|
UASF (donc BIP148) est déployé sur 3% du réseau.
On ne connaît pas le potentiel de minage de ces 3%.
16% du réseau Bitcoin ne supporte pas SegWit (et oui).
Donc, faut attendre le 1er pour voir.
Comme avec le Segwit2x d'ailleurs ...
Le passé a montré que les utilisateurs du Bitcoin ... switchent assez vite quand l'évolution est nécessaire.
Une caractéristique de l'humain à survivre (évoluer par obligation pour éviter la disparition), diront certains.
|
|
|
|
ça y est, les médias commencent à pousser l'optique du BIP148 en liant la baisse de ce week-end. je parle des médias spécialisés (qui ne font pas du copier-coller et écrivent des informations vérifiés au moins 3 fois). les médias mainstream commencent à parler du Segwit2x comme étant une "voie" officielle.  On commence à comprendre qui veut quelque chose dans l'histoire ... en fonction de la couverture médiatique non-spécialisée. |
|
|
|
2. the node goes through a series of hard coded IP addresses to connect to one of them. these IP addresses are for reliable, always up, nodes (that is why they are hard coded anyways). you connect to one of them.
Official Bitcoin Core ... Solution :  2017-07-08 12:14:22 Loaded 58421 addresses from peers.dat 382ms |
|
|
|
 non, juste les mains acides ... les cuirs de volant n'y résistent pas non-plus d'ailleurs. si tu me donne un truc avec un traitement opaque (un plastique granuleux), je te le rendrais dans 6 mois ... lisse comme un piano noir laqué. 
|
|
|
|
|
J'ai une vieille tour fixe pour ça : E8600 à 4,2GHz et GTX770 Windforce OC 2,2GHz.
La raison est simple : je bouffe un clavier et une souris par an.
|
|
|
|
EFT Fail event = 800 USD down. Now ? Only 700 USD. But in 1st August and after, yeah ... it can be a mess "for a time only".  |
|
|
|
|
Cost of food for 1 year : 2 BTC.
|
|
|
|
Subject is interesting : 0,5 BTC for 1 month ... and 1 BTC for 1 year. I understand why somes peoples leave more than 6 months outside the country ...  |
|
|
|
their money vaporizing before their eyes are only going to be interested in the safest bet possible, and that is not cryptocurrency.
I like you. But you don't understand the solution of P2P network. P2P network are solutions for flux. Precious metal are regulate since a long time now, look what paper contract can make on this assets. You can't regulate P2P network. All people from earth can use this network now, with phone and EDGE connexion. And that why, the actual value of this 21 millions bitcoins (actually, 2 100 000 000 000 000 units) is not enough to prepare/create/build a new trust & value network. We, The People, Build a trustnet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rrj8sjHJthUAnd when people isolate saving, they use ... somes tools to evaluate the potential of the escape plan :  |
|
|
|
0,5 BTC per month. So ... you must buy something, instead ... |
|
|
|
Qui met encore un HDD (mécanique) dans un portable ? ça devrait être interdit ... ... surtout qu'un SSD qu'on achête, on le change plus ensuite (du tout). Tous les SSD que j'ai mis en place (depuis les 64Go), je les ai plus jamais touché. A part ceux qui tombent en mode dépannage après 2 semaines (débit réduit à 3-5Mo/s) = garantie. |
|
|
|
Explication : https://medium.com/@SDWouters/why-schnorr-signatures-will-help-solve-2-of-bitcoins-biggest-problems-today-9b7718e7861c1er problème rêglé par cet outil : la taille des transactions qui proviennent du couplage de plusieurs sommes stockées. All this signature data increases the transaction size, and thus the transaction fee that is paid to the miners with it. You are claiming space that could be used for other transactions, which means you must pay to take their place.
At the end of the day, if it is just one person sending that transaction from multiple sources, there should be some way to do so with just one signature, right? This is what Schnorr signatures allow us to do.
One transaction has one signature
Estimates are that this upgrade would reduce the use of storage and bandwidth by at least 25%. To point out the obvious: that is a huge efficiency gain. 2ème problème ciblé : le SPAM de la MEMpool. To push people into increasing the blocksize, the attackers made it expensive to send bitcoin transactions for weeks in a row, by using up as much transaction space as possible through all kinds of constructions.
One of their methods was to include dozens of signatures in transactions by constantly sending transactions from many sources.
[...]
Fortunately for us, Schnorr signatures would help combat this kind of spam attack.
If we only have one signature per transaction, more transactions will fit into blocks and a spammer would need to send far more transactions in competition with more people, and thus likely spend more money to take up the same transaction space. Signatures are often the largest individual part of a transaction, so the attacker would be disadvantaged. |
|
|
|
When bad append ... wait 1 month.  |
|
|
|
You have a dead RAM or HDD. or ... it's the antivirus that it corrupt the job of Bitcoin Core. so, uninstall first ... the antivirus. Bitcoin Core don't crash since 0.9.1  |
|
|
|
c'est un peu long mais on est encore dans le modèle "normal".  |
|
|
|
Quel est le risque si on laisse ses btc sur bittrex par exemple ?
La révolution.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
