Bump.
Problem still exists.
I have no idea who should I request to solve the problem.



I still can manage 🤣

Let the bounty hunters to get paid by established coins if not bitcoin for their work. Managers will not need to worry about allowing newbies because the genuine members will start showing interests. The promoters want free marketing and expect to have massive good things from that marketing? Nothing is free.

Are you sure that most of the DT even deserve to be in the DT network? Forget about the feedback they leave. These days the DT network is filled with vulnerable users who are doing everything to have a place in the network.

All these 382 newbie will find a way to receive 1 merit and will post the proof of authentication. Result is 382 merit used in abuse LOL

In my opinion, stop paying for any service in token/altcoin but accept only bitcoin (it's a bitcoin forum). 1st: Scam projects will not come here and spend cash in advertising. 2nd: Since scam projects will stop coming, the genuine projects will start getting their attention and they will feel encouraged to spend money on marketing. 3rd: Since it will be paid by bitcoin (genuine cash), good users will start joining bounty and managers will not need to worry about having less participants  to accept newbies.

I am not sure but reading the responses, at least from BitMaxz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5417940.msg61161848#msg61161848) it seems one can not receive PM if the other one put them in their ignore list.

JG likes everyone to give him attention. On the other hand he knows he has very little to say in defense of his trust abuse on this one, not just this one but most of the feedback he left for others. But still it's weird to see a lot of the users think he is a good scam buster and have him in their trust list.

Maybe from now, when we are building our trust list, we need to start considering who are picking a good feedback leaver. If a user can not see a controversial scam hunter who turned out to be a ghost hunter and using feedback system to hostage others with his red tag then they should be distrusted from others list too.

Against JollyGood this is not the first complaint but not going to the last one too.

No excuse for Liverpool. It's better to keep the mouths shut. 🤔

I was having this weird feeling that Chelsea match will be a draw. After seeing their last four head to head I was almost convinced that it will be a draw. Then I thought the chances for Chelsea is higher since they are in their home. Decided to go with a small margin win for them. When they scored I was happy to see I am getting 3 points until at the last minute it all turned out to be a regret LOL. When are these two teams are going to break their drawing streak 🤣?

I am having a second thought. spyrosc200 how did you know that they are paying everyone eventually? Giving us some reference will help.

A project can request their admin to remove a negative feedback and they moderate the reviews in the favor of the project. That's how TrustPilot run their business having the projects in their side. So anything from those review sites are massively manipulated.

I don't care who else is winning and who else is losing today. Maybe I will wish for the teams who are above Liverpool on the table lose points but that's impossible wish. City is going to destroy Brighton to recover the point they lost in the last match against Liverpool. Whatever it is, I am off to watch Liverpool starting in 15 minutes. Lets make it a 0 - 8 🤣

I am totally with you but just look everywhere and tell me do you really believe people are making posts because they care about the forum? Most of the users are making posts to fill up their weekly requirement. Very few maybe even under a 1% (a blind number random number only, please don't assume I have done extensive research 🤣) will be the users who are contributing because they love bitcoin.

He does not have to. We can not ask for it from him and put him to a corner with a negative feedback.

That feedback is justified. Do you think the red feedback left by JollyGood, Lauda are actually justified?

Where is the money both user lost or where is the money that BitcoinTurk scammed. Did he even scammed anyone? I would like to see proof of him scamming users.

Observing @ $ 19,160



Original idea 🤣

I don't think anyone is going for even a draw in the match except I saw few members who take the whole lot of risk and always go with underdog. Surprisingly they are doing well on the pool overall. For example buwaytress but it's Liverpool and I know for sure he will not do anything against the team he likes the most 🤣


A 1 - 1 will make you happy. I can not remember what my pick in this match. I always find it difficult to pick a draw and even when I pick I never get the correct one LOL

This is eventually a good thing. A casino can restrict their clients account if they find anything suspicious but after investigation if they return the money they owe to their clients then the casino is doing right thing. Honestly speaking I never heard of the n1bet, the logo seems unknown too to me. On the other hand OP only posted two screenshots and some words which make it difficult to understand the validity of his case.

Do n1bet have an account on the forum?

I think OP is considering possible DT member's feedback. I looked at his feedback received history. Lauda and JollyGood seems two users who can be in the DT list considering their history. Possibility for others are very little unless some of them start actively contributing to the reputation system and in the future their feedback starts showing up as trusted feedback.

Everyone forgot about Lauda because he left the forum but JollyGood is still active and according to my study few months ago I found most of the negative feedback left by him are out of harsh judgement or retaliation. He even leveraged his DT power not to pay a user for the work that user has done for him instead he left a negative feedback to that user to stop his mouth. Eventually the user left the forum.

Edit:

This is interesting. starmyc was the user who left the forum after harassing by JollyGood. If I remember correctly then after LoyceV's suggestion and after long thinking I included starmyc  in my trust list so that the feedback starmyc left can be seen in DT and others can be aware about JollyGood's feedback leaving criteria to hostage users. But seems like distrust from nutildah and of course JollyGood himself actually took  down starmyc from trust network so the feedback is not visible anymore under default trust.

If adding removing a user from trust list truly based on their feedback leaving accuracy then I don't understand which feedback from starmyc was wrong that he was distrusted by two DT members?

Loycev, the trust list on your loyce.club used to show weekly or I guess monthly history of a users trust activity. But it turns out the feature is not there anymore. I am guessing you removed it. This was helpful to check when a user added or removed another user in their trust list.

Match day today, don't forget to make your picks.

Surprising stat between Chelsea and Utd. Find out yourself 🤣



Nottm Forest vs Liverpool, Let it not surprise us please.

Aren't all of us making money from our signature, avatar, personal text, website address space and possibly renting out whatever we can?

Unfortunately other DTs who have JollyGood in their trust list still think he is the best police officer around LOL. Such abusive red tag from JollyGood is not anything new.

I have not used it yet and have not seen many platform to use it too. But my guess is sooner this will be widely usable like we do for legacy, segwit and native segwit.

This is one of the disadvantage of bech32 format but I think now almost all platform allow the format. A year and two ago it used to be an issue.

I see many neutral tags are already given to Pandukelana. Hopefully mods/admin will consider locking the account with some custom title to remind his memory on the forum.

I still don't want to check his post history but want to guess. This is the user who were spamming on boards and asking he can influence BTC price?

How long you are familiar with the forum? You sound like you woke up today and learning all about signature and things of the forum. From Jan 2017 to today, in all these years how haven't you encounter such experience?

I got a copy of your post https://ninjastic.space/topic/5417080
Where is the signature?

Yes, there are problems. Imagine everyone is positing something with every post they are making. It will look members are just spamming everywhere.

It's a same broken tap recorder. Bookies will not share their information to prove an account is multi accounting with the excuse of opening a hole for the cheaters. Cheaters will always take advantages of the promotions. The fight is in between bookies and the gamblers. As forum members we are not getting paid nor can talk with confidence who is guilty because you do not have any data.

Lately I am tired of seeing the accusations against bookies and them not defending cases with evidence.

Betesports, is this money includes your deposit?

Epic 🤣

The match was close even though we were better in every sector of the match than West Ham. But we failed to score more. Imagine if the penalty was scored LOL.

I am not sure if I will ever be able to feel it LOL
Congratulations Woodie from number 32 🤣