Many times challenges solve themselves and that is why they say time heals. People who have gone through this would see that sometimes it is time that will pass and you will gradually adjust to yourself and you now realise you would have been the greatest full for wanting to take your life which is to the extreme.

Apart from time, there is another solution which is talking it over with family or friends. They are source of encouragement for someone in such hopeless state .

The third is music. Listening to some cool reflective songs that will bring your mind down and free from whatever you have been through with. Music have been known to be recipe for many people in such condition.

It is a circle yes. If a country also does not partake in global politics and get it self affiliated to what is happening and try to influence it to their favour then the negative aspect of the global politics will keep hitting on the country's economy. The decisions agreed on the global comes down to the local, if world bank increase it spending, it is either it will benefit some countries in terms of loan and it is those that are influential and have presented very good reasons will get such on the shortest time while others are left behind.

Everyone already know buying bitcoin is a financial secret on the long time.


Staying lowkey is good that is if you are a starter in your financial process because there is a financial level you get to you can not stay lowkey, I mean people already know you even if you decide to stay on lowkey. However, back to your first point, I don't think giving is bad but you only have to be reasonable. If you are not a huge spender on things that are not necessary then to invest will be a challenge.

This is a very good advise and that which I think differentiate the poor who is gambling and the rich who is gambling. The poor gamble in desperation because they see it as the only possible source of income so when they lose a bet, they desperately chase back the money and they keep loosing but the rich could have other source of income that he may have made profit from also so he covers the gambling loss with some profit from his diversified investment hence they wait for a lucky day instead of desperately trying to win at all cost.

Yeah the name of drake was mentioned as a popular artist and rich but like you said and just like him too, he has that as a habit, profession to stream and win more people over. To him those rich guys who are not social media incline or YouTubers don't usually involve in gambling. That was his view but I think some of these rich people could be gambling in their closet maybe for fun and not necessarily streaming.

I think that is the point he tried to make that because the rich have a stable and steady financial inflow, they may not be found gambling like the lower class. Believe it that most people who gamble do that for the additional money expected as winning reward. I think there could be some sense in that anyway but I also know that some rich do gamble especially in football betting and when they are drinking, they could lock horn in P2P gambling with friends maybe that could be for fun and superiority to show who follows football more.

I was in argument with someone. His view is that people who gamble are those that what they have is not sufficient for them and so they try to make more money from gambling. He said if you have sufficient money to take care of your needs that you won't think of gambling. He made reference to some rich people, who don't gamble because they have sufficient money to even gift to charity but that those rich who still gamble are only addicted to it not just because of the money. Therefore, that the percentage of the rich gambling is very small compared to those in middle class and lower class.

So my question is, is the percentage of the rich gambling lower than the middle and lower class?

You could have asked a question to reflect your topic which is a sensitive one and very good also. Listening those items like you did would have given responses that will make your thread very much intellectual one. Not withstanding the lacuna of merging your thoughts together, Political economy is not discussed differently from politics as it affects the economy.

That said, we have to look at politics which is basically the alliances formed to get government policies formed, execution or order of priority, likewise the economic policies. So it is basically the policies of economy in order of priority, which policies interacts to influence which policies. Politics is about lobbying also, compromise, alignments and priority. How politics affects or influence government policies is of top consideration in policy formation.

The possibility of the poor providing collateral is very small yet they need loan , so what do you do in such instance when they can not provide collateral? I think that is a delicate situation . IMO I think depending on the amount they are asking for, if it is reasonable with what they want to do with the loan, you can split into three also and give to help them without asking for it back, that is if you can afford to especially with family and close friend but a random person may not be of same consideration.

I want to say there is nothing bad to express hope in whatever you are doing but the above particular sentence is the reason that some gamblers have turn to addicts. They don't consider that luck is involved in it but they have taken it to be what they can't give up in and they consistently play to chase back their losses.  They work with hope for the bet to turn their way and when it doesn't, they are turning themselves deeper in betting. Although their are people who have benefited for consistently hoping for you who finally got it but at what percentage is that compared to those who never got it , that is the important thing to note.

This question dey straight to answer oo. The thing na as e dey play e dey show, we all sabi say politicians don show us shege. I don't know the people wey dey advise the people in power, their brain need to be examined. The thing be say even the advisers na part of game of selfishness and personal gain. Wetin additional 8k want do for a family in one month while Dem dey share billions as allowance. The Nigerian politicians matter pass wetin pesin fit understand.

Despite all our good plans to have a stable financial status to be able to lead a good home, train the children and make them happy as a father, we still should remember we can't wait forever for that to happen. Trying to achieve all that if that is your purpose, you should consider the economic situation of where you are living, times are hard and a stitch in time saves nine as they say.

I think what @Odusko was saying is referring to the past actually. Those times they women were not allowed to do certain things with women. In Africa for example, there was a time when a girl child was not sent to school, a time when the boy child is preferred to the female child. The boy child was sent to school and the female wasn't because of the excuse that she would marry outside the family and become the "property " of the husband family and whatever proceed to her as a result of her educational standard would go to the husband and husband family. I have also heard that kind of stories from other countinent. I have heard some countries also recently allowed their women to start driving, go to same school with men. At least every countinent had their own premordial stories including for gambling but all those have gone while some countries are still racing to meet up with the pace setters.

To support this view is to say one of the factors pushing women to gamble is the survival need. Gambling is not only the new found means to shoot at survival for women because they have been found in other business areas doing well including politics. Women no longer want to be known as the gender ascribed to be the kitchen maker, baby feeder through only the mammalian gland. They are talking over the role of breed winners and so they have to be in search of all the possible resources to improve on the finance of the home so that where the reasonable man is not able to fit in, they are already there and filling the gap for the home front.

Being the easiest or fastest nor biggest is not excusable for a company not to go down or disappoint, that is not tenable because it is not a fact. Gmail may have had a network issue that they are resolving and that is understandable. They have made some solution online for accounts that are having such issue.

Terrorism is a global phenomenon and not just an African issue but the problem with the African situation is that they lack adequate weaponry gadgets to take on the terrorist and that makes the challenge worse. When terrorist have more mechinery to fight the government , it means whatever effort made will be defeated.  However, somehow there could be external forces in the African struggle because of market for their weaponry.

You should already know this is same characteristics you have with banks, fiat casinos and centralized crypto casinos. Fiat casinos may not request for your picture but centralized casinos among other things requested may further ask to see your face which in fact is very discouraging. So what point are you making with this? I'm sure your link could be about a casino running on KYC.

China and India supports your position also. For them, their population is a blessing and not a curse. They have used their population for an advantage rather than disadvantage like African countries. Population should be an advantage if properly planned because countries need market where they can export their manufactured products, so such is an advantage to countries who have large population as they have already existing market for themselves and others, trade is important. There are other advantages, like human resources apart from welfare, they are also involved as expatriate which generate foreign income to them.

Consistent playing is what is known by many bettors who see it as a source of income. They don't see it as greed when they win and instead going away but continue to play. Sometimes you feel that the big win will bring more wins if you continue but it has not really been that way. The amount of money also contribute to greed like in football betting, some bettors carry alot of impossible games either because of the odd but they fail on the bet at the end. It is better to play reasonably.

No, the risk in bitcoin hodling is not more than gambling risk except you are trading it but if you are hodling bitcoin then you have a chance to still have your coins but in a lower value but gambling and trading bitcoin could be seen as same risk because if you lose you won't recover that particular chance except you make another bet or take another trade order.