|
----- .---- .---- ----- ----- .---- .---- ----- ----- .---- .---- .---- ----- .---- ----- .---- ----- .---- .---- ----- ----- ----- .---- .---- ----- .---- .---- ----- .---- ----- .---- .---- ----- ----- .---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- .---- .---- .---- ----- .---- ----- ----- ----- .---- .---- ----- .---- ----- ----- ----- ----- .---- .---- ----- .---- ----- ----- .---- ----- .---- .---- .---- ----- ----- .---- .---- ----- ----- ----- ----- .---- .---- ----- .---- ----- ----- ----- ----- .---- ----- .---- -----
|
|
|
|
Coindesk reporter tweets: https://twitter.com/nikhileshde/status/1124041880541462533"1/ Buried in this doc is a seeming confirmation that Fowler was indeed behind Crypto Capital, and @bitfinex did lose access to $850m as a result of this investigation"USG seeking to hold Reginald Fowler without bail. This also backs up Bitfinex's story about losing 850 million bc of Crypto Capital. It also calls into question their claim it will be freed up in "a few weeks". It appears to me that USG may have the $850 million which gives them 850 million reasons to destroy Bitfinex. Its kinda hard to sue the gov for 850 million when you are in prison. Sharks are circling. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYRJ-ryPEu0 x850 I have not seen anything anywhere that supports a government having seized the $850 million. How do we know these blokes haven’t just run off with it? |
|
|
|
Peter Peter Mr Bear Eater  |
|
|
|
|
-.-- --- ..- -.-. ..- -. - ... -.. . .-.. . - . -.. - .... . .-.. .. -. -.-
|
|
|
|
I'm pro-silver & gold and anti all (((digital currency))), ...
On a digital currency forum ... I guess you just said you don't really belong here, but for some reason like to hang around. Enjoy your stay.  Just don't be salty with the outcome When the bitcoin price moons I will pay r0ach well..... To valet my car once & week a do my gardening. He doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who could do all that without badly fucking it up |
|
|
|
Golden cross approaching on the 100 (orange) & 200 (red) MA Dailies on Bitstamp  BFX Spread continues to widen  While Tether continues to sag below par (see blue line which represents parity with USD).  2015 Fractal, which uses BFX price, looks increasingly broken  The view from 10,000 feet is solid (BraveNewCoinLiquid Weekly showing MAs)  |
|
|
|
39k sats, an All Time Low and all is well...  |
|
|
|
Splitting shit coin forks perhaps? What forks were after Feb18? |
|
|
|
|
CMON SHORT SQUEEZE LETS GO
Shorts are at record highs. Let’s make this epic and break $6k.
|
|
|
|
you can enjoy it a lot more when your younger.
Really? Are you sure? It doesn’t matter if you are young or old. It doesn’t matter if you are rich or poor. But I would rather not be old and poor at the same time. |
|
|
|
It cost only around $6500 to create havoc on the BSV chain.
What 'havoc' is this of which you speak? Cry ‘Havoc!’ and let slip the dogs of war |
|
|
|
2015 fractal reporting in. Looks good from this height.  Bitcoin long/short ratio is at record lows. In the middle of a run on the bank on Bitfinex. How fucking dumb are these traders? See blue line on bronze chart which is ratio (grey line is volume).  |
|
|
|
There was some interest in the antics of my neighbor and his 69 Camaro last year so I will offer an update.
His tech is scheduled for Saturday, it just came out of the garage for the first time this season and laid a solid 80 ft burnout in our alley.
All the cats in the neighborhood are in hiding.
Nice. How are the brakes? brakes? those things again? excess weight when accelerating. unless offroad, as then they do prove useful. or pure electric drive, as you can use the regenerative capabilities to recover power for accelerating again. sarcasm aside though. brakes and tires are far more important than any other mods that can be done. suspension and weight reduction are next. engine mods are last on my list. hopefully your neighbors too, at least to a point. is suspect the cats have figured out camaros cant climb trees by now. thats what jeeps are for. EDIT: seeing a later reply with more info, sounds like hes got a pretty sweet car there. i remember some posts about it from last year. always fun to have a gearhead nearby. Always nice to discover the benefits of good tyres and limits of your suspension when your car sticks to the road but has suddenly developed a sway because you are going through the same corners 20 kmh faster. Wilwood brakes look good. Hadn't heard of them before. Everyone around here swears by AP. |
|
|
|
There was some interest in the antics of my neighbor and his 69 Camaro last year so I will offer an update.
His tech is scheduled for Saturday, it just came out of the garage for the first time this season and laid a solid 80 ft burnout in our alley.
All the cats in the neighborhood are in hiding.
Nice. How are the brakes? |
|
|
|
Bitfinex price / Bitstamp price daily  |
|
|
|
I read his TA. If you sold at his “bearish trend” on a death cross 20 Weekly MA / 50 Weekly MA you would have sold at $8.5k on the drop from $19k. That’s not particularly insightful. You don’t need to lose 56% to know the market is bearish. |
|
|
|
And “resurfaces” is the wrong term as it implies that the need has previously surfaced, which it has not. The need may never surface.
You've already banished it from your revisionist history? There were some high fees in 2017. There was no need for a block size increase as demonstrated by the failure of BCH. If it was “necessary”, BCH would have won. The result was a BTC dominance drop from an overwhelming ~85% to abut half. Are you prepared for a drop to about a quarter next time the stream is blocked? You're whistling past your own graveyard. Do you actually believe that the value of Bitcoin is diminished every time some scammer comes up with ‘X on a blockchain’ and manipulates the price on some exchange with zero liquidity to create a meaningless market cap? You are smarter than that. Aww... ::blush::. No. I believe that the value of Bitcoin is diminished every time its limitations surface in an orgy of nonfunctionality, driving actual use to other competing blockchains that can handle to load. Which brings us around in a nice circular fashion to the market failure of these competing blockchains including BCH and SV. Why did they fail? Because there was never a need in the first place. I think I recently made an observation of you whistling past your own grave. Oh yes. There it is. Right up there. I have noticed a certain unwillingness on your part to engage with the substance of the argument. I thought we already covered it. You're repeating yourself, which will only lead to me repeating myself. ::sigh:: OK. I'll play along. We'll see the result when blocks again become persistently full. Which will happen at the next inkling of mass market attention. Happy? In agreement. Let’s all take a wait and see approach. No need to really talk about it until then. |
|
|
|
And “resurfaces” is the wrong term as it implies that the need has previously surfaced, which it has not. The need may never surface.
You've already banished it from your revisionist history? There were some high fees in 2017. There was no need for a block size increase as demonstrated by the failure of BCH. If it was “necessary”, BCH would have won. The result was a BTC dominance drop from an overwhelming ~85% to abut half. Are you prepared for a drop to about a quarter next time the stream is blocked? You're whistling past your own graveyard. Do you actually believe that the value of Bitcoin is diminished every time some scammer comes up with ‘X on a blockchain’ and manipulates the price on some exchange with zero liquidity to create a meaningless market cap? You are smarter than that. Aww... ::blush::. No. I believe that the value of Bitcoin is diminished every time its limitations surface in an orgy of nonfunctionality, driving actual use to other competing blockchains that can handle to load. Which brings us around in a nice circular fashion to the market failure of these competing blockchains including BCH and SV. Why did they fail? Because there was never a need in the first place. I think I recently made an observation of you whistling past your own grave. Oh yes. There it is. Right up there. I have noticed a certain unwillingness on your part to engage with the substance of the argument. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
