0.05 BTC/hour. Post what you want done and I'll reply with whether I can do it or not. Simple as that.  P.S: Don't even think about posting inappropriate stuff, kthx  |
|
|
|
|
Yes, they did, because it's not TF's server anymore.
|
|
|
|
Reserving E37 – Meeting Mastercoin, should have it done within a day or two. |
|
|
|
Trust is something very hard to earn...why sell it for just a measly 200$??
Exactly. $2000 might interest some people. |
|
|
|
200$ new starting price, PM is also good if you are interested
You underestimate how much time "trusted" people spend here. Personally, I've spent over 500 hours here. |
|
|
|
|
PM'd you. You can always use John. K, also.
|
|
|
|
Tweaked my settings a bit. I added users I haven't interacted with, but with ratings I like/trust.  Much better  You got TradeFortress in your default trust list... Which makes it useless to me. TF isn't in DefaultTrust anymore.  |
|
|
|
|
They aren't going to magically see this, you need to wait until you become a Jr. Member (~4 hours).
|
|
|
|
Many thanks go to randomcloud for his
Lawl'd. |
|
|
|
|
Bump, DiscussBitcoin has been updated. We're not running the promotion anymore, it just encourages spam.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't access any other part of the website, it just redirects to the password reset page even after I've reset my password.
|
|
|
|
Daily: Diamond The daily roll on Satoshi Slider is quite fun. |
|
|
|
"Well hang on, my trust list says you're untrusted..."
"Hm? Mine says that I have +5 rep points and that you have -1..."
"No, it says -5 for you..."
- Why everyone having a different trust list isn't a perfect system.
I agree that having everyone being able to give rep that means something is bad because...look at my rep page, but having those people be exclusively chosen by ~10 people is worse.
I don't see why everybody should have the same trust about someone... Why should I trust someone you trust? You have -1 for me and I have -5 for you? Well I guess we won't trade together. And that's all. Hmmm, true. |
|
|
|
Fucking hell, and I almost invested 1 BTC in this. |
|
|
|
Like your reply and your style Whiskers, you made that go away much easier to swallow, thx :-) With BadBear I had a situation before, so he did not surprise me too much: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297290.0 I wonder though if Tysat reply is a reply from forum stuff member or another personal opinion... Forum "stuff" members don't have to be your personal servant, they're allowed to have personal opinions and dislike/like people, no? |
|
|
|
|
"Well hang on, my trust list says you're untrusted..."
"Hm? Mine says that I have +5 rep points and that you have -1..."
"No, it says -5 for you..."
- Why everyone having a different trust list isn't a perfect system.
I agree that having everyone being able to give rep that means something is bad because...look at my rep page, but having those people be exclusively chosen by ~10 people is worse.
|
|
|
|
Lot of convoluted theories in here. Simplest explanation is that theymos has changed the algorithm, since this is the first major shift in trust on someone who had a lot of positive trust. I noticed that even after 6 or 7 people on the default list had given him neg trust he was still at 17x something.
Right. The Trust system isn't really designed to deal with "long con" situations, but it was performing particularly badly in this case. I changed the algorithm to more severely limit the maximum number of positive trust points you can get per month. (I'm not saying that TradeFortress is or is not a scammer at this point, but someone with more than 30% negative trust ratings should have a negative trust score.) I also removed TradeFortress from DefaultTrust (early yesterday), so his entire branch of the trust network is now untrusted by default. When you say thirty percent neg. This only counts if it is trusted? I'd assume so. Else...well, look at my trust page. I think he mad. Uh huh. |
|
|
|
|
DefaultTrust would be fine and people wouldn't bitch about it if people weren't added to it just because they're friends of theymos. Fuck, at least have some user input if it's DEFAULT.
I don't even edit my trust list because 90% of the forum will just have DefaultTrust and see my trust as DefaultTrust thinks it should be anyway. No point having 999 people with the same trust list and being the 1 person with a different trust list.
|
|
|
|
Lot of convoluted theories in here. Simplest explanation is that theymos has changed the algorithm, since this is the first major shift in trust on someone who had a lot of positive trust. I noticed that even after 6 or 7 people on the default list had given him neg trust he was still at 17x something.
Right. The Trust system isn't really designed to deal with "long con" situations, but it was performing particularly badly in this case. I changed the algorithm to more severely limit the maximum number of positive trust points you can get per month. (I'm not saying that TradeFortress is or is not a scammer at this point, but someone with more than 30% negative trust ratings should have a negative trust score.) I also removed TradeFortress from DefaultTrust (early yesterday), so his entire branch of the trust network is now untrusted by default. When you say thirty percent neg. This only counts if it is trusted? I'd assume so. Else...well, look at my trust page. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
