Hi,
the question marks are orphan blocks.
Vin
that is, they don't come? It means someone else submitted a valid response to that block before you did and theirs was accepted on the network by peers. You are not doing anything wrong, they happen to everyone. Those orphans are the stake you earned after that. Once orphaned, it will continue trying to stake until it is accepted. All those orphans are most likely the same inputs that staked shortly after that Hi, and what do I do? on the computer, too, is not nothing! The stakes you earned later are the orphans trying to stake again for a higher amount. You already got the coins |
|
|
|
Hi,
the question marks are orphan blocks.
Vin
that is, they don't come? It means someone else submitted a valid response to that block before you did and theirs was accepted on the network by peers. You are not doing anything wrong, they happen to everyone. Those orphans are the stake you earned after that. Once orphaned, it will continue trying to stake until it is accepted. All those orphans are most likely the same inputs that staked shortly after that |
|
|
|
did i do some wrong or can't i check my wallet anymore on freestaking?
You can still search for address on the presstab explorer. I replaced the search box on the main page with a tweet box |
|
|
|
And just voted too.
Did you vote yes or no? yes , don't want many coin over inflating it , maybe run the staking rate for a certain amount of time then slow it up. I would have it kick in at block 500k so everyone knows the bottom is 10,000 coinage and 5000 max reward. Nice round numbers to start charts That would be a couple months, probably. Hopefully around 1,000,000 total CUBE If thats the total cube before slowing it up then thats not so bad , then maybe the value and trading gets way way better and the coin stays around like one of my old favs UNO . We need coins that are going to stay and keep going. So many die after so long . This is a good coin , alot like it . and keep up the good work on it but don't run ragged and get bored with it. It's not boredom. I think very soon when my whole side of the story comes out you guys will understand a little better why I made the choices I did in the past |
|
|
|
And just voted too.
Did you vote yes or no? yes , don't want many coin over inflating it , maybe run the staking rate for a certain amount of time then slow it up. I would have it kick in at block 500k so everyone knows the bottom is 10,000 coinage and 5000 max reward. Nice round numbers to start charts That would be a couple months, probably. Hopefully around 1,000,000 total CUBE |
|
|
|
I'm thinking of something like 2% of the block height is needed to earn maximum stake, while the maximum reward could be something like 1% of the block number
Right now that would be about 7003 CUBE to earn 2000% and a max stake reward of around 3501 per block. Both would increase as the block height gets higher, so it would scale fairly well long term
this sounds good. so if you don't have 2%, say just .5% of the block what would be the stake%? Option 1: Make small inputs and compete for the 1 cube reward blocks. At start there can't be more than about 100 blocks each day staking for full reward (with roughly 1% of the coin supply needed) so there are plenty of blocks to collect with the small rewards. If you look into the chain there are still many blocks rewarding less than 1 coin, even with 1 coin blocks you can get a very good return. For still quite some time at least (or this reward slides as well, for example block payout 1/500,000th of the block height). Option 2: If it's indeed 2% of the block height in coin age/coin days and not the number of coins needed you would have a 2nd option. Everything in 1 input and then manually stalling staking for 4 days, to compensate lack of coins with age, and stake for the 2000%. Correct. You could hold 5000 coins for two days to get the 2000% - This is why I think it will really help combating compounding while still offering great rewards. It's a very simple code change of about 8 lines that does a whooooole lot You understand it correctly, though, so I'm glad I'm explaining it fairly well because it's a simple, but big, change |
|
|
|
And just voted too.
Did you vote yes or no? |
|
|
|
Make sure you guys vote if you want your voice to be heard |
|
|
|
I'm thinking of something like 2% of the block height is needed to earn maximum stake, while the maximum reward could be something like 1% of the block number
Right now that would be about 7003 CUBE to earn 2000% and a max stake reward of around 3501 per block. Both would increase as the block height gets higher, so it would scale fairly well long term
this sounds good. so if you don't have 2%, say just .5% of the block what would be the stake? Something low, maybe, like 1 CUBE? think that work? how will new people view CUBE? The longer we go, the lower % of the total coins will be required to reach the threshold. Money Supply will go up much faster than block count, percentage-wise |
|
|
|
I'm thinking of something like 2% of the block height is needed to earn maximum stake, while the maximum reward could be something like 1% of the block number
Right now that would be about 7003 CUBE to earn 2000% and a max stake reward of around 3501 per block. Both would increase as the block height gets higher, so it would scale fairly well long term
this sounds good. so if you don't have 2%, say just .5% of the block what would be the stake? Something low, maybe, like 1 CUBE? |
|
|
|
Lol damn you're fast. Thanks for the screenshot, I can use that  |
|
|
|
Very interesting idea on the new staking params. I wouldn't be entirely opposed to that especially if it helps keep the price up. It might make it hard for the little guys to stake though.
My thinking is that if it dumps it will be to new users going for the higher stake rate, who are planning to hold, resulting in a higher price. And since the cap is also sliding, the max inflation will always stay under a certain %, regardless of the actual supply |
|
|
|
the numbers are exactly what we need to push cube past btc. How soon can you implement them
It can be done very easily. I would probably set it to block 500k or something so people have plenty of time to update wallets and set their blocks up however they want to havent checked out all features on the stakestick how easy will it be to update the wallet on the stick? The StakeStick will auto-update when the new wallet is pushed to the Google Play Store |
|
|
|
the numbers are exactly what we need to push cube past btc. How soon can you implement them
It can be done very easily. I would probably set it to block 500k or something so people have plenty of time to update wallets and set their blocks up however they want to |
|
|
|
I'm thinking of something like 2% of the block height is needed to earn maximum stake, while the maximum reward could be something like 1% of the block number
Right now that would be about 7003 CUBE to earn 2000% and a max stake reward of around 3501 per block. Both would increase as the block height gets higher, so it would scale fairly well long term
that is a great idea! you should do a coin like that instead of changing specs mid life of this one. So you suggest I let CUBE inflate to oblivion instead of implementing a very easy fix, opening the door for you to talk shit about me abandoning CUBE? Your opinion has lost its meaning No, I merely suggest you start a coin with high PoS but put harsh checks on coin generation. Thus checking inflation from the gate and having your platform for moving staking hardware. CUBE is in a great place to apply such a system What does everyone else think of these numbers? |
|
|
|
I'm thinking of something like 2% of the block height is needed to earn maximum stake, while the maximum reward could be something like 1% of the block number
Right now that would be about 7003 CUBE to earn 2000% and a max stake reward of around 3501 per block. Both would increase as the block height gets higher, so it would scale fairly well long term
that is a great idea! you should do a coin like that instead of changing specs mid life of this one. So you suggest I let CUBE inflate to oblivion instead of implementing a very easy fix, opening the door for you to talk shit about me abandoning CUBE? Your opinion has lost its meaning |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
