Vote for us: https://poloniex.com/votingKeep voting guys. Symbol Name Votes SUPER SuperCoin 172 Vote TAC TalkCoin 162 Vote DCM DigitalCommerce 111 Vote SUM2 SummerCoinV2 100 Vote ATH AtheistCoin 91 Vote POT PotCoin 86 Vote OC OrangeCoin 66 Vote MUGA Mugatu 61 Vote DUCK DuckNote 59 Vote RUBY RubyCoin 47 Vote VC VirtualCoin 40 Vote MMXIV MMXIV 19 Vote BOB Dobbscoin 12 Vote |
|
|
|
Here is a Simple a analysis on Supercoin reasonable price after Anon wallet release Until now, only Dark coin and XC coin has some Anon features Darkcoin has a worked mixer but also some problem with their master node XC coin has a test net mixer and do not worked Anon wallet yet, they will have a version2.0 two weeks later. Vericoin do not have a Anon wallet, they only have a development plan Supercoin has a Anon wallet on testnet. Dark coin Current total supply is 4.3 Million, the Price is 1.7 Million Satoshi/11$ XC coin Current total supply is 5.5 Million, the Price is 130K Satoshi/0.84$ Vericoin Current total supply is 26 Million, the Price is 15K Satoshi/0.1$ Supercoin Current total supply is 10 Million, the Price is 3K?  /0.018$??? personally i think we have done much work on Anon features than Vericoin so the reasonable Supercoin price at least hit 15K*2.6=37.5K Satoshi
if we compared with XC coin, the reasonable price will hit 60K Satoshi.now the Current Supercoin price is only 3K Satoshi. so what are we waiting for???.  +1 thank you for your support! |
|
|
|
multipool dump ends. if you can not connect to supercoin network. Here is my supercoin.conf, it may help you. 16 connection to supercoin network and very fast to sync to supercoin network. testnet=0
listen=1
maxconnections=100
server=1
daemon=1
rpcuser=user
rpcpassword=pass
rpcport=19391
rpcconnect=127.0.0.1
addnode=115.28.162.137
addnode=209.222.20.140
addnode=107.2.74.208
addnode=173.170.158.80
addnode=173.18.229.235
addnode=31.210.61.50
addnode=38.126.94.60
addnode=85.25.201.132
addnode=86.198.145.13
addnode=84.220.209.103
addnode=162.243.39.146
addnode=85.25.201.132
addnode=75.150.145.65
addnode=62.116.254.204
addnode=198.1.59.33
addnode=108.48.80.153
addnode=115.28.162.137
addnode=67.11.141.143
addnode=98.126.73.2
addnode=38.126.94.60
addnode=37.187.74.123
addnode=86.24.209.143
addnode=50.161.173.218
addnode=81.98.103.142
addnode=80.238.174.253
addnode=110.15.197.136
addnode=193.219.117.63
addnode=223.84.30.169
addnode=95.84.19.6
addnode=180.93.160.174
addnode=106.113.178.130
addnode=184.145.203.49
addnode=94.54.178.190
addnode=84.102.53.41 PUT a Supercoin.conf on ANN thread dev, it seems new comer can not syn the wallet. |
|
|
|
anybody want to join supercoin giveaway on poloniex trollbox? Thanks i can see votes rapidly increasing. i am do some giveaway on poloniex. join us dev.. haha but maybe you have more important work to do. so i will keep do some giveaway on poloniex. |
|
|
|
anybody want to join supercoin giveaway on poloniex trollbox? |
|
|
|
multipool dump ends. if you can not connect to supercoin network. Here is my supercoin.conf, it may help you. 16 connection to supercoin network and very fast to sync to supercoin network. testnet=0
listen=1
maxconnections=100
server=1
daemon=1
rpcuser=user
rpcpassword=pass
rpcport=19391
rpcconnect=127.0.0.1
addnode=115.28.162.137
addnode=209.222.20.140
addnode=107.2.74.208
addnode=173.170.158.80
addnode=173.18.229.235
addnode=31.210.61.50
addnode=38.126.94.60
addnode=85.25.201.132
addnode=86.198.145.13
addnode=84.220.209.103
addnode=162.243.39.146
addnode=85.25.201.132
addnode=75.150.145.65
addnode=62.116.254.204
addnode=198.1.59.33
addnode=108.48.80.153
addnode=115.28.162.137
addnode=67.11.141.143
addnode=98.126.73.2
addnode=38.126.94.60
addnode=37.187.74.123
addnode=86.24.209.143
addnode=50.161.173.218
addnode=81.98.103.142
addnode=80.238.174.253
addnode=110.15.197.136
addnode=193.219.117.63
addnode=223.84.30.169
addnode=95.84.19.6
addnode=180.93.160.174
addnode=106.113.178.130
addnode=184.145.203.49
addnode=94.54.178.190
addnode=84.102.53.41 |
|
|
|
I just updated OP with new data. Thank you for patience.
Seriously, you deserve a pat on the back. Thank you for all your hard work. thank you. You are certainly a good community and it's pleasure for me to work for you. I just updated website www.super-coin.netthe picture on the website should be more large? it's too small |
|
|
|
|
anybody give me more node please?
thanks
|
|
|
|
Here is a Simple a analysis on Supercoin reasonable price after Anon wallet release Until now, only Dark coin and XC coin has some Anon features Darkcoin has a worked mixer but also some problem with their master node XC coin has a test net mixer and do not worked Anon wallet yet, they will have a version2.0 two weeks later. Vericoin do not have a Anon wallet, they only have a development plan Supercoin has a Anon wallet on testnet. Dark coin Current total supply is 4.3 Million, the Price is 1.7 Million Satoshi/11$ XC coin Current total supply is 5.5 Million, the Price is 130K Satoshi/0.84$ Vericoin Current total supply is 26 Million, the Price is 15K Satoshi/0.1$ Supercoin Current total supply is 10 Million, the Price is 3K? /0.018$??? personally i think we have done much work on Anon features than Vericoin so the reasonable Supercoin price at least hit 15K*2.6=37.5K Satoshi
if we compared with XC coin, the reasonable price will hit 60K Satoshi.now the Current Supercoin price is only 3K Satoshi. so what are we waiting for???. 4 Darkcoin $ 48,120,176 $ 10.99 4,377,443 DRK $ 897,571 -0.06 % 14 XC $ 4,646,424 $ 0.842879 5,512,566 XC* $ 275,190 -10.85 % 21 VeriCoin $ 2,536,439 $ 0.094763 26,766,151 VRC $ 153,031 -9.12 % 69 SuperCoin $ 226,224 $ 0.021851 10,353,197 SUPER $ 63,272 +233.40 % |
|
|
|
still works. let's do something good for community. |
|
|
|
Supercoin beyond LTC within the next two years, I believe that this is not a dream! It is possible.  First we may rank top 20 on coinmarketcap several weeks later. |
|
|
|
Some people asked for details of our plan and implementations, here are some information on it. I'll use question/answer format to give details. Please post more questions if you have, the dev team will do our best to answer them. Q: What is the overall plan for SUPER to support anonymous features?A: Our ultimate goal is to create a peer-to-peer and completely de-centralized anonymous system. This is shown in the following diagram. Any node can become an intermediate "mixing" node, if some minimum requirements are satisfied. There is no central control parts. Everything is peer-to-peer and de-centralized. Remember that this is a trustless system, any node may cheat if it can. In order to achieve this goal, we divide our work into 2 steps: - Phase-1. To achieve anonymous wallet with a simplified, and easy to implement system
- Phase-2. To implement a fully de-centralized peer-to-peer anonymous system
What is an anonymous system? Simply put, it is a system that people can not trace clearly the transactions from the blockchain, and see where the transaction really originated and where it is terminated. This protects people's privacy. So why we don't go directly to our end-goal? This is because from our surveys and investigations, it is very complex and difficult to achieve a completely decentralized anonymous system. The key here is the "trust". When you do A->X->B, where X is some sort of the middle "mixer" node, the send or sign or commit of A->X and X->B (or its equivalent, such as a double-signed address, mini-escrow, etc), can not completely happen simultaneously, the one side (sender or Mixer-node) that has the last act can always cheat, though sometimes the cheat does not give the cheater benefits, but it can cause damage to the other party. Therefore, a complete trustless system is more difficult to be implemented (though it is possible - we'll discuss some more below). For this reason, in phase-1 we decided to develop a system that will depend on some sort of the trust, it is much easier to implement, and will give people the anonymous feature. This trust will be done through the dev team, or a credible mining pool. Q: So what is your Phase-1 solution?A: Our initial anon solution will involve some middle trusted mixing pools. This is shown in the following diagram: The mixing pools will be hosted initially by dev team, and can also be hosted by credible mining pools. The anon send will be directed to these mixing pools by wallet and mixed and then send to its destination. Basically it is done like this: A (source) -> {Xi} (i = 1, ..., m), then {Yi} (i = 1, ..., n)->B (destination) where {Xi} and {Yi} are randomly chosen addresses from a large pool of addresses (belonging to a mixing pool, and these addresses are periodically refreshed, phased out, and created). The source amount from A is split randomly into m parts (for now we choose m = 2,3 or 4 randomly in the anon version we will release for testing, but it will be a configurable parameters later), they are sent to m random addresses in randomly chosen mixing pool. The pool, on confirming the amounts received, will send the same amount in n parts to the destination (for our testnet we choose n=1, again this can be changed and configured). The result transaction is not traceable (at least extremely difficult to trace, given the large number of addresses in the mixing pool and dynamism of the addresses). The main part of our phase-1 solution is implemented, and we will release a version for testnet shortly. Q: Sounds good, is mixing pool software and coin wallet client are two different software?A: Absolutely not. They are exactly the same. It is the SUPER coin wallet. Eventually this will be used for peer-to-peer system (in phase-2), so no reason to be different. Now we configure only a few special nodes as trusted nodes. Once we implement the trustless system in phase-2, no special config is needed. Q: What is a trust system, and what is a trustless system?A: A trust system will have at least one node that everyone trusts. This node will never cheat. Other nodes may or may not cheat. A trustless system is that any nodes will cheat if they can. So to implement a trustless system it is more difficult as you have to implement mechanisms to prevent or discourage a node to cheat. If a node cheats, it will lose much more than it gains. Q: Can you give some details on the mixing pool?A: OK, it is basically a wallet client, with a pool feature configured as shown below. A array of the incoming/outgoing addresses are created and refreshed dynamically, and randomly chosen for each transaction. Incoming and outgoing addresses balance their coins with predefined algorithms. Q: Looks good for Phase-1. What about Phase-2? Is it feasible?A: Phase-2 is absolutely feasible, albeit more difficult. We actually already defined a workable scheme, and work on details now. It involves a complex system with multi-signature (m-to-n signature) addresses and multi-signature transactions. We can not reveal more details now. We will publish the full scheme design details after we implement, test and release it. The Phase-2 will be built on top of the Phase-1 codebase. In phase-2, any node (wallet client) can become an intermediate mixing node if it satisfy some minimum requirements (e.g. minimum balance, network connectivity etc). great! it's more clear now. thanks for the hard work dev. |
|
|
|
provenceday when did you buy in
i am keep buying now. |
|
|
|
Here is a Simple a analysis on Supercoin reasonable price after Anon wallet release
Until now, only Dark coin and XC coin has some Anon features
How on earth can anyone take you seriously when you don't mention XMR (or any of the CryptoNote coins) that are the ONLY cryptocurrencies that are truly untraceable? Besides, all these coins are doing shitty implementations of mixing or CoinJoin, both of which are proven to be shitty and not anonymous. sorry i missed XMR, CryptoNote is also a very promising Technology. |
|
|
|
Multipool dump again...  Why you creating panic? Its natural process for multipool. yes. Multipool will dump any mined coin when they have profit. look forward to the First Halves now. |
|
|
|
Multipool dump again... |
|
|
|
Let's do something good for Supercoin! Send Emails guys.... dev send them a emails? |
|
|
|
Thanks provenceday. So for now a centralized workaround will be implemented. It's cool that it will be implemented in the wallet, but I prefer a non-centralized workaround. [/quote] i also prefer a decentralized Anon network, hope dev can improve this in the next version. |
|
|
|
 I thought so many people were bumping this thread and hyping supercoin but I realized it is just provenceday.  sorry |
|
|
|
...
It's basic impossible to detect the original source address of this transaction, from the receiving transaction.
...
 So basically it works like this image, correct? Are you using a seperate pool that needs to be on a server, like PINKcoin does? I really don't get it. we will release testnet anon version in the weekend. General system simple like you said. For more details follow our thread please. I've been reading through the complete thread, but I can't find any more details about the anon feature. If you have a minute to explain more about it, that would be great. HERE: Anon Feature Explained-we will release testnet anon version in the weekend
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=618552.msg7244842#msg7244842 So what is anon features?Anon features hide the traces of the transaction. So basically when you want to send from A to B, instead of showing in the blockchain explicitly a transaction showing A-B, it may show A->X, then Y->B, where X, Y are some random addresses (at least from a large address pool). Of course the transaction can be further obfuscated, such as you can split the sending amount to several parts, and apply the above for each part. This way, it is virtually impossible to trace the real transaction. So it protects your privacy. Read more... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=618552.msg7244842#msg7244842 Let me show you an example in our testing: A user send 999.0123 coins from address A (mxcMnGPthZp7rzQ7TUg8kZcbVyB8CrXy8p) to address B (myKydMhECoFyY2iAWgwuEVbthej1sKHFdR) (1) Send from sender's Qt client  (2) The send is automatically split into 2 (random) parts and send to 2 different addresses X1 (mquFq9qNwDDVbNKLwThvhFDpbFPot8HixR) and X2 (mgniPoAcsSzvpfisxg1cyueUvqApAZbwbK). This is displayed in sender's tx list (2 red ones).  (3) On receiver's side, he sees the amount arrived (from yet another address Y (n1mFH2L7PhhMc6BLFMDoD7tDc2AXtZGJS4) - you don't see it in current tx, but if you check its in-tx, you will see it)  The 3 related tx details are posted below. It's basic impossible to detect the original source address of this transaction, from the receiving transaction. {
"txid" : "6c7a8d751381e088c3c7eb7db3ebf13f6c148456cb392f05b83fb86f626e804c",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1402462734,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"txid" : "0694419082ee689ec21681db4822f3453126fce079d77c2db6ab5bb34e568585",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "304402206407e11bf057b3f5cdd97c31729e2d7266528dbca39ee87cee0b8675f133362f022044971c0e34c380a3051b8e92f3df0b7c5caa19b02f54801ae38345eff241b2fd01 03c288f76512d3093439ecbd2c78c5cf997e41132d08ce44ae3a116e099bdf6faf",
"hex" : "47304402206407e11bf057b3f5cdd97c31729e2d7266528dbca39ee87cee0b8675f133362f022044971c0e34c380a3051b8e92f3df0b7c5caa19b02f54801ae38345eff241b2fd012103c288f76512d3093439ecbd2c78c5cf997e41132d08ce44ae3a116e099bdf6faf"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 52.45424200,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 c4737f339ef96dba8decbd799874aae3f9224a68 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"myRh6WvjaN8riGEkrdMuFd5Vg8L7MyfpG8"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 459.54565800,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 71e90c272a86ec027071c7de1df5a14b8a187937 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mquFq9qNwDDVbNKLwThvhFDpbFPot8HixR"
]
}
}
],
"amount" : -459.54565800,
"fee" : -0.00010000,
"confirmations" : 11,
"blockhash" : "000005fb04de17a44bcfc2195aed1878e890a1898799772a7fcf2e4dc80e1284",
"blockindex" : 2,
"blocktime" : 1402462748,
"txid" : "6c7a8d751381e088c3c7eb7db3ebf13f6c148456cb392f05b83fb86f626e804c",
"time" : 1402462734,
"timereceived" : 1402462734,
"details" : [
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "mquFq9qNwDDVbNKLwThvhFDpbFPot8HixR",
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -459.54565800,
"fee" : -0.00010000
}
]
}
{
"txid" : "7f14e6f0b00e98b25b4acf5463ca5419f6ec86673d5540dd8da3c8c147eb90c0",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1402462734,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"txid" : "ae2242db5b8002af78b5969c353a0d167267f9e24dac7535d90610a6cbf1a607",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "3045022100d5e024b40f00c8f08be5ba2ee55c14e67bd186e308d5612ef34b63bc13ea452302202dd4d883cebd384774c1f586c6a445c8be5615c90886a66f70184faf32be71d701 022221c6c6804456de70dfe332c9a8f1694b27c1ddf5023faf980324952de08c79",
"hex" : "483045022100d5e024b40f00c8f08be5ba2ee55c14e67bd186e308d5612ef34b63bc13ea452302202dd4d883cebd384774c1f586c6a445c8be5615c90886a66f70184faf32be71d70121022221c6c6804456de70dfe332c9a8f1694b27c1ddf5023faf980324952de08c79"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
},
{
"txid" : "6300d320e006a7be95556f38d80c2225f73761dfc6998d5f1765e441d7972e59",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "3045022100e780ee7216f56a1075a068e3bf9a32778b246ca153abe6551ebf5db3a50b3181022012929c5a2be93e7167ac7eec028764da4be4bbe7c685b974a7a294fab99bfa3201 02db386f4f155744e11dee9b182cb014b89c3d7104827303bc4f8d55b822961ddd",
"hex" : "483045022100e780ee7216f56a1075a068e3bf9a32778b246ca153abe6551ebf5db3a50b3181022012929c5a2be93e7167ac7eec028764da4be4bbe7c685b974a7a294fab99bfa32012102db386f4f155744e11dee9b182cb014b89c3d7104827303bc4f8d55b822961ddd"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
},
{
"txid" : "2d7cd6c42fe591bbcdd4c7fbc95c5b92c8c9f57406b48c2fd48c42d3f224a0a1",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "30440220704aee08f4ea413967a65f43d80618eebcba407f5ec47f9bb4dd861294feb670022028e8b81335381438387f4a6aca80d4000f97aadda149360dca12b9caa49387cb01 022221c6c6804456de70dfe332c9a8f1694b27c1ddf5023faf980324952de08c79",
"hex" : "4730440220704aee08f4ea413967a65f43d80618eebcba407f5ec47f9bb4dd861294feb670022028e8b81335381438387f4a6aca80d4000f97aadda149360dca12b9caa49387cb0121022221c6c6804456de70dfe332c9a8f1694b27c1ddf5023faf980324952de08c79"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 0.56089498,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 3845a744f2480b47443d20122171e80971194ec8 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mkeVaQ7XR9gS2mTDKeH378r2agpuiCvqna"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 539.46664200,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 0df32d5dd2f602fac3ef26452c91fcb15d4c91af OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mgniPoAcsSzvpfisxg1cyueUvqApAZbwbK"
]
}
}
],
"amount" : -539.46664200,
"fee" : -0.00010000,
"confirmations" : 11,
"blockhash" : "000005fb04de17a44bcfc2195aed1878e890a1898799772a7fcf2e4dc80e1284",
"blockindex" : 3,
"blocktime" : 1402462748,
"txid" : "7f14e6f0b00e98b25b4acf5463ca5419f6ec86673d5540dd8da3c8c147eb90c0",
"time" : 1402462734,
"timereceived" : 1402462734,
"details" : [
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "mgniPoAcsSzvpfisxg1cyueUvqApAZbwbK",
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -539.46664200,
"fee" : -0.00010000
}
]
}
{
"txid" : "d0ce1a74c9e03fca3a507dfef2d0e7e8e6bc0b9b8180676a6fc481a275e0b670",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1402462729,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"txid" : "81fac0abe2b4ecc9002dbc79a6ac0dfd4ee6cbfdb8f491e98dbaf9be835eaa69",
"vout" : 1,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "3045022100e932e4cb29d6b6fd76dd943d162cf38e52bb2ed852a5afd7a2f5497c6711243a02202aff5c3840b8a8fec710655a36ed931e7d3198cbaf0a7b1441d2726d1db73b4801 023ef1072fdaa98ac338d5c6d81dbbe5e3b04ba93ab264fabf1cfebcded3a0f79d",
"hex" : "483045022100e932e4cb29d6b6fd76dd943d162cf38e52bb2ed852a5afd7a2f5497c6711243a02202aff5c3840b8a8fec710655a36ed931e7d3198cbaf0a7b1441d2726d1db73b480121023ef1072fdaa98ac338d5c6d81dbbe5e3b04ba93ab264fabf1cfebcded3a0f79d"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 49000.98760000,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 b9cad0c51435f495f3e97220f53585e581d34249 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mxTLGQoK2sGQhtVMSe4qWZnb1nfC3QQHaL"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 999.01230000,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 c35ecd1597c76829e5118f36033207795709b4bf OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"myKydMhECoFyY2iAWgwuEVbthej1sKHFdR"
]
}
}
],
"amount" : 999.01230000,
"confirmations" : 11,
"blockhash" : "000005fb04de17a44bcfc2195aed1878e890a1898799772a7fcf2e4dc80e1284",
"blockindex" : 1,
"blocktime" : 1402462748,
"txid" : "d0ce1a74c9e03fca3a507dfef2d0e7e8e6bc0b9b8180676a6fc481a275e0b670",
"time" : 1402462731,
"timereceived" : 1402462731,
"details" : [
{
"account" : "D2",
"address" : "myKydMhECoFyY2iAWgwuEVbthej1sKHFdR",
"category" : "receive",
"amount" : 999.01230000
}
]
}
This is only showing 3 transactions. Not explaining HOW the anon functin works. Darkcoin works through MasterNodes and they do the mixing. Pinkcoin works through a centralized pool. How does Supercoin work? dev has explained this before, i remembered Supercoin also has some Supernode(?) on the First Anon stage. similar concept as Masternode and XC node. I've been reading through the complete thread but couldn't find anything about Supernodes. I think this is important information that can be shared in the OP if it's available. RE: anon features, dev, do you use Fedoracoin or XC code base? Can you give some more details on the strategy you are using? I heard the complete de-centralized solution not working, can you please comment?
We don't use any Fedoracoin or XC code (XC code not available anyway). We developed our code from scratch. This said, in the future it is possble that we may use Fedoracoin's mixerann system (it is not currently used). As for a complete de-centralized solution, you are right, we are not aware an algorithm that works. The key thing is the "trust". It's like you go down the street, see a person, and ask him "can you please give $100 to Dave in that shop? And I will give you $100?". Though you may find a good person to do it, in general, you have no guarantee that this guy will not take the money and run away, or that he gave $100 to Dave, he has no guarantee you will give him $100. Thus in our initial phase implementation, some trust mixer nodes are required (dev team will provide such nodes initially). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
