Most of team member of ICO was fraud, always intend to scam. Since they have used fake identity, the chances was high to scam people. As a result, people were not motivated to invest in ICO, not even in a legit project because they don't know which one is legit and not.
On the other hand, IEO is being held on exchange platform. The team member procedure the KYC too, the chance of scamming is very lower. On behalf of you, reputed exchange do the research as well.
Investors get attracted, project get fund.
That's the basic different between ICO and IEO.

I guess they are wasting their time. They could have done other physical work as well to earn some bucks. This is not the place, nor the way to earn. I have participated in some but lesson learned and I am not gonna participate anymore.

Everyone will buy it. Facebook is one of the biggest giant in technology, I believe they will bring a coin which will widely be accepted for money transferring. This will probably be a revolution. Nevertheless, it is better for the whole cryptocurrency industry because more people will be concerned about cryptocurrency.

harizen has cleared some facts which you probably have missed. Both cold and hot wallet have seperate usages and benefits. Hot wallets are better for using BTC regularly, on the other hand, cold wallet can be used for long term holfing purpose.

OMG, I was talking about 2 users ban and thought these were not perfect for them. Now this is the reality. I wouldn't support any of these types ban appeal.

Would it be begging if I sincerely ask to change the date, prior to February 10, I have nothing much to share here. I guess your rules are a bit strict for which you probably not having newbie flood 

Chances are high but I would not stake my money into it, it has high chance of being crashed anytime since other than IEO, there has no real demand of this coin.

OP isn't talking about Bitcoin, he is talking about bitcoi sv or satoshi vision. I guess it's a pump and dump coin controlled by the group of liar, stupid who wants to be satoshi, better stay away from these. Anytime soon it can be lost.

If someone is financially motivated, he would not post as like he did before the ban. It would be easy to track if the list of users are limited. But from what I observed, there are hundreds of banned people and it would not be that easy to track their activities.
I would say sig ban must be of at least 1 year and if in case any user continue to contribute to the forum despite their sig ban, some reputed members vouch for them as well after some months, their ban can be reversed.

Very sad dude. You must not trust anyone other than yourself. I would suggest you to use electrum wallet. In this way, there's no one who will call you and act as customer support.

Till now, I have participated in couple of bounties and airdrops but got nothing. Each of the token value is zero which I have received. I guess it's better to stop participating on these bounties.

I have participated some of the airdrops in bitcointalk, these are a waste of your precious time. I have never seen any related info about MiaoA airdrop. Is there any ANN in bitcointalk?

I am not certain which kind of plagiarism it was in the case of cellard. If plagiarism was not for monetary gaining (Imagine no signature campaign here), I guess no much soaring would be here, a least not like as of now. this outstanding reputed dude probably tried to help someone with the information from the internet, forget or didn't care much to add a reference link. I reckon dude would never say it's my opinion or my original works. It can be seen as a silly mistake.

Thank you and yes, I stored the seed phrase securely and that's what I was trying to know. I think 3 places are more than enough to find out after 5 or 10 years 

Some of the banned users are high ranked and they have a good posting habit, (ex. bill gator, cellard). Nevertheless, if their copy posts were for any kind of financial motivation/ gaining incentives, I would say they deserve a permanent ban. On the other hand, if they intended to help other (no monetary gaining affiliated), they must not be banned, this would be the exception.
I am not sure how to be certain about monetary affiliation of their posts. I guess there's way but it will be time consumable as well. Therefore, the current punishment of a certain time of signature ban is perfect, if they intend to help other, they will continue. If they are here for monetary gain, they will go away.

I would, infact, I am sticky with the top 2 only. Although I have purchased Ethereum recently before the bullrun of bitcoin. I have had a little bitcoin from the previous, and invested some along with ethereum. I believe this 2 are the best for portfolio.

Since bitcoin is soaring heavily now, the chances of getting below $240 is low but again, if bitcoin starts to fall heavily, it's nit impossible too. However, it's better to hold on now.

Is it enough to store the seed of the electrum or we must have to store the private key of all of the addresses too? I'm using electrum and only stored in seed in 3 physical places.

It's not about paying the taxes all the time. You can't believe how a govt can interfere in all of your funds, it depends on the country where you live though.

How will you manage customers to add feedback, you are offering guarantee of good reviews, even if the product isn't good?
There's no way but putting fake reviews. You are trying to attract more people with the lies.