I pushed it for you. The blockcypher explorer shows it's highly likely to get confirmed soon. You could also try submitting it to the viabtc transaction accelerator to be certain it gets confirmed soon.

https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/tx/7a39996d855d0db95b886a6d4bd2a855e5fe7ded0fb888ddb21a7a7a185e4b0b/



This is the link to the accelerator. You often have to keep trying it because it only accepts 100 transactions an hour.

https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/

edit

It's just confirmed, there's no need to use the accelerator.

Do any of those addresses have a red letter U next to them when you check them on blockchain.info? The top address in the example below shows a red letter U to indicate that its inputs are unconfirmed. If one or more of your addresses shows a red letter U then the problem might be due to an unconfirmed input, otherwise the problem's caused by something else.

You can find it on the website of Japan’s Financial Services Agency at this link. However it's legal jargon in Japanese, so you will have to use Google translate if you can't read Japanese. After that you'll have to trawl through all the legal jargon in a load of pdfs until you find it.

http://www.fsa.go.jp/news/28/ginkou/20170324-1.html

Bitfinex has hit 1000 €, but the other exchanges are lagging behind. Until bearstamp goes over 1000 € it's not really significant. After bearstamp breaks 1000 € that barrier will be well and truly broken on all the other exchanges.

It's weird that stamp's only $4 below finex, it's normally at least $10 below. The pump is wavering a bit now so maybe stamp's bigger spread will facilitate a dump back to the usual $10 below finex.

It's even on softpedia. They need warning that it's dodgy, it needs removing from that site as fast as possible. It's also on a few other software distribution sites like softroy, downloadtopc, and spotpig, but I have never heard of those before. Softpedia's massive, it's one of the best known download sites.

edit

I reported it as malware to softpedia and linked here.

http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/Back-Up-and-Recovery/Bitcoin-find-and-recover.shtml

I'm sorry you were hacked, but if you think the openssl windows binary file I linked to is malicious then read this post explaining why it's almost certainly clean. The short version is the openssl project does not release binaries, it provides a page of links to third party products. That file I linked to was from such a third party whose site is referenced by the openssl project website. A virustotal scan of the file is clean, and the third party providers have been distributing openssl binaries since 2003 without complaints. I'm sure the openssl website would quickly remove its link to that third party if there were any complaints.

This a post with the long version.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1847935.msg18396705#msg18396705

This is a clean virustotal scan of that file.

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/08c9a3ad60239dca835966dd38005cd19bf16d641bbb5853dd889900ada5fe2f/analysis/1490906637/


There are waybackmachine historical snapshots of the fulgan.com website openssl binary download page going back to 2003 at this link that prove how long its been distributing binaries.

https://web.archive.org/web/20030701000000*/https://indy.fulgan.com/SSL/




This is a link to the openssl page with links to sites with binary downloads available.

https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Binaries

Here's a screenshot of it showing the fulgan.com site that the openssl binary I linked to came from.



I never recommended you try "Bitcoin find & recover" software, the software I recommended is called btcrecover which well known highly trusted legendary members such as shorena recommend.


edit

Here's some fresh news from HCP about the "Bitcoin find & recover" software github.

It's great to hear you got it working. Kleopatera isn't easy to configure, but it's the only windows GUI software I know of that can properly verify files. There's easier to use alternatives for simpler tasks, and sooner or later one will probably add support for proper file verification. Until then there's no real alternative to Kleopatera/Gpg4win for windows if you want a GUI.

He says here it was either an openssl windows binary I posted a link to, or some new software that claims to enhance the btcrecover software. If you could evaluate whether either of those programs is malicious it would help prevent others getting hacked. I made a post explaining why I think the openssl binary I recommended is clean here. The TLDR is that file is from a site referenced by the openssl website. There have been no other complaints about it, or its creators who have been distributing binaries since 2003, and a virustotal scan of it is clean.

I made another post explaining that I recommended trying software called btcrecover, but not the new software the OP tried here. You can find a quote from the creator of the new software the OP installed at the bottom of that post. His software's called "Bitcoin find & recover", not btcrecover.

I feel sorry for the OP as he says he got hacked straight after I posted a solution for how to recover 17 Bitcoins from his corrupt multibit wallet file here. If you, or anyone you know, could identify any malicious software you could help stop others losing their coins.

edit

The "Bitcoin find & recover" software's github's been deleted, which strongly suggests that software was malicious, not the openssl installer binary I posted a link to.

Regarding the software called "Bitcoin find & recover", I never advised you or anyone else to try it. I did make a post advising someone to try software called btcrecover, because the community has been using it for years without any problems I'm aware of.

The btcrecover software was created by a hero member called btchris. A multitude of high ranking members here recommend it including a highly trusted legendary member called shorena. Here's an example.


Shorena tested it and included a screenshot of the test in this post from 2015.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=85495.msg12523175#msg12523175

The "Bitcoin find & recover" software was created by a low rank member called racezefi who has only made 72 posts. I'm sorry you got hacked, but I never recommended trusting and installing any software created by racezefi.

This is the post I made recommending trying btcrecover, it doesn't even mention trying racezefi's "Bitcoin find & recover" software.



I found this post by racezefi which claims his software enhances btcrecover, and I'm sorry you trusted it, but I didn't recommend trying it.

I'm sorry to hear your computer was hacked. However, I doubt it was the openssl installer binary file link I posted in a tutorial that infected your computer because I ran it myself and have had no problems. This link is to a virustotal scan of it that says it's clean. Although that doesn't conclusively prove anything it's a good indication.

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/08c9a3ad60239dca835966dd38005cd19bf16d641bbb5853dd889900ada5fe2f/analysis/1490906637/

The link I posted was suggested by the openssl wiki. Openssl does not provide windows binaries (executable/runnable files), instead it provides links to third party products on its wiki. This is a quote from its website explaining this. That page contains a link to the wiki page which displays a list of links to third party binaries .

https://www.openssl.org/community/binaries.html


This is a quote from the wiki page that displays links to third party windows binaries.

https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Binaries


This screenshot of that wiki page shows a link to the fulgan.com site that the openssl binary I linked to came from.



This screenshot is of the openssl binary downloads available at fulgan.com with the link I posted highlighted at the bottom.

https://indy.fulgan.com/SSL/



This is the link to the fulgan.com openssl binary I posted.

https://indy.fulgan.com/SSL/openssl-1.0.2k-x64_86-win64.zip

There are independent waybackmachine historical snapshots of the fulgan.com website going back to 2003. That site has been providing windows openssl binaries for years without any complaints of them being infected that I'm aware of. If there were any complaints I'm sure that openssl would quickly remove the link to that site from its wiki. You can view the historical snapshots of the windows binary download page here.

https://web.archive.org/web/20030701000000*/https://indy.fulgan.com/SSL/

Yes it only works on unencrypted wallets. There's a tool called wallettool in bitcoinj that can decrypt .wallet files and extract private keys from them. However, it requires installing and configuring a load of software, and using some quite technical command line instructions. Furthermore, if a .wallet file is slightly corrupted wallettool might not be able to work on it

The whole wallet file can't be encrypted because there's some human readable text at the start of an encrypted one. If only the unencrypted part was corrupt, it might still be possible to work on the encrypted part using openssl. Multibit encrypts .key files using openssl, and it probably uses openssl to encrypt .wallet files too. There's probably a way to decrypt them using the openssl command line. There's a tutorial explaining how to decrypt a .key file using openssl here.

https://multibit.org/help/v0.5/help_lostOrForgottenPassword.html

Unfortunately I haven't yet found a tutorial explaining how to decrypt a .wallet file using openssl, or figured out how to do it myself.

Nevertheless, the OP said his wallet file wasn't encrypted, so that shouldn't be a problem for him.

My bitcoin address is in my profile page here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=325680

Since version 0.4.0 multibit classic wallet files are in a format called Google protocol buffer format (protobuf). Open a file with a .wallet extension in a hex editor and look for the following sequence of bytes 08 01 12 20. The next 32 bytes after that should be your private key in hex format. After you get your private key in hex format you can convert it to a normal format using an offline copy of the bitaddress website.

I tested this on an unencrypted wallet (one with no password) in multibit version 0.5.1.6 and it worked for me.

This is the hex editor I used, although any other is probably sufficient.

http://www.wxhexeditor.org/home.php

This is the bitaddress website. I advise you not to directly paste private keys into it.

https://www.bitaddress.org/

Instead look for this link at the bottom of the page and use it to download a zipped copy you can run offline.

https://github.com/pointbiz/bitaddress.org/archive/v3.3.0.zip



This is my multibit wallet file opened in the hex editor with the bytes 08 01 12 20 that precede a private key highlighted.






This is the 32 bytes of a private key (in hex format) highlighted.







This is the 32 bytes of a private key (in hex format) copied directly from the hex editor into notepad.






This is the 32 bytes of a private key after removing the spaces in notepad.






This is the private key copied from notepad and pasted into an offline copy of the bitaddress wedsite. Click the view details button to get the private key converted to normal formats.





This is my multibit wallet's address 1F84fkbMng6dJpGZmtycRbUe72B7XSYbeT shown on the right hand side of bitaddress. Every raw private key can convert into two different bitcoin addresses, which is why there's two.






This is my multibit wallet's address 1F84fkbMng6dJpGZmtycRbUe72B7XSYbeT shown in multibit.




You can import your private key into the wallet of your choice to get control of yours coins back. Electrum's a good choice.

I hope it takes some time. A technical analysis advice website warned to beware of sharp pumps upwards at this stage of a cup and handle. It said if the price stays relatively flat for a while it's more likely to result in a giant handle pumping the price really high. After all the FUD it will probably take a while before the majority get the confidence to start buying. That flat period should fit into a good handle formation.

There is a forum member called walletrecoveryservices who advertises a service for recovering passwords. He has both software, hardware, and expertise at it. However as mocacinno says it's best to try doing the job yourself. If you can't, and are considering using his service, then first check the feedback other people left at his trust rating page. It's mostly good, though there are a few negatives.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=130960

This is his bitcointalk thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=240779.0

This is his website.

http://walletrecoveryservices.com/

Mocacinno is right, you have to verify the installer files, not individual wallet files. I demosnstrated it below using the latest portable installer and its corresponding .asc file as an example. Normally on any page with links to download installers there are also links to download their corresponding .asc files.

You must put an installer and .asc file in the same folder before verifying. For the example I downloaded electrum-2.8.2-portable.exe and electrum-2.8.2-portable.exe.asc from this page.

https://download.electrum.org/2.8.2/


These are the steps I followed, starting with putting both those files in the same folder.

This is the bit where people are frightened to buy in case it starts heading back down again. It will probably stay fairly flat for a while before people get the confidence to start really pumping up the price. If we are in a giant 2013 style cup and handle that's good. Before the handle goes  sky high there should be a flat phase.

Is the electrum wallet file you are trying to verify in the same folder its corresponding .asc file? The two files need to be in the same folder. Also how did you try to decrypt/verify? Did you do it directly inside kleopatera like in the first screenshot below, or did you do it through the context menu like in the second screenshot below?

I sometimes had problems with the context menu method, but verifying directly inside kleopatera worked.

Bter announced a new BTC-B reimbursement plan on 26 March. They are copying bitfinex by changing BTC-B into BTRX tokens, then starting a market where people can trade them. Bter says it will buy back some tokens each month, but doesn't say how many. The new BTRX token market opens on April 2.

https://bter.com/article/14192

Blocktrail's explorer says your transaction contains dust. I tried the viabtc accelerator but it's rejecting it like you say. The 0.00021229 BTC/KB fee is higher than viabtc's minimum required 0.0001BTC/KB. I don't know for sure why it's rejecting your transaction, but it might be because it contains dust.


https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/d20483e4540ede66acacebfd1a50fca41d7b8749a163f95b2c5aea666429fad3

If you are not in a hurry you could wait a long time for it to confirm, or if you want confirmation fast you could contact a bitcointalk user called Quickseller or another called macbook-air and offer to pay a small fee for them to get your transaction confirmed.

Both of them have access to the F2Pool mining pool's accelerator, and can get it confirmed in the next block F2Pool mines. Here's a review of QuickSeller's service.