during communism sport was something more hobbylike professional boxing was banned among others.
I beg to disagree, DDR was notorious for their doping. Communist countries saw sport as a way of propaganda, so they really went all in( not just them ofc) . Those were different times though, less money in sports. Oh yeah. Most (if not all) of the communist countries would dope the hell out of their athletes because if they were to bring a medal back home they'd be able to continue the whole 'we're still the best in the world, obviously' Yup. In China they have special sports schools potential Olympic athletes. There are lots of interesting articles out there about the process (Ping Pong, Canoeing and Gymnastics have all been covered). If a child shows they might be capable of winning a medal when they grow up they're placed in one. (I think I read they have about 200k - 300k athletes under 18 in these schools) No education, just training for a single sport for their entire childhood. Their parents have no say in the process and neither do the athletes. And they don't get to decide when they retire either, China decides for them. And when they do retire, the only thing they are qualified to do is train younger athletes since they were never educated in anything else. i am one oppinion with muslims on this actually and many russians too, sports for perfectionism is pointless, olympics is not about maintaining human health, it has become just a spectacle, chasing records. those athletes are a pointless waste of money, those that created the olympics did it in order to have some kind of international cooperation but science, engineering, police, farming and other anti terror networks do even better not to mention the cyber gaming networks. olympics is outdated perfectionism, and doping perverted it, but it is not a russian thing doping is widespread among all athletes of the world. |
|
|
|
Russia as an empire has no place at the Olympics.But because the UN acts with regard to the Olympics, and Russia has lots of control of the UN, maybe Russia has a big place in the Olympics as "umpire."  un has become a piece of junk anyway, western countries should abandon it. |
|
|
|
at olympics doping is normal,
That's what Russia thought. Oops. they are all doping, How do you know that? because thats how it is, no one can compete there so all cheat, the big problem is they have is to not get caught, and they all have developed technques to avoid that besides its true ukraine is a victim of western hostility towards russia but so is entire eastern europe, during cold war germany was the splitted victim between east and west that shifted eastward and its now ukraine. we soon could observe a westwardness, we are all sheep and the banksters are the masters/kings/emirs there are also muslim countries that suffer because they are being abused by the forced between them, like afghanistan that isnt able to run its own government and is being terrorised by taliban from pakistan the gulf arabic muslim core also terrorises its periphery in a difficult split situation, similar like the west, russia, etc. everything behaves imperial, even producing private corporations act like empires, |
|
|
|
at olympics doping is normal,
That's what Russia thought. Oops. they are all doping, |
|
|
|
Kurds are not communist or brave fighters. They are just capitalists' cheap power in order to steal oil from Syria  If the Kurds were really right, I'm sure the Western media wouldn't show them on TV. Turkey is an Republic, not Islamic country therefore we don’t arm any islamic groups. The FSA is a group that opposes the invasion of northern Syria by the Kurds. kurds are same kapitalists like alevite syrians, these power games are all about the money earning cattle, that have to get imposed a banking cartel uppon, you are not a real member of any nation if you don't have access to it's financial system |
|
|
|
during communism sport was something more hobbylike professional boxing was banned among others.
I beg to disagree, DDR was notorious for their doping. Communist countries saw sport as a way of propaganda, so they really went all in( not just them ofc) . Those were different times though, less money in sports. well they where forced into a competition with capitalists, french revolution was about egalite, fraternitee, communism was more the realisation of those concepts, capitalism has not much to do with egalitee fraternitee. true communism like in cuba doesn't has professional boxing people have to box themselves |
|
|
|
|
at olympics doping is normal,
countries have to spend a ton of money for specialised athlets, but why cent they spend a ton of money for drugs or high tech equipment.
at china olympics high tech shark skin suits where banned, as they helped break records.
during communism sport was something more hobbylike professional boxing was banned among others, it is the greed of the paying visiting masses that pushes olympics to the extremes.
|
|
|
|
once kommunism kicks in, people in the deluded west will realise that a financial nobility is ruling them. regards |
|
|
|
This girl leaves school to start his fight against global warming, but i do not agree with her way to fight. I think the right way to fight against big things like this is with a big preparation in school and not with ignorance. I have read a lot about the topic and there are lot of extremist attacking or deffending this girl, so, what are your thoughts? she doesnt need to have preperation those that use her as an icon have already a lot of education |
|
|
|
DRC uses child labor.
Every Tesla/powerwall sold is using child labor.
What's the societal impact of child labor on finished products?
investing into africa becomes pure madness. eurasia is the way forward. |
|
|
|
Abraham Lincoln was a pretty shrewd cookie. He knew when to stick with the law, and when not to. It all had to do with slow communications of the day, and the popularity of whatever the issues was.
We now see that Lincoln was pro-slavery for much of his life. All that the 13th and 14th Amendments did was to take slavery out of the private and make it public... the U.S. Government, the greatest slave owner the world has ever seen. And Lincoln was behind it all.
The Lincoln Cult's Latest Cover-UpOn July 19 the Associated Press and Reuter’s reported an "amazing find" at a museum in Allentown, Pennsylvania: A copy of a letter dated March 16, 1861, and signed by Abraham Lincoln imploring the governor of Florida to rally political support for a constitutional amendment that would have legally enshrined slavery in the U.S. Constitution.
Actually, the letter is not at all "amazing" to anyone familiar with the real Lincoln. It was a copy of a letter that was sent to the governor of every state urging them all to support the amendment, which had already passed the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, that would have made southern slavery constitutionally "irrevocable," to use the word that Lincoln used in his first inaugural address. The amendment passed after the lower South had seceded, suggesting that it was passed with almost exclusively Northern votes. Lincoln and the entire North were perfectly willing to enshrine slavery forever in the Constitution. This is one reason why the great Massachusetts libertarian abolitionist Lysander Spooner, author of The Unconstitutionality of Slavery, hated and despised Lincoln and his entire gang.
The Lincoln cult knows about all of this, but works diligently to keep it out of view of the general public. The fact that news organizations reported the "find," however, creates a problem for the cult. A cover-up/excuse-making campaign must commence.  slavery and dictatorship always exists, if you are being thrown into a muslim empire, there is a slavemaster (emir) and you are his tax slave, and if you get unlucky someone will simply catch and enslave you. the slavery in the us gets created by americans working for us dollar only because they trust only the us dollar running government, which was a remarkably good goverment as it achieved a scale of military power no muslim power ever was able to achieve. |
|
|
|
what is a society that is acceptable according to BadDecker and other radical muslims, the slaughtering islamic state because it shots into everyones head if he isn't praying how ordered?
The only really acceptable society is one that allows freedom for all individuals who are adults.The only exception is when it is proven that an individual has harmed or damaged another human or his property. The freedom is taken from the guilty person until he has paid off the debt of harm or damage. Judgment as to guilt must be based on at least one witness besides the harmed/damaged person, and substantial evidence... and the defendant gets to cross examine the accuser and the witness. A judge may make the judgment, but the defendant may require a jury of 12 impartial men and women. Do Muslims have rules like this? These are the basic rules in the USA. Seems to me that rules for Muslims are found in the Koran and Hadiths. Islamic rules promote lack of freedom, and violence at times. read human history there is property over the means of production (equity) there is exploitation, islam is easy to handle as everyone thinks he goes to hell if he harms his fellow brothers but it can backfire, (exploitation etc.) historically armies that go into battle in order to get into paradise aren't very good armies as they dont seek to win. islamic state terror spreads now because world is still influenced by american hedonism (liberalism) but once this turns, armies seeking to die are not good fighters anymore. secondly what do you recommend what shall europe do with those migrants it gets from third world? |
|
|
|
A few days ago I posted the below stuff into a self-moderated thread. The owner moderator took the post down. My thoughts are that when such a moderator takes posts down, that part of the reason is that it might be too relevant in some way. I took the below from a website called "Stop the Pirates" - http://stopthepirates.blogspot.com/. Since then the site as been reduced in size to only a fraction of what it was when I was there then. And the below info isn't included in the site any longer. Maybe it is just a hint for me to stop posting the info. But here it is again. And. I have taken it under fair use. I have posted the source site, above, even though they have taken this info down. What I am looking for is comments regarding the below info. Is it right? Is it wrong? Has it been discarded in law? Has it been overruled by various court cases? Are the legal sites accurate? What does anyone think? The points are numbered, so it should be easy to answer them point-by-point.
1. The IRS is Not a US government agency. It is an agency of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Diversified Metal Products v I.R.S et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391) 2. The IMF (International Monetary Fund) is an agency of the U.N. (Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Ed. page 816) 3. The United States has NOT had a Treasury since 1921 (41 Stat. Ch 214 page 654) 4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Presidential Documents Volume 24-No. 4 page 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-2887) 5. The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States! No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it is finally over. (Executive Order 12803) 6. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the U.S. government, even though the “U.S. Government” held stock in the agencies. (U.S. v Strang, 254 US491 Lewis v. US, 680 F.2nd, 1239) 7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the U.N. through the IMF (International Monetary Fund). The application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 Form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 forms and not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who publishes them while the old form states they are “Department of the Treasury”. (20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111 Subpart B. 422.103 (b)) 8. There are NO Judicial Courts in America and have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat 138-178) 9. There have NOT been any judges in America since 1789. There have just been administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178) 10. According to GATT (The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) you MUST have a Social Security number. (House Report (103-826) 11. New York City is defined in Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Guiliani stated on C-Span that “New York City is the capital of the World.” For once, he told the truth. (20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111, subpart B 44.103 (b) (2) (2) ) 12. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619 Steward Co. v. Davis 301 US 548) 13. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF (International Monetary Fund), which is an agency of the United Nations. (It says “U.S. Department of Treasury” at the top left corner, which again is part of the U.N. as pointed out above) 14.You own NO property!!! Slaves can’t own property. Read carefully the Deed to the property you think is yours. You are listed as a TENANT. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session) 15. The most powerful court in America is NOT the United States Supreme court, but rather the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 PA. C.S.A. 502) 16. The King of England financially backed both sides of the American Revolutionary War.. (Treaty of Versailles-July 16, 1782 Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80) 17. You CANNOT use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself because you are NOT a party to it! The U.S. Constitution applies to the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES, a privately owned and operated corporation (headquartered out of Washington, DC) much like IBM (International Business Machines, Microsoft, et al) and NOT to the people of the sovereign Republic of the united States of America. (Padelford Fay & Co. v The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520) 18. America is a British Colony. The United States is a corporation, not a land mass and it existed before the Revolutionary War and the British Troops did not leave until 1796 (Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774) 19. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVsMUpPgdT020. Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213) 21. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1, 53-54) 22. A 1040 Form is for tribute paid to Britain (IRS Publication 6209) 23. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery. (Papal Bulls of 1495 & 1493) 24. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455 & 1493) 25. The Pope’s laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix, c. vii, n. 4. Prati, 1844 Syllabus Prop 28, 29, 44) 26. We are slaves and own absolutely nothing, NOT even what we think are our children. (Tillman vs. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten vs. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 438 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481) 27. Military dictator George Washington divided up the States (Estates) in to Districts (Messages and papers of the Presidents Volume 1 page 99 1828 Dictionary of Estate). 28. “The People” does NOT include you and me. (Barron vs. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243) 29. It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION and arrest code breakers. (SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, REiff vs. City of Phila. 477 F. 1262, Lynch vs. NC Dept. of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247) 30. Every thing in the “United States” is up for sale: bridges, roads, water, schools, hospitals, prisons, airports, etc, etc… Did anybody take time to check who bought Klamath Lake?? (Executive Order 12803) 31. “We are human capital” (Executive Order 13037). The world cabal makes money off of the use of your signatures on mortgages, car loans, credit cards, your social security number, etc. 32. The U.N. – United Nations – has financed the operations of the United States government (the corporation of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) for over 50 years (U.S. Department of Treasury is part of the U.N. see above) and now owns every man, woman and child in America. The U.N. also holds all of the land of America in Fee Simple. The good news is we don’t have to fulfill “our” fictitious obligations. You can discharge a fictitious obligation with another’s fictitious obligation.
what is a society that is acceptable according to BadDecker and other radical muslims, the slaughtering islamic state because it shots into everyones head if he isn't praying how ordered? |
|
|
|
Yes, true. Scotland also seem to think that if they leave the UK they can then rejoin the EU as an independent nation. Absolutely won't happen. That would give the green light to separatists everywhere, from Catalonia to Bavaria.
if scots rejoin eu better be bad europeans, because the damn EU is very corrupt and under foreign lobby influence it is actively seeking to enslave all europeans to african problems, they are completely out of mind and out of that issue i completely can understand uk why they left it. EUROCRATS are big retards. You talk like there is not any corruption in the UK. How about all the money that are spend for the Queen and the British royal family? It is a corruption scheme but you are not able to recognize it royalties exist in order to guard the top that would be the top of the republic, without a royalty the top heads would be massively corrupt. |
|
|
|
|
Wenn die Afd doch zurück zur DM will und den daraus folgenden problemen, warum führen sie nicht selbst eine AFDMark ein?
die afd kann sich die dimension der vernetz und gemischtheit der bevölkerung selbst kaum vorstellen.
die afd ruft schon die ganze zeit zum auflösen des euro auf.
|
|
|
|
Yes, true. Scotland also seem to think that if they leave the UK they can then rejoin the EU as an independent nation. Absolutely won't happen. That would give the green light to separatists everywhere, from Catalonia to Bavaria.
if scots rejoin eu better be bad europeans, because the damn EU is very corrupt and under foreign lobby influence it is actively seeking to enslave all europeans to african problems, they are completely out of mind and out of that issue i completely can understand uk why they left it. EUROCRATS are big retards. |
|
|
|
British digital asset management firm CoinShares has released a report that outlines a number of trends in the Bitcoin and cryptocurrency market in 2019.
The report describes the social, political, economic, and technological forces driving cryptocurrency adoption, and the consequent trends that have materialized in the cryptocurrency market.
The report opens with the technological, economic, political, and social macro forces that have brought the cryptocurrency market to its current state.Check out the full news hereAs a millennial myself, I would highly agree with this. Although that gold and real estate are both reliable long-term investments, it's just that Bitcoin is "red hot" right now. The risks are higher though due to the volatility of the market. To all of the millennials here in Bitcointalk, do you also agree that Bitcoin is a much better option than gold or real estate? As much as I liked real estate, the target market is kinda tough. Unlike Bitcoin, anyone can afford to buy it, even in the form of satoshis. with the migration crisis the useless government is causing i wouldn't wonder. |
|
|
|
If the available resources can be fair shared amongst available inhabitants this would greatly spore a happy community, state, and even nation.
The birth of a child, the first cry of a baby, a new life should most likely bring joy and happiness but no being able to take care of the child because of low income and resources can become a night mare and very frustrating. This is a circumstance experienced by developing countries.
With few economical developments going on the level of over population in developing countries is worrisome not only to the country but to the world at large, we get to see on a daily occurrence immigrant try to legally or illegally get into a country with more prospect than theirs. Some get them self killed and to those that manages to get in "any thing to survive" becomes there watch word which can increase crime rate.
Why are developing countries getting over populated
Developing countries are getting over population via so many reasons like
Poor education~ developing countries are struggling with poor educational system, they lack adequate family planning orientation, a family who feeds on below1$ a day can get over 8-12 kids and they see it as a blessing
Early marriage~ this is also an urgent issue that should be tackled you girls as young as 9 get pushed into marriage and start as a very early stage to give birth and when the hit menopause they must have given birth to over a dozen of kids.
Sexual crimes~ sexual offense like rape, taking advantage of the poor for sex, child trafficking, sex trafficking can cause a rise in unwanted pregnancy and over population grows.
Overpopulation is dangerous for developing countries and the government has it as a priority to educate the people on this and also look into the issue.
muslims told me that reason of humans is limited, therefore those countries are doomed to collapse anyway, if they do it sudenly it is maybe better, stupid western government should stop building those nations.
Western government is only out after the oil. Everything else they do is only to make them look like good people (a little bit) to the Muslims. oil isn't a big problem enough substitutes existing, the big problem in the west is now that entire savage third world tries to enslave westerners for their problems. |
|
|
|
If the available resources can be fair shared amongst available inhabitants this would greatly spore a happy community, state, and even nation.
The birth of a child, the first cry of a baby, a new life should most likely bring joy and happiness but no being able to take care of the child because of low income and resources can become a night mare and very frustrating. This is a circumstance experienced by developing countries.
With few economical developments going on the level of over population in developing countries is worrisome not only to the country but to the world at large, we get to see on a daily occurrence immigrant try to legally or illegally get into a country with more prospect than theirs. Some get them self killed and to those that manages to get in "any thing to survive" becomes there watch word which can increase crime rate.
Why are developing countries getting over populated
Developing countries are getting over population via so many reasons like
Poor education~ developing countries are struggling with poor educational system, they lack adequate family planning orientation, a family who feeds on below1$ a day can get over 8-12 kids and they see it as a blessing
Early marriage~ this is also an urgent issue that should be tackled you girls as young as 9 get pushed into marriage and start as a very early stage to give birth and when the hit menopause they must have given birth to over a dozen of kids.
Sexual crimes~ sexual offense like rape, taking advantage of the poor for sex, child trafficking, sex trafficking can cause a rise in unwanted pregnancy and over population grows.
Overpopulation is dangerous for developing countries and the government has it as a priority to educate the people on this and also look into the issue.
it wasnt the europeans that stopped colonialism it was the noneuropeans, they have put themselves into the misery of the current, during colonial time there was always a possibility to join the workforce of the european colonial empire and get to the colonial regions that were constructing infrastructure. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
