Bitcoin Forum
July 12, 2024, 04:53:19 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 [118] 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 ... 233 »
2341  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Offline mode 1.5 years unable to get out of blockchain wallet consistant on: December 07, 2016, 09:46:22 AM
You showed me your armorylog.txt, I need to see dbLog.txt now.

If you do not have one, do the following:

- open the command line (type cmd in the Windows search bar)
- browse to your Armory installation folder (type this command in the prompt: cd C:\Program Files (x86)\Armory\)
- run ArmoryDB.exe (just type the name out and press return). Let it do its thing then post the log file.

Quote
since I seem unable to upload a screenshot

www.imgur.com

--------------------------

Do you have a brain damage as I, or did your mother just teach you rudeness? If I need to explain I wasn't writing an essay it was line by line instructions.... seems like someone so perfect could figure that above was my directory file structure since I seem unable to upload a screenshot.

I do my best and do appreciate your help but don't need humiliation or scolding, or is that your job title also? Thank you.

Since you can resort to proper English in order to insult the people helping you, you should have no problem maintaining that level of writing when asking for help.

As for your condition, I do not care. You didn't ask for special treatment before hand, so do not expect to be treated otherwise.
2342  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Offline mode 1.5 years unable to get out of blockchain wallet consistant on: December 06, 2016, 07:48:53 PM
Do not delete any file I did not instruct you to. Just go through the motions, ignore any step that you can't perform for now. And for love of all that's alive, please try to construct grammatically sound sentences.
2343  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Offline mode 1.5 years unable to get out of blockchain wallet consistant on: December 06, 2016, 11:48:30 AM
Your log suggests you are only using Armory 0.93.

Your blockchain history seems super old too:

Code:
-INFO  - 1452244825: (..\BlockUtils.cpp:1322) Total blockchain bytes: 50,611,985,356

This is what you should do:

1) If you have not done that yet, upgrade Bitcoin Core to 0.13.1. Then start BitcoinQt manually, let it fully catch up.

2) Install Armory 0.95.1: https://github.com/goatpig/BitcoinArmory/releases/tag/v0.95.1

3) In your datadir folder (C:\Users\Zebra\AppData\Roaming\Armory\) do the following:

- delete the /databases folder
- delete armorylog.txt and armorycpplog.txt. Your logs are too long, I need something fresh to narrow down any potential issues.

Once this is all done, make sure BitcoinQt is closed, then start ArmoryQt.exe and let it do its thing. Report here afterwards.
2344  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory DB massages, what do they mean?Armory stops DB on: December 06, 2016, 09:14:21 AM
Too many log files. Delete armorylog.txt, armorycpplog.txt and dbLog.txt. Then run Armory again, then post the new logs.

Quote
BtW: Databasebuilder parsed file #700
How many blockfiles are still to come?

Build is done, run ArmoryQt, it will start scanning.
2345  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Offline mode 1.5 years unable to get out of blockchain wallet consistant on: December 05, 2016, 06:42:47 PM
You can copy paste your logs in pastebin and post the link here. Give me all the logs you got.
2346  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Offline mode 1.5 years unable to get out of blockchain wallet consistant on: December 05, 2016, 06:32:38 PM
Post your logs then
2347  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Offline mode 1.5 years unable to get out of blockchain wallet consistant on: December 05, 2016, 06:09:49 PM
Default path in Windows is:

C:/Users/*yourusername*/AppData/Roaming/Armory/databases
2348  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory DB massages, what do they mean?Armory stops DB on: December 05, 2016, 03:42:12 PM
Ignore the sequential part, it is not a bug, just the code not going out of its way to report every file it scans. The DB looks fine. Run ArmoryQt.exe, the post the whole armorylog.txt.
2349  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Offline mode 1.5 years unable to get out of blockchain wallet consistant on: December 05, 2016, 03:38:11 PM
Delete your /databases folder in the Armory datadir.
2350  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Extremely long engine initialization, v 0.95.1 on: December 04, 2016, 07:18:55 PM
Both pc running against the NAS? Can you post both specs next to each other for comparison?
2351  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory transactions fee problem on: December 04, 2016, 12:36:41 PM
Quote
Can you disable minimum fee control (may be in settings) who forbid send transactions? And show size for all existing transactions in wallet and size of new transaction before create?

I'll look into it for next version.
2352  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory DB massages, what do they mean?Armory stops DB on: December 04, 2016, 08:52:49 AM
Code:
2016-12-03 17:55 (INFO) -- ArmoryUtils.pyc:1270 -    Available HDD (BTC)   : 0 GB

That's no good

Quote
Ho to get the dbLog.txt ?   

Your log files are:

C:\Users\Thomas\AppData\Roaming\Armory\armorylog.txt
C:\Users\Thomas\AppData\Roaming\Armory\dbLog.txt

Post these both here. Use pastebin if they're too big.

2353  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Extremely long engine initialization, v 0.95.1 on: December 04, 2016, 08:51:05 AM
I mean, it does not feel like it's broken, it's definitely syncync as the NAS is basically unusable now and working on the laptop is a pain. It's just slow. Extremely slow. Couldn't perhaps Windows Defender or firewall be interfering with the process?

I dont recall anyone complaining about that in recent memory. At this point you should ask Core directly.

Quote
Has to be a good reason why this can fall over in this way.

LevelDB is flaky on Windows. It has gotten a lot better with the years but a bad shutdown or basically anything else can completely destroy Core's DB.
2354  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Extremely long engine initialization, v 0.95.1 on: December 03, 2016, 02:33:12 PM
It *almost* worked for me in the end, but it crashed at the armoryDB.exe part still. I reinstalled Armory and without wallet it worked, then when I imported the old wallet it happened again after trying to sync.

So i thought maybe the blockchain got corrupt (Bitcoin Core was synced but there were no wallets in it). Anyway, I am now running Bitcoin Core getting fresh blockchain. Problem is, it seems it will take at least 10 days to fully sync. Is it normal these days?

This is basically your last resort, albeit I can't think of any other issue causing your grief. Your only other solution is to let me SSH/TeamViewer into your machine so I can debug the code directly.

10 days is a bit excessive, but if you have bad connectivity to the network and/or a slow CPU, it will take days. It would prolly take my machine over 12h to sync the full chain now (for info, it builds & scans Armory's DB in 4min total, and I'm on fiber internet).

Quote
I am running it on the NAS and while the CPU and RAM usage is relatively low, the NAS is hammered badly. I can hear its 6 RAID-6 connected HDDs working all the time now. The NAS has write speed of around 100MB/s.

When I was syncing the blockchain on the internal SSD, the laptop was unusable almost completely.

Since the headers first change in Core, the chain data commit is random, which will grind a HDD to a crawl. The process is very CPU intensive too, courtesy of ECDSA. It will routinely max your cores.

2355  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory DB massages, what do they mean?Armory stops DB on: December 03, 2016, 02:18:45 PM

Please post armorylog.txt and dbLog.txt. Is your harddrive running out of free space?

Quote
Hi goatpig,
are there any interferences with ArmoryQt,bitcoind and Armory DB and securitysoftware like Windows Defender or Avira Pro with their real-time scanning?(Firewall is allowing the apps)

Because sometimes I miss some blockfiles as you can see here:
http://imgur.com/WJCoeHZ

A few years ago someone pushed some data in a signature that was flagged by some anti virus software. This resulted in some block data files getting quarantined. The issue has since then be reported as a false positive and you should not experience it anymore. You can verify yourself if your block files are sequential.

As for the block building report, that output is not meant to be exhaustive. It will only report when the first thread (among many) parses a block file, hence the gaps in the logs.

2356  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory DB massages, what do they mean?Armory stops DB on: December 03, 2016, 07:20:42 AM
First link is dead, second one is benign, ignore it.
2357  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory DB massages, what do they mean?Armory stops DB on: December 03, 2016, 12:22:35 AM
Use imgur
2358  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Extremely long engine initialization, v 0.95.1 on: December 03, 2016, 12:21:33 AM
Quote
Been all over the client, in expert mode, can't find the "address chain length", either where to change it, or extend it.

There's a clickable figure in the wallet's properties dialog next to "Addresses Used", in export mode.

Quote
I do see a decent amount of "-ERROR - 1480706621: (..\BitcoinP2P.cpp:865) caught BitcoinP2P_Exception in processDataStackThread: invalid header size" in the ArmoryDB console however. I'll work on getting you logs. Pastebin ok?

That's benign. Still, pastebin your log file.
2359  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Extremely long engine initialization, v 0.95.1 on: December 02, 2016, 09:16:43 PM
1) Please don't hijack somebody else's thread, create your own and post your log files.

Your problem is different from the OP's. You also didn't post your log files as requested.

Consider that for each vocal user seeking help here, there is a silent majority that parses these threads and fix their setup on their own. Isolating each issue in its own thread enhances search results and readability.

Quote
You are correct, I misread it.. it hammers the machine so hard it -acts- like it's completely out of ram and into swap.

In this case Armory is allocing <1GB memory but caching its reads in whatever left over RAM (mmap memory does NOT spill over the swap). This in turn reduces the load on your SSD, as this data is read over several times. As for the SSD load, there's some 90GB of data to process at this time. It will have to be read one way or another.

I don't particularly care to change your appreciation of the code. This is more of an informative point for the silent majority. You obviously made your opinion of me before you started posting.

Quote
I hope you understand peoples frustration here...

Do you understand mine? This project went from being funded, with 6 full time developers and 2 interns, to getting bombed and leaving me working on it alone, out of my pocket. There was not even a plan to further development of the FOSS version past 0.93. Armory would be nowhere if I didn't volunteer over a year of my time and money to keep it going. And with that I have to catch up on the technological debt cumulated over 2 years FOSS development stagnation.

Imagine my joy when people who did not participate to the testing phases, provide no feedback or code reviews, let alone contribute some code or help with maintaining the webpage, inaugurate their first post in this forum will all spite and venom.

But at any rate, this path doesn't really achieve anything. Reread yourself. Then put yourself in the position of the people that could help you. Do you really think your post did anything but deter them from helping?

Quote
a product

This is not a product but a project. It's always in development, always trying to get better, always in need of feedback, testing and code reviews. This is also beta software that you run at your own discretion. You are approaching this from an entitled perspective. The Bitcoin world will be full of bad experiences if you stick to that view.

Quote
free or not

Wrong again. A "free product" still has a monetization scheme. You may not be aware of it, but it is still there. Facebook and Google data mine you. Youtube feeds you advertisement. Free to play games come with micro transactions and pay to win schemes.

With Armory, there is none of that. There was quite a push under ATI to go down that path, but under my rule it has strayed as far as possible from this path, to deliver the leanest solution possible. The first I did was to get rid of the phone home code, which was intended to track user statistics for revenue projections and attracting new investors.

Quote
has become, for whatever reason, impossible to use, monopolizing their machines

Jesus... try syncing 0.93 with the current chain, let's talk again after.

Quote
and most importantly, holding their BTC hostage.

Your coins are not being held hostage. Your private keys are in your wallet, free for you to use. You can access them anytime with offline Armory, with versions as old as 0.90. Your private keys are your coins. Armory is a framework among others that deploys services to interface with the bitcoin network. Why do I even bother trying to explain this...

Quote
Speaking of which, after another over-night run, the client finally appears happy and caught up, except all the wallets have zero balance. Rescan gave zero change.

What is the address chain length on your wallets? Did you restore them from a paper backup before syncing 0.95? Try extending the address chain in offline mode before rescanning. Also, what is the top block displayed in the bottom right? Log files would go a long way.
2360  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Extremely long engine initialization, v 0.95.1 on: December 02, 2016, 09:14:28 AM
FWIW, even with the suggested command line switches, ArmoryDB still uses 100% of the system RAM within 60 seconds.

1) Please don't hijack somebody else's thread, create your own and post your log files.

2) There is a difference between allocated memory (malloc) and mapped files (mmap). The usage figures show you total RAM load, but the distinction is significant: allocated memory belongs to the process while mapped files boils down to hinting the OS that you want these files cached in RAM for faster access. Mapped memory does not prevent new allocations, it simply uses otherwise free resources to speed up I/O.

You are better off documenting yourself on these topics than just jumping to conclusion. Armory has been using this model for nearly 3 years now.

3) This is an open source project, feel free to submit code if you have a better solution, or at least participate to the testing phases and provide constructive feedback and bug tracking.
Pages: « 1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 [118] 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 ... 233 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!