Yes. It's just as simple as what Raptor said:
Don't mine Scrypt coins less profitable than {percent or Scrypt coin choice box} Don't mine SHA coins less profitable than {percent or SHA coin choice box}
Mine only the single most profitable Scrypt coin, or Mine all of the most profitable Scrypt coins; Mine a single Scrypt coin if it exceeds {enter percent}
Mine only the single most profitable SHA coin, or Mine all of the most profitable SHA coins; Mine a single SHA coin if it exceeds {enter percent}
Aurum said exactly what I was thinking already. (It's been a busy day at work) It's mainly a matter of just being able to customize your auto-mining a little more without having to run two instances side-by-side.
|
|
|
For those of us who mine both SHA-256 and SCRYPT coins on the same machine, would it be possible to expand the "don't mine coins less profitable than" field to divide between the two types of coins?
Such as: Don't mine SHA256 coins less profitable than: <dropdown> Don't mine SCRYPT coins less profitable than: <dropdown>
|
|
|
Hi, Is there a way to avoid to push in background bfgminer output better then modify and compiling the source? I had a look at source code and your comment about the hashrate improvement but I'd like to have the possibility to enable "-q" option by using it or not in the string for miner configuration (or better in the GUI as a tick ) I haven't tested it, but you can set pool-specific config information. This command can likely go in there.
|
|
|
Hi
nwoolls,
Please Set the MaxLength property of the TextBox (CoinEditForm->symbolEdit) to 5 . I have created a new coin with a symbol name length > 5 chars (I didnt know that symbol name max length is 5) and i was getting API error (Mobile api returns an error).
Also if there isnt any coin selected on a device (gpu,proxy etc) the app throws an exception(If you delete the coins and import new coins this happens). There should be a check or a message there.
Thanks in advance, Nikos
Isn't the symbol length supposed to be 3 or 4? Seems like poor planning on your part.
|
|
|
Could always be really ambitious and make your own API site... I'm fairly certain my wife would kill me if I spent more time programming than I already do Just make the argument that you'd have to spend less time debugging someone else's buggy API. Seriously though, I understand.
|
|
|
On the same note, would it be possible to set a default coin to miner if coinchoose or coinwarz returns an API error?
Already have plans to make CoinChoose.com fail over to CoinWarz and vice-versa when one is down. If that doesn't help I'll consider this request further. It's on the list but honestly I'd rather keep the code simple and have the API providers get their shit together Could always be really ambitious and make your own API site...
|
|
|
would it be difficult to implement a strategy toggle to the effect of "continue strategy after manually switching" like if I manually switch to a coin not listed in the coinchoose api, it would still check the api 5,10,15 minutes later etc.. As of now when you manually switch, it unchecks the "automatically mine coin/s based on xxx" toggle. Seconded. On the same note, would it be possible to set a default coin to miner if coinchoose or coinwarz returns an API error?
|
|
|
updated to 2.5.3 everything working smooth so far. will report anything if I see it. Great job man! donating extra 1% for such a stellar program. now we just need coinchoose to add more sha256 coins or for coinwarz to make their api free for more uses a day ^^ I just have coinchoose running by default and manually switching if a coin not represented goes way up on coinwarz. Too bad I cannot put like 10 coinwarz api in and if one is out of uses have it move to the next one lol That, or for someone to make their own unified API that combines the data values from both...
|
|
|
I've started seeing this bug since upgrading to the 2.5.2 release. Sometimes, one of my miners (seems to only be the AntMiners) will suddenly display its average speed several thousand times higher than it should. 2nd from the top: Is your pool paying them out? 67,500 btc a day would pay some bills Nope. If you look at the submissions, it's roughly the same as the three others. I do wish I got paid that much/day. I'd consider quitting my job.
|
|
|
I've started seeing this bug since upgrading to the 2.5.2 release. Sometimes, one of my miners (seems to only be the AntMiners) will suddenly display its average speed several thousand times higher than it should.
2nd from the top:
Is your pool paying them out? 67,500 btc a day would pay some bills Nope. If you look at the submissions, it's roughly the same as the three others.
|
|
|
I've started seeing this bug since upgrading to the 2.5.2 release. Sometimes, one of my miners (seems to only be the AntMiners) will suddenly display its average speed several thousand times higher than it should. 2nd from the top:
|
|
|
Coincidentally, I tried to do the same this morning, and got this as well. Every submission got "H-not-zero". I was mining from another computer using an extra Block Erupter.
This is a bug in cgminer that was fixed by their team in 3.9 or 3.10. I was running 3.8.5. I'll test it with a newer version later tonight. Thanks for the assist.
|
|
|
ok i got stratum working on multi miner however I am getting 100% errors. Any ideas Nwoolls
Coincidentally, I tried to do the same this morning, and got this as well. Every submission got "H-not-zero". I was mining from another computer using an extra Block Erupter.
|
|
|
Will you send us PMs when you send them out? I sent you an order yesterday and hadn't heard back.
I'll send you your tracking in a moment, I auto send out tracking # to the emails via stamps.com but I'd guess 10% to 20% of the time it goes to spam folders Just received my order of the four I ordered. Took a whole 3 business days. Thanks for the quick turnaround!
|
|
|
Hi =)
Two questions here: - Is there a way to set per-device bgminer arguments like per-coin and per-pool? - using a erupter and a ant-usb-miner, choosing the "Difficulty" strategies, MM chooses to set two different coins (for example, eMark and terracoin) for the two devices. Why ?
Thanks and keep up the good work!
Not sure about the rest of it, but you can set up per-coin rules in the "miner arguments" section of the coin config.
|
|
|
Don't they use 5v though, not 12v?
|
|
|
nwoolls, I'm getting a few AntMiners sometime this week or next. Is there anything you want me to test for you?
|
|
|
This was going to be my suggestion as well. BITMAIN really looks like the way to go right now for getting current-gen chips and power-use delivered ASAP. Your power consumption would also be a lot lower with the U1s vs the one you were originally considering. IMO, save up for the S1. Granted, it's about twice your current budget, but you'd get 6 times the hashing power.
|
|
|
Cool deal. That will make things easier as well. I'm actually making my decision on what to purchase tonight and tomorrow. Depending on what I go with I may have multiple systems going with the differing gear. I really wish I had the money to just buy and Ant S1 but the most cash I could get was the $400 that and I got $300 for some networking gear I don't use anymore. $700 doesn't buy much GH/s right now. $700 would get you ~28 Gh/s in Bitmain U1's https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=382494.0
|
|
|
|