Please tell me what does this mean
5. We don't pay for posts less than 40 symbols in length.
By this, do you mean 40 words or just 40 alphabets?
And please add me in, my details are:-
Username: aakashsangwan
Current Post Count: 52
Current Rank: junior member
Bitcoin Address: 1MEv8g6PZYcBeYknbosQzB1YY16iP41Aqv
Accepted. |
|
|
|
Mich can you tell me why? And why didn't you notify me earlier? At least you could leave spreadsheet online, untill I get the data.  To others...I'll take over this camapaign, payment is comming soon. I must count posts and check quality. Could you tell me if I'm accepted in the campaign? I am a regular poster. I see that one of the Member ranked person has been kicked out from the campaign, can I take his place instead.
Rank: Member
Posts: 71(Including this one)
Activity: 71
Btc Adress: 1EjMchjQL6Q6QeX6D8ChvaGSPBVgAVgvU
10 posts since then. You're accepted. Change signature and set personal text to "Crypto-Games.net: DICE and SLOT" and send info in this fromat Username: Current Post Count: Current Rank: Bitcoin Address: |
|
|
|
Mich can you tell me why? And why didn't you notify me earlier? At least you could leave spreadsheet online, untill I get the data. To others...I'll take over this camapaign, payment is comming soon. I must count posts and check quality. |
|
|
|
Did you fix your site issues?
Investors should be warned.
Investors were warned before this even reached publicity. |
|
|
|
and is everything sorted now?  Yes. |
|
|
|
|
Waiting for user michinzx to count and check posts.
|
|
|
|
who can tell and confirm that it is provably fair?
Check the provably fair tab on our website. |
|
|
|
SIMSIM.
Even though sending them to me does not really prove anything since the main issue is trust. I'm trying to test the trust of your site and since I don't have public access to check them, what difference would it make if you 'send them all' on your behalf?
Where on the site can I check all my bets? If I can't, anyone who uses the auto-bet loses the ability to check the provable fairness of their bets.
Here you have links to all bets: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/49691113/bets.txtEDIT: need to make API so users can check their bets and stuff.... but it's much work. So what you're saying is that allowing users to publicly check that their bets are provable fair is too much work. I see. Don't turn around words. API is in our plan. Its pretty much exactly what you said. I guess it's not THAT provably fair if we don't have a way to prove our bets eh? Do you know the difference between API and provably fair? Yes I do. I know if we can't have access to the bets to prove them then it isnt fair to people on autobet. You have access to every single bet: https://www.crypto-games.net/fair.aspx?coin=BTC&type=3&id=BET_ID_NUMBER |
|
|
|
SIMSIM.
Even though sending them to me does not really prove anything since the main issue is trust. I'm trying to test the trust of your site and since I don't have public access to check them, what difference would it make if you 'send them all' on your behalf?
Where on the site can I check all my bets? If I can't, anyone who uses the auto-bet loses the ability to check the provable fairness of their bets.
Here you have links to all bets: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/49691113/bets.txtEDIT: need to make API so users can check their bets and stuff.... but it's much work. So what you're saying is that allowing users to publicly check that their bets are provable fair is too much work. I see. Don't turn around words. API is in our plan. Its pretty much exactly what you said. I guess it's not THAT provably fair if we don't have a way to prove our bets eh? Do you know the difference between API and provably fair? |
|
|
|
SIMSIM.
Even though sending them to me does not really prove anything since the main issue is trust. I'm trying to test the trust of your site and since I don't have public access to check them, what difference would it make if you 'send them all' on your behalf?
Where on the site can I check all my bets? If I can't, anyone who uses the auto-bet loses the ability to check the provable fairness of their bets.
Here you have links to all bets: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/49691113/bets.txtEDIT: need to make API so users can check their bets and stuff.... but it's much work. So what you're saying is that allowing users to publicly check that their bets are provable fair is too much work. I see. Don't turn around words. API is in our plan. |
|
|
|
The dadice cheerleader/shill reports it, wonder if subSTRATA told dadice threw pm. Anyway Crypto-Games you know what they say? All publicity is good, welcome to the top of the gambling section for a few days. You know what I am more of a silent reader, I only came to know the name of site (just like all other people) when joter made this post himself in the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1106133.msg11780396#msg11780396but still at the moment, "what exactly the bug is" was not revealed anywhere. However it didn't take much to realize what was wrong, and as I said before not just 1 but 2 things were wrong there causing +EV. I tested it myself and started to enjoy reading all the chat and curses going over there. While in midst of that there were many people in chat talking to kewl (if I recall correctly) but all of them were trying to cut a deal without giving up on details of bug first hand. Well at that moment, anxiety and restlessness of these guys was at its peek and I jumped it and told him what exactly the exploit is and send me the damn bounty to me instead. He told me contact me on forum, by this time I had realised there is no bounty to expect from here and in my PMs which I sent to both joter and kewl, I told them to just leave a feedback on bitcointalk. Its not just I told these clueless people what everybody in forum is talking about but also gave them solutions. What is my fault here? There's no fault from your side. We both leaved you positive trust and we are grateful for what you did. After the bug was found things got out of control. Everyone was complaining, crying, some just talked pure lies. Yes that you did but I will still criticize how this whole situation was handled. Situation could be handled better, I admit, but when bunch of people start to criticize, insult, talking BS, put all hard work into nothing, then man lost temper. |
|
|
|
The dadice cheerleader/shill reports it, wonder if subSTRATA told dadice threw pm. Anyway Crypto-Games you know what they say? All publicity is good, welcome to the top of the gambling section for a few days. You know what I am more of a silent reader, I only came to know the name of site (just like all other people) when joter made this post himself in the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1106133.msg11780396#msg11780396but still at the moment, "what exactly the bug is" was not revealed anywhere. However it didn't take much to realize what was wrong, and as I said before not just 1 but 2 things were wrong there causing +EV. I tested it myself and started to enjoy reading all the chat and curses going over there. While in midst of that there were many people in chat talking to kewl (if I recall correctly) but all of them were trying to cut a deal without giving up on details of bug first hand. Well at that moment, anxiety and restlessness of these guys was at its peek and I jumped it and told him what exactly the exploit is and send me the damn bounty to me instead. He told me contact me on forum, by this time I had realised there is no bounty to expect from here and in my PMs which I sent to both joter and kewl, I told them to just leave a feedback on bitcointalk. Its not just I told these clueless people what everybody in forum is talking about but also gave them solutions. What is my fault here? There's no fault from your side. We both leaved you positive trust and we are grateful for what you did. After the bug was found things got out of control. Everyone was complaining, crying, some just talked pure lies. |
|
|
|
So how much did this entire fiasco cost investors? You should make a breakdown how much was won with a low (or negative) house edge and refund investors.
The invest option was opended exactly 3 weeks (from the the day we offer invest option till the day we changed payout that investors don't loose funds on some payout multipliers). Most of them have really small amout of invested funds, except one guy who own 13% of bankroll. More than 85% of the bankroll are our funds. All the investors are in profit, there is and was none of them who wouldn't profit. But still, because of wrong payout and based on calculations we owe investors 0,103712 BTC. This amount will be returned to their account. |
|
|
|
And are you sure those are same vulnerabilities? Yep. |
|
|
|
Why don't u just pay 1 BTC for the first exploit and the second u discuss with dooglus. I mean come on u run a bitcoin casino, what u care about .4 BTC for a serious bug!
ClamCoin
Exactly if you are serious about business you should be thankful to someone who contacts you regarding a bug. No offense to crypto-games, but take a look at their bankroll, the amount strata is asking(increased,after agreeing before on 1.1btc for all the bugs), is nearly 1/30th of the total bankroll. If you would read the whole messages in post you would know where's the problem. We both agreed for 1.1 payment, but then they step away and started to blackmailing us. Yes I did read the messages and if what you claim is true(which I suspect it is), subSTRATA has indeed broke his promise and should report all bugs known to him for the agreed amount, but if it is not in his power to report them(as he claims) then there is nothing that can be done from his side, you should talk to dooglus and agree upon a new bounty then. We said that he gets reward if he apologizes... this is my 10 times explaining this. We will use escrow no problem. So just to clear it, has he reported all of the bugs known to him? He didn't report any of his bugs. Someone else did. But as we are so generous we will give him rewards because he discovered it. If thats the case then shouldn't the person who actually reported the bug get the reward? subSTRATA found 1 bug and dooglus 1. After subStrata found 1 he asked dooglus to confirm and dooglus found the second bug. So in total 2 bugs! True, after going public everyone searched for this bugs because they knew something very simple is wrong. And one guy found it in 5 minutes. Hard to tell if he's the one to claim a reward... |
|
|
|
Why don't u just pay 1 BTC for the first exploit and the second u discuss with dooglus. I mean come on u run a bitcoin casino, what u care about .4 BTC for a serious bug!
ClamCoin
Exactly if you are serious about business you should be thankful to someone who contacts you regarding a bug. No offense to crypto-games, but take a look at their bankroll, the amount strata is asking(increased,after agreeing before on 1.1btc for all the bugs), is nearly 1/30th of the total bankroll. If you would read the whole messages in post you would know where's the problem. We both agreed for 1.1 payment, but then they step away and started to blackmailing us. And bug is fixed now. But if he apologizes for all he said, we give him 1,5BTC bounty. Till then we won't discuss about this with him anymore. I will apologies, will i get 1,5 btc? You didn't report this bug. So sorry, no. |
|
|
|
Why don't u just pay 1 BTC for the first exploit and the second u discuss with dooglus. I mean come on u run a bitcoin casino, what u care about .4 BTC for a serious bug!
ClamCoin
Exactly if you are serious about business you should be thankful to someone who contacts you regarding a bug. No offense to crypto-games, but take a look at their bankroll, the amount strata is asking(increased,after agreeing before on 1.1btc for all the bugs), is nearly 1/30th of the total bankroll. If you would read the whole messages in post you would know where's the problem. We both agreed for 1.1 payment, but then they stepped away and started to blackmailing us. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
