Bitcoin Forum
July 02, 2024, 12:11:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 [125] 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 ... 258 »
2481  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Building headless Bitcoin and Bitcoin-qt on Windows on: May 17, 2013, 04:57:04 PM
All windows VC6, VC++Express 2005, 2008, 2010, 2012 (all free IDE BTW) users, let's contribute.
FYI building with VC6 is not possible. It does not support modern versions of boost (compiler lacks some perfectly standard C++ syntax) and has buggy C++ standard library. What do you expect of a 15+ year old compiler...

Newer MSVC should work with the headless version, but getting Qt to work with Express versions is very tricky, as it doesn't support add-ins you need custom build defines and steps for moc/qrc/etc. With the retail version you can install https://qt-project.org/wiki/QtVSAddin and have those handled automatically.


how exactly do you get bitcoind working with visual studio 2012?
2482  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Uncommitted transaction?? on: May 17, 2013, 02:53:10 PM
Hi, I sent 7.9 btc to my wallet. It shows 20 confirmation on block chain but it shows me 0 confirmation on my btc-e account.
The transaction is not listed on my history page, but it shows on the bitcoin deposit page as 0 confirmations.

https://blockchain.info/tx/89a51ea735bca437e014e4536974eb442f57900d3fe1d6fbc13d70bc9ca29ced

Kindly help me resolve the issue. Thanks
that's BTC-E's problem. contact them to resolve it.

Mine stuck too 0 conf 7+ hours now, the odd thing is that there are a lot of small blocks <100 even <50 kb why they are not filled to 250 with theese transactions. I don't get it if there is room why not use it ?!
as the block becomes more filled up, the default bitcoin implementation behavior is to make it more and more expensive to include a transaction. this it to prevent spammers from filling up the blockchain and forcing everyone to potentially store the data forever.
2483  Economy / Goods / Re: 750ml Colloidal Silver - $29 on: May 16, 2013, 11:19:55 PM
The fact is people attack this subject with almost a fundamentalist religious view - it doesn't matter if colloidal silver has been proven to be safe or effective because I BELIEVE it is harmful! If you dare to tell me otherwise I will attack you as if you threatened my faith. This type of belief system is pervasive in EVERY field, its not hard to spot once you recognize it for what it is - ego masturbation.
No, I attack this because I don't want other people to get their hopes up buying a quack product. Their time and money can be better used finding real cures, not some cure-all supported by anecdotal evidence. But apparently, him and many others don't have a problem with pure anecdotal evidence. In fact, they either don't care, or deny the documented issues with anecdotal evidence:
IDC about the theoretical hobgoblins (bias, variables, and placebos, OH MY!)


The thing is, if a product really did work, it should be reproducible in many environments, including RCTs. However, there are no RCTs supporting colloidal silver's efficacy. iCEBREAKER thinks this is totally ok because no one will ever fund such a study, therefore it's totally ok to believe in colloidal silver without rigorous evidence.
2484  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Paying .05btc for Good 7950 drivers (ReOPEN!!) on: May 16, 2013, 03:46:17 AM
are you sure the lag is because of the gpu? setting intensity too low (less than 3) introduces moderate cpu load on one core.
2485  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Avalon #2 is shipping. on: May 16, 2013, 03:39:13 AM
so i'm guessing batch 3 is shipping 3 weeks from now?
2486  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Blockchain.info; repeated transactions of 0.0000025?!? on: May 16, 2013, 03:02:50 AM
it means that 19 transactions were sent with value of 0.0000025 BTC.
2487  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: So... have we survived the May 15th hard fork? on: May 16, 2013, 02:32:45 AM
the fork only occurs if the block has too much transactions. no such block has been found yet, so there technically isn't a fork.
2488  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Wow, didn't realise how long it takes to get my transaction mined into a block.. on: May 16, 2013, 12:42:40 AM
There is no pool, mining pools have their own policies.

Bitcoin has much more users now, you *need* to pay transaction fees. Soon there will be a market for transaction fees (you propose a fee, miners tell you ETAs..)

Interesting. I thought this would happen, just not this soon.

Is there any way to see/tell where in the queue of transactions without fees a particular transaction is? I know the ones without fees, and therefore the ones that do not get batched immediately by miners, have a priority ascribed to them based on how long they have been waiting and their size etc...
bitcoincharts used to have such a list, but it became so large (over 10k entries) that they had to shut it down.
2489  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Paying .05btc for Good 7950 drivers on: May 15, 2013, 06:50:59 PM
Is that only with 7000 series cards? 5000 series cards mine just fine while gaming, even with 13.x drivers.
2490  Other / Meta / why is this topic a sticky? on: May 14, 2013, 08:36:02 PM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=205408.0
2491  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Help required re bitcoin qt wallet update on: May 14, 2013, 01:39:03 PM
read:
http://bitcoin.org/may15.html
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=201124.0 (probably around the 5th paragraph)
2492  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Blockchain.info | Firstbits not found on: May 14, 2013, 01:37:21 PM
both are invalid.

>bitcoind validateaddress 12BDSoRxAoKd214UcWE9Mu1Eg9E
{
    "isvalid" : false
}

>bitcoind validateaddress 16mgN7SEmyhgsHeqXTp9NWXQYmf
{
    "isvalid" : false
}
2493  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Is BitCoin forever broken!? WTF IS THIS SHIT on: May 14, 2013, 01:36:32 PM
just email all your worthless, dust choked wallets to the bit dust farmers who'll probably give you a few millbits for it

So you trade in your dust for... dust?

Yea that didnt make any sense? Also, the Bitcoin client should contain the option to be able to spend certain Bitcoins, so that you can handpick what address you send from, and not just to. Right now, dust is going to clutter even more if we dont get hang of where all Bitcoins are stored and how we access them. It should be possible to merge keys (without having to go through a miner).
hahahahahhaha

even if all the dust are at one address, your transaction size will still be huge.
2494  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Anyroll's 10 BTC giveaway is a scam, he sent me and others a phishing link on: May 14, 2013, 02:07:01 AM
lol:


bonus: http://btceexchange.comze.com/phisher.php?email=&password=
2495  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: New FPGA rig or ugrade my gaming rig? on: May 14, 2013, 02:02:45 AM
could an admin pls move this thread to "Custom Hardware ASIC, FPGA, ..."
just saw the right topic for my question
you can move it yourself
2496  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: bitcoind and who sent ? on: May 14, 2013, 01:59:56 AM

 I notice most people have a signature on this forum with
a bitcoin address for donations -

 How would one know , who sent the donation ?


you can know which address sent the donation, but it's hard to tie the address to a specific entity. a wallet has multiple addresses that are independent of each other. even if you know a person's public address, but he may have other addresses under his control.
2497  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon batch [3] countdown! on: May 13, 2013, 05:00:17 PM
batch #3 coming in july

CALLED IT
2498  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Printing many private keys on: May 13, 2013, 02:48:33 PM
LOL, I just know enough to boot into a Live CD and load Bitcoin. I was looking to make some type of paper wallet to make sure I didn't lose some BTC I would like to back up. I was looking to make about 100 different addresses so that when I want to spend a tiny bit I don't have to import a whole BTC. I was a little worried about the js paper wallet that's online as I'd rather only trust Bitcoin and not another third party.

I'm thinking I'll just sit down and manually do dumpprivkey a hundred times and print that off.
the js paper wallet generator can be used offline for maximum security.
2499  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Printing many private keys on: May 13, 2013, 03:50:18 AM
This. Right-click on the icon and choose "debug window" to try out these commands (drop 'bitcoind'), then write yourself a script to call bitcoind.
you don't need bitcoin-qt's debug console. it's much easier to use the daemon itself. command line = easy piping.

Is that script hard to make? I don't know scripting.
you were talking about linux, so I assumed you would know a bit about shell scripts
2500  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Vircurex hacked? on: May 13, 2013, 02:09:50 AM
Quote from: vircurex.com
Due to a security breach we had to reset all wallet addresses of all coins. You cannot user the old addresses anymore to deposit funds. Should you need to transfer funds from a source which does not allow you to change the deposit address (e.g. mmpool.bitparking.com), then contact us and we will work out a solution.
Pages: « 1 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 [125] 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 ... 258 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!