|
Software is already way ahead of hardware..
|
|
|
|
Another coin man. Have you not invented enough shitcoin already or is this the mega final shitcoin?
This is not a new coin Oh. A rebrand. How many coins in circulation? 12,933 http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/SPOTS/index.phpAverage stake rate is roughly 80% per year (though it's a unique staking structure, so you could earn much higher, or much lower) |
|
|
|
Do it coin similar to tbcoin(tbc) but eariler get inform,what coins and when launch.
This coin is already over 6 months old, only the thread is new. It was launched on New Year's Day and was the first coin of 2016 |
|
|
|
Another coin man. Have you not invented enough shitcoin already or is this the mega final shitcoin?
This is not a new coin |
|
|
|
Version 8.0 Features | Optional Update
- Analytics tab added
- Tickers, Explorer, Analytics, Trading, Multipool, and more are all now in-wallet
|
|
|
|
It's up to you guys to notify exchanges of the fork, I'm quite out of the loop now I have included the source on my Github http://github.com/iGotSpots |
|
|
|
Just a quick update on what I've been working on the last couple days  Click the picture above to take a peek. It will have graphs and charts and stuff eventually, as well as multipool stats when we get that up. I'm still working on all the API, but if you notice any exchanges missing for any coins, please let me know Site looks good! Will we see a wallet update soon?  Yes |
|
|
|
i send some coins to my wallet and this 2 hours ago, and still always not confirmed.
have someone an idea whats the problem?
Has it confirmed? |
|
|
|
|
Ugh, Github added a bunch of shit for some reason. Upload bug; fixed
|
|
|
|
Click the image below to download the Windows wallet. Github has been updated to v2.0 Click the image above to download the Windows wallet. Github has been updated to v2.0 |
|
|
|
|
Ask Bittrex how the CUBE nonfork feels
|
|
|
|
|
Pool progress is coming along very well. You will be able to mine a bunch of different shit with this one, it's going to be the one stop shop
|
|
|
|
All this bull don't help a coin to stabilaze and price fall.
Folks you need to chill and Spots your responces don't help things getting better.
It is what it is. This situation has been discussed ad nauseum and the simple minds still don't comprehend. I just don't give a shit anymore, I have more important things to do than explain basic coin fundamentals to people who aren't listening. You guys are on your own to get shit done now and I don't have any forks planned anymore I'm focusing on SPOTS and PRIME now, fuck this Bittrex-shill bullshit, they can have their sandbox back with their shills that will defend them until their fingers bleed. Fuck all of you. People like Wuher have been riding Richie's dick for years now, not even realizing how much of a pawn they are. They're not getting off anytime soon Everyone in that chat log, including you Demon.. all of you.. fucking idiots |
|
|
|
|
Got dumped overnight, nice buy opportunities today
|
|
|
|
|
At least the game was fun until people started cheating instead of playing fair lol
|
|
|
|
Ok so
just for my own piece of mind do i need t check my own wallet to make sure that is still on the right fork and if so how often should i do it.
And most of all how do i do it?
cheers
getcheckpoint However, since I'm being blamed for human-error, I have taken down the server, so it won't work because it's not making any new checkpoints anymore. Just gotta make sure you're synced with explorer, I guess You can check this in the wallet on the 'On the Web' tab, too |
|
|
|
other people sent coins out on that day too from Bittrex i sent 26290.50958900 to a friend and they just never confirmed but no one got in-touch or offed a replacement i had to replace them my self.
Because they were on their own fork and everyone else was on mainnet.. that's what I've been trying to say but nobody is listening Do you think that BITTREX should be investigated? Do you think that BITTREX are in a hurry to delist CUBE, just to cover their tracks? I remember a coin that I had with them in the not so distant past - a theft occurred, but Bittrex just delisted that coin without bothering to stop/catch the culprit, because BITTREX tries to protect their own interests. I believe what they are saying is true with rollback blocks. The misunderstanding is they think the entire network rolled back, which it did not You guys are not understanding what I am saying. The wallet validates checkpoints, yes, but if there are no new ones on the fork Bittrex was on, the wallet has nothing to verify.. They should have checks in order to stop the wallet if no checkpoints are coming in and no invalid transactions would have occured This is a simple case of wallets being mismanaged. If you don't validate that checkpoints are recent, then what good are they..? |
|
|
|
other people sent coins out on that day too from Bittrex i sent 26290.50958900 to a friend and they just never confirmed but no one got in-touch or offed a replacement i had to replace them my self.
Because they were on their own fork and everyone else was on mainnet.. that's what I've been trying to say but nobody is listening |
|
|
|
ahhh what is wrong with your wallet spots it's not staking at all. you said there is no minimum amount of coin in staking right? so I have 0.015 spots and it's been 6 days already and there is no staking happening at all.
Should be soon, difficulty is still quite low "proof-of-stake" : 0.00216379 Please report back on how long it took that amount to stake. Please remember.. the more you have, the more often you will stake. Especially with 10 minute maturity, this is of the utmost importance with this coin correct me im wrong , when you say 10 minute maturity, it means if i have 1 spots , I can stake every 10 minutes? because after i stake, i need to wait 10 minutes again for my coin to stake. soon and so forth? so in one hour i can stake for 6 times right? 60minutes divided by 10 equals =6.. sorry spots i really dont get it..  If you deposit coins now, in 10 minutes you will be eligible to stake and start increasing coin age, which increase reward |
|
|
|
The trouble about this is it's really hard to figure this out without being a dev or even hobby programmer myself. Bittrex seems to be right that it looks like there was an issue with the checkpoint server restart. The question here I'd like to know is if the checkpoint server was indeed staking? Then checkpoint server are not really compliant with the idea of decentralization, but so are exchanges for that matter.
Now spots has a point too. There are coins using checkpoints and if indeed it's a matter of running a script, and I see no reason why this shouldn't be the case, then someone like an exchange really should run one to put a wallet in maintenance if things look wrong. Checkpoints may be a source for problems but that doesn't change by disregarding them. For an exchange it's either checking them or refusing any coins running them in the first place. Anyway, my question here would be: If checkpoints are a manual thing and the whole mainchain was on the other fork from it, how did it resolve such quickly? Were such few wallets online that the power of 2-3 people actually checking and spots itself pulled everyone else around?
sprout coin has had no checkpoints (dev left the coin a year or so ago) and the coin runs without issue. Here CUBE's checkpoint server stopped (why?, did he turn it off? was it a power failure?, why did it stop?) this question still isn't answered. and i asked him 3 times what exactly did he do during the reboot phase, and his only reply has been just calling me stupid and saying we all just believe trex and he's done with this coin. what kind of answer is that except one that is in denial and hiding something... I don't think it's realistic for an exchange to be able to manage so many checkpoint servers without enough man power to do that, since it's not an automated system. or they would have to develop one that notifies them of any such issues arising like a script that issues a flag saying the coin hasn't had a checkpoint in X amount of time. And let's point out it is very interesting that CUBE is now without a checkpoint in over 24hrs and are no problems. It was only that moment after gregofdoom was the first to post about there being no checkpoint for 500 blocks that shit started to happen.... WHY?! And trex was receiving VALID blocks, they were as valid as the blocks being confirmed RIGHT NOW with no checkpoints. It's when the rollback happened because the server said oh wait none of these 1700 blocks were checked at the restart point, so it has to invalidate ALL THOSE blocks and start all over again..... If there's another explanation to this, god please give one It doesn't matter if a coin runs well without checkpoints, that's not the point. The point is that checkpoints that are there should get checked and the wallet gets put into maintenance if irregularities occur and an admin notified. Of course it has to be done automatically, it's not possible to do it manually. Then it wouldn't have mattered who's fault it was, the wallet would have been in maintenance once too may checkpoints went missing and the chance of coin loss reduced. This time it seems only Bittrex lost coins, but what would have happened if a buyer sent these coins into the wallet? His TX would have been rollbacked but like the scam deposits and trades that withdrawal would have been in the books of Bittrex. Would they have taken that loss on themselves and book these lost coins back or go bad luck, not our fault? Of course then the question arises how coins should be treated that should have checkpoints but don't because the server is not there anymore? They work for now, but if that server comes back it may cause major troubles. Well, from the point of view of someone in a fork blocks would look valid as well, but it really looks like that doesn't apply here. Because on the explorer about 12h of blocks are missing. If there was a fork and the fork was killed off then the clients of the minor fork, like Bittrex or the explorer, would resync with the real valid blocks from the 'main fork'. Not just 12h of nothing. Since the explorer gives me no AM/PM on a 12h time scale I couldn't find the exact spot in a hurry, though, just noticed the time runs from 12:00 to 12:00 twice before the date changes on normal days but does so only once on the 18th of May and it contains about the number of disputed blocks less than other days. So one thing really happened: It was a complete rollback of the blockchain and not a normal repair of a fork as usual. Now, why did that happen? It's that simple. You just compare checkpoint timestamp with current time. Anyone responsible for millions of dollars of other people's money surely would have the most basic, rudimentary failsafes such as this in place. Not having at least something to verify the available tools at hand is pure incompetence. Their responses mean that not one other person moved coins anywhere other than Bittrex in an entire day. Anyone who believes this is a fucking moron who deserves to lose everything |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
