Deleted on their new censored thread: We are fully regulated and licensed Who regulates you and how? We go through annual compliance check with our regulator, Curaçao Egaming, which is authorized and regulated by the Government of Curaçao. Definition regulator: An official who works for the part of the government that controls a public activity (such as banking or insurance) by making and enforcing rules. Curaçao eGaming does not work for the part of the government and therefore is not your regulator! Are there documents about the procedure of the annual compliance check available (even per pm)? Curaçao eGaming received the 1668/JAZ license from the Government of Curaçao, but they do not regulate Curaçao eGaming! However, if you have proof or documents that the Government of Curaçao regulates Curaçao eGaming, feel free to show it? On the bottom of our home page you can find a shield and by clicking that it will validate our license. More information about the seal system can be found by clicking here. If I click on the license seal on your website, I will be forwarded to the seal status page of Curaçao eGaming. The seal status is not to be accepted as valid license certificate. Therefore your claim that the seal status page validates your license is baseless! The only thing the seal status page of Curaçao eGaming does is to confirm the claim of bitcasino.io to operate under their 1668/JAZ license. It is also clear that Curaçao eGaming can not validate your license. Because if key conditions of the usage rights contract to operate under their 1668/JAZ license are not fulfilled or Curaçao civil and criminal laws are breached, then the usage rights contract to operate under their 1668/JAZ license becomes invalid! And this totally independent of what Curaçao eGaming claims, because Curaçao civil and criminals laws and courts stand above the anonymous venture Curaçao eGaming.
|
|
|
Deleted on their new censored thread: We are fully regulated and licensed Who regulates you and how? We go through annual compliance check with our regulator, Curaçao Egaming, which is authorized and regulated by the Government of Curaçao. Definition regulator: An official who works for the part of the government that controls a public activity (such as banking or insurance) by making and enforcing rules. Curaçao eGaming does not work for the part of the government and therefore is not your regulator! Are there documents about the procedure of the annual compliance check available (even per pm)? Curaçao eGaming received the 1668/JAZ license from the Government of Curaçao, but they do not regulate Curaçao eGaming! However, if you have proof or documents that the Government of Curaçao regulates Curaçao eGaming, feel free to show it? On the bottom of our home page you can find a shield and by clicking that it will validate our license. More information about the seal system can be found by clicking here. If I click on the license seal on your website, I will be forwarded to the seal status page of Curaçao eGaming. The seal status is not to be accepted as valid license certificate. Therefore your claim that the seal status page validates your license is baseless! The only thing the seal status page of Curaçao eGaming does is to confirm the claim of bitcasino.io to operate under their 1668/JAZ license. It is also clear that Curaçao eGaming can not validate your license. Because if key conditions of the usage rights contract to operate under their 1668/JAZ license are not fulfilled or Curaçao civil and criminal laws are breached, then the usage rights contract to operate under their 1668/JAZ license becomes invalid! And this totally independent of what Curaçao eGaming claims, because Curaçao civil and criminals laws and courts stand above the anonymous venture Curaçao eGaming.
|
|
|
What game-protect messaged one of our players (shared with their permission): If it is one player, why their permission? Do you have permission from the author? What you are offering is blackmail/racketeering as a service, Where? not only is this highly unethical but I strongly question the legality of what you are doing. - Online gaming consumer protection service is legal. - Give the offender the opportunity to give the loot of a victim back is legal. - Demand letter and start a court case is legal. - Report the offender to the police and authorities is legal. You are making the claim that these websites are "probably breaking X law" so you can blackmail them for money back to keep quiet? No, GP says and has proof that these websites indeed breaking X law. No, GP does not blackmail illegal casino operators to keep quiet. We only assist the enforcement of legitimate claims. I have no interest in responding to your emails and you can consider this a written ban from using Primedice/Stake. As the operator of a casino taking Bitcoins worth $ millions you are obligated to show your authorization to have anonymous accounts and ignore AML laws! Because neither Curaçao nor Australian laws allow this! However, if you think the issue is solved with ignorance, then that is fine for GP either. One of them that isn't is "betonline" which is very widely known to be a scam site, video evidence exists of them rigging games. You are obviously very clueless in regard to legal things! Only because a dealer of a third party live casino provider took the second card instead the first does not make BetOnline a scam! Despite of this, it is totally unclear if this dealer has cheated. Cheated would mean that he knew the first and the second card and decided to take the second. If these dealers know the cards why is there only one video where this one time out of millions of hands happened? Does not make any sense! If you continue to fill up this thread with your bullshit you can be certain I will make certain no website in this entire industry wants your business. I think your problem is arrogance! The fact that you aren't banned from this forum is a travesty, you promote known scam sites, Where? you prey on players who are put in a bad position by online casinos and then try to gouge them for an extra 10% of what they were scammed for Where? You will soon see how Game Protect works, so no need to state nonsense about it! and best of all you pretend to do so with the most ethical intentions. Where? In the hundreds of conversations with victims, GP never used the words ethical intentions! The worst part of your presence on this forum is legitimate complaints and attempts to rectify issues are flooded out by your non-sense spam which makes it easier for casinos to ignore issues entirely. Please quote the non-sense and explain why it is non-sense? Yes, in case of private victims the most successful strategy is to simply ignore them. But in all enforced GP cases the strategy ignorance failed during the enforcement process!
|
|
|
Are you blind? If you click on this link it says The seal status is not to be accepted as valid license certificate! Where is your valid license certificate?
|
|
|
Today is last day of the rake race promo, will you run another race after that? Based on betking's experience, the traffic drops significantly after they stop the promo. Hopefully the same thing wont happen with your traffic, but obviously you need to improve if you want players stay longer on your site.
I think it does not make much sense to compare this poker room with BetKing, because they had unlike larger leaderboard prizes. I am not able to understand the leaderboard here, but the 5th placed and below receives nothing? Why would they leave after the race is finished if they anyway did not play to receive extra rakeback?
|
|
|
Sent 3 emails within 3 weeks and never received a response! If offenders think they can get away with ignoring Game Protect, I can inform they are wrong. If you have a real and valid reason to contact support, and for any reason you don't get any answer after trying the -Live Support- and the -Contact Email-, then send a message to Stunna. I already sent a message to Stunna and Aengus 18 May.
|
|
|
guys they dont asked any KYC for me and im betting on site for last 2 years, placed bet with more than 2-3 btc trust me.
Can you clarify, this 2-3btc is your average amount per bet or just your total bet for 2 years? As per sportsbet's term, they will ask KYC for withdrawal above or equivalent to 1btc. If the 2-3btc is just your total bet amount so I believe they wont ask you for KYC as I also using this site for few years already but with small amount only. How much was your biggest withdrawal here? According to them KYC if you withdraw more than €2300 what is currently 0.4 BTC! Hi all, Regarding the complaint of player ExcessTest: sportsbet.io is a regulated online gambling provider which does not withold customers funds and processes hundreds of withdrawals of BTC in a week. Regardless the nature of Bitcoin payments as a regulated operator we are obliged to ID verification, KYC and AML (anti-money laundering) procedures by the regulator at certain withdrawal levels. We have stated this clearly in our Terms & Conditions page available here – https://sportsbet.io/about/general-terms-and-conditions3.3.3. Sportsbet reserve the right to carry out additional KYC verification procedures for any withdrawals exceeding the equivalent of 10 Bitcoins or €2300 which ever is lower, and further reserves the right to carry out such verification procedures in case of smaller withdrawals, as demanded by our gaming license. Account Holders who wish to recover funds held in a closed, locked or excluded account, are advised to contact Customer Support. i withdrawl more than 0.4 btc and they never requested for kyc Then they did not fulfil the obligation by their regulator (whoever this is?) and breached AML laws!
|
|
|
guys they dont asked any KYC for me and im betting on site for last 2 years, placed bet with more than 2-3 btc trust me.
Can you clarify, this 2-3btc is your average amount per bet or just your total bet for 2 years? As per sportsbet's term, they will ask KYC for withdrawal above or equivalent to 1btc. If the 2-3btc is just your total bet amount so I believe they wont ask you for KYC as I also using this site for few years already but with small amount only. How much was your biggest withdrawal here? According to them KYC if you withdraw more than €2300 what is currently 0.4 BTC! Hi all, Regarding the complaint of player ExcessTest: sportsbet.io is a regulated online gambling provider which does not withold customers funds and processes hundreds of withdrawals of BTC in a week. Regardless the nature of Bitcoin payments as a regulated operator we are obliged to ID verification, KYC and AML (anti-money laundering) procedures by the regulator at certain withdrawal levels. We have stated this clearly in our Terms & Conditions page available here – https://sportsbet.io/about/general-terms-and-conditions3.3.3. Sportsbet reserve the right to carry out additional KYC verification procedures for any withdrawals exceeding the equivalent of 10 Bitcoins or €2300 which ever is lower, and further reserves the right to carry out such verification procedures in case of smaller withdrawals, as demanded by our gaming license. Account Holders who wish to recover funds held in a closed, locked or excluded account, are advised to contact Customer Support.
|
|
|
Take a look what they have done here, then you know with what you are dealing 21.5 BTC TAKEN BY SPORTSBET.IOAs long as it is too difficult to put sportsbet scam into google, people will continue suffering losses! Use bet365, williamhill, pinnacle sports. They will never steal your money and you can always appeal to IBAS. Pinnacle Sports is based in Curacao and Malta, whereas IBAS is based in the UK and not responsible for Curacao or Malta!
|
|
|
Sent 3 emails within 3 weeks and never received a response! If offenders think they can get away with ignoring Game Protect, I can inform they are wrong.
|
|
|
@ pieh1wo
Did you tell them that you already passed KYC 1 month ago?
|
|
|
yesterday I made a bet of 100 mbtc on Croatia and she won, today I wanted to withdraw money and again I can not do it, they sent me a link to the email for kyc but I already passed kyc
1) Passed KYC 2) Bet 100 mBTC and won 3) Asked for KYC? Please describe the some new online verification KYC? they send me this link https://magic.veriff.me/error: "Could not connect to the API."
|
|
|
This user in question was linked by fingerprint to a user who defrauded PD out of a significant sum of money. Given that, their account had a flag on it before they even made a deposit. We asked for ID and the user provided an identity we believed wasn’t theirs. We wanted to have a phone call with them to try and clear this up and after many delays they agreed. It was clear they had found a non-involved girl talk to us who didn’t seem to know anything about primedice or bitcoin. That violated our terms but obviously that isn't why we held the withdrawal, we held it for the reason originally stated.
I'd like to stop this right here and make clear that this is not a matter of money but rather a matter of principle. I'm happy to donate at minimum the funds involved in this claim to a charity of the community's choosing. The trust of this community is not something we take for granted and is why we elected to post here to further explain this unusual situation.
Who received the donation? He's gone quiet recently, if you see this you won't get anything back. Anyone who believes after 5 years of operating even paying out suspected cheaters like Hufflepuff 2400+ coins that we'd hold a withdrawal for arbitrary reason is just fooling themselves. If they were aware of what we knew I doubt they'd be posting here, luckily the truth always comes to light. We'll have a chat with them later if they'd like and put this to close. I cannot post more details publicly at this time.
So you are a defender of the truth, but in your case persistently ignore it?
|
|
|
yesterday I made a bet of 100 mbtc on Croatia and she won, today I wanted to withdraw money and again I can not do it, they sent me a link to the email for kyc but I already passed kyc
1) Passed KYC 2) Bet 100 mBTC and won 3) Asked for KYC? Please describe the some new online verification KYC?
|
|
|
Did not know that you are now focusing on the disabled or is that a new regulation like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) you referred recently?
|
|
|
@game-protect Both myself and @N1CKH0LAS (a trusted forum user) explained how the rollover works in our posts above. Calling other players stupid isn't a great way to entice people to 'donate' to your 'google law' service. You explained that you demand to wager the whole deposit at least once to be able to withdraw after a victim has fallen into your trap and I explained that your demand has no legal basis and is illegal! How is this related to donate to GP? Victims donate to Fraudbet and not to GP! We do not assist Fraudbet cases and we do not want to entice people to donate for our 'google law' service. I am not saying it is not possible to find responsible people behind your scam, but we have enough to do with cases where the operator and responsible parties are already known.
|
|
|
If you changed your mind and decided to operate honestly now, can you process the balances of 15 1xBet and 1xBit and Betandyou victims Game Protect has collected proof?
what are you talking about dude?! Around 15 victims with proof joined 1xBet scam + 1xBit + Betandyou 70:30 litigation claim your money! We are a SAFE website to gamble and it's also a fact - many websites are cooperating with us on the affiliate model and everything is ok. Do you think such huge crypto portal as Coinmarketcap will cooperate with the "scam" ?! http://prntscr.com/jx2mszGambling is probably safe, but account balances and winnings are definitely not and there are countless scam reports on the internet! Yes, almost everyone takes money for advertisement, even if it is a publicly proven scam like 1xBit!
|
|
|
If you changed your mind and decided to operate honestly now, can you process the balances of 15 1xBet and 1xBit and Betandyou victims Game Protect has collected proof?
|
|
|
|