Fibonacci

Thanks Kiritsugu for the concise explanation, that conversion was what was missing out in my settings as such the multiplier effect wasn't working out until now. All the same, good to have Seuntjie's dicebot already integrated with this site, so that other possibilities not featured in the autobetter can also be implemented.

The introduction of new play panel is quite a relief as those "hook stuffs" were actually standing in the way of most players, nice to see that Dicebot works good with this site and the speed so far have remained quite impressive.

@ Ethan_nx, I would want to set autobetter to be able to increase previous bet by a certain percentage, how should I go about that?

I think you got a point there in hodling  part of your coins and trading the rest. In the long run it stands to bring in more coins that would have ordinarily been possible with just hodling. One thing though is that some experience and skills would be necessary, otherwise panicking and untimely sell-off would be rubbing off the gains.

It is so interesting to note that bitcoiners have so much faith in Bitcoin and held on to their coins inspite of the ETF disapproval. The much talked about sell-off, dump and even outright death of Bitcoin should the ETF fail is now like the millennium bug. As I write, Bitcoin is back at  $1,191.83 at Coindesk, everyone fasten your seat belts for some cruise

Bitcoin is indeed maturing and I think its decentralized nature is beginning to hold sway as can be seen from its resilenceeven after the ETF disapproval. One of the worries was that people were going to panic and dump Bitcoin, but it was all water poured on the back of a duck. $1200 is in view one more time and Bitcoin goes on even without SEC.

Isn't it laughable that one of the commentators argument against the ETF was that Bitcoin is characterized by extreme hoarding and low liquidity   Guess someone should tell him, we're going to hoard it even the more until it value docks on the moon.

Faucet was booming awhile ago, when Google Adsense looked the other way, but these days, they have been read the riot act and fauceting is seen as incentivized traffic. For same reason, the network sites that tolerate faucets, pay very little thus making faucet owners hardly able to offer rewards that could engage people and not see it as waste of time.

To generate extra revenue, you may want to consider promoting your own affiliate links from programs with potentials, the very popular ones are likely to be saturated already.

You are indeed on spot, they certainly have good business prospects by putting their feet down and running their business as professionally as possible, the edge is already to their favor and of a certainty most players would without sweat, hand over their money to them.

In view of developments in the Bitcoin network, minimum withdrawal of 0.004BTC and fee of 0.0003BTC is still reasonable, but giving players a number of options on how much fee to pay would be better off. However, I think a more proactive move to ease the pressure would be to incorporate few other coins and an internal exchange system.

They were simply being cautious, Bitcoin's core attributes are not something one can easily overlook and evidently it was a struggle for them to reach the decision to disapprove the ETF. The aftermath of the rejection is that Bitcoin is now set to get even stronger, because their chief reason for saying no is actually the bedrock of our faith in Bitcoin - it is unapologetically unregulated!

Would have been surprised if it were the other way round - imagine asking the authorities to put their stamp on Bitcoin. They don't dislike Bitcoin for nothing, it is actually a threat to their survival and relevance and I don't see them undoing themselves.

How are those iffy situations you cited ever going to materialize? Which investors do you know that are presently sustaining Bitcoin and given all the good attributes of Bitcoin, what exactly do you think is capable of making everyone lose interest in Bitcoin? So far we are yet to see that new coin that will kill Bitcoin, because everything so far took a cue from Bitcoin, so until that new coin arrives, that is not an issue for now. Again how would internet connection fail globally, when situation like that was the main reason behind the invention of the internet?

As it stands, the one thing that has the potential of killing Bitcoin is inside Bitcoin itself and it is the lack of one voice on many solvable issues that are beginning to snowball. The size of the blockchain is one of them and so also is the regrettable delays in transaction.

Reality is that you don't protect your economy or currency by shielding it from others! That is like over pampering a baby and we can see an example in China's economy where every now and then the government must have to intervene by pumping in money (blood transfusion) to save it from anemia. Your country had better wake up from its slumber, if at all it plans to make some progress because true progress is not possible without the inputs of foreigner. Healthy competition is always what makes the difference, the automobile industry in America should yell you better.

It is obvious the real competition Bitcoin is having is with the fiat currencies and that's the real threat the governments see in Bitcoin and not all those "use for illegal this and that." As for the altcoins, they are all copies and descendants of Bitcoin and so far we are yet to see anyone that a match for Bitcoin. Some of them however have some high points and so enjoys the ride the success of Bitcoin brings to the crypto industry, while a good number should be resident in the trash.

Actually with some approach to trading, it becomes quite hard to tell trading apart from gambling, but that is as far as it goes - knowledgeable and experienced traders don't gamble, the ones that do are most newbies and that is because they are yet to realize there is indeed a boundary. However with time, the university of hard knock often open their eyes to see beyond their nose.
I see you point there, in gambling, one is actually playing against the house and since the house does not have other means of income, there is always this suspicion that most gambling sites cook the outcome of their games. However, trading in most cases, involves traders and buyers using brokers as middlemen.
I think the point you are trying to make there is that proper study and analysis gives high probability of getting a decision right in trading as against gambling, but that is not to say that even experienced traders don't run into wrong trading decisions one time or the other.

My two other vpses are doing good.
Want to try your Brazil vps! Windows 2016.

More disturbing when one take into account the fact that majority of mining rigs are situated in China and monopoly of all things in the hand of the Chinese doesn't bide well for the rest of the world. Something need be done to address this ugly part of Bitcoin before it metamorphosed into a point of departure.

I see the minimum withdrawal is now back to 0.01BTC and that must have come as the implication of that explainable hike dawned on them, they actually thought little of it to have implemented it in the first place without any thought it was going to be the cog in their wheel. In these days that dice sites are springing up like mushroom, a good manager's priority should be geared towards retaining and maintaining the loyalty of their clients and not to give them a reason to look elsewhere, because some may never come back.

I think we are forgetting the fact that gambling hardly offers a chance to cut short one losses and that is the reason bursting one's entire balance in matter of seconds is a regular occurrence in gambling. With trading, except a trader also gambles with his trade, it is always possible to cut short one's losses or to determine from the on set how much one is willing to lose for trades gone wrong, more or less like saying gamblers hardly have second chance to try again after some losing streaks.

Yes the fiats will always be there because they serve the interests of the government, of which Bitcoin looks the other way. It follows that at no point in time would we see the governments fully backing Bitcoin, they understand too well what implication that holds for the fiats currencies. What every bitcoiner must hold paramount is that the survival of Bitcoin is our collective role to play, the government just won't, in fact, if the governments have had their way, Bitcoin would have been straggled by now.