I propose the forum to do the following, pay $5 per day to ten forum members reporting more than 1000 good reports per month. pick ten people and pay them a total $1,500 to have them reporting 10,000 good reports.

Report them to moderators like I just did, they spam while nobody is stopping them, they get paid to post.

Hey scammers devs, where can I find the new signature to wear? pre-ICO has ended, right?

Don't leave retaliatory feedback, even if they're wrong let them be. if you want to tag people like that then you are no different than ogy and other trust abusers. I can vouch for you to be fair with your trust ratings, you don't bully people, you don't use DT for financial benefit of your own business like almost every other DT.
IMO other DT members should ask the opinions of community members first before tagging anybody but they all think that they own this place and that they are always right.

My zero satoshi.

I don't care what is the amount or what is their intention, I only care about your left feedback on somebody calling (spamming) you scammer, you could've reported their post because that post is just a spam and is against the rules, you could actually get them banned if they were repeating the same spam over and over but tagging somebody with red after they called you scammer is trust abuse, you are not even the owner of cloudbet or are you? are you only their campaign manager? what do you get from tagging him with red? maybe you get some money by managing their campaign and that's why you felt the need to protect them?

Leaving negative trust like this is trust abuse, are you going to turn into OgNasty to tag people for calling you out? if this is all about a freaking $20 then give them their freaking $20 and be done with it instead of making it look like you are abusing them with negative trust.


I know that you agree with these kinds of behavior, after all, you are working and promoting for criminals doing money laundering. I don't expect anything less from somebody like you who'd hire green trusted members to make their mixing business more legit.

---

I'm all in for trust abuse, be my guest and keep doing it as if nothing is wrong, if I were cloudbet I'd give them their $20 and ask them not to make any more deposits, it's not worth it to tag people for $20.

Do you have any evidence of a DT member tagging any of the supposedly cheating participants? did they actually get any of you tagged? was it by actmyname? I'm not surprised to see that a project involving Roger Ver is trying to steal the identities of people and call it KYC, MF you need to ask for KYC before they start working and not after they have done the work.

If you could find any participant from this bounty with negative trust from a DT member you should post your evidence, they might have posted the connections on a thread in reputation section where a known MF cartel member has done this job of finding alt accounts for years. they first launch their shitcoins, scam people and then tag them. we need more evidence.

Using negative trust to silence somebody calling them scammer is untrustworthy, maybe you need to read the link I provided, they have tagged that member for calling them scammer which is a trust abuse. I can't say anything about their terms and conditions because I don't trust any of these casinos.
They could send their coins to the same address they used to deposit, I don't see any attempt at mixing their Bitcoins if they receive the same amount to the same address.

It's not cool to withhold the coins from their rightful owners and use DT2 members to tag anybody calling you a scammer. I can see that your campaign manager https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=911719 has tagged this member with negative trust for calling you a scammer, not only abusing the trust system but withholding their coins is considered as untrustworthy as fuck.

This is a normal thing here, scammers hire some green trusted member to manage their campaigns to make their business legit, if you have concrete evidence about their scam, contact Hhampuz and let them know, I'm sure they are the good guys (at least I hope they are).

No. when you are banned, you are banned.

If we are going to let them decide on participating or not then we should also let others decide whether they want to lend money to newbies asking for a loan with no collateral, why do we have DT members tagging them?
IMO, only trusted bounty managers should hold the tokens, meaning if a newbie started to manage a bounty then they should receive negative trust for not using escrow because they are not trustworthy enough.

Well, that's the job escrow does, at least you'd have something which is better than nothing.

Actually, there is an easy way to solve this, the manager does the job and only provides the escrow with a list of addresses and the escrow sends them all out to the participants at once.

Staff members are not the police, admin is not a police officer, if I talk about trust issues is because the admin is in charge of the whole forum including trust system if I bitch about things is because I expect them not to take sides and do favors for their own beloved green members. what you expect from them is not what they are willing to do, can you understand?

If you want to go to the police for $900 then be my guest, people have scammed more but nobody gives a fuck about it. you are the one freaking out right now.

Wrong, you are not allowed to make any new account and continue posting while you are banned, wait for your ban period to be over. anybody who posts after a temporary ban is evading their ban because temporary bans don't have any ban appeal.

A temporary ban means that you have broken some rules and they are your warning, you could only appeal if the ban was permanent, so stop posting and wait it out, this is your warning you wished for.

I assume that staff never temp-ban people by mistake, otherwise, it's fine to appeal.

Pay up to whom? if you could ask them to pay to the forum I don't see how that could result in a community revolting, would you consider paying the fee for evil IPs as extortion? or maybe paying for copper membership is also an extortion attempt?

But because forum owners charge those fees nobody says anything.
Stop trolling us for one unhandled report, I've got 27 unhandled reports but you don't see me trolling people for them.

I want to know if any DT member would consider not using an escrow for large amounts in bounties as something untrustworthy and red tag worthy?
What these bounty managers are doing is not using any escrow to hold the coins/tokens, they expect you just to trust them to pay you at the end, they are not reputable forum members and sometimes they claim that they are paying Millions of dollars in coins/tokens to their participants.

Should we hold them accountable and ask them to put these coins in escrow and if they refused to do it should we have them tagged?

For example, [Bounty 150 ETH] SERVADVISOR.CO-DECENTRALIZED SERVICES RECOMMENDATION PLATFORM
⚡[BOUNTY] 🔥 LaborCrypto 🔥 - HOT BOUNTY UPTO 💰$175,000💰 TO SHARE!⚡ I would like to see tokens worth $175,000 for this one in a trusted escrow agent, is that too much to ask?

You can get paid by posting here, what did you expect? ban them all but they will come back again if jr members are mostly the ones doing this then we should consider banning them from wearing any signatures.