https://decrypt.co/120260/ftx-sister-firm-alameda-hits-bankrupt-voyager-digital-446m-lawsuitFTX Sister Firm Alameda Hits Bankrupt Voyager Digital With $446M Lawsuit "Trading firm Alameda Research has filed a new lawsuit seeking to recover about $445.8 million from the bankrupt crypto broker Voyager Digital. Sam Bankman-Fried, the disgraced founder and CEO of FTX, also co-founded the trading firm in 2017. A day before FTX filed for bankruptcy in November 2022, it emerged that the crypto exchange had lent customer funds to help prop up Alameda Research."
|
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Ledger/status/1620089512268374016"NEARProtocol is now available on Ledger Live! 🚀 That means you can send & receive your $NEAR, and stake it via our @Figment_io validator." https://www.ledger.com/blog/send-receive-stake-near-tokens-through-ledger-live?" Things to know: – Until now, you could secure your NEAR tokens with your Ledger hardware device, but you had to use a third-party wallet to view and manage it. – NEAR Protocol (NEAR) has joined Ledger Live, which means you can now send, receive and stake your NEAR coins from your all-in-one digital asset management app with full ownership on your coins. – Staking your NEAR coins with the Ledger by Figment validator brings many advantages: it is secure, convenient, and comes with a low commission fee. – NEAR Protocol is a low-cost and high-speed platform for building and launching DApps. Its native token is NEAR."
|
|
|
|
Чтобы гнать цену аптоса вверх, понадобятся 100 проектов, которые может загнутся через год или даже не реализуются. Пользователи придут на хайп. Дельнейших этапов манипуляций может быть несколько, но мы не знаем время. Если по простому сценарию, то поднять цену нужно за 2-4 месяца до начала разлока токенов инвесторов, но рынок может политься вниз летом.
Чтобы гнать аптос вверх ничего не нужно. 90% монет в локе, остальное у инсайдеров. Внимательно смотрел за движением на споте и перпах на банане, четкое есть ощущение, что заманивают в шорт разного рода шустрых ребят. И возможно, что успешно. Если влезет кто-то крупный и будет ситуация корнера, монета может показать финальный мега вынос и дальше слив/стагнация. Это не нужно скам проекту. Толкать цену можно манипуляциями на бирже, но идти против рынка не имея хорошей экосистемы за спиной такому крупному проекту неправильно. У манипулятора все карты игроков видны и он заработает, но он не ограничен временем. |
|
|
|
Как я понимаю, цену разгоняют чтобы привлечь внимание пользователей к сети, ведь без пользователей далеко не уехать. Но мне кажется что они немного перебарщивают с такой стратегией, т.к. большинство людей, которые получали дроп уже вышли, те кто зашли на низах сделали несколько иксов и повыпрыгивали в надежде перезагрузиться ниже, а новые пользователи побаиваются заходить по такой цене из-за токеномики. Разгоняя цену все сильнее они теряют потенциальных пользователей, что мне кажется очень важно на раннем этапе.
Тут большая игра и сценарий будет сложным. Много проектов было на Кардано, но пампили не проекты, а монету Ада. Проекты слились, хомяков накормили, теперь можно отбирать подешевле и готовится к новой игре. Если бы я делал проект, то остановился бы на L2 Эфириума, аптос не нужен. Классика 400 сравнительно честных способов отъема денег. Золотой теленок https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4d25NTUJc8&t=15sЧтобы гнать цену аптоса вверх, понадобятся 100 проектов, которые может загнутся через год или даже не реализуются. Пользователи придут на хайп. Дельнейших этапов манипуляций может быть несколько, но мы не знаем время. Если по простому сценарию, то поднять цену нужно за 2-4 месяца до начала разлока токенов инвесторов, но рынок может политься вниз летом. |
|
|
|
You just don't have to spend time analyzing coins other than Bitcoin. All of them, sooner or later, almost always turn into dust. Are there any new and unique projects? This is a rewriting in your own words of other people's ideas, which also does not succeed. Read their roadmap, learn about their developers' experiences, and everything The Ultra Elite has already said will be your experience. I agree that some people benefit from alternative coins that can provide them with an increase. But this requires understanding, and a lot of people most often lose by not taking anything from their experience. As a result, the value of your time is only as great as your desire to spend it.
And what then to spend time in the study of cryptocurrencies? Buy bitcoin for $20,000 and forget about it for a few years until its price rises.Soon there will be regulation from the SEC, and most of the cryptocurrency projects will be closed, but some projects, like Ethereum, Polkadot, Atom, should work on the market, because many financial companies will work in these ecosystems, which will tokenize their assets. |
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/justinsuntron/status/1619607043203268609"As we work towards the adoption of #TRX as legal tender, let's not be too US-centric. US🇺🇸 regulation is important, but we should focus on the 8 billion people on Earth. The US is just one country, and while it may be a major player in the crypto world, it's not the only one." Justin Sun has always been a good buffoon, but I like his idea.
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone. Recently I started diving deeper into Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and there are some questions or behavior that I am really curious about.
For example,
When you borrow some assets, you needed some assets as collateral (this is given).
But, what if instead of borrowing some assets, you can just use the one you are willing to use as collateral?
Can anyone have a good explanation here of borrowing using collateral versus not borrowing and using the collateral instead for the exchange of other assets?
You have 1 ethereum at its price of 1500 dollars for example. On the DeFi platform, you can get from 100 to 1000 USDT against 1 ethereum. If the price of Ethereum has risen, then you can take more USDT as collateral. If the price of ethereum drops to $900, then you will have your $1000 left  . And DeFi ecosystems additionally distribute their tokens to all users. It's all a lot of fun and seems like a break even trade, but there are always smart contract risks involved. Hacking a smart contract, developer mistakes can deprive you of all collateral. There are many reasons for using DeFi ecosystems: token farming for users, financial manipulation, risk diversification, and so on. But there is a big downside DeFi hacks [history] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267124 |
|
|
|
I was still hold Luna for $ 350, I bought 7 months ago when Luna drop price was significant and if calculated there was a profit of around $ 30 because I bought $ 320, I think Luna still had power for rising, this could be seen from the volume of large transactions and binance It is still a power of Luna to continue to pump in the future.
The ecosystem is practically dead, I don’t exclude pumps and dumps from manipulators, but in order not to lose money, I would wait for growth by 200-300% and take my investments, and then calmly wait for growth with free coins.But I would not invest large sums in this project. |
|
|
|
With the current state of market trust what will incentivize the average person to use bitcoin over a CBDC?
Since banks can control supply they can use inflation and other mechanisms to encourage spending. Bitcoin on the other hand requires additional layers to handle even the current network traffic and lacks incentive for day to day transaction use.
The emergence of CBDC will not stop people from using bitcoin, this is because CBDC as we all know is no different from our traditional fiat currency, the only difference is that CBDC is the digitalized form of it, - CBDC is still prone to centralized control like it is with our normal physical fiat currency - CBDC is still prone to inflation, which can lead to loss of purchasing power, like it currently is with our physical fiat currency. - CBDC can be frozen right there in your wallet by the Federal government or central banks they controls it, without your consent or permission, like it is with our physical fiat currency. - with CBDC, your every transaction is monitored, you have no financial privacy of any kind because at all time, the central bank know how much you have in your wallet. - with CBDC, when you send money to other parties, your identity is known to the central Banks, and so is the identity of whom ever you send money to. - with CBDC, you can be denied access to your money any time and day, and there is nothing you can do about it if they refuse to grant you access to your money, who are you going to report to?. But Bitcoin, Is the direct opposite of all that CBDC represent and stand for, - Decentralized is bitcoin, - Freedom is bitcoin, - Privacy is bitcoin.. What more can one possibly ask for? Bitcoin has provided us with all that we need to live our lives free from other people controlling our finances lives, the ball is now in your court to either accept or reject. Very good words, but if you read a little analytics and see what people and large banks made it so that bitcoin was traded on all major world exchanges and became very famous, it becomes clear that the same people are trying to participate in the launch of CBDC. Given the necessary situation in the world, these people can very quickly ban bitcoin mining and ban it on all exchanges. So far, such a situation has not occurred, but this scenario is possible. |
|
|
|
Okay, I know that the founders are pretty clever and accomplished, but you could say that of
just about every Layer 1 project. Why is Aptos special ? What does it bring to the space that other
L1 projects can not offer ? We already have too many of these, all of them run by geniuses, all of them
with ground-breaking technologies, and I don't see any of them pumping the way Aptos is ? Or is it because this
project is new or something ? Frankly I don't get why Aptos is so important, but I'm open minded, and
willing to listen.
You need to study the tokenomics of the project. The next token unlocks will be in November 2023, but so far there are very few tokens on the market. This is an airdrop and some ecosystem tokens. According to analytics, more than 95% of all available tokens are on 20 wallets, but there are also exchanges in this list. The greed of the manipulators can raise the price to the maximum values, and in November there will be a sale of the tokens that are being compromised. |
|
|
|
https://www.theblock.co/post/205859/ftx-creditor-list-includes-star-athletes-crypto-firms-state-governmentsFTX creditor list includes star athletes, crypto firms, state governments "Companies that offered their services to bankrupt crypto exchange FTX are included on the creditor list, which lists vendors as well as business partners. Digital service providers are joining the line to get back a piece of their funds, including giants like Amazon Web Services, Apple, Meta Platforms, LinkedIn, Twitter, Netflix and Adobe. From the crypto industry, names like Coinbase, Binance Capital Management, Chainalysis, Yuga Labs, Doodles, BlockFi and Silvergate Bank made the list. News publications include The Wall Street Journal, CoinDesk and Benzinga. "
|
|
|
|
https://blog.hashflow.com/hashflow-prioritization-roadmap-2023-2acc26cfc66eHashflow Prioritization Roadmap: 2023 "2022 was a monumental year for Hashflow, with the introductions of the Hashflow DAO and $HFT to the community — now it’s time to build on that momentum. We’ve got big plans for 2023, focusing on expanding the Hashflow DEX product offering, introducing the Hashverse, the first gamified and story-driven DAO, and lots more."
|
|
|
|
Polkadot continues to write articles about DOT being a utility token, not a security token They are very afraid of SEC  https://twitter.com/Web3foundation/status/1618550186166620161@Polkadot's native token DOT is, and always has been, co-ordinating software. Following W3F's announcement on DOT morphing into a non-security, read the thread below to learn how DOT was able to morph, what Polkadot is, and the primary goals of the network. |
|
|
|
If you are in same position like me, no matter how much you like someone or want the best for them do not help them to invest in crypto, they are lazy asses who can't get anything done on their own, and this type of game I don't play it because, in the end, you will become their enemy. It's already happening and I just ignored them. Is anyone seeing the same thing in their city or country?
I think that human psychology does not depend on the city or country. If your advice is good, they won't thank you. If you make a mistake, you will hear a lot of negativity. If Financial Advice is not part of your job, then it's best that friends and family don't know about your passion for cryptocurrencies. |
|
|
|
Will you start trusting a new crypto wallet after it's been out for years or based on users reviews? Or it depends on what the wallet is offering, for example new crypto wallet that's fully open source but not popular because its new, is this a good reason enough to start using?
There are people who use Guarda wallet, Atomic wallet or Exodus wallet the same year of release before they become popular, what could possibly prompt you to start using a new crypto wallet today?
I also want to know if Guarda wallet is better than Trust wallet, I read that the Guarda wallet was released in 2018 but I've never used this wallet before, I just want to here from users if any is on here.
I would look at the rating of crypto wallets and use only hardware wallets. The article is advertising, but it is true that Ledger and Trezor are the best hardware wallets. https://www.forbes.com/uk/advisor/investing/cryptocurrency/best-crypto-wallets/Any software wallet can be hacked, so it's best to use a hardware wallet that is compatible with many third party software. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
