the BCH? I can check my old services records to see if I have any matches. It doesn't sound like one of our old FreeBitcoins.com digs, but it's likely worth double checking for the sake of peace of mind. |
|
|
|
|
I can't / refuse to have BTC on Poloniex.
The problem is most exchanges suck donkey dick atm.
|
|
|
|
I've added over 100 CLAMS to the FreeBitcoins.com blastOFF (rockets) weekly prize pool. Right now if you win 0.21 CLAMS... you get a 14.28 CLAM bonus at the end of the week. (this is going to change and bounce around as the week goes) Anyone and everyone is welcome to contribute to the pool by typing "/reward x.xxxxxxxxx"  |
|
|
|
[Weekly-Commissions] total commission: 13.27942114 collected from: 26 users
[Weekly-Commissions] Investment balances: [5248.05039846,3697.36737666,3297.22810957,1027.52142983,303.81906188,123.46061159,74.14201414,52.06221223,29.91648711,29.42479363,20.47627125,20.18592294,11.78869062,10.47568407,1.36894971,1.17767375] Total Stakes: 192 Total CLAM: 192.00340000 Orphan Count: 28 |
|
|
|
|
Do me a favor first.
Go create a auction thread... then edit that OP and let me know what world I'm from.
It's not a minor thing that Mprep did.
|
|
|
|
I see no issues in extending the auction if there is valid reason for doing so (which mprep stated).
What was that reason for extending the auction in the OP? That he had issues with the previous month? "The minimum bid is 0.02 BTC, the bids should be evenly divisible by 0.01 BTC. The auction will end on March 15th when this thread is closed if there is at least 1 valid bid. If there isn't one, it'll end 1 week after the first valid bid is placed. The winner's advertisement will run for 1 month." An excuse after the fact isn't acceptable or honest. If everyone extended their auction on a whim... it would cause problems on that side of the forum. Mprep knows they were wrong and their new auctions now include some pretty lame terms in the OP. I've reached out to Mprep because he counter my feedback with his own negative (lol). This isn't politics. It isn't debatable... the quotes are his quotes. He violated them + other things that are above my pay grade. So if something were to happen after you've opened an auction you are never, under any circumstances, allowed to change something about it? What planet are you from? Were you personally effected by this auction being extended for 1 week? Did it cause you any losses? Why are you so invested in this, if not for a personal vendetta against mprep? If you want to ask questions about me personally... I recommend opening a new thread our back and forth is going to hurt Mprep further here with your nonsense. |
|
|
|
I see no issues in extending the auction if there is valid reason for doing so (which mprep stated).
What was that reason for extending the auction in the OP? That he had issues with the previous month? "The minimum bid is 0.02 BTC, the bids should be evenly divisible by 0.01 BTC. The auction will end on March 15th when this thread is closed if there is at least 1 valid bid. If there isn't one, it'll end 1 week after the first valid bid is placed. The winner's advertisement will run for 1 month." An excuse after the fact isn't acceptable or honest. If everyone extended their auction on a whim... it would cause problems on that side of the forum. Mprep knows they were wrong and their new auctions now include some pretty lame terms in the OP. I've reached out to Mprep because he counter my feedback with his own negative (lol). This isn't politics. It isn't debatable... the quotes are his quotes. He violated them + other things that are above my pay grade. |
|
|
|
I see no issues in extending the auction if there is valid reason for doing so (which mprep stated).
What was that reason for extending the auction in the OP? |
|
|
|
Is this still a thing?
Yes, but there's been a massive complication. The deposit engine got really confused and I've been forced to take it down and run a full audit on the deposit history. There are a lot of errors to sort through and I don't have tons of time to work on it, so it's been down for a while. It's not going away, I promise! I took down the shit spamming faucet too btw. That should make life a little easier for all the CLAM services. I humbly apologize about that. I was just trying to do what was helpful. Well... "helpful"  . |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
