You didn't share your sources, though. Turns out, we figured out why. Don't do it again. I'd like to hear it privately because my sources do not involve phishing as you suggest. |
|
|
|
|
I'd prefer if you are less cryptic, and most of my information were shared with certain global moderators and theymos specially. It's hard to find who to trust.
(For one, I have actual evidence in the form of BitMessages which should be verifiable with cryptography but it's still uncharted territory)
I wouldn't listen much to scotaloo, they are responsible basicasics at one point.
|
|
|
|
|
lnputs.io (PHISHING SITE DO NOT VISIT)
|
|
|
|
I apologize for not being able to publicly disclose the evidence or the sources. However, the people with an appropriate need to know (ie not the peanut gallery) has already been notified. It appears that other investigative efforts have also uncovered the same thing.  |
|
|
|
|
Hi netzwerg!
You are one of the purchased accounts of BTCTalkAccounts, a person connected to the recent phishing and scamming events.
As this topic is sensitive, information has been sent to global moderators.
Have a good day, and I'd still like to reach contact with you.
|
|
|
|
|
Google does not have a blanket ban on Bitcoin sites with Adsense.
|
|
|
|
|
If it encourages more betters ("I want to make money on JD like that guy!") and gets rid of depositors ("Gah I'm not going to lose money again") then that's good (and is what has been happening). It would be interesting if the opposite happened however - betters believed that since the house lost a lot before, the house is going to win next and depositors deposit thinking that the invisible strings are going to pull the losses back to profits.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, this is the problem with faucets ran by people who do not have the funds to pay out :/
BitcoinBlogger works through.
|
|
|
|
We've just helped the Bitcoin dev team fix a critical deadlock bug |
|
|
|
|
Besides it's totaly stupid for dooglus to cheat this much at a time. If he wanted to he'd do it slowly over time, not like this.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe signing in counts as a "post".
|
|
|
|
|
Put google analytics at the bottom of your body. Right now you screwed with !DOCTYPE html.
|
|
|
|
I though you were told to stop posting under scotaloo?  |
|
|
|
|
For those who don't know.. mah87 has been one of the more consistent Ripple shills.
|
|
|
|
This is irrelevant, this case is about you not r3wt.
Is it really though? I didn't want to say anything cos i'm not sure yet, I've been digging and thats not the picture I'm getting. It'll all be about r3wt soon me thinks. (I think he realizes what this means too). i think you got to much to lose. you won't do it. not over .2 btc That 25 BTC offer still stands. |
|
|
|
Explain this statement: I want your honest opinion on what happened TODAY and not what either of us done in the past. There's no "may" or "allegedly". And this one: *cough* I have a domain to sell you. Wink Just forgot you haven't responded to this. |
|
|
|
of course they aren't. you would have been banned by now.  this is an honest and fair community BWAHAHAH Aren't you the guy who was outed for running extortion? Are you sure you haven't got anything to do with this? This is irrelevant, this case is about you not r3wt. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
