Not really sure what it has to do with SHA256 though. I think network should switch to hashing algorithm that would be optimized for GPU/CPU mining so that making asic for it would be unprofitable. you're always free to use litecoin |
|
|
|
|
if you need windows binaries, i suggest gitian VM builds.
|
|
|
|
freedom fighters enjoy being on a terrorist blacklist  |
|
|
|
My point was that there are other things more mundane that are classified as "POSSIBLY CARCINOGENIC".
...and that proves that EM radiation is not possibly carcinogenic how exactly? That wasn't my claim. Quit strawmaning. My claim is that to be consistent, you should avoid nickel and rippened fruits as well, since they are also "possibly carcinogenic". |
|
|
|
You know that cell phones have to broadcast for you to be able to connect to the network right? Antennas can be used for sending waves as well as receiving them.
so your argument is: radio waves -> piece of wire ->  -> radio waves into your brain. Something is off about that. Probably something involving a massive loss of EM energy when going from electrical energy to EM energy and vice versa. So you listed other things that may cause cancer, that some how means that EM radiation doesn't? Like I said previously you have a gross misunderstanding of basic scientific concepts.
You claimed that since it's on the list of possibly carginogenic substances, it should be avoided. It's retarded to avoid EM radiation on that basis because other mundane things are on that list. Therefore, if you're avoiding EM radiation on the basis of it being on the list, you should avoid ripened fruits, just to be consistent. |
|
|
|
1. So instead of using another antibiotic that is proven to work, you're going to use something that hasn't been proven to work? I see nothing wrong with that logic.  inb4 someone is allergic to all known antibiotics 2. that is, of course under the assumption that colloidal silver actually works 3. appeal to "muh freedums" 4. how is "cure/prevent/diagnose any known illness" related with FDA? 5. your argument is that "drugs that have undergone RCTs still harm people", therefore, RCT system is totally broken and we should never use it. RCTs are not prefect, but if you have something better, I'm all ears. 6. still ad hominem 7. see #4 also, my previous point still stands: So your logic is: there isn't evidence proving that colloidal silver isn't effective, therefore it's wrong for me to question the effectiveness of colloidal silver in preventing/curing/diagnosing any known disease.
Actually your previous point doesn't stand. You have been proven to rely upon assumptions for your arguments with ZERO scientific basis backing your claims. So you're arguing that if there is no rigorous evidence regarding a substance's ability to diagnose/treat/prevent a disease, it should be assumed that it's effective? 1. As some one who doesn't have antibiotic allergies it is convenient for you to dismiss this since you pay no price for some one else's bad health. 2. And you of course ASSUME it doesn't without any evidence, only LACK of evidence. 3. If you like being a bootlicking slave that is your prerogative - You don't get to decide where other people's freedoms end no matter how much you would love that. 4. For about the hundredth time, try understanding the words you post... http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRsearch.cfm?fr=101.935. All that garbage you just spouted was your personal interpretation as an attempt at marginalization, NOT what I said. RCT's you hold so highly are proven to be flawed SCIENTIFICALLY, therefore not as completely safe and sound as you pretend it is. This is also evidence that profit motive trumps healthcare. 6. So the medical industry harming people for profit has absolutely no logical connection to the way drugs are approved and processed? Also, the medical industry is not a person, so I am not sure how it could be a personal attack. I didn't say the medical industry smelled funny, I said its primary motivation is MONEY, not healthcare - and that point is clearly tied logically to this discussion regardless of the fact that it goes against your argument. 7. Number 4 is FDA policy - try actually understanding your own words for once before you spew them all over like self affirming vomit. You are one of the most willfully ignorant, intellectually lazy, and arrogant people I have ever had a "discussion" with (I don't think most of it counts as discussion, you are more like a Neanderthal smacking his own reflection in a pool over and over because he is afraid of the man in the water). You understand very little of the points you copy and paste from the internet, you rely completely upon 3rd parties to form your opinions for you, then you parrot them with zero critical thought or understanding. Why waste time learning or understanding things when correctness and win is just a Google search and a Wikipedia link away? You lack understanding of even the most basic scientific concepts. The fact that you walk around pretending to have this knowledge and giving advice to people is not only repugnant, it is scarey that someone might believe you actually know what you are talking about. My opinion is you should go back to school to learn how science really works, then if you can manage, you can come back and try to have an actual debate. Your logic boils down to: There is weak evidence supporting colloidal silver's effectiveness in curing/preventing a disease. Since there isn't evidence against this, we should use colloidal silver to treat/prevent disease. Am I correct? Also, #1: begging the question (already explained) #4: Oh, just because FDA used that phrase suddenly means that I'm some sort of regulator? I chose that phrase because it accurately describes my argument. How about I drop the "diagnose" part because no one is claiming colloidal silver can detect a disease. Would that make you happy? Oh right medical doctors, the ones who receive kickbacks and profit sharing of the drugs they prescribe. The ones who have their prescription pad in hand prior to even seeing you.
I am NOT saying I believe this whatsoever but I damn sure am not taking the word of medical doctors. If there was a natural healing method out there that did work they would be the last to know.
ad hominem. |
|
|
|
|
Can you put up a demo site?
|
|
|
|
This isn't a trojan wallet stealer? Crazy.
Query, how much difference in power is there running ram at full clocks and at say, 300Mhz?
It seems to be legit. The only executable is digitally signed and the rest are configuration files.  |
|
|
|
Can goldtсoin contain a trojan?
I use Kaspersky Antivirus and it delete goldcoin at once when I download it.
Then OP change link and viruses not detected.
I use and mining goldcoin since may, 25.
Possibly. If you have that coin's binary, scan it on malwr.com and anubis.iseclab.org Or just send it to me i will check it. also http://virustotal.com/ |
|
|
|
1. there are plenty of other antibiotics to use. bonus: they actually have rigorous evidence demonstrating their effectiveness. 2. that is not a valid concern when it comes to human use of antibiotics. antibiotic resistance is formed when there are left over bacteria from a antibiotic regiment. this usually occurs when the patient does not finish all their antibiotics, or the antibiotics are used in low dosages in a preventative manner (usually in farms). 3. homeopathy is probably safer than colloidal silver, so are you ok with that too? the problem isn't with colloidal silver's safety. the problem is people wasting time and money on treatments that have not been shown to do anything. 4. antiviral =/= cure/prevent/diagnose any known illness 5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy6. ad hominem: "you can't trust conventional medicine because they have profits in mind!" 7. how exactly am I acting bureaucratically? I never once asked for FDA or any regulatory approval. 1. As I said before individuals clearly do not have as many choices as you claim if they have problems with allergies. Just because they are ok for YOU doesn't mean everyone else can use them. Who are you without this issue to tell them otherwise? Seems like everyone else pays the cost having a product banned that you have no use for. 2. First of all how antibiotic resistant bacteria are created wasn't in question - it is a FACT they exist regardless of how it is created. That is not the primary mechanism creating resistant bacteria anyways. The primary mechanism is thru food produce production and overuse of antibiotics in animals which often live in unsanitary conditions basically creating a super bug breeding ground. Additionally excessive use of antibacterial soaps and scrubs, especially in hospitals creates especially resistant strains. These are both far larger problems than individuals misusing antibiotics. 3. If a consenting adult is willing to use their own hard earned money buying whatever they want I have no problem with it. It is the responsibility of the individual to make choices that effect them personally, and I reject your notion that a 3rd party is required for everyone like mommy and daddy giving you the ok rather than learning how to make choices for yourself. They make the choices and they pay the price if they are wrong (like adults do). 4. That is FDA regulation (read policy not law). 5. How is the fact that thousands of drugs pass thru FDA approval with RCTs, yet still end up killing or injuring thousands of people in addition to some times being ineffective, implausible? It is fact, there is no debating it. I think you don't really understand 90% of the Wikipedia posts you link, you just pick stuff out of a search engine, don't bother understanding it and mistake it for knowledge. (example: http://anh-europe.org/news/analysis-of-clinical-trials-reveals-that-placebo-content-is-rarely-described IE if you are testing a diabetes drug and the placebo is a sugar pill it could clearly effect the tests and make your "drug" appear more functional than it is.) 6. I fixed that for you: "You can't trust conventional medicine because they have profits in mind FIRST!" 7. See number 4. 1. So instead of using another antibiotic that is proven to work, you're going to use something that hasn't been proven to work? I see nothing wrong with that logic. inb4 someone is allergic to all known antibiotics 2. that is, of course under the assumption that colloidal silver actually works 3. appeal to "muh freedums" 4. how is "cure/prevent/diagnose any known illness" related with FDA? 5. your argument is that "drugs that have undergone RCTs still harm people", therefore, RCT system is totally broken and we should never use it. RCTs are not prefect, but if you have something better, I'm all ears. 6. still ad hominem 7. see #4 also, my previous point still stands: So your logic is: there isn't evidence proving that colloidal silver isn't effective, therefore it's wrong for me to question the effectiveness of colloidal silver in preventing/curing/diagnosing any known disease.
|
|
|
|
You don't see how mounting what is functionally an antenna directly to your head might channel the EM radiation to it? I am not sure all the explaining in the world could fix your lack of understanding of basic scientific concepts.
But antennas do not work that way. They convert radio waves into electricity. That's it. They don't relay or amplify radio signals (that's a job for satellite dishes). Unless your 3.5mm jack is plugged into a radio transmitter, I wouldn't be worried. I debunked that in the other thread. there are much more mundane things that are considered "POSSIBLY CARCINOGENIC". If you're going to avoid cell phones, you might want to avoid ripened fruits as well. |
|
|
|
Oooor like a rational human being with self preservation instincts you could just limit your exposure. Not everything is a conspiracy to sell crap.
My point was that there are other things more mundane that are classified as "POSSIBLY CARCINOGENIC". |
|
|
|
Not if they use something I'm developing.
Oh, do tell?!! I'm guessing it's some sort of risk managed 0-confirmation payment provider. Merchants pay him x% as a fee and he provides a guarantee (within a few seconds) on the transaction. |
|
|
|
There's nothing I can change in the forum's HTML to stop this. This isn't a side-effect of my anti-ABP code.
Yes, it is. You're the one who started the arms race with EasyList. If you removed your anti-ABP code, easylist maintainers wouldn't have to go through such extreme measures. This whole arms race is retarded, and you're turning it into a game of "why are you hitting yourself". |
|
|
|
It's ironic you complaining about TradeFortress first when you have a ripple ad in your signature  "Ripple Explained, for Bitcoiners!" is less of an ad than "⚠ Ripple is a scam" |
|
|
|
Thank you so much for your donation! Your EPIC! *you're |
|
|
|
I understand what happened- but this is not safe for the USER and needs to be addressed. if bitcoin has any chance to be adopted on a larger scale, it can't be easy to simply "lose" you bitcoins.
What will happen is all addresses will be two-way and eventually I doubt people will even know their address, it will be hidden and simply an "account".
Shame on CampBX for not functioning like blockchain or a wallet.
Actually, most merchants use 1 address per transaction. It also makes no sense that you're shaming CampBX for it. It clearly says that you can't reuse the deposit address, so how about you accept the blame for once? Pretty sure that Bit365 also says that you can only use certain wallets with their service. |
|
|
|
context: other substances classified as "possibly carcinogenic" http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/ClassificationsGroupOrder.pdfnotable mentions: Caffeic acid (found in coffee) Acetaldehyde (occurs naturally in coffee, bread, and ripe fruit) Bitumens (Asphalt) "Carpentry and joinery" (whatever that means) Cobalt and cobalt compounds Coffee Nickel, metallic and alloys you better be scared! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
