Even if we assume that the 750 is a data anomaly and we pick another March date (or even walk it back further to the Feb 2017 that were much higher than March) as a replacement, the overall trendline doesn't change much.
When you take out the "noise" of the entire space suddenly "mooning", alt inversion to BTC in Sept., and non-normal actions that December brought, you're left with something that may "look like" cherry-picking lows; however, early Dec is a near perfect retracement on any trendline one places from pre-June '17 to now.

Every non-noise trendline points to upward movement. We could argue all day if that movement is 2x BTC, 3x BTC, or 12x BTC/USD (depending on points of data and/or valuation), but the fact remains that all markets suck right now in comparison to some historical date. Since we're stuck trying to swim with the BTC rock around our necks, one could ask why it's sunk to less than 1/3 of what it was 6 months ago and dragging those tied to it with it.

The reality is that no matter what conclusion you come to or what your basis for evaluation is, it's always going to be provably wrong in someone else's view because every bit of it is based on multiple markets daisy-chained together that sometimes move together, sometimes move independent, and sometimes move as a complete inverse and and no time has any rational explanation as to why which is which.

See above for the 1st part of how you're wrong.
As for the rest, between May 15 and June 15 2017, nearly every market irrationally "exploded" to new ATH levels. The majority of the markets today are still overvalued and the dates that I picked represent a realistic trendline that ignores both irrational and hype spikes that don't matter to any long term value.

Stop trying to think; you're apparently not good at it:


image.ibb.co/eVH3x8/Untitled.png

Then you CMC wrong, because that's where the chart and numbers came from (although I added the physical trendline).

And, like I said, you're starting from a point in time that was still an irrational market and not taking that into account.

LOL the bunny is fun to play with, but impossible to take serious; I'm still waiting for him to sign a message with an addy that holds "seven figures".....

Looking at a 1 day market (half of which is a 3 market pseudo value) to compare to a 15 month quote? how do you even manage to tie your own shoes? Kindly go back to your troll-hole and stay there with your unSafe friends....

so true, it's only at 37x for the last 15 months

What, exactly, did Komodo do to piss in your bowl of ZERO coin? 

I would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone dumping their bags at a loss because they have an issue with 1 GUI out of the dozens of platform projects; I promise that when the market goes back up, I'll spend the profits you're giving up on so many nice things for myself. 

Part of what you're not taking into account is that all markets went, pretty much, insane just before the time of your base comparison.
Once you get past that, you should ignore the pseudo USD price of combining mutiple markets to arrive at a "price" that's not truely a legitimate value.

Now, let's look at real markets:
March 14, 2017 - KMD/BTC - 0.00000751
April 14, 2017 - KMD/BTC - 0.00011952
Dec 11, 2017 - KMD/BTC - 0.00018155
June 20, 2018 - KMD/BTC - 0.00027889

Plot it all on a realistic trendline and you get:


Even the massive "crashes" that amount to nothing more than realistic corrections end up on an upward trend.

I'd assume that, just like bm miners, the ambient is relative and less important than the rate at which output air is removed from the room.

Since I don't eat lamb (you can't buy it within 100 miles from here), I say tomatoes get the credit. 

Only a hobby miner, like you, would think that anyone besides an accountant has those details and only a dumb hobby miner would think that a real miner would give out such details.
How about you go back to your little unSafeCoin troll-hole and leave the adults to talk....

OK, so the secret to high-yield blocks is that I need to be out in the garden planting tomatoes. 
If this holds true, this year's crop might get replanted a couple dozen times. 

Would you like me to start with:

• the fact that there are more ASIC chip producers than GPU chip producers (which actually nullifies most of the "Bitmain making ASICs will lead to centralization" claims, especially given that 1 of the 2 GPU chip manufacturers halted production months ago),
• the fact that you can get an entry level ASIC for cheaper (and at a greater profitability level) than a "top end" GPU which is 1/14th the hashrate and consumes ~ the same amount of energy,
• the fact that increased hashrate increases network difficulty (which in turn increases security),

or is there some specific misinformation you'd like me to dispel?

This miner doesn't currently support the same K & N values that version does ("*  Solver for equihash 200,9 has been deleted.").

I'm pro-mining, anti-misinformation, and my GPU investment dwarfs my ASIC investment.

And how much RAM do they have?

Misinformation upon misinformation upon misinformation.

• The security of a blockchain should never be whittled down to something based on what some random burger flipper making minimum wage can afford to mine with.

• If the above does happen, the lie that an $871 ASIC is "too expensive" for entry should be pointed out

• If you see $871 ("ASIC's that only 'rich capitalist farmers' can buy") for the same hashrate as a $12,000 GPU setup ("that the 'common man' still can barely afford") as how it is, then you can't math.

• The decentralization of 3 ASIC chip manufactures is greater than the "decentralization" of 2 GPU chip manufactures (one of which hasn't made any chips in 6 months and the other which is widely not supported by these new changes); because, math!

Never party before it's locked in  


Edit:
confirmed by 528,273

Now we can party.