Theresa May had no intention of leaving the EU she betrayed the UK over brexit all because the political elite and the royals told her to betray the UK .. She said if no deal is reached we will enter a backstop and then the EU will never ever let us go NOT EVER.. I will explain business in the next thread and what average joe doesn't know what he or she is doing .. But lets just say this deal Theresa May has drawn up is a SHAM dishonest deal a trick to stall then keep us in forever by entering the backstop.. Hellfish ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) keep trying little fishy ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif) do you want to say to us that she is not the fanatic and iconic brexit zealot that the 52% that voted for it, wanted?
|
|
|
Regulation will give limited space for bitcoin and become not profitable when bitcoin could growing up, when have regulation bitcoin always at the same price and investor could not take profit more than 100% at the next time.
give me one concrete example how to regulate bitcoin? you want policement to lie publicly to everyone that its regulated? everyone with mind knows its not egalitarian. its a powergrapsh and grasp for consumption capacities by concrete group of technicians. in a time where there are a lot of abundand offered goods, but now a lot of people want to do that. and now they protect bitcoin with a corrupt cryptocurrency index.
|
|
|
bitcoin cannot be regulated. only the cryptocurrency indexation and advertisement can be regulated, plus the usage of fiat style token.
bitcoin is defined in its code.
its idiotic that people ask this question at all.
the government does not provide regulations internally, of course it will not be possible, the government will provide regulations outside or around the use of bitcoin. such as the presence of KYC or something like that is a form of regulation that might be applied. it might have a positive and negative effect regulation cant be applied on bitcoin, how? can you explain me that detailed? and why should anyone have an interest upkeeping a regulation on "bitcoin" upkeeping regulation has costs. this forum is full of noobs that have no idea how the world works
|
|
|
pension funds are gambling idiots anyway, let them pay for the lambos of the bitcoin whales, and the miners.
sad thing is that as soon as those idiots will have aquired their lambos they will become outdated already.
|
|
|
irgendwie hatte ich mir gesagt, nur noch lachen, nicht antworten, aber geht irgendwie doch nicht (man verzeihe es mir).
also du wirfst hier Fakten in den Raum, die stimmen vermutlich weitestgehend. Deine Schlussfolgerung könnte aber immens daneben liegen. Könntest du auch mal schauen, was andere Info-Portale/Seiten/Foren so verlieren? Damit könnte man ein Bild kreieren, eine Aussage tätigen. Das hier sagt: Bitcointalk.org verliert Besucher. Vielleicht ist es dir nicht klar, aber am allerwenigsten bin z.B. ich hier, wegen Infos rund um Bitcoin... Die bekommt man woanders fundierter, passender und ohne hype-geblubber dazwischen.
Und mit den ganzen Tokens von den verschiedenen Chains habe ich aufgegeben im Bereich Announcements mitzulesen. Diese Tokenwelle hat einfach gezeigt, dass ein Forum dafür nicht die richtige Plattform ist. ISt das gleichzusetzen mit nachlassendem Interesse von Bitcoin (in diesem Ausmaß)? Nö.
klar stimmen diese fakten das forum ist ruhiger geworden die kryptoindustrie dezentralisiert sich weg von bitcoin du kritisierst die behauptete korrelation zwischen bitcoinpreisverlust und besucherzahlen hier im forum? ja ich denke diese korrelation gibt es. dieses forum ist ja sozusagen das medina, oder das jerusalem von bitcoin. man sollte den niedergang schon ernst nehmen. diejenigen die was anderes denken, sind halt diejenigen die glauben das die index diktatur bitcoin ewig populär halten wird. das denke ich aber nicht. der vorgesetzte index welcher von den bitcoinern zentral gesteuert wird wird sich nicht lange halten können. und es wird weltweit veränderungen geben gruß
|
|
|
it doesnt really matter what purpose you give to your capitalism, you will still have an unending amount of leechers that will want to obtain financial freedom.
|
|
|
its similiar like with the roman empire, italy had its good geographic borders and all over the mediteranian people dreamed of italy and the italian dream
today we have the american dream the country that has the good geography, even the chinese use "the beautiful land" chinese sign to describe the united states.
but crypto will disassemble the american dream heavily.
crypto is like the arrow or the achilles verse that damaged the usa and changed the course of its future.
|
|
|
If there was an election today. He would crush it.
I didn't vote for Trump in '16, I thought he was just another bag of hot air. I will most certainly vote for him 2020, and his successor in 2024! you have no choice but to vote for his successor.
|
|
|
Pure Democracy is just mob justice where the minority have zero personal rights. I prefer a Constitutional Republic with a limited democratic element as we have in the US to choose our representatives. We need to enforce the laws we already have, not rebuild the whole system.
democracy is pointless trash, if all the businesses, craftsmen, etc. give a damn about the elections. because thats what cryptocapitalism is causing. it removes the purchasing power from the elected officials. but that can be also a good thing. just look at american democracy its effectively a democracy of the rich. and their media gimmicks the social mood of a society can also be measured with other means, not constant pointless massmedia lobbyism influenced elections. look at uk or us democracies they are 50+-1% elections, the queen should just throw a coin, would save a lot of work.
|
|
|
bitcoin is being forked for profit gains, gains the big problem the trash media tries to sell that trash looking professionally. experts and perfectionism will get globally a bad image. mark my words regards
|
|
|
You're asking about a future for BTC and yet all you talk about in your post is price. Even if that's all you care about, how do you expect the price to go up without some actual utility for the asset? Maybe you're looking in the wrong direction.
finally a technician answer, that doesn't look like profit maximalization, do you truly care just about the tech of bitcoin and cryptocurrencies or do you care how expensive they can be sold?
|
|
|
don't tell anyone honest what you think in here,
because it will offend some people.
just tell them what the want to hear.
yes bitcoin will be the world global dominating currency
it will successfully centre the worlds economy on itself
all global deserts will be pflastered with bitcoin mining facilities.
the investment punk that mine a lot of bitcoin will be the billionaires of tomorrow.
|
|
|
presidents are doomed just like anyone else, the capitalists, enterpreneuers, trump creates winners and losers, with every his decision, be it the wall, the military budget, you will have constantly media group lobbying against for for trump, it will be a neverending nasty story for everyone outside.
|
|
|
and centrally by few humans controlled cryptocurrency index, that discriminates between cryptocurrencies?
isnt that contradicting itself. is bitcoin just a fake decentralisation to earn lambos like the bitcoin hodlers are saying?
in my oppinion yes.
The few whales who have the majority of BTC right now are the people who took risk and bought BTC at a time when nobody was willing to invest in BTC. They took a risk and are now enjoying the fruit of that risk, its very simple. just like the ex whales that bought bitcoin at a high like novogratz and lost a lot. i dont mind, i am afraid the longer you constantly talk and claim about the bear market the sooner you will be exposed and considered a bunch of losers and no one will want to have something to do with you.
|
|
|
Bitcoin can help the population more than the Government. Using Renminbi, Rubles or gold are the methods governments use to avoid US sanctions. It is untrue that sanctions are imposed because of actions by a government, they are usually imposed to force a regime change so that the US can divert the assets to the City of London ruling elite.
bitcoin is just a token from a internetcult who stands for it except this forum community. the biggest issue is that no one has a sustainable interest to reinforce bitcoins money and value
|
|
|
Can we think that Bitcoin can help governments that are in a boycott? My point is negative, since Bitcoin is severely compromised by the other side to deal with these governments. The main problem for these governments is finding traders, not a way to pay. What do you think of this?
everything of value can help a government in or not in boycot (ressources, also other cryptocurrencies, labour, services, even just talking good about them), bitcoin helping everyone basically is most responsible for its value loss. the tech freaks that sold their lifesavings for "bitcoin" made that help possible. then basically saw bitcoin collapse as soon as someone who earned them, sold them for consumable goods.
|
|
|
bitcoin cannot be regulated. only the cryptocurrency indexation and advertisement can be regulated, plus the usage of fiat style token.
bitcoin is defined in its code.
its idiotic that people ask this question at all.
|
|
|
it has a stable value because all those that got it airdropped can't sell it.
it can have a huge marketcapitalisation, potentially even bigger than bitcoin, depends on the manipulation the issuers have executed with it.
My socks are worth 100 trillion because a) Nobody else but myself can sell them b) I won't sell any below 1 trillion c) Yeah, I do have around 50 pairs and no I'm not insane.... I think ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) well get used to these numbers then, because there are many token that have a many billion usd marketcapitalisation. your "bitcoin" becomes a brand or whats even worse. potential future mickey mouse money.
|
|
|
|