I would like a lot of things, but grandma tends to refuse to give them to me.   


That's why bitcoin gonna liberate some of us.   


Hopefully. 

They are smart enough to invest the appropriate %age of their funds in bitcoin, without us forumers advertising to keep that percentage at the correct level of... 100%

Ren — who formerly served as chief investment officer at Brevan Howard’s Systematic Investment Group — said that screening of the sector had resulted in Elwood identifying up to 50 crypto hedge funds as “probably satisfy our due diligence.”

From 2016 to the end of the bull market in 2018 bitcoin never closed the daily candle bellow the 137 daily moving average.
Guess what.

edit 137 MA, currently around 9000/9100

Next 12 hours are critical.^tm  Or is it 8 hours?  Hairy?

Oh.  Good implication that HODLers, including yours truly, are gonna be (if not already) famous (presumably through level of rich).

What are "strike rates?"  Similar to penis sizes?

Don't worry, I give this drop just another few hours before we are back up again, my DCA auto-buy is coming up later this evening.

Unless you plan on buying a kilo or three of molly and flipping it... buying falling knives is super sketchy in Altcurrency Land.  At least you didn't have to work hard for that money that Mommy gave you.

Bitcoin under $5000 by Christmas.  Shitcoins due for a bloodbath too in a huge way. (My guesses)

My last merit well spent.


I have been saying for years our economic disparity has all stemmed from Nixon and been yelled down for it.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(i), the Court deems the following facts to be established for purposes of this action: (1) Dr. Wright and David Kleiman entered into a 50/50 partnership to develop Bitcoin intellectual property and to mine bitcoin; (2) any Bitcoin-related intellectual property developed by Dr. Wright prior to David Kleiman’s death was property of the partnership, (3) all bitcoin mined by Dr. Wright prior to David Kleiman’s death (“the partnership’s bitcoin”) was property of the partnership when mined; and (4) Plaintiffs presently retain an ownership interest in the partnership’s bitcoin, and any assets traceable to them.

Two preliminary points. First, the Court is not required to decide, and does not decide, whether Defendant Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of the Bitcoin cybercurrency.2 The Court also is not required to decide, and does not decide, how much bitcoin, if any, Dr. Wright controls today. For purposes of this proceeding, the Court accepts Dr. Wright’s representation that he controlled (directly or indirectly) some bitcoin on December 31, 2013, and that he continues to control some today.

Counsel for Dr. Wright argued that it would be fundamentally unfair to Dr. Wright, and contrary to concepts of justice to impose discovery sanctions that forfeited his right to fully litigate the merits of his case. I have found that Dr. Wright intentionally submitted fraudulent documents to the Court, obstructed a judicial proceeding, and gave perjurious testimony. No conduct is more antithetical to the administration of justice. The sanctions I am imposing are necessary to achieve the remedial and punitive purposes of Rule 37. No lesser sanction would suffice.