Payslip nalang kung wala kang business. pero sa form na fill upon mo online, pwede namang business pero unregistered. Hindi naman talaga fix lang ang requirement ng coins.ph kasi sa pagdaan ng panahon, may mga new requirements or directives galing kay BSP na kailangan i pa implement ng coins.ph.
Wala talaga tayong magagawa kundi mag comply, pag mag complain ka naman, sasabihin nilang galing sa BSP or regulators are requirements, talo pa rin tayo.
Yun nga ang masakit eh, have to comply. Payslip not an option sakin, baka mag make up na lang ng business kuno online selling or something. haha Sana hindi ka hingan ng business permit and ITR, dahil kung legit business ang operation mo, automatic meron ka talaga niyan. Hindi mo rin naman pwede I fake ang documents kasi malaking kaso din yan, public documents eh. If hinde kana comfortable sa ganitong updates ni Coinsph, better not to use it anymore pero since most of us here ay no choice, kaya magcomply nalang. Supporting documents ay kailangan talaga, just try to contact them as well if you have questions about the update.
Hindi na nga ako komportable lalo na nanghihingi pa sila ng video recording. Anong worst case scenario pag di ako nagcomply dito enhance verification? sana di maclose account ko, okay lang kung lilimit nila daily cash-ins. Hindi naman yan ma disclose, parang bank rin merong tinatawag ng bank secrecy law, at bawal i divulge ang information mo without your concent. |
|
|
|
There is less than a day left before the fight and now the boxers' chances are leveled and the adds return to the original ones, let the strongest win, but I will still cross my fingers and wait for Mark Magsayo to win.
We have to unite here to support Magsayo on the biggest challenge in his boxing career. He knows how big is at stake here, his current belt and his future depend on the outcome of the fight, so he has to win this. Magsayo by KO, that is my prediction. |
|
|
|
any developers ng coins.ph here? na pwedeng mag bigay ng info to what is really happening kasi if in case man legitimate yung complaint then, threatening yung ganitong hinain. akalain mo yun, nag endorse pa naman ako na legit gamitin ang coins.ph para less hassle sa mga superior ko sa trabaho tas may pa refer refer pa ako kunwari para may 50 pesos, tapos ito lang yung makikita ko? hala na!!! dapat magawan to ng paraan.
Unfortunately wala ng active representative ng coins.ph dito. Ito ang ANN thread nila, ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1558587.0), pero ito OP ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=879966), october 2016 pa lang last active nila. Maganda sana kung mabalik nila ang active na ANN thread dito para update tayo. Pwede mong i request yan kabayan sa support nila, at saka, yung refer mo, hindi mo naman kasalanan kung merong mangyari sa account nila kasi may rules naman na pina follow ang coins.ph. |
|
|
|
So, Imho It's very unlikely that KD will be traded in the summer league.
Agree with that, KD will remain as Nets, unless he will ask for a trade and would not play until he gets traded. Irving will likely get traded as that has been his trademark already, and in the first season he will show up, the next season he will struggle, the kind of superstar he is.  |
|
|
|
It is really unfortunate to the Brooklyn Nets because they didn't got what they paid for, their biggest problem last season was Irving when he denied getting vaccinated when in-fact he signed a contract to the Nets that says he must play for the team but he didn't and that was so selfish because the team needs him while Durant was still injured but he didn't bugged in to help.
The fact that Brookly Nets entered the playoffs even with those problems and situations, everything that happened on that season should be forgotten once the playoffs started. All teams are entered in a fresh 0-0 standing when they start at playoffs and if it's about seeding, I don't see that the Nets should have a problem with that as they are quite healthy entering the playoffs, faced the Boston Celtics at the first round and the rest is history. Boston Celtics just did a great job that's why they were able to sweep the favorite Brooklyn Nets. I don't see any problem honestly with Durant and Irving's performance back then but it's just that the Celtics did great limiting the Nets' offense. Instead of just putting the discussion on why the Nets failed in their playoffs rally, not their overall performance but it's because of the much-improved version of Boston Celtics. There is no problem with Durant and their performance, it's Irving's absence when he is needed the most. They have been seated at the top seed in ECF for quite some time but Irving hasn't played when the team needs him and obviously Harden can't just keep up. Before the regular season ended, they had fallen into the depths and only managed to climb the #7 seed when Durant came back. I'm just saying that they could've avoided being swept by the Celtics in the 1st round if they remained in the upper seed and if Irving played along and that will also mean that Harden won't force a trade if Irving had been there with him. That has nothing to do with performance, what's the use of talent if it is not used. |
|
|
|
but there are gamblers who are willing to deal with it especially those big time gamblers who use a huge amount of money and play heavy, they are more into accepting the terms and condition. Since they are putting big money on that particular site, it means they trust the site. Therefore, undergoing KYC should not be a big problem for them as it's just easy to complete it. These big-time gamblers are not dumb to just trust a site with their money easily. These big gamblers' research is beyond average compared to the majority and they are very strict at choosing a site. KYC is not really a problem if there's a time that it will be a mandatory thing to do. We have no choice in the first place if it's become a necessary requirement. Just make sure to just comply with it on a trustworthy site and of course, not with the site that just comes out of nowhere and lacks reviews. And because of these big-time gamblers, the trusted platforms that they are playing are also obliged to keep their system safe and updated so that the details of their clients won't leak if there are some threats that could put their license in the line and worse, these big-time gamblers will be forced to sue the casino and leave them with more problems. |
|
|
|
Can't really say that Canelo alone has all the advantage in their 2 previous fights, GGG was much younger that time too that's why Canelo really struggled in the those 2 said fights. The first fight was declared draw and the 2nd was a majority decision in favor of Canelo but that fight doesn't show that Canelo is more dominant that's why a trilogy was called years ago but Canelo didn't let it happen as he quite knew that the score might be settled to 1-1-1.
The trilogy fight was originally proposed in 2019, but Canelo delayed it for three years. I don't know why he ran away from the fight, as he knows that the jury is on his side. Look at the fight between Canelo and Bivol. Bivol completely dominated the match, but according to the official scorecard, it was a narrow victory for him. The same happened with Golovkin for his first two fights as well. He didn't got as many points as he would have got, and as a result lost the second match to Canelo. This time there will be a lot more scrutiny. For sure, a lot of eyes will be on this fight, we've already witnessed two great fight between the two and it's hard to score. We haven't know the judges yet right? So we can't speculate if they are going to be biased or least see their record as well judging previous that. Because if it will be another questionable judges then I would say that GGG would have to win convincingly, even close to get a knock to secure his win. That is for sure, no doubt! This fight might not be that interested anymore because it was very delayed by Canelo but there I bet that there is still many people and fans of both sides who will surely watch this fight. Also, people are not taking this chances slip because this might be GGG's last dance in his career. As for the judges, we can't still say about that but the fight will be held at T-Mobile Arena, Las Vegas. |
|
|
|
This is obvious, so even if you get amazing players, this method won't work. Hence, it's both about getting good players, but also having a good system in place for those players to have good roles that do not overlap each other.
Yeah, a good team system is very important, and the Nets clearly lacked this. I agree that players' roles shouldn't overlap, and it was probably the main reason for the Nets' failure since Durant, Harden, and Irving are all scorers first, and each of them only cares about individual stats not team results. At least I don't remember someone from the Nets' big trio adapting his style of play to help the team to win something in the previous season. We could also factor in the injuries, for their big 3 that's why it was a total failure for the Nets. Not sure how many games do this 3 have played in the Nets uniforms, Harden has hamstrings in the playoffs 2 season ago, Durant didn't start the season 2 seasons ago, and then the Kyrie drama in the pandemic. It's just very unfortunate for a team such as the Nets to not have their superstars jive together to accomplished one thing, which is to win a championship for their city. But that opportunity no longer exists as KD and Irving might not be in the Nets jersey at the start of a new season. It is really unfortunate to the Brooklyn Nets because they didn't got what they paid for, their biggest problem last season was Irving when he denied getting vaccinated when in-fact he signed a contract to the Nets that says he must play for the team but he didn't and that was so selfish because the team needs him while Durant was still injured but he didn't bugged in to help. This coming season, there might no superstar in the line-up of the Nets as Irving might end in the Lakers while Durant might end in the Warriors. |
|
|
|
it is 72% against 27% favoring Donnie Nietes 11 .
I assume that even in His older age still People are aiming and trusting Him to win this fight?
but the sad part here is if that he losses this one , maybe he will also retire like the 2 famous Filipino Boxer that face defeat and decide for retirement.
Retiring is going to be an option for Nietes IF he losses, which I don't thin he will. If you take a look at his last fight against Reveco last year, he's still looking sharp and mixes his punch very well. Nietes is a smart boxer and an underrated one. He fought Ioka once and that gave him the edge to win the fight, and that explains the odds as well. And that also explains why people/bettors are trusting him 100%. Being strong and smart at the same time is a formidable force. For the records as well, he's the longest reigning Filipino world champ boxer. True! He won't be the longest-reigning Filipino world champion if he's not that good, he's just underrated because back in his prime, Pacquiao and Donaire are more known than him. He may be aging but his experience and IQ in the ring will speak for him in the ring, particularly this time that he had already faced Ioka few years back and I also don't think that Ioka will have the advantage in this upcoming fight. If we do look on Donnie Nietes stats. https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/21559943-1-6 Out of 43 wins it does have 23 KO's.Yes, he might lack in power but sustaining on having 1 loss out of 43 wins then this is something that cant really be ignored.Its true that he might that not getting too much attention because of pacquiao and donaire but this guy is already 40 which retirement would really be next in line whether he do win or loss this one. He is actually a decent boxer with 23 knockout results over 43 wins, his only loss came from a boxer named Angky Angkotta way back in 2004 in Jakarta but that was not a bad loss either because it was a split-decision. After that, he never tasted loss again and surely that loss made him a far better boxer than he is in the year 2004. He is good but his timing was unfortunate because Donaire and Pacquiao were also reigning at the industry that time. |
|
|
|
We experienced unexpected events or moments in gambling like this one, you are calling it off a day in a session then you're suddenly on a winning streak thinking that it's your time to get back what you've lost will you go or will you stop and come back the next day.
I'm sometimes tempted to continue but I know you cannot beat the house, so most of the time I just call it a day and just wished that tomorrow or next time it's my lucky day. What about you what's your take.
Anyone that have been a regular on betting platform or shop as was mine case, you certainly must have had these experiences. You suddenly feel like it's your time to recover all you've lost and even gain more. A few more loses after some consecutive wins don't seem to matter but in actual, its a clear warning on how things have turned and you ought to heed and call it a day. Even when you've not lost, the fact that you made some wins already is you to have gained in on your lose or made profits off your stakes. Best thing to do is to walk away before other emotions set in and your likely to lost all that you've won. As a bettor and a gambler, it is really hard not to have these experiences and this is one of the most common problems that gamblers are still trying to conquer because it really hard to put a stop sign on that specific activities if you're having a good run. We are thinking that this might be the day where we can somehow recover our losses in the past days but in the end, we still lose. That's because we can't stop ourselves and that's also why it's really important to have the right mindset. If you often have an idea to try to win back your past losses, then you obviously play gambling not for fun but to chase big winnings. And if so, then most likely you will once again leave the gambling area with empty pockets, as you do not comply with risk management and play as long as you have money. Personally, I always try to get out of the game in the black, of course if luck favors it. In my opinion this attitude to money and gambling helps to bring up a sense of responsibility. That seriously depends on the gambler on how they put it in perspective but for the majority, that is the most common cases that they are trying to conquer. Gambling can be enjoyed if it is viewed as an activity where we can entertain ourselves just like what you said, in my case, I go for the both sides, I'm bringing what I can afford to lose with a goal of having fun. |
|
|
|
LOL no doubt if the main purpose to make people will be very difficult to withdraw their money. That rule was also forcing people to verify and reveal their identity. I was always considering that kind of casino as a scam casino. There's no guarantee if withdraw will be smooth after you have verified your account through sending your KYC to them. They were making their TOS stricting people to withdraw their money. Less money can be withdrawn from that casino.
People will be made difficult to withdraw their winnings by making strict KYC because that is what suspicious casinos will do. But a trusted casino with a good reputation won't do it because once they do and many of their members complain, the casino can lose out on a huge potential profit. People who play at crypto casinos will probably prefer casinos that don't implement KYC as they don't want to send their documents to the casino for security reasons. Who would of course want a KYC casino? We sure know the risks entailed with it so I don't think there's someone who will happily choose and bet to a casino that will ask KYC. I for one wanted a non-KYC casino but I maintain my deposits little and I prefer not to go big in case they will suddenly freeze it. |
|
|
|
This is true, It's a common behavior of people who just got into the market. They lose trust after seeing a massive down fall on prices and eventually sell their asset on a low price that result to a loss. Whales just keep taking advantage of the market buying all those discounted bitcoins, This is why whales are just becoming richer as time goes. I'm pretty sure that those weak hands just entered crypto because of the hype of bull market in the past few months and now they are suffering because we entered bear market. They haven't experience the bear market that's why it's very new to them. I hope those who just entered the market and sold at a loss will learn their lesson on their experience.
People could only be classified in to two. 1. One who do believes into potential of Bitcoin 2. One who do easily get affected by their emotion and making out direct conclusions. Its not something new for a human being to have those reactions because who wont really be that get stressed on the time that the market do make out some decline? For sure we are really experiencing those stuffs. I agree, I mean we're also affected about it but the thing is that we are much calmer than the ones who have just started their journey in bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies and just like @abel1337 said, these new ones haven't experienced bearish market since they started at the previous bull run where the bitcoin achieved new ATH. Now, they are really stressed on what's happening because they don't know what to do in times of declination. That takes us back to the basics, always keep ourselves informed and knowledgeable before starting to invest in unknown fields. |
|
|
|
The thing with Bivol is that he is tall, so Canelo has difficulty getting inside because Bivol know how to used his reach advantage. GGG obviously doesn't have the height, so this is going to be pure brawl, 12 rounds of full pack action, hehehehe.
Bivol is only 9cm taller, and has only 4cm reach advantage. I am not a super expert in boxing, but that isnt that advantage to be so dominant in their fight. GGG is also a bit taller than Canelo. Imho, in the Canelo vs Bivol fight, Canelo was aimed on a KO, while Bivol on gaining points. Good defence, speed in legs and little reach advantage beat heavy Canelo punches. I try to look at their face-off, and it seems Bivol is looking down at Canelo. Maybe it's a indication that he is really the bigger and the taller between the two and Bivol makes used of this advantage. Of course, he beat Canelo with his foot work because he is the natural LHW as compare to Canelo who is going up. Bivol had the most advantage on that fight, except the experience as Canelo has it the most but it didn't matter that much because Canelo was the guest in LHW where he needs to get an extra added weight to have that fight and that made him more vulnerable as his speed was not that good enough and the same as the power. Bivol made sure to give a gap in-between punches so that Canelo will have a hard time reaching him, that resulted to a loss in Canelo's side. |
|
|
|
~
It's like the Brooklyn Nets just made an experiment but it failed. So what's next? A question that had been itching for many Brooklyn fans.
Durant wants a trade and I think Kyrie want the same.
They will be left with nothing if it happens or a roster with roleplayers unable to create chemistry or they could just stick with the plan and try the experiment one more time just to see where it will go.
It really is a failed experiment by the Brooklyn Nets but with their superstars, they might get a good trade package for those 2 especially Durant. Kyrie wants to be in the Lakers and Lebron wanted it as well but the question is who will the Lakers trade just to get him. Durant now want's to go to either Phoenix or Miami but that would be hard because I don't know who will either Phoenix or Miami want to trade just to get Durant. I just don't know but if Kyrie will go to Lakers, the Warriors might get Durant again (guess only) and they have a good trade package to get Durant with Poole, Wiggins and Wiseman so they an get it if both parties will agree. The future of the Nets now is still unknown but we might see a picture of what they will be doing next season if Kyrie and Durant will be traded and which players will get in exchange for both of them. Gonna be huge for the Warriors if they will able to get Durant back. But we all know things have been said after Durant left, so might not be a good idea for the Warriors to get him back again that will cost a lot. But who knows, as we have seen in the last decade or so, there are no longer loyalties in the NBA. Organizations too, if they think it will be good for them, then definitely they can break the winning formula so we will see. I'm still on the fence though. I don't think they can get Durant back. Even if they do, it seems like there would be some issues there with drama. I did notice that Draymond Green came out the other day and said that they wouldn't have been able to beat LeBron without Durant in their last Finals matchup. That seemingly was an olive branch to Durant, who Green famously told that they could win without him. I guess father time has made that statement no longer true. For sure they will never try to get durant back as the Nets ask those young guys of Warriors which can help then in future, If they trade them for Durant its like they are risking their future to a injury prone guy and proven that he can't lift a team so its good that they retain their young core and develop more other rookies rather than breaking it and get a problem which they already get rid. It's interesting to see what will be the performance of warriors next season since to many of their young key players already departed from their team. Exactly, that specific trade will be at the Brooklyn Nets advantage. Maybe not this coming season but in the long-term they will be at their advantage mainly if Poole, Wiggins and Wiseman will be at the Nets in-exchange for Kevin Durant. The way I see it, the management of the Nets are already tired of building a superteam because in the end, it will be a big disaster if the superstars won't be synchronized just like what happened to them recently. |
|
|
|
He wouldn't be worry, he has been calling Spence Jr for quiet sometime now and is eager to face him. And this will be his perfect opportunity, no more Bob Arum in the middle for him to negotiate with Spence Jr and PBC. He might get the short end of the deal, but still, that money is going to be big.
Exactly, 50% of 10 million is smaller than 40% of 20 million, so the percentage does not really matter and Crawford has to take a low percentage for this fight to finally be sealed. Spence is a PPV attraction, so if Crawford could beat Spence, then he will become popular and next fight of his will make him earn more. That's why Spence Jr. is called the king of PPV because of the revenue he can attract through PPV whenever he got some fights. For Spence, I think he will be more than happy to accept that 40% purse cut just to make the fight happen and that specific cut is already big enough for him as he's now flying solo with no Bob Arum. He may be under Mayweather Promotions in this fight but his cut will be much bigger than he's with Bob, and that will be his biggest paycheck in his entire career. |
|
|
|
it is 72% against 27% favoring Donnie Nietes 11 .
I assume that even in His older age still People are aiming and trusting Him to win this fight?
but the sad part here is if that he losses this one , maybe he will also retire like the 2 famous Filipino Boxer that face defeat and decide for retirement.
Retiring is going to be an option for Nietes IF he losses, which I don't thin he will. If you take a look at his last fight against Reveco last year, he's still looking sharp and mixes his punch very well. Nietes is a smart boxer and an underrated one. He fought Ioka once and that gave him the edge to win the fight, and that explains the odds as well. And that also explains why people/bettors are trusting him 100%. Being strong and smart at the same time is a formidable force. For the records as well, he's the longest reigning Filipino world champ boxer. True! He won't be the longest-reigning Filipino world champion if he's not that good, he's just underrated because back in his prime, Pacquiao and Donaire are more known than him. He may be aging but his experience and IQ in the ring will speak for him in the ring, particularly this time that he had already faced Ioka few years back and I also don't think that Ioka will have the advantage in this upcoming fight. |
|
|
|
We experienced unexpected events or moments in gambling like this one, you are calling it off a day in a session then you're suddenly on a winning streak thinking that it's your time to get back what you've lost will you go or will you stop and come back the next day.
I'm sometimes tempted to continue but I know you cannot beat the house, so most of the time I just call it a day and just wished that tomorrow or next time it's my lucky day. What about you what's your take.
Anyone that have been a regular on betting platform or shop as was mine case, you certainly must have had these experiences. You suddenly feel like it's your time to recover all you've lost and even gain more. A few more loses after some consecutive wins don't seem to matter but in actual, its a clear warning on how things have turned and you ought to heed and call it a day. Even when you've not lost, the fact that you made some wins already is you to have gained in on your lose or made profits off your stakes. Best thing to do is to walk away before other emotions set in and your likely to lost all that you've won. As a bettor and a gambler, it is really hard not to have these experiences and this is one of the most common problems that gamblers are still trying to conquer because it really hard to put a stop sign on that specific activities if you're having a good run. We are thinking that this might be the day where we can somehow recover our losses in the past days but in the end, we still lose. That's because we can't stop ourselves and that's also why it's really important to have the right mindset. |
|
|
|
In my opinion, there can be many good reasons for a player to opt out of the KYC procedure.
Anonymity and confidentiality are the core values of a crypto enthusiast.
These values were important to Satoshi Nakamoto and others who were at the forefront of Bitcoin. They are important to all of us.
The KYC procedure carries a great danger for the player. Confidential data can get into the dark web and be used by criminals for illegal purposes. For example, data obtained as part of the KYC procedure can be used to apply for a loan or loan, as registration data for illegal and criminal actions.
Therefore, I avoid online casinos that require mandatory KYC.
But we cannot really blame these casinos because they are just implementing what the government wants as they won't have their license if they would not obey that implementation. The government is just harsh sometimes with these kinds of things but these things have only surfaced when they received intel that casinos and other online platforms may have been used to launder money. But we as decent citizens, we are taking the burden because of those criminal organizations, so now we are taking these KYC procedures even if we don't want it so that we can claim and withdraw our winnings/funds. |
|
|
|
Like most who answered, I believe I am a casual player, I play few times, my goal in gambling is just for fun and to pass the time and most of the time the amount of money I bet is very small and it's nothing very significant!
Since we are in crypto market, most of us here are busy with other things like on bounty, trading, and even on the P2E games, that’s why casual gambler are more popular. I also play casual since I don’t want too much exposure in gambling and like what i’ve said I’m also busy with other things. Gambling is more fun if you don’t take it seriously, casual gaming is ideal to those who are seeking to have more fun. Same here, and actually that's really common here and the poll shows that 53.7% of the users here in this forum are more of casual social gamblers than the others specified by the OP. That said, I only gamble rarely and if I gamble, I'm just there to entertain myself and not seeing gambling activities as a way to generate money. If at the end of the day I'm winning then that's just a bonus for me as I only seek entertainment. |
|
|
|
the blockchain analysis shows that a lot of bitcoin hodlers are actively buying bitcoin and increasing their wealth by taking advantage of the current discount offered to them by the weak hands and their panic sells. as we can see here the number of addresses that are holding more than 1 bitcoin is significantly increasing which shows how people who were struggling to reach 1 BTC target are succeeding these days and are even surpassing that target heading to the next one.  source of the pic is reddit If you are in the bitcoin forum for quite long, you will eventually develop your high interest for bitcoin and become one of those bitcoin enthusiasts which the only concern is to satisfy their craving for bitcoin and own a lot of bitcoin in their portfolio. It's just that the crypto market condition at the present is giving us the best opportunity to buy at its cheapest value, so not surprising if those long term hodlers of bitcoin have increased because they can buy more bitcoin at a very convenient price. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
